Hearth Record

Kelton Home Health Care

A home health agency in Atlanta, Texas 75551

301 West Main Street, Atlanta, Texas 75551. (903) 796-4040.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 11, 2026: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 11, 2026: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 1,424 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure the plan of care contained the required elements to cover all supplies and equipment required, patient specific interventions and education, and safety measures to protect against injury for 4 of 10 patients reviewed for plan of care. (Patient#1, Patient#2, Patient#3, Patient#4) The agency did not ensure the plan of care including bleeding precautions for Patient#1, Patient#2, Patient#3 and Patient#4. The agency did not ensure Patient #2’s POC included the location of the dialysis access or where Patient #4 received dialysis. This failure could place patients at risk of injury, improper care and instruction leading to complications and hospitalization. Findings included: 1 Record review of a plan of care dated 1/3/2026-3/3/2026 indicated Patient #1 was 86 years old, admitted on 1/8/2025 with diagnosis including congestive heart failure (chronic heart condition where the heart muscle is too weak or stiff to pump blood efficiently), cardiomyopathy (disease of the heart muscle), high blood pressure, and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). The plan of care indicated Patient #1 was prescribed Eliquis (a blood thinner to reduce stroke and blood clots) 5mg 2 times per day. The plan of care did not indicated bleeding precautions or teaching regarding bleeding precautions. 2 Record review of a plan of care dated 12/16/2025-02/13/2026 indicated Patient #2 was 79 years old, admitted on 08/18/2025 with diagnosis including chronic kidney disease stage 5 (kidney failure where kidneys function less than 15 percent capacity), dependance on renal dialysis (life sustaining, long term requirement for kidney failure, usually due to end stage renal disease), arteriovenous fistula (created surgically in the arm to provide access for dialysis) and history of transient ischemic attack (temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain causing stroke like symptoms). The plan of care indicated that Patient #2 received dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. The plan of care did not indicate where Patient #2’s arteriovenous access device was located or where Patient #2 went for dialysis or dialysis physician. The plan of care indicated that Patient #2 was prescribed Aspirin (blood thinner) 81 mg daily. The plan of care did not indicate any bleeding precautions under safety precautions. 3 Record review of a plan of care dated 1/18/2026-3/18/2026 indicated Patient #3 was 92 years old, admitted on 11/30/2023 with diagnosis including glaucoma (eye disease that damages the optic nerve leading to permanent vision loss or blindness), osteoarthritis (wear and tear joint disease) right knee, polyneuropathy (damage to multiple peripheral nerves leading to symmetric, distal symptoms such as tingling, numbness, burning pain and muscle weakness often to the feet and hands), high blood pressure and atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm). The plan of care indicated Patient #3 was prescribed Aspirin (blood thinner) 325 mg one tablet daily. The plan of care did not indicate any bleeding precautions under safety precautions. During a record review on 2/10/2026 at 9:30 a.m., a medication list inside Patient #3’s home indicated he was prescribed Aspirin 325 mg daily. During an interview on 2/10/2026 at 9:32 a.m., RN B said Patient #3 took 325 mg of Aspirin daily due to his history of atrial fibrillation. During an interview on 2/10/2026 at 9:35 a.m., Patient #3 said his daughter filled his pill planners for him to take daily. He said whatever was on that medication list was what he was taking because that is what his daughter put in the pill planner for him to take. 4 Record review of a plan of care dated 12/12/2025-02/09/2025 indicated Patient #4 was 91 years old, admitted on 6/15/2026 with diagnosis including stage 3 pressure ulcer to the sacrum ( localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue over the tailbone (sacrum), caused by prolonged pressure, friction, or shear, typically in immobile or bedridden individuals), urinary tract infection (bacteria in the urinary tract), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), high blood pressure and history of transient ischemic attack (temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain causing stroke like symptoms). The plan of care indicated Patient #4 was prescribed Apixaban (blood thinner) 5 mg one tablet twice per day. During an interview on 2/10/2026 at 10:40 a.m., RN B said she assessments and the plan of care for patients of the agency. RN B said the plan of care included orders, goals, safety precautions, supplies and medications for each patient. RN B said Patient #4 was taking aspirin due to his history of atrial fibrillation and this should be included on his plan of care including bleeding precautions and teaching. RN B said this was important so that each nurse would know how to care for each patient, what to educate the patient and family on and signs and symptoms to report to the physician. During an interview on 2/11/2026 at 9:18 a.m., RN B said Patient #1 should have anticoagulation or bleeding precautions and teaching for her Eliquis. RN B said the administrator/DON reviewed all of the plan of cares prior to them being locked to ensure accuracy. RN B said individualized plan of cares are important for patient safety and for other nurses seeing patients to be aware of the needs of each particular patient . During an interview on 2/11/2026 at 9:42 a.m., RN D said she was a field nurse and primarily did assessments including admissions, recertifications, resumption of cares, and discharges. RN D said the administrator / DON reviewed all of the plan of cares prior to them being locked. RN D said a plan of care should include all orders, goals, medications, safety precautions and supplies needed and should be individualized to each patient. RN D said if a patient is taking any type of blood thinner the plan of care should include bleeding precautions and teaching. RN D said Patient #2 should have had bleeding precautions on his plan of care as well as the location of his dialysis access and what facility he received dialysis from. RN D said this was all very important for patient safety and continuity of care. During an interview on 2/11/2026 at 10:00 a.m., the Alternate DON/ Alternate Administrator said he had been in this position since October of 2025. He said he primarily did field assessment visits and was training with the Administrator/DON for the alternate positions. The Alternate DON/ Alternate Administrator said the Administrator/DON reviewed all of the plan of cares for the agency. He said Patient #4 should have had bleeding precautions on his plan of care due to him being prescribed Aspirin and Eliquis for a blood thinner. The Alternate DON/Alternate Administrator said it was important to ensure the plan of cares included safety precautions so that hospitalization is decreased and patients and families are educated on signs and symptoms of bleeding to report to the agency nurses or physician. During an interview on 2/11/2026 at 2:00 p.m., the Administrator/DON said he reviewed all of the plan of cares for the agency. He said Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3 and Patient #4 should have had bleeding precautions on their plan of cares. The Administrator/ DON said Patient #4 should have proper dialysis details including access location and the location where she received her dialysis on the plan of care. The Administrator / DON said all patient needs are different and independent and the plan of care must address all needs for safety for patient safety. Record review of a policy 01/01/26 titled Plan of Care indicated III. A. The individualized plan of care must include the following: 10. All medications and treatments; 11. Safety measures to protect against injury; 14. Patient/client specific interventions and education.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 11, 2026Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Mar 9, 2005.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Ryon S Kelton (owns 5% or more directly); Ryon S Kelton (corporate officer); Ryon S Kelton (corporate director); Ryon S Kelton (managing employee (on the payroll)); Riley Hamilton (managing employee (on the payroll)); Holly R Kelton (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (51 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate60.96% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate16.72% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.14% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 17 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75551, where this agency’s office is, 17 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.