Hearth Record

Sunrise Home Health Services

A home health agency in Bedford, Texas 76021

2117 Central Drive Ste 104, Bedford, Texas 76021. (817) 283-2100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 2, 2026: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 15, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Be Free From Abuse

    The inspectors’ words, 2,194 words

    “Be free from abuse CFR(s): 484.50(c)(2) Be free from verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, neglect and misappropriation of property; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a patient’s right to be free from neglect by an agency employee for one of one patient (Patient 1) in that the OT failed to provide services necessary to avoid physical harm during a visit. This failure resulted in Patient 1 falling during an OT visit requiring EMS transportation to an emergency room with injury, increased pain and a decline in ambulation. Findings included: Record review of Texas Unified Licensing Information Portal ((a database utilized by the state to maintain licensing, demographic information, complaints and self-reported incidents on Home Health and Hospice agencies for the State of Texas) included a self-reported incident (Intake 1003861) in which the Adm/DON reported to the Health and Human Services Commission Complaint and Incident Intake on 04/16/2025. The report included an allegation of Neglect of Patient 1 by OT. The report read in part, “… During OT session on 04/15/2025, [Patient 1] was ambulating using RW around to the other side of her bed from recliner to address bed mobility… OT had a hold of patient’s gait belt, (a safety device used to help someone move, such as from a bed to a chair. The belt is also used to help hold someone up while walking, to provide support and prevent a fall)and was walking with patient. When close to bed, OT moved pillows to allow room for patient to sit down, and noticed what appeared to be large wet spots on the sheets at the head of the bed under pillows on clean and made bed. OT turned, while still having a hand on patient, to see if area was wet before having patient sit and lay down. Patient then said “I’m going down.” OT quickly turned towards patient who was no longer holding on to her walker and began falling backwards. OT unable to keep patient from landing on her bottom on the floor… Patient… complained of pain in lower back… When EMTs assessed patient’s cardiac rhythm, they reported that patient was having Ventricular Trigeminy (abnormal heart rhythm)… Patient does not have a history of this… Patient was taken to [Hospital]… Patient was diagnosed with compression fracture of back (broken bone in the spine) in the ER… returned home on same day… Immediate action taken to protect client Reviewed proper transfer protocols with OT…” Record review of the Agency’s complaint log revealed a 2-page document created on 04/17/2025 that was signed by the Adm/DON and titled, “Patient Fall Log” regarding Patient 1 and OT that read in part, “… Fall occurrence date 04/15/2025… The patient fell while being assisted or in the presence of an agency staff member, and the agency staff member was unable to prevent the fall… Agency Staff Member [OT]… Injuries… Type: Major Injury… Compression fracture found… Spoke with [FM] – She states she is disappointed and would like new OT. She reports her family member is very tiny and easy “to catch” if unsteady. She does not believe OT had her hand on gait belt …” Record review of Patient 1’s electronic health record included a plan of care dated 03/06/2025-05/04/2025 with a start of care date of 03/06/2025 that was digitally signed by RN A on 03/06/2025 and Doctor A on 03/26/2025. The plan of care included Patient 1 was born on 07/17/1937, resided in an assisted living facility and had a diagnosis of osteoporosis (a disease that causes bones to become weak and brittle), pain, anxiety, kidney disease, and a history of falling. The plan of care included orders for the nurse to visit once a week for one week, twice a week for two weeks, the once a week for one week and orders for OT and PT to visit twice a week for four weeks. The plan of care read in part, “… Risk Factors: History of falls (2 or more falls - or any fall with an injury - in the past 12 months). Multiple hospitalizations (2 or more) in the past 6 months. Multiple emergency department visits (2 or more) in the past 6 months. Decline in mental, emotional, or behavioral status in the past 3 months… Currently reports exhaustion… At Risk for Falls, S/P Inpatient discharge for fractures of the spine and L ribs… DME… wheelchair. Grab bars… walker. Hospital bed… Safety Measures… Support During Transfer and Ambulation… Safety in ADLs… Functional Limitations… ambulation… Occupational Therapy to provide transfer training from recliner to stand and use RW for functional mobility focused on correct hand and feet placement to address difficulty with postural control with sit… stand transitions… Occupational Therapy to develop and manage a balance program focused on core and back muscle strengthening to address loss of balance during functional mobility tasks… OT Goals… will improve… standing balance… to reduce risk of falls during ADLs…” The record included a 32-page start of care nursing assessment signed and dated by RN on 03/06/2025 that included Patient 1 was 4 foot 8 inches tall and weighed 90 pounds. The assessment read in part, “… past medical history… fractures (broken bones)… falls… anxiety… kyphoplasty 9/18/2024 (a procedure to treat back compression fractures where bone cement is used to stabilize the bone and reduce pain)… ambulation difficulty… poor balance… Able to walk only with the supervision or assistance of another person at all times…” The nursing assessment included: • a Fall Risk Assessment score of 7, where a score of 4 or more is considered at risk for falling; • partial/moderate assistance was required for walking 10 to 150 feet; • a high risk for hospitalization; • pain to the left ribs and lower back rated 4 on a scale of 0-10; • use of an opioid (narcotic) prescription pain medication The record included an OT re-evaluation visit note signed and dated by OT on 04/03/2025 that read in part, “… multiple recent falls resulting in L rib Fxs… Patient is forgetful, and needs cueing for steps in a transition and transfer… impaired balance/gait and pain…” The record included an PT re-evaluation visit note signed and dated by PT on 04/04/2025 that read in part, “… Muscle weakness contributes to increased fall risk w/ transfers, ambulation, ADL’s… Severe debility (weakness), chronic pain, impaired balance, memory/ cognitive deficits contribute to gait impairments… Barrier to progress has been chronic back pain, worse with activity. Although client has made progress, client is still considered a high fall risk, and still requires considerable assistance for safe mobility…” The record included patient care records from Fire Department dated 04/15/2025 that read in part, “… responded to a call for an 87-year old female patient with a chief complaint of a fall from a standing position. Upon arrival… EMS proceeded to the third floor where the patient’s room was located. EMS was greeted by nursing staff and an occupational therapist, who was present at the time of the incident. The occupational therapist reported that while working on mobility exercises with the patient, she momentarily looked away, during which time the patient fell from a standing position… Upon evaluation, the patient… reported significant pain along her spine… The patient was connected to a cardiac monitor to assess vital signs. ECG was performed, revealing bigeminal PVCs (irregular heart rhythm)… The patient was transported to the ambulance, where an IV line was established… the patient continued to report pain. An initial dose of… Fentanyl (potent narcotic) was administered IV. After five minutes, the patient stated the pain had not improved and that the roughness of the ride was exacerbating (increasing) her discomfort. A second dose of… Fentanyl was administered along with… Zofran (anti-nausea medication) IV to prevent nausea…” The record included emergency department medical records from Hospital dated 04/15/2025 that included a diagnosis of a compression fracture of T3 (the third thoracic vertebra, playing a crucial role in the thoracic spine’s structure and function). The record read in part, “… 87-year-old female presents after a ground level fall. She was in the middle of receiving some occupational therapy, she was transferring over when she missed sitting in the appropriate spot causing her to slip off the chair and fall onto her buttocks. There was acute pain in her lower and mid back after that event… She has a chronic spinal issues in his (sic) had kyphoplasty last year… her pain was under reasonable control with a dose of tramadol (narcotic pain medication)... Discussed case with [Doctor B] neurosurgeon, he reviewed imaging. He is suspicious that there is acute (new) fracture at T3…” The active employee roster provided to the surveyor by the Adm/DON on 05/14/2025 at 1:04 PM included OT’s hire date was 02/13/2020. Record review of OT’s personnel record included an active Texas OT license for period ending 10/31/2025. The record included that on 11/12/2024, OT completed mandatory annual agency training which included patient rights and patient abuse, neglect and exploitation. During an interview with OT on 05/15/2025 at 9:46 AM, OT stated: During the OT visit on 04/15/2025, a gait belt was placed on the patient to work on bed mobility and walking. The patient used her RW as the OT and patient approached the bed. The bed appeared to have large wet spots on it so the OT placed her left hand on the patients back and reached to feel if the bed was wet. The OT heard the patient say, “I’m going down.” The OT turned towards the patient who fell backwards onto the floor. An assisted living staff nurse called EMS who transported the patient to the hospital. Prior to the fall, the patient never got out of her recliner unless someone was there to assist. The surveyor asked what the OT could have done differently. The OT stated she could have been more conservative with Patient 1 during the visit but she did not feel Patient 1 had been neglected. The OT stated Patient 1 did not hit her head or lose consciousness when she fell but landed on her bottom. The OT further stated as a result of the fall, Patient 1 was diagnosed with a fractured vertebrae in the Hospital ER. During an interview with the Adm/DON on 05/15/2025 at 2:30 PM, the Adm/DON stated: Patient 1’s FM stated it was the agency’s fault the patient had a setback. Patient 1’s FM considered transferring Patient 1 to hospice after the fall but decided to continue with at home therapy with the agency but requested a different OT for Patient 1. Patient 1 was ambulating approximately 200 feet prior to the fall but was now only able to ambulate 30-35 feet. The Adm/DON further stated knowing Patient 1’s history of falls and compression fractures, the OT should have sat Patient 1 down on the bed and then checked for wet spots. The surveyor asked how Patient 1 was affected by the fall. The Adm/DON stated Patient 1 was transferred to the Hospital ER by EMS due to her injuries that caused increased pain; a decrease in her ability to ambulate the distance that she was previously ambulating and a greater fear of falling. The surveyor read the definition of neglect to the Adm/DON, “Neglect: the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness” and asked if Patient 1’s rights were violated due to the neglect of the OT. The Adm/DON stated she did not know how to answer the question because she felt the OT was trying to improve Patient 1. The surveyor called Patient 1 on 05/15/2025 at 10:02 AM. Patient 1 declined to speak to the surveyor. The surveyor called FM on 05/15/2025 at 10:06 AM. FM stated she would call the surveyor back but the call was not returned. Agency policy titled, “TX.3 Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation” with a revision date of 082523 read in part, “… Purpose To identify suspected or alleged victims of abuse, neglect, and exploitation… To protect and promote a patient’s rights, which include the right to be free from verbal, mental, physical, or sexual abuse, neglect and exploitation from an agency employee, contractor or volunteer… Definitions… I. “Adult Neglect” means the failure to provide for one’s self the goods or services, including medical services, which are necessary to avoid physical or emotional harm or pain or the failure of a caretaker to provide such goods or services… Procedure A… 2. Criteria to identify elder neglect or abuse, physical assault and domestic abuse include… c. Inadequate supervision with resulting effect on ADL provision, e.g., bathing, toileting, food, etc…” Agency policy titled, “RI.1 Patient Bill of Rights and Responsibilities/ Right of the Elderly” with a revision date of 070124 read in part, “Purpose To ensure all patients/patient representative (if any)/legal guardians and Agency staff acknowledge, understand, observe and implement the patient’s rights and responsibilities to protect and promote the patient’s rights… Patient Rights… D. A patient has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation by an agency employee, volunteer, or contractor…””

    Rule G0430. Element-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 2, 2026Recertification inspectionNo deficiencies cited
May 15, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 10, 1999.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Lori Kari (managing employee (on the payroll), 75%); Vernon Govender (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Neville Govender (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Vernon Govender (corporate officer); Vernon Govender (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sarah Govender (managing employee (on the payroll)); Neville Govender (corporate officer); Neville Govender (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (178 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate86.68% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.97% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.08% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 143 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 76021, where this agency’s office is, 122 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.