Hearth Record

Carter Healthcare

A home health agency in Irving, Texas 75062

4425 W. Airport Freeway Suite 580, Irving, Texas 75062. (972) 255-3840.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 20, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 20, 2026: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 1,260 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation and interview, the agency failed ensure that accepted standards of practice were followed, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, in that: for one (Patient # 5) of three records reviewed in which the patients received a home visit; the (Admin/DON) failed to provide wound care using clean and aseptic technique (techniques utilized to reduce the number of microorganisms and decrease to risk of infections) in accordance with the agency’s policies. The failure caused the patient to not receive wound care in accordance with the agency’s infection control policies. The failure placed the patient at increased risk of skin infections. Findings include: Patient Record Review # 5: Review of Patient # 5’s EHR revealed a POC with a start of care date of 07/29/2025 for certification period of 01/25/2026 to 03/25/2026. Review of the POC revealed that the Admin/DON signed and dated it on 01/25/2026; it contained a primary diagnosis of encounter for change or removal of non-surgical wound dressing; it included orders for SN visits two times per week for eight weeks and one time per week for one week. Continued review of Patient # 5’s record revealed a physician’s order addressed to nurse practitioner (NP # 100) dated 02/10/2026. Review of the physician’s order revealed the Admin/DON signed and dated the order on 02/10/2026. Further review of the physician’s order revealed the following: “…Interventions added [:] SN Performed 3 times weekly wound care to [right upper quadrant abdomen] and right upper forearm wounds using aseptic technique with wound cleanser and covered with silicone foam dressing (wound dressing with many layers to absorb moderate to high levels of drainage)…SN preformed 3 times weekly wound care to right pelvic fold using aseptic technique cleansed with wound cleanser, applied [normal saline] soaked alginate to wound bed, applied silver cloth over alginate pad, applied Nystatin powder along intact skin within fold and folded skin to secure…SN performed 3 times weekly wound preventive care to former wound sites including both forehead temples, inner thigh and both axilla using clean technique, cleansed area with wound cleanser and applied [antibacterial medicated] gel twice weekly…” During a home visit, interview, and observation with Patient # 5, Admin/DON, and Surveyor B on 02/18/2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the surveyors observed: the Admin/DON use hand sanitizer upon entry to the patient’s residence, don (put on) gloves, lay out a reuseable agency protective liner on Patient # 5’s bed, lay out wound care supplies on the liner, assess and listen to Patient # 5’s heart, lungs, assess (Patient # 5’s) blood pressure, and measure the wound to the right pelvic fold (lower abdomen). The surveyors observed the Admin/DON cleanse Patient # 5 wounds while gloved; gloves were never changed when going from wound to wound; Admin/DON used a disinfectant wipe to cleanse gloves between three wounds. The Admin/DON cleansed the two wounds on Patient # 5’s temple areas with normal saline wound cleanser (sterile salt water) and immediately applied antibacterial medicated ointment with the same gloves; cleansed left and right arm pits and immediately applied antibacterial medicated ointment with the same gloves; immediately moved to the right pelvic fold, cleansed it, and applied dressing without changing gloves or wiping off with the wipe. The surveyors observed the Admin/DON use the same wipe to cleanse gloves throughout the wound care. When wound care was completed the Admin/DON used the same wipe to cleanse his gloves and help Patient 5 dress. The surveyors observed the Admin/DON used a wipe that he previously used to clean his equipment, to clean his equipment and the reuseable liner. Then he cleansed his tablet with the same wipe that he used to cleanse his gloves. The Admin/DON used the same pair of gloves during the entire visit. During an interview with the Admin/DON, on 02/20/2026 at approximately 12:30 p.m. the surveyor asked who was responsible for ensuring that the agency’s patients received services as outlined in the plan of care. The Admin/DON stated that (Admin/DON) was responsible. The surveyor asked what the agency’s processes were for providing wound care as outlined in the plan of care. The Admin/DON stated that the process was to provide wound care as written in the physician’s orders. The survey asked the Admin/DON to describe the process for clean and aseptic technique. The Admin/DON stated that all tools and equipment that were used should be on a clean area or barrier (liner) so that they were not contaminated. The Admin/DON stated that gloves should be changed anytime visibly soiled or compromised (torn) and especially when going from one area to another or gloves should be changed when in doubt. He stated that hands should be sanitized or washed before going into the home, when touching surfaces in the patient’s home, or after touching the patient. He stated that when going from one wound area to another aseptic technique should be maintained and gloves should be sanitized and changed if soiled. The surveyor reviewed the findings and asked why wound care was not provided as outlined in the plan of care and as order by the physician (with clean and aseptic technique). The Admin/DON that he was “pretty nervous.” He stated that he lost track of which wipe he used. The surveyor asked what could have been done differently to ensure that wound care was provided as outlined in the plan of care and agency policy. The Admin/DON stated that if he had any concerns that gloves might be contaminated he would change them. Review of agency policy titled, “Standard Precautions (foundational or minimum practices, i.e., hand washing, used for all patient care to prevent infections)” last reviewed on 12/2024 revealed the following: “Purpose [:] To reduce the risk of exposure and transmission of infections when caring for patients. Policy [:] Organization personnel will adhere to the following precautions…Procedure…Gloves are to be worn when…xi. Performing wound care…C. Gloves are to be changed: i. Between tasks and procedures on the same patient i. After removing an old dressing…D. Gloves should never be washed or disinfected for reuse…” Review of agency policy titled, “Clean vs. Aseptic Technique” last reviewed on 12/2024 revealed the following, “Purpose [:] To define the difference between aseptic (near sterile) and clean environment for patient- care-related procedures. Policy [:] All home health personnel will use the appropriate technique for the procedure being performed. Procedure [:] Clean technique refers- to the infection control strategies utilized to reduce the number of microorganisms or to reduce or prevent the transmission of microorganism (bacteria or viruses) from one person to another. Clean technique includes the following strategies… keep the work area clean with an appropriate disinfectant or cleaning solution… Wipe the area with alcohol or the disinfectant solution prior to performing the procedure… Decontaminate hands using an alcohol-based hand rub before and after the procedure… 1. Aseptic, or Near-Sterile, Technique- refers to infection control Strategies used to render and maintain objects in areas maximally free of microorganisms. Aseptic technique includes the following strategies… wash hands thoroughly with antimicrobial soap and warm water… Establish a sterile field to prevent transmission of microorganisms from the environment or from the clinician to the patient… Use sterile gloves to perform the procedure… Maintain all equipment used in a sterile condition or use disposable, one-time-use sterile equipment.””

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Receive All Services In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,241 words

    “Receive all services in plan of care CFR(s): 484.50(c)(5) Receive all services outlined in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation, and interview, the agency failed to ensure that the patient received all services as outlined in the plan of care in one (Patient # 5) of three records reviewed in which the patients received a home visit. The (Admin/DON) failed to provide wound care using clean and aseptic technique (techniques utilized to reduce the number of microorganisms and decrease to risk of infections) as written in the plan of care (physician’s orders). The failure caused the patient to not receive wound care as ordered on the POC and addendum orders. The failure placed the patient at increased risk of skin infections. Findings include: Patient Record Review # 5: Review of Patient # 5’s EHR revealed a POC with a start of care date of 07/29/2025 for certification period of 01/25/2026 to 03/25/2026. Review of the POC revealed that the Admin/DON signed and dated it on 01/25/2026; it contained a primary diagnosis of encounter for change or removal of non-surgical wound dressing; it included orders for SN visits two times per week for eight weeks and one time per week for one week. Continued review of Patient # 5’s record revealed a physician’s order addressed to nurse practitioner (NP # 100) dated 02/10/2026. Review of the physician’s order revealed the Admin/DON signed and dated the order on 02/10/2026. Further review of the physician’s order revealed the following: “…Interventions added [:] SN Performed 3 times weekly wound care to [right upper quadrant abdomen] and right upper forearm wounds using aseptic technique with wound cleanser and covered with silicone foam dressing (wound dressing with many layers to absorb moderate to high levels of drainage)…SN preformed 3 times weekly wound care to right pelvic fold using aseptic technique cleansed with wound cleanser, applied [normal saline] soaked alginate to wound bed, applied silver cloth over alginate pad, applied Nystatin powder along intact skin within fold and folded skin to secure…SN performed 3 times weekly wound preventive care to former wound sites including both forehead temples, inner thigh and both axilla using clean technique, cleansed area with wound cleanser and applied [antibacterial medicated] gel twice weekly…” During a home visit, interview, and observation with Patient # 5, Admin/DON, and Surveyor B on 02/18/2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m., the surveyors observed: the Admin/DON use hand sanitizer upon entry to the patient’s residence, don (put on) gloves, lay out a reuseable agency protective liner on Patient # 5’s bed, lay out wound care supplies on the liner, assess and listen to Patient # 5’s heart, lungs, assess (Patient # 5’s) blood pressure, and measure the wound to the right pelvic fold (lower abdomen). The surveyors observed the Admin/DON cleanse Patient # 5 wounds while gloved; gloves were never changed when going from wound to wound; Admin/DON used a disinfectant wipe to cleanse gloves between three wounds. The Admin/DON cleansed the two wounds on Patient # 5’s temple areas with normal saline wound cleanser (sterile salt water) and immediately applied antibacterial medicated ointment with the same gloves; cleansed left and right arm pits and immediately applied antibacterial medicated ointment with the same gloves; immediately moved to the right pelvic fold, cleansed it, and applied dressing without changing gloves or wiping off with the wipe. The surveyors observed the Admin/DON use the same wipe to cleanse gloves throughout the wound care. When wound care was completed the Admin/DON used the same wipe to cleanse his gloves and help Patient 5 dress. The surveyors observed the Admin/DON used a wipe that he previously used to clean his equipment, to clean his equipment and the reusable liner. Then he cleansed his tablet with the same wipe that he used to cleanse his gloves. The Admin/DON used the same pair of gloves during the entire visit. During an interview with the Admin/DON, on 02/20/2026 at approximately 12:30 p.m. the surveyor asked who was responsible for ensuring that the agency’s patients received services as outlined in the plan of care. The Admin/DON stated that (Admin/DON) was responsible. The surveyor asked what the agency’s processes were for providing wound care as outlined in the plan of care. The Admin/DON stated that the process was to provide wound care as written in the physician’s orders. The survey asked the Admin/DON to describe the process for clean and aseptic technique. The Admin/DON stated that all tools and equipment that were used should be on a clean area or barrier (liner) so that they were not contaminated. The Admin/DON stated that gloves should be changed anytime visibly soiled or compromised (torn) and especially when going from one area to another or gloves should be changed when in doubt. He stated that hands should be sanitized or washed before going into the home, when touching surfaces in the patient’s home, or after touching the patient. He stated that when going from one wound area to another aseptic technique should be maintained and gloves should be sanitized and changed if soiled. The surveyor reviewed the findings and asked why wound care was not provided as outlined in the plan of care and as order by the physician (with clean and aseptic technique). The Admin/DON that he was “pretty nervous.” He stated that he lost track of which wipe he used. The surveyor asked what could have been done differently to ensure that wound care was provided as outlined in the plan of care and agency policy. The Admin/DON stated that if he had any concerns that gloves might be contaminated he would change them. Review of agency policy titled, “Standard Precautions (foundational or minimum practices, i.e., hand washing, used for all patient care to prevent infections)” last reviewed on 12/2024 revealed the following: “Purpose [:] To reduce the risk of exposure and transmission of infections when caring for patients. Policy [:] Organization personnel will adhere to the following precautions…Procedure…Gloves are to be worn when…xi. Performing wound care…C. Gloves are to be changed: i. Between tasks and procedures on the same patient i. After removing an old dressing…D. Gloves should never be washed or disinfected for reuse…” Review of agency policy titled, “Clean vs. Aseptic Technique” last reviewed on 12/2024 revealed the following, “Purpose [:] To define the difference between aseptic (near sterile) and clean environment for patient- care-related procedures. Policy [:] All home health personnel will use the appropriate technique for the procedure being performed. Procedure [:] Clean technique refers- to the infection control strategies utilized to reduce the number of microorganisms or to reduce or prevent the transmission of microorganism (bacteria or viruses) from one person to another. Clean technique includes the following strategies… keep the work area clean with an appropriate disinfectant or cleaning solution… Wipe the area with alcohol or the disinfectant solution prior to performing the procedure… Decontaminate hands using an alcohol-based hand rub before and after the procedure… 1. Aseptic, or Near-Sterile, Technique- refers to infection control Strategies used to render and maintain objects in areas maximally free of microorganisms. Aseptic technique includes the following strategies… wash hands thoroughly with antimicrobial soap and warm water… Establish a sterile field to prevent transmission of microorganisms from the environment or from the clinician to the patient… Use sterile gloves to perform the procedure… Maintain all equipment used in a sterile condition or use disposable, one-time-use sterile equipment.””

    Rule G0436. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 20, 2026Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 27, 2008.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Oklahoma Homecare, LLC owns 100% directly since Oct 22, 2014.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Justin Carter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 90.29%); Robert L Peters (corporate director, 33%); Robert L Peters (runs it (operational or managerial control), 33%); Cynthia Carter (owns 5% or more through other companies); Cynthia Carter (corporate director); Cynthia Carter (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Oklahoma Homecare, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 22, 2014

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate80.51% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.85% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.