Hearth Record

Brema Healthcare Inc.

A home health agency in Dallas, Texas 75234

2727 Lbj Frwy, Suite 324, Dallas, Texas 75234. (214) 339-9466.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 16, 2024: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 16, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 937 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interviews, the Agency failed to make sure that the patients were receiving the care that was ordered in their plan of care in 4 of 13 current patient’s records reviewed. Citing Patient # 1, Patient #4, Patient #10 and Patient # 11. This failure could result in the patient not having adequate care and could lead to negative patient outcomes. Findings: Patient #1 Review of Patient #1’s EMR revealed a plan of care with a certification period of 11/13/2024 - 1/11/2025. Review of this plan of care revealed orders that read, in part, “...Notify physician of...Diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 or less than 60...” Further review of Patient #1’s EMR revealed a nursing noted dated 11/26/2024. This note was signed by RN A. This note revealed a blood pressure of 151/92. Nowhere in this nurse’s note was it indicated that the physician was notified of the elevated diastolic blood pressure. Further review of Patient #1’s EMR revealed a nursing note dated 11/29/2024. This note was signed by RN A. This note revealed a blood pressure of 148/98. Nowhere in this nurse’s note was it indicated that the physician had been notified of the elevated diastolic blood pressure. Patient #4 Review of Patient #4’s EMR revealed a plan of care with a certification period of 10/26/2024 - 12/24/2024. Review of this plan of care revealed orders that read, in part, “...Notify physician of pulse greater than 100 or less than 60...” Further review of Patient #4’s EMR revealed a nursing note dated 11/8/2024. This note was signed by LVN A. The note revealed a pulse of 55 beats per minute. Nowhere in this nurse’s note was it indicated that the physician had been notified of the low pulse. Patient #10 Review of Patient #10’s EMR revealed a plan of care with a certification period of 11/5/2024 - 1/3/2025. Further review of Patient #10’s EMR revealed orders that read, in part, “...Notify physician of diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 or less than 60...” Further review of Patient #10’s EMR revealed a nursing note dated 11/14/2024. The note was signed by LVN A. The note revealed a blood pressure of 92/55. Nowhere in the nurse’s note was it indicated that the physician had been notified of the low blood pressure. Patient #11 Review of Patient #11’s EMR revealed a plan of care with a certification period of 11/8/2024 - 1/6/2025. Further review of Patient #11’s EMR revealed orders that read, in part, “ Notify physician of diastolic blood pressure greater than 90 or less than 60...” Further review of Patient #11’s EMR revealed a nurses note dated 11/21/2024. The note was signed by LVN A. The note revealed a blood pressure of 117/57. Nowhere in the nurse’s note was it indicated that the physician had been notified of the low blood pressure. A telephone interview was conducted with LVN A on 12/16/2024 at approximately 1:50 p.m. The surveyor inquired as to why the physician had not been notified regarding the vital signs of Patient #4, Patient #10 and Patient #11 that were out of the bounds of the parameters as the physician had ordered. LVN A inquired if the surveyor was allowed to call and ask these questions. LVN A then stated, “...I usually call the doctor and put it in a communication note. I forgot to document it but he was notified...” On 12/16/2024 at approximately 1:35 p.m. a telephone call was made to RN A at 219-276-XXXX. There was no answer and the call went to voice mail. The surveyor requested that RN A call her back at 817-614-XXXX. RN A did not return the surveyor’s call by the end of the survey. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing and with the Administrator on 12/16/2024 at approximately 1:20 p.m. The above findings were reviewed. The surveyor inquired as to why RN A and LVN A did not follow the plan of care by notifying the physician of the vital signs that were out bounds of the parameters as ordered by the physician. The Director of Nursing stated, “...We do have a QA Company. QA should notify the nurse...” The surveyor inquired if this was something the Director of Nursing should be following. The Director of Nursing stated, “Yes. But I don’t see anything unless the nurse tells me...” The surveyor inquired as to whose responsibility it is to make sure the nurses are following the plan of care. The Director of Nursing stated, “...Mine...” Review of the policy titled “Responsibilities of the Clinical Manager – Addendum, LD.30-TX Page 1 of 1, HCL Last Reviewed: 041423” read, in part, “...Policy The Supervising Nurse, appointed by the Administrator, is responsible for the daily direction of patient/client care and participates in activities relevant to professional services furnished. Procedure A. The responsibilities of the Supervising Nurse include but are not limited to: 2. Ensuring that a patient’s/client’s Plan of Care or care plan is executed as written...””

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Visit Schedule

    The inspectors’ words, 970 words

    “Visit schedule CFR(s): 484.60(e)(1) Visit schedule, including frequency of visits by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews, interviews and home visits, the agency failed to ensure that patients were provided with a visit schedule in 5 of 5 home visits conducted. Citing Patient #1, Patient #3, Patient #4, Patient #7 and Patient #18 This failure could prevent the patient and personnel from being aware of the patient’s schedule and could cause scheduling conflicts and missed visits leading to poor patient outcomes. Findings: Patient #1 Review of the EMR for Patient #1 revealed a plan of care with a certification period of 11/13/2024 - 1/11/2025. Further review of the plan of care revealed orders for the Skilled Nurse to visit 1 time a week for 9 weeks, Home Health Aide to visit 3 times a week for 9 weeks, Physical Therapy to evaluate and treat and Occupational Therapy to evaluate and treat. A home visit was conducted with Patient #1 on 12/12/2024. During the visit, the surveyor reviewed Patient #1’s admission packet. There was no dated or filled out visit schedule in the admission packet and there was no dated or filled out visit schedule anywhere in the patient’s immediate surroundings. An interview was conducted with Family Member #1 on 12/12/2024 at approximately 9:45 a.m. The surveyor inquired if the agency ever filled out a visit schedule. Family Member #1 stated “No.” The surveyor inquired how Family Member #1 knew when agency staff were going to visit. Family Member #1 stated “... They call the night before...” Patient #3 Review of the EMR for Patient #3 revealed a plan of care with a certification period of 11/21/2024 - 1/19/2025. Further review of the plan of care revealed orders for the Skilled Nurse to visit 1 time per week for 9 weeks and for Physical Therapy to evaluate and treat. A home visit was conducted with Patient #3 on 12/12/2024. During the visit, the surveyor reviewed Patient #3’s admission packet. There was no dated or filled out visit schedule in the admission packet and there was no dated or filled out visit schedule anywhere in the patient’s immediate surroundings. An interview was conducted with Patient #3 on 12/12/2024 at approximately 10:45 a.m. The surveyor inquired if the agency ever filled out a visit schedule. Patient #3 stated “No.” The surveyor inquired how Patient #3 knew when agency staff were going to visit. Patient #3 stated “... They contact me the night before...” Patient #4 Review of the EMR for Patient #4 revealed a plan of care with a certification period of 10/26/2024 - 12/24/2024. Further review of the plan of care revealed orders for the Skilled Nurse to visit 1 time per week for 9 weeks and for Physical Therapy to evaluate and treat. A home visit was conducted with Patient #4 on 12/13/2024. During the visit, the surveyor reviewed Patient #4’s admission packet. There was no dated or filled out visit schedule in the admission packet and there was no dated or filled out visit schedule anywhere in the patient’s immediate surroundings. An interview was conducted with Family Member #2 on 12/13/2024 at approximately 12:15 p.m. The surveyor inquired how Family Member #2 knew when agency staff were going to visit. Family Member #2 stated, “...Physical Therapy and the nurses would text me...” Patient #7 Review of the EMR for Patient #7 revealed a plan of care with a certification period of 11/8/2024 - 1/6/2025. Further review of the plan of care revealed orders for the Skilled Nurse to visit 1 time per week for 9 weeks, Physical Therapy to evaluate and treat and Occupational Therapy to evaluate and treat. A home visit was conducted with Patient #7 on 12/13/2024. During the visit, the surveyor reviewed Patient #7’s admission packet. There was no dated or filled out visit schedule in the admission packet and there was no dated or filled out visit schedule anywhere in the patient’s immediate surroundings. An interview was conducted with Patient #7 on 12/12/2024 at approximately 10:50 a.m. The surveyor inquired how Patient #7 knew when agency staff were going to visit. Patient #7 stated, “...They call me...” Patient #18 Review of the EMR for Patient #18 revealed a plan of care with a certification period of 11/5/2024 - 1/3/2025. Further review of the plan of care revealed orders for the Skilled Nurse to visit 2 time per week for 9 weeks. A home visit was conducted with Patient #18 on 12/12/2024. During the visit, the surveyor reviewed Patient #18’s admission packet. There was no dated or filled out visit schedule in the admission packet and there was no dated or filled out visit schedule anywhere in the patient’s immediate surroundings. An interview was conducted with Patient #18 and Family Member #3 on 12/12/2024 at approximately 12:00 p.m. The surveyor inquired how Patient #18 knew when agency staff were going to visit. Family Member #3 stated “...generally they just call...” An interview was conducted with the agency Administrator on 12/16/2024 at approximately 1:45 p.m. The surveyor inquired as to why there were no 9 day planners completed and placed in patient’s homes. The Administrator stated, “...We didn’t know...” The surveyor inquired as to whose responsibility it was to know and to make sure the 9 day planners were completed and placed in the patient’s homes. The Administrator stated, “...It’s mine...” Review of the policy titled “Implementing Care and Treatment, PC.40, Page 2 of 4, Last Reviewed 080120” , read, in part, “...VI. Written information to the patient/client. A. The Agency must provide the patient/client and caregiver with a copy of written instructions outlining: 1. Visit schedule, including frequency of visits by agency personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the agency.”

    Rule G0614. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 16, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 8, 2009.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Dinesh Selvakumar (owns 5% or more directly, 70%); Steven Philips (owns 5% or more directly, 30%); Dinesh Selvakumar (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Steven Philips (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 1 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (162 surveys completed): 71% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 54% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 51 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate81.63% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.92% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.83% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 184 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75234, where this agency’s office is, 144 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.