Hearth Record

Pace Health Care

A home health agency in Weslaco, Texas 78596

1001 Rone Dr # 2, Weslaco, Texas 78596. (956) 447-8886.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 28, 2025: a complaint and recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 28, 2025: complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 606 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview the Agency failed to transmit completed OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) Assessments within 30 days of completions for 20 of 43 assessments submitted between 05/01/24 through 05/21/25. This failure prevented the patient’s data from being made available to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) for analysis to identify Agency performance levels in the provision of patient care. Findings included: Record review of the IQIES (Internet Quality and Improvement Evaluation System, an internet-based system that consolidates and replaces legacy systems for survey and certification functions) “Home Health Error by Summary Agency” report generated by the CMS national data system during presurvey preparation on 05/21/25 revealed the Agency had submitted and processed 49 assessments. The report indicated the Agency had a 40.82% of assessments with -3330 error that indicated the assessments were submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. Record review of the Agency OASIS final validation reports dated 05/01/24 through 05/21/25 revealed 43 were processed by the Agency. Further review of the Agency OASIS final validation reports revealed 20 of the 43 assessments had error -3330 indicating those records were submitted after the 30th date of the M0090 date. In an interview on 05/27//25 at 11:30 a.m., the Adm/DON stated the Agency’s policy for submitting OASIS assessments were within 30 days. The Adm/DON the Agency was aware they were submitting OASIS assessments after the 30 days because the Agency had gone through personnel change. The Adm/DON stated the person who was responsible for submitting assessments to CMS quit in September 2024 and a new person was hired. The Adm/DON stated the Agency had to train this person in IQIES software and how to submit OASIS assessments. The Adm/DON stated the Agency also had gone through computer and software issues around the same time that caused delays in submitting assessments. The Adm/DON stated she was the one responsible to ensure assessments were submitted within the 30 days and the Agency already had implemented a plan to ensure the assessments were submitted on a weekly basis. In a follow up interview on 05/28/25 at 01:30 p.m., the Adm/DON stated patients continued to be seen, and she did not think it would negatively affect patient care if the assessments were not submitted within the 30 days. The Adm/DON stated the standard of care for the Agency’s patients was there. The Adm/DON stated not submitting assessments withing the 30 days would instead affect the Agency because it was more of a “compliance issue”. Record review of the Agency policies titled, “Timelines, IM.35”, with a revised date 10/25/24, quoted in part, “The Agency will ensure timely provision of care and services to meet the patient’s/client’s needs in compliance with all federal and state laws and regulations…II. All completed and encoded OASIS data will be transmitted via electronic communications software that is available from CMS or software that conforms to CMS electronic record layout, edit specifications, and data dictionary, and that includes the required OASIS data set and the CMS-assigned branch identification number, as applicable. It will be transmitted using electronic communications software that compiles with Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS 140-2, issued May 20, 2001) from the Agency or the Agency contractor to the CMS collection site within 30 days of the M0090 date…””

    Rule G0372. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 1,589 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation, and interview, the Agency failed to ensure a registered nurse conducted an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of 2 (Patient #1 and Patient #7) of 7 patients whose records were reviewed in that: · Patient #1’s initial comprehensive assessment visit was not held within 48 hours of referral. It was conducted approximately 72 hours (3 days) after the referral date and without coordination of the patient’s physician. · Patient #7’s initial comprehensive assessment visit was not held within 48 hours of referral. It was conducted 96 hours (4days) after the referral date and without coordination of the patient’s physician. This failure has the potential to delay the immediate care and support needs and prevent initiation of required services in a timely manner of patients. Findings included: Record review of the Agency’s “Unduplicated Census” roster provided by the Alt Adm upon entrance on 05/22/25 at 09:10 a.m., indicated Patient #1 was an “active” patient of the Agency with a start of care (SOC) date of 04/07/25 and a certification period of 04/07/25 through 06/05/25. Further review of the roster indicated Patient #7 was a discharged patient of the Agency with a SOC date of 11/11/24, a discharged date of 12/16/24 and a certification period of 11/11/24 through 12/16/24. Record review of Patient #1’s electronic medical record (EMR) included a “Patient Profile” that documented a SOC date of 04/07/25 and a referral date of 04/04/25. Further record review of Patient #1’s EMR included a “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC)” signed and 05/23/25 that documented a SOC of 04/07/25 and a certification period of 04/07/25 through 06/05/25. Further review of the POC indicated Patient #1 was an 89-year-old male with a primary diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (chronic condition where the body has persistently high blood sugar levels with chronic complications of the kidney caused by elevated blood sugar levels). The POC documented the following orders: · Skilled nurse (SN) frequency: 1 time a week for 1-week (1w1), 2 times a month for 2 months (2m2), and 3 as needed (prn) visits. · Physical therapy (PT) frequency: evaluate and treat. · Occupational therapy (OT) frequency: evaluate and treat. Record review of Patient #1’s EMR included a referral with a date and time stamped 04/04/24 at 10:08 a.m. that documented “…Home health and physical therapy…” Record review of the OASIS comprehensive assessment for the start of care revealed it was conducted by RN A on 04/07/25 at 01:15 p.m., approximately 72 hours (3 day) after the referral order for home health was received by the Agency. Record review of Patient #1 failed to include documentation with the physician for a delayed or change in the ordered start of care date. The Agency failed to ensure the initial assessment of Patient #1 was completed within 48 hours of receipt of the referral. Record review of Patient #7’s EMR included a “Patient Profile” that documented a SOC date 11/11/24 and a referral date of 11/07/24. Further record review of Patient #7’s EMR included a POC signed and dated 12/24/24 that documented a SOC 11/11/24 and a certification period of 11/11/24 through 01/09/25. Further review of the POC indicated Patient #7 was a 73-year-old male with a primary diagnosis of other specified diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer (chronic condition where body has persistently high blood sugar levels with complications of an open sore or wound on the foot caused by elevated blood sugar levels”. The POC documented the following orders: · SN frequency: 2 times a week for 2 weeks (2w2), 1 time a week for 4 weeks (1w4) and 3 as needed (prn) visits. Record review of Patient #7’s EMR included a referral with a date and time stamped 11/07/24 at 11:25 a.m. that documented “…RN Eval/Nursing….” Record review of the OASIS comprehensive assessment for the start of care revealed it was conducted by RN A on 11/11/24 at 11:00 a.m., approximately 96 hours (4 days) after the referral order for home health was received by the Agency. Record review of Patient #7 failed to include documentation with the physician for a delayed or change in the ordered start of care date. The Agency failed to ensure the initial assessment of Patient #1 was completed within 48 hours of receipt of the referral. In a simultaneous observation and interview of Patient #1 during a home visit on 05/27/25 at 03:35 p.m., the surveyor was greeted and escorted by a provider who accompanied Patient #1 to Patient #1’s clean and well-kept living room. Patient #1 was sitting comfortably in a chair watching television. Patient #1 stated he was a patient of the Agency for approximately 1-2 months after his physician had referred him for physical therapy. Patient #1 stated he lived with his family member who provided care during the evenings and the provider who provided care during the day. Patient #1 stated he was unable to care for himself because he had weakness and was never left alone. The surveyor observed Patient #1 had limited mobility to his right upper extremity (arm). Patient #1 stated he only had one nurse who had come to visit with him and one therapist who provided therapy. In a simultaneous record review and interview on 05/28/25 at 01:50 p.m., RN A confirmed Patient #1 was an active patient with a SOC date of 04/07/25. RN A confirmed Patient #1’s current certification period was 04/07/25 through 06/05/25. RN A confirmed the Agency had received a referral on 04/04/25 for Patient #1. RN A confirmed the OASIS comprehensive assessment for the SOC was performed on 04/07/25 by her. RN A stated the patient was not seen within 48 hours of the receiving the referral. RN A stated there was a delay because “the physician’s office was supposed to update the referral but never sent the updated referral to reflect nursing services”. RN A stated the referral used was only for physical therapy and Patient #1 needed a nursing referral, but she did not follow up because “I left out of town”. RN A stated this was an oversight on her part because “I am the only one who sees the patient”. RN A stated she did not have any other documentation that provided information on why the client was not seen within the 48 hours. RN A confirmed Patient #7 was a discharged patient with a SOC date of 11/11/24. RN A confirmed Patient #7’s certification period was 11/11/24 through 01/09/25 and the receipt of a referral on 11/07/24. RN A confirmed the OASIS comprehensive assessment for the SOC was performed on 11/11/24 by her. RN A stated the patient was not seen within 48 hours of receiving the referral. RN A stated there was a delay because Patient #7 had been discharged from a skilled nursing facility and could not remember “exactly why there was a delay’. RN A stated Patient #7 was supposed to get wound care and a referral for that. RN A stated Patient #7 was supposed to go to his physician the following Monday for a follow up and a new referral for that wound care but did not go. RN A stated she could not provide any further documentation that reflected why there was a delay and why the client was not seen within 48 hours of the referral. In an interview on 05/28/25 at 03:20 p.m., the Adm/DON stated RN A did not follow Agency policy by not completing the initial comprehensive assessment within 48 hours. The Adm/DON stated the nurse was responsible for ensuring the initial assessment was completing the assessment within 48 hours of the receipt of the referral for Patient #1 and Patient #7. The Adm/DON stated this was not done because one client was needing to follow up with his physician for wound care orders and the other was waiting on a physical therapy referral. The Adm/DON stated she has oversight to ensure the nurse completes the initial assessment within 48 hours of receipt of the referral and this was not done. The Adm/DON stated this can negatively affect patient care if the patient’s having to wait for care “especially a whole weekend”. The Adm/DON stated it can also delay other services like therapy, “it is unacceptable”. Record review of the Agency’s policies titled, “Timelines, IM.35”, with a revised date 10/25/24, quoted in part, “The Agency will ensure timely provision of care and services to mee the patient’s /client’s needs in compliance with all federal and state laws and regulations…A. The evaluation for admission to Agency is conducted within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s/client’s return home or on the physician/and or non-physician practitioner start of care date. In instances where the patient/client requests a delay in the start of care date, the Agency will contact the physician and/or non-physician practitioner to request a change in the start of care date and such change will be documented in the medical record…””

    Rule G0514. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 28, 2025Complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 10, 1996.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech pathology.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: Yolanda Salinas (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Thelma Cavazos (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Yolanda Salinas (general partner); Yolanda Salinas (corporate officer); Yolanda Salinas (corporate director); Yolanda Salinas (managing employee (on the payroll)); Thelma Cavazos (general partner); Thelma Cavazos (corporate officer); Thelma Cavazos (corporate director); Thelma Cavazos (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.