Hearth Record

Remarkable Home Health

A home health agency in Temple, Texas 76502

6428 S General Bruce Dr Ste A, Temple, Texas 76502. (254) 771-4131.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 14, 2025: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 14, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 698 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Agency failed to encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system within 30 days of completing the assessment of the patient for 6 of 1141 assessments processed for the time-period reviewed of 05/11/2024 – 5/11/2025. This failure resulted in quality data used to continuously improve the effectiveness of home healthcare and improve patient care failing to be reported to CMS in the required time frame. Findings included: Review of the Home Health Agency Error Summary Report for the period of 05/11/2024 – 5/11/2025 identified Error #-3330. The description for Error #-3300 read in part, “Record Submitted Late: The submission date was more than 30 days after M0090 (item M0090 specifies the date the actual assessment was completed) on this new record.” The documentation further identified the number of assessments with this error was 6 assessments and the percentage of assessments with this error was 0.53% of assessments completed by the Agency. In an interview completed with the Administrator on 05/14/2025 at 3:03 PM, the surveyor showed the Administrator and Compliance Personnel A the “Home Health Error Summary” report which indicated that 6 OASIS assessments were late. The surveyor asked the Administrator and Compliance Personnel A why assessments were submitted late to OASIS. The administrator and Compliance Personnel A reported that these submissions were labeled as late because they went back and made corrections to a few assessments, and when the corrections are saved, OASIS counts this as a new submission and it is classified as late, even though the original assessment was submitted on time. Compliance Personnel A explained that some of the patients had a change in their Medicaid number, and when they updated in OASIS it counted the assessment as late. The surveyor asked if the Administrator if she thought that this impacted client care. The administrator responded that she did not think so because all patients were still receiving their plans of care on time and getting the services they needed. The surveyor asked who was responsible for submitting and updating assessments to OASIS. The administrator stated that it was Compliance Personnel B, whose title was “RN Compliance”. In a phone interview completed with Compliance Personnel B on 5/14/2025 at 3:17 PM, the surveyor asked if it was part of her role to ensure the timely transmission of OASIS assessments, and she replied that it was. The surveyor stated that 6 of 1141 assessments submitted in the last year were submitted after the 30 days required by OASIS. The surveyor asked what the reason for this was. Compliance Personnel B stated that it was likely due to the assessments they had to go back and edit, because when that occurs after 30 days from the M0090 date they are considered late. Surveyor asked what processes the agency has in place to ensure assessments were submitted in a timely manner. Compliance Personnel B stated that they ran an OASIS audit report daily and looked at the visit date to make sure assessments were submitted on time. The surveyor asked if she thought this impacted patient care. Compliance Personnel B stated she did not think so because it was more of a “process thing” and that by that time the patients already received care. Review of the Agency’s policy titled “OASIS Compliance,” dated December 2023, revealed that “the M0090 (Date Assessment Completed) will indicate the last day the assessing clinician gathered or received any input used to complete the comprehensive assessment.” Further review revealed that, “On a Start of Care (SOC) episode, the SOC assessment OASIS data elements will be encoded and transmitted to the national OASIS system within 30 days of completion (M0090). For a recertification assessment, the OASIS data elements will be encoded and transmitted to the national OASIS system within 30 days of completion (M0090).””

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Participate In The Hha’S Qapi Program;

    The inspectors’ words, 1,558 words

    “Participate in the HHA’s QAPI program; CFR(s): 484.75(b)(8) Participation in the HHA’s QAPI program; and This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to staff its QAPI meetings with required agency staff in 12 out of 12 QAPI meetings (1/13/2022, 4/14/2022, 7/13/2022, 10/13/2022, 1/16/2023, 4/14/2023,7/18/2023, 10/17/2023, 1/23/2024, 4/18/2024, 7/19/2024, and 10/15/2024) in the 3 years reviewed (2022, 2023, and 2024). Failure of the agency to have someone representing all services provided by the agency in the QAPI program resulted in missed opportunity for the administrator, therapists, and MSW to provide clinical input on best practices and contribute to improving client care. Findings included: Review of document titled “QAPI Meeting Attendance Roster,” dated 1/13/2022, revealed that attendees included the Previous Administrator A, Previous SN, MD A, PTA A, and PT-A. According to this record, no OT or MSW attended the 01/13/2022 QAPI meeting. Review of document titled “QAPI Meeting Attendance Roster,” dated 4/14/2022, revealed that attendees included the Previous Administrator A, PT-A, ST A, and OT A. According to this record, no MSW attended the 4/14/2022 QAPI meeting. Review of document titled “QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes” dated 07/13/2022, revealed that a QAPI meeting was held on 07/13/2022. The document revealed that “review of minutes approved by RN A and second by MSW A.” According to this record, no PT, ST, or administrator attended the 07/13/2022 QAPI meeting. No corresponding attendance roster for this meeting was available to review and therefore attendance history could not be obtained. Review of document titled “QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes” dated 10/13/2022, revealed that a QAPI meeting was held on 07/13/2022. The document revealed that “review of minutes approved by PTA A and second by RN A.” According to this record, no MSW, ST, or administrator attended the 10/13/2022 QAPI meeting. No corresponding attendance roster for this meeting was available to review therefore attendance history could not be obtained. Review of document titled “QAPI Meeting Attendance Roster,” 1/16/2023, revealed that attendees included the Previous SN, PTA A, PT-A, MD B, RN A, PTA B, ST A, and Previous Administrator A. According to this record, no OT or MSW attended the 1/16/2023 QAPI meeting. Review of document titled “QAPI Committee Meeting Agenda” dated 4/14/2023, revealed that a QAPI meeting was held on 4/14/2023. No corresponding attendance roster or meeting minutes for this meeting was available to review therefore attendance history could not be obtained. Review of document titled “QAPI Meeting Attendance Roster,” dated 7/18/2023, revealed that attendees included Previous Administrator B, Previous SN, OT/PT Owner, PTA A, MSW A, Marketer A, LVN A, PTA B, RN B, Marketer B, PT-B, Nurse A, RN C, Intake A, Intake B, HR A, and MD B. According to this record, no ST attended the 7/18/2023 QAPI meeting. Review of document titled “QAPI Committee Meeting Minutes” dated 10/17/2023, revealed that a QAPI meeting was held on 10/17/2023. The document revealed that “review last QAPI meting reviewed by Previous Administrator B.” According to this record, no MSW, ST, OT, or PT attended the 10/17/2023 QAPI meeting. No corresponding attendance roster for this meeting was available to review therefore attendance history could not be obtained. Review of document titled “Inservice Attendance Record” dated 1/23/2024, revealed that attendees included Previous Administrator B, Intake A, OT/PT Owner, PT-B, MSW A, Marketer B, PT-A, PTA C, LVN B, LVN A, HR A, RN B, and MD B According to this record, no ST attended the 1/23/2024 QAPI meeting. Review of document titled “QAPI Meeting Attendance Roster,” dated 4/18/2024, revealed that attendees included Previous Administrator B, Previous Administrator A, Previous SN, VP, PT-A, PTA C, PT-B, Nursing Supervisor, and LVN B According to this record, no OT, ST, or MSW attended the 4/18/2024 QAPI meeting. Review of document titled “QAPI Meeting Attendance Roster,” dated 7/19/2024, revealed that attendees included Previous Administrator B, Previous Administrator A, Previous SN, VP, PT-A, PTA C, PT-B, Nursing Supervisor, RN D, LVN B, LVN A, RN E, MD B, and Marketer B. According to this record, no OT, ST, or MSW attended the 7/19/2024 QAPI meeting. Review of document titled “Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Meeting” dated 10/15/2024, revealed that attendees included Previous Administrator C, RN A, Intake A, Intake C, OT/PT Owner, PT-B, Marketer C, Marketer B, PT-A, PTA C, LVN A, Nursing Supervisor, LVN C, RN D, MSW A, and Compliance Personnel. According to this record, no ST attended the 7/19/2024 QAPI meeting. In an interview with the administrator and compliance personnel on 05/14/2024 at 2:00 PM, the surveyor confirmed attendance for the QAPI meetings. The Administrator and compliance personnel reported that they were unable to locate attendance sheets for 7/13/2022, 10/13/2022. 4/14/2023, and 10/17/2023 QAPI meetings. The surveyor asked if there was any way to confirm who did attend those meetings or if anyone still working with the agency knew. The Administrator responded that she was not working with this license until April 11, 2025 and the Alternate Administrator was not designated for this license until May 12, 2025, and therefore neither of them knew who attended previous meetings. The Administrator and Compliance personnel were not aware of any employee who would be able to speak on who attended those meetings that did not have sign in sheets. The Administrator and Compliance personnel acknowledged that though some of the meeting minutes for QAPI meetings included a section on membership, those listed in that corresponding membership section did not always consistently reflect who actually attended QAPI meetings. In an interview with the Administrator and compliance personnel on 5/14/2025 at 2:35 PM, the surveyor reported that QAPI meetings are required to have individuals representing the scope of their services. The surveyor confirmed with the Administrator that the services provided included SN, MSW, PT, OT, and ST. The surveyor asked if clients were receiving services from all those disciplines within the past 3 years. The Administrator and compliance personnel confirmed that clients received services from all of those services in 2022, 2023, and 2024. In an interview with the Administrator on 5/14/2025 at 2:47 PM, the Surveyor asked who was responsible for setting up QAPI meetings and deciding who attended. The administrator stated that was the SN’s responsibility. The Administrator reported that the SN was currently sick in the hospital and would not be available for an interview. The Administrator stated that she only took on the responsibility of QAPI meetings when she began working with this license in August, 2024 and therefore she would not have known why all 11 meetings reviewed prior to that date did not include representation of the full scope of services. Surveyor showed the administrator the agency’s QAPI policy and asked the administrator who encompasses the governing body of the agency? The administrator stated the governing body referred to GB A. The surveyor showed the Administrator her signed job description, which indicated she was responsible for ensuring that the QAPI reflected the program’s scope of services. The Administrator stated that she is responsible, but she delegated this task to SN. The surveyor asked why ST, OT, and MSW was not consistently included in all of the QAPI meetings since they offer those services to patients. The Administrator stated OT and ST are contracted and as needed positions and so that may have been why they were not included in the past. The Administrator acknowledged that that the QAPI policy included contractors and that she did not know why they were excluded in the QAPI meetings prior to her becoming administrator. The Surveyor asked the Administrator if they thought not having all skilled professionals participate in QAPI impacted patient care. Administrator reported “no.” In an interview with the Administrator on 5/15/2025 at 3:30 PM, the surveyor asked the Administrator for clarification on a document provided that refers to GB A as representative of the governing board of “HHA A.” The Administrator reported that HHA A is the business entity that owns HHA B and oversees them and that the document does apply to HHA B. The surveyor attempted to call GB A for an interview on 5/14/2025 at 3:15 PM and on 5/15/25 at 1:58 PM. The surveyor left a voicemail and requested a call back on both occasions but did not receive one. Record review of the agency policy titled, “Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement” dated 2023, revealed a document that read, in part, “The governing body must ensure the program:…B. Involves all services provided by the agency including those provided under contract or arrangement.” Record review of the document titled “Administrator – Home Care: Job Description”, signed and dated by the administrator on 11/11/24, revealed a description of the Administrator’s role and included the following: “As the liaison with the governing body, ensures the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program reflects the complexity of the organization and services. Ensures QAPI includes all agency services (including those services provided under contract or arrangement).” Record review of the agency’s policy titled “Scope of Services”, dated 2024, revealed a document that read in part, “The scope of services is available upon request in agency brochures.” Review of the agency’s brochure titled, “Welcome to Our Family,” undated, revealed the following services listed under the heading “Covered Services for Home Health”: Skilled Nursing, Transitional Care Coordinator, Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, Medical Social Work, Home Health Aide.””

    Rule G0720. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 14, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 22, 1982.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Echh Central, LLC owns 99% directly since Mar 1, 2026.
  • Excelacare Capital Corporation runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Nicholas Schwedock (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Collin S Mcquiddy (corporate officer, 0%); Robin Kirkland (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Melanie Ford Person (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Donnie Maberry (corporate officer, 0%); John Durbin (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Excelacare Capital CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2026
Excelacare Capital CorporationRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Mar 1, 2026
Excela Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2026
Point 83 Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2026
Echh Central, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99%Mar 1, 2026
Excelacare Home Health of Texas, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies99%Mar 1, 2026
Excelacare Home Health, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies99%Mar 1, 2026
Seven Eleven 99 LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies49.88%Mar 1, 2026
Seven Eleven TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies49.88%Mar 1, 2026
Jd Durbin Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies37.43%Mar 1, 2026
Jerri D Durbin TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies37.43%Mar 1, 2026
Painted Skies Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies12.69%Mar 1, 2026
Red Dirt TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies12.69%Mar 1, 2026

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (71 surveys completed): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 52 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate80.81% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate13.14% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.36% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76502, where this agency’s office is, 29 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.