Hearth Record

Retreat Health Care Services Inc.

A home health agency in Texarkana, Texas 75503

4321 Mcknight Road, Texarkana, Texas 75503. (903) 701-1996.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 22, 2025: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 21, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Conformance With Physician Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 687 words

    “Conformance with physician orders CFR(s): 484.60(b) Standard: Conformance with physician or allowed practitioner orders. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure skilled nursing followed the written POC for 1 (Patient # 3) of 7 records reviewed for physicians’ orders, in that: The agency did not ensure Patient #3’s weight was taken and documented at every skilled nurse visit. This failure to follow the POC could place the agency’s patients at risk of hospitalizations and receiving inadequate care, services and negative outcomes. Findings included: Record review of Patient # 3’s POC dated 1/8/2024 – 3/7/2024 indicated he was 68 years old with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic kidney disease and long-term use of aspirin (blood thinner). The POC indicated the skilled nurse was to obtain a weight every skilled nurse visit. The POC indicated skilled nursing visits would occur twice a week for three weeks and once a week for six weeks. Record review of a skilled nursing visit note for Patient #3 dated 1/17/2024 did not have a documented weight. Record review of a skilled nursing visit note for Patient #3 dated 1/31/2024 did not have a documented weight. During an interview on 2/21/24 at 1:40 p.m., RN A said Patient #3 had congestive heart failure and had issues with high blood pressure, elevated heart rate, and shortness of breath. RN A said Patient #3 had recently been sent to the emergency room for shortness of breath, weakness, severe dizziness, and decreased level of consciousness. RN A said it was important to monitor Patient #3’s weight to see if there was a weight gain and to monitor for fluid buildup. RN A said she did not recall not getting a weight on Patient #3. RN A said normally if she could not get a weight, she would notify the physician and would measure his ankles to continue to monitor for fluid buildup. RN A said Patient #3 should be weighed at every skilled nurse visit because of his heart failure. During an interview on 2/21/24 at 1:40 p.m., RN B said weights were important for a patient with heart failure to monitor for fluid build-up. During an interview on 2/21/24 at 2:45 p.m., the DON said a patient with heart failure should have an order to monitor weights at each visit and notify the physician of weight gains outside of the parameters on the POC. The DON said the field nurses were responsible for assessing patients and QA was responsible for reviewing nurse notes and sending any corrections or questions to nurse. the DON said the plan of care was a physician’s order and should include interventions, goals, code status, medications, all diagnoses, frequency orders for each discipline providing care, vital sign parameters, safety precautions, diet and diagnosis. During an interview on 2/21/24 at 2:55 p.m., the administrator said the DON was responsible for the plans of care for patient safety and teaching of clients. Record review of an undated policy titled Physician participation in the Care-Planning Process, indicated its purpose was to ensure physician participation in the care planning process as appropriate to the care provided and according to law and regulation. Professional clinical staff will ensure that the patient’s physician participates in the care-planning process when: The care necessitates physicians orders in accordance with applicable law and regulation; and the patient’s condition or response to care changes, resulting in the organization contacting the physician. Information will be obtained from the patient’s physician at admission regarding the patient’s diagnosis, current medical findings, dietary restrictions, medication and treatment orders and will be documented on the plan of care and signed by the physician. Review of Managing Heart Failure dated June 13, 2023, and accessed on Managing Heart Failure Symptoms | American Heart Association indicated many people are first alerted to worsening heart failure when they notice a weight gain of more than two or three pounds in a 24-hour period and more than five pounds in a week. This weight gain may be due to retaining fluids since the heart is not functioning properly.”

    Rule G0578. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 1,254 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure the plan of care contained patient specific interventions and safety measures to protect against injury for 3 of 7 patients reviewed for plan of care. (Patient #4, Patient #6, and Patient #7) This failure could place patients at risk of not recognizing symptoms of bleeding, and not receiving proper care/instruction leading to complications and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Patient #4’s POC dated 1/29/2024- 3/28/2024 indicated she was 94 years old with diagnoses including hyponatremia (low sodium), chronic pain, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that increases the risk of stroke, heart failure and other heart complications), and presence of cardiac pacemaker. The plan of care did not include pacemaker (battery powered device that prevents the heart from beating too slowly) safety precautions, location, or teaching. Record review of Patient # 6’s POC dated 1/1/2024- 2/29/2024 indicated he was 74 years old with diagnoses of stage 3 pressure ulcer (skin and soft tissue injury), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (progressive weakness and reduced senses in the arms and legs), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side), depression, high blood pressure, muscle weakness, long term use of aspirin (blood thinner) and wheelchair dependence. The POC did not include bleeding precautions or teaching. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at 11:20 a.m., Patient #7 said he had a pacemaker placed “several years ago” in the left side of his chest. Record review of a referral order dated 1/24/024 indicated Patient #7 had a surgical history of pacemaker placement on 10/1/2020. Record review of Patient #7’s POC dated 2/5/2024 – 4/4/2024 indicated he was 82 years old with diagnoses of prostate cancer, epilepsy (seizures), high blood pressure, and heart disease. The POC did not address Patient #7’s pacemaker location, safety precautions or teaching. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at 1:40 p.m., RN A said she built the plan of care based on the patients needs and it was reviewed in the office to ensure nothing was missing. RN A said if a patient was on blood thinners the POC should include an order to teach on bleeding precautions including symptoms of bleeding, who to call and teaching on the medication. RN A said there was a section on the POC for safety precautions where the bleeding precautions would be listed. RN A said when a patient has a pacemaker she would ask the patient about its functioning, document any teaching provided and incorporate into the POC so that other nurses caring for the patient would know where to examine the insertion point of the pacemaker. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at 1:51 p.m., RN B said she built/entered the data for the POC. RN B said patients on blood thinners should have bleeding precautions and teaching on bleeding on their POC. RN B said if the patient had a pacemaker, it should be documented in the assessment the type and placement of the pacemaker. RN B said it was important for the pacemaker to be included on the POC so there is proper coordination of care between nursing staff. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at 2:45 p.m., the DON said the plan of care was a physician’s order and should include interventions, goals, code status, medications, all diagnoses, frequency orders for each discipline providing care, vital sign parameters, safety precautions, diet and diagnosis. The DON said patient on blood thinners should have bleeding precautions and teaching on their POC. The DON said patients with a pacemaker should have a diagnosis coded on the POC. The DON said it was important to have an accurate and complete POC for care coordination and patient safety. During an interview on 2/21/2024 at 2:55 p.m., the administrator said the DON was responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the POC’s for the safety and teaching of patients. Record review of a policy dated 01-2018 titled Care-Planning indicated its purpose was to identify the agency’s processes for development, updating, revising the plan of care. The policy indicated it was the policy of the agency to develop an individualized care plan to meet the unique needs and circumstances of the patient. The individualized care plan will incorporate the needs, identified problems, specific care and services, patient wishes, goals, family and caregiver need, as appropriate, and the patient’s environment. The plan of care addresses the following: All pertinent diagnosis… any safety measures to protect against injury. Record review of an undated policy titled Physician participation in the Care-Planning Process, indicated its purpose was to ensure physician participation in the care planning process as appropriate to the care provided and according to law and regulation. Professional clinical staff will ensure that the patient’s physician participates in the care-planning process when: The care necessitates physicians orders in accordance with applicable law and regulation; and the patient’s condition or response to care changes, resulting in the organization contacting the physician. Information will be obtained from the patient’s physician at admission regarding the patient’s diagnosis, current medical findings, dietary restrictions, medication, and treatment orders and will be documented on the plan of care and signed by the physician. Review of Aspirin (oral route) precautions dated 02/22/2024 and accessed at Aspirin (Oral Route) Precautions - Mayo Clinic indicated “...this medicine may increase risk for bleeding problems, including stomach ulcers or bleeding. This usually occurs if you are taking aspirin with certain medicines. Check with your doctor right away if you have black, tarry stools, severe or continuing stomach pain, unusual bleeding, bruising, or weakness, or vomiting of blood or material that looks like coffee grounds…” Review of Living with a Pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator accessed at Living with a Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ICD | Johns Hopkins Medicine indicated “…The following precautions should always be considered…Avoid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machines or other large magnetic fields, these may affect the programming or functioning of the pacemaker. Turn off large motors such as cars or boats, when working on them as they may temporarily “confuse” your pacemaker. If you have a surgical procedure done by a surgeon or a dentist, tell your surgeon or dentist that you have a pacemaker. Always carry an ID car that states you have a pacemaker. Although your device is built to last 5 to 7 years, you should have it checked regularly to ensure that it is working properly, your doctor may ask you to check your pulse rate periodically and report unusual symptoms of symptoms similar to those you had before the device to your healthcare provider right away.””

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 22, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 21, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 22, 1991.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Rickey W Riebesell (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Rickey W Riebesell (corporate officer); Rickey W Riebesell (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate81.49% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.52% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.12% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 75503, where this agency’s office is, 21 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.