Hearth Record

Life Home Health Care Inc.

A home health agency in Weslaco, Texas 78596

1609 Davenport Street Suite B, Weslaco, Texas 78596. (956) 287-7080.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 7, 2025: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 7, 2025: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 917 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Agency failed to transmit completed OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) assessments within 30 days of completion in 7 of 8 months of transmissions reviewed (February 2024, May 2024, July 2024, August 2024, September 2024, October 2024, and November 2024. This failure prevented the patient’s data from being made available to Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) for analysis to identify agency performance levels in the provision of patient care. The findings included: Record review of IQIES “Home Health Error Summary by Agency” report generated from the CMS national data system during presurvey preparation on 02/04/25 revealed Agency had submitted and processed 262 OASIS assessments to CMS. The report also revealed the Agency had 13 OASIS assessments with error -3330 indicating those records were submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 (assessment) date, which equaled to 5% of the total assessments submitted in error. Record review of the OASIS Agency Final Validation report with submission date of 02/12/24 at 07:49 am revealed 5 total records were submitted. Further review of this report revealed 1 of the 5 (record 3) records processed with error -3330 indicating that record was submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. Record review of the OASIS Agency Final Validation report with submission date of 02/27/24 at 08:28 am revealed 4 total records were submitted. Further review of this report revealed 1 of the 4 (record 2) records processed with error -3330 indicating that record was submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. Record review of the OASIS Agency Final Validation report with submission date of 05/23/24 at 07:32 am revealed 6 total records were submitted. Further review of this report revealed 1 of the 6 (record 1) records processed with error -3330 indicating that record was submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. Record review of the OASIS Agency Final Validation report with submission date of 07/13/24 at 07:53 am revealed 4 total records were submitted. Further review of this report revealed 1 of the 4 (record 4) records processed with error -3330 indicating that record was submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. Record review of the OASIS Agency Final Validation report with submission date of 08/08/24 at 06:57 am revealed 5 total records were submitted. Further review of this report revealed 1 of the 5 (record 4) records processed with error -3330 indicating that record was submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. Record review of the OASIS Agency Final Validation report with submission date of 09/13/24 revealed 11 total records were submitted. Further review of this report revealed 3 of the 11 (record 3, 9 and 11) records processed with error -3330 indicating those records were submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. Record review of the OASIS Agency Final Validation report with submission date of 10/01/24 revealed 11 total records were submitted. Further review of this report revealed 2 of the 11 (record 4 and 10) records processed with error -3330 indicating those records were submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. Record review of the OASIS Agency Final Validation report with submission date of 11/08/24 revealed 13 total records were submitted. Further review of this report revealed 3 of the 13 (record 1, 4 and 13) records processed with error -3330 indicating those records were submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. In an interview on 02/07/25 at 11:30 a.m., Alt Adm stated Alt Adm was responsible for reporting OASIS assessments to CMS. Alt Adm stated Alt Adm was responsible for making sure the OASIS validation reports were sent timely to CMS. Alt Adm stated the submissions were late when the Registered Nurse completes the assessments late. In an interview on 02/07/25 at 11:30 a.m., Alt Adm stated that the Agency’s current process to track OASIS data transmission to CMS consists of a clinician turning in their notes and Quality Assurance (QA) reviews and returns to clinician for corrections. This way the Agency keeps a tally of the timeframes for OASIS data transmissions. Agency currently keeps a report that tells the Alt Adm which OASIS transmissions may be outstanding. As per Alt Adm, most of the late entries are due to Medical Doctor no signing the discharge orders timely as well as clinicians taking long to return the corrected notes timely. In an interview on 02/07/25 at 11:30 a.m., Alt Adm stated that failing to provide patient pertinent data to CMS could have a negative impact to the Agency’s active patients in that there could be a delay on payment from CMS as well as Agency’s performance data would be compromised. Agency policy titled “Administrative Policy Manual” with revision date of 12/01/2014 revealed in part: “...Timelines...1.11 Completed and encoded OASIS data will be transmitted via electronic communication software that is available from CMS or software that conforms to CMS electronic standards. It will be transmitted to CMS OASIS contractor within 30 days of the M0090 date...” The agency was afforded the opportunity to provided additional information, no other information provided upon exit 02/07/25 at 12:00 pm.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 7, 2025Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 20, 2009.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech pathology.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Arturo Ramos (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Arturo Ramos (corporate officer); Arturo Ramos (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Roberta L Reyes (managing employee (under contract)); Roberta L Reyes (corporate officer); Roberta L Reyes (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate55.68% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.15% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 80 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78596, where this agency’s office is, 67 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 1.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.