Hearth Record

Beacon Home Health

A home health agency in Jackson, Tennessee 38305

8 Stonebridge Blvd Suite L, Jackson, Tennessee 38305. (731) 664-2264.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 10, 2026: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 10, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Transfer And Discharge

    The inspectors’ words, 315 words

    “Transfer and discharge CFR(s): 484.50(d) Standard: Transfer and discharge. The patient and representative (if any), have a right to be informed of the HHA’s policies for transfer and discharge. The HHA may only transfer or discharge the patient from the HHA if: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, medical record review, and interviews, the agency failed to ensure contact information of other home health agencies were provided for 1 (Patient #1) of 3 patients reviewed for discharge. The findings included: Review of the agency’s policy titled “Discharge of Patients,” last reviewed 02/11/2026, revealed “...The HHA [home health agency] may only transfer or discharge the patient from the HHA if...The HHA determines...that the patient’s (or other persons in the patient’s home) behavior is disruptive, abusive, or uncooperative to the extent that delivery of care to the patient or the ability of the HHA to operate effectively is seriously impaired...Provide the patient and representative...with contact information for other agencies...who may be able to provide care...” Review of the medical record revealed Patient #1 was admitted to the agency on 08/15/2026. The patient’s diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Hyperlipidemia, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, and Polyneuropathy. Review of the Discharge Order dated 10/06/2025, revealed “...NON VISIT DC [discharge] TO BE PERFORMED DT [due to] THREATENING MESSAGES AND UNSAFE ENVIRONMENT MD [medical doctor] IS AWARE...” The agency provided no documentation that contact information was given to Patient #1 for home health agencies potentially able to provide care. During a phone interview on 07/06/2026 at 3:30, Patient #1 said the agency did not provide contact information for any other home health agencies who could potentially provide care. She said, “They just dropped me.” During an interview on 07/10/2026 at 10:20 AM, the Branch Director said she did not have any documentation that she provided contact information for other home health agencies to Patient #1.”

    Rule G0452. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Apr 30, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 346 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the agency failed to perform appropriate hand hygiene by 1 of 2 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2) nurses observed performing wound care. The findings included: Review of the agency’s “Hand Hygiene,” policy dated 6/26/2024, revealed, “…The term hand-hygiene includes both handwashing with soap and water and use of alcohol-based products that do not require the use of water…Perform hand hygiene as follows…Before donning gloves…After removing gloves…” Review of the medical record revealed Patient #7 was admitted with a start of care date of 1/28/2025 with diagnoses of Stage 3 Sacral Pressure Ulcer, Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer of Left Lower Leg, Burn of Left Lower Leg, Adjustment of Urinary Catheter, Anxiety, and Paraplegia. Review of the physician order dated 4/21/2025, revealed, “…CLEAN WITH WOUND CLEANSER AND PAT DRY…APPLY SKIN PROTECTANT TO ALL SURROUNDING SKIN FOR INCREASED PROTECTION FROM URINE…APPLY CALCIUM ALGINATE [substance that forms a protective gel and non-adherence to the wound] TO OPEN SORE AND COVER WITH BORDERED GAUZE [dressing with a non-adherent pad in the center surrounded by a flexible adhesive border to secure the dressing in place]…NURSING TO CHANGE 1XWEEK [one time each week] AND CAREGIVER TO CHANGE IF LOOSE OR SOILED…” Observations in Patient #7’s home on 4/29/2025 at 11:05 AM, revealed LPN #2 performed a dressing change to Patient #7’s sacrum. LPN #2 failed to perform hand hygiene 3 times between glove changes during the removal of the soiled dressing and the cleaning of the wound and failed to perform hand hygiene 2 times between glove changes during the application of the new dressing. During an interview on 4/29/2025 at 11:45 AM, LPN #2 confirmed she was supposed to perform hand hygiene between each glove change. During an interview on 4/30/2025 at 915 AM, Director of Operations #1 confirmed staff were to perform hand hygiene between glove changes.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 722 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the agency failed to update the medication profile for 3 of 7 (Patient #1, #2, and #7) patients reviewed. The findings included: 1. Review of the agency’s “Drug Regimen Review,” policy last revised 12/9/2024, revealed, “...Purpose: To identify appropriateness, inconsistencies, and/or significant drug interactions in the patient’s current medication regimen, as well as ensure the comprehensive list of medications are updated any time there is a medication change including dose changes, new medications, and any medications discontinued…” 2. Review of the medical record revealed Patient #1 was admitted with a start of care date of 3/20/2025 with diagnoses of Dehiscence of Abdominal Wound, Malignant Neoplasm of Right Ovary, Diabetes Mellitus, and Hypertension. Review of the Physician Orders revealed: Minocycline (treats infection) 100 mg (milligrams) orally twice daily. Observations in Patient #1’s home on 4/28/2025 at 2:17 PM, revealed the following medications: Eliquis (anticoagulant) 2.5 mg orally twice daily. Over the counter (OTC) Vitamin E (supplement) 180 mg (400 IU [international units]) orally every day. The Eliquis and OTC Vitamin E were not listed on Patient #1’s medication list from the agency. During an interview on 4/28/2025 at 3:05 PM, Patient #1 confirmed she was taking Eliquis and Vitamin E, but she was not taking Minocycline. 3. Review of the medical record revealed Patient #2 was admitted with a start of care date of 4/17/2025 with diagnoses of Orthopedic Aftercare and Presence of Right Artificial Hip Joint. Review of the Physician Orders revealed: Amlodipine (treats high blood pressure) 5 mg orally every day. Cefadroxil (treats infection) 500 mg orally every day. Observations in Patient #2’s home on 4/28/2025 at 3:15 PM, revealed the following medications: OTC Jet-Asleep Nighttime Hydroxyzine 50 mg orally three times daily Furosemide (treats fluid retention and swelling) 20 mg orally every day. OTC Allergy Relief 4 mg orally as needed. The OTC Jet-Asleep Nighttime, hydroxyzine, furosemide, and OTC Allergy Relief medications were not listed on Patient #2’s medication list from the agency. During an interview on 4/28/2025 at 4:10 PM, Patient #2 stated “If it is not in that basket, I don’t take it.” She confirmed she had not taken Amlodipine in a long time and was not currently taking the cefadroxil. 4. Review of the medical record revealed Patient #7 was admitted with a start of care date of 1/28/2025, with diagnoses of Stage 3 Sacral Pressure Ulcer, Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer of Left Lower Leg, Burn of Left Lower Leg, Adjustment of Urinary Catheter, Anxiety, and Paraplegia. Review of the Physician Orders revealed: Potassium chloride 10 extended release 10 meq 2 tablets twice daily. Observations in Patient #7’s home on 4/29/2025 at 11:35 AM, revealed the following medications: OTC naproxen (treats symptoms of arthritis) 2 bottles of OTC aspirin (treats pain) 325 mg orally as needed. L-Lysine (enzyme) 75 mcg (microgram) orally every morning. 1 bottle of OTC ibuprofen. 1 bottle of OTC milk thistle 175 mg 1 bottle of Milk of Magnesia 1 bottle of potassium chloride liquid 20 meq (milliequivalent)/5 ml (milliliter) 15 ml (60 meq) orally twice daily OTC triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray There were no potassium chloride 10 meq extended release tablets observed with Patient #7’s medications. The naproxen, aspirin, L-lysine, ibuprofen, milk thistle, Milk of Magnesia, potassium chloride liquid, and OTC triamcinolone acetone nasal spray were not listed on Patient #7’s medication list from the agency. During an interview on 4/29/2025 at 11:05 AM, LPN #2 stated, “…the daughter gives the patient her medications, and they come from the pharmacy in a bubble pack…” During a telephone interview on 4/29/2025 at 2:01 PM, Pharmacist #1 confirmed Patient #7 received her medications from their pharmacy. Pharmacist #1 stated, “…We do pack this patient’s [Patient #7] medications. A receipt and medication information are stapled to the bag of bubble packs when they are paid for and picked up…” 5. During an interview on 4/30/2025 at 9:20 AM, Director of Operations #1 confirmed medications were to be reconciled with each home visit.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 10, 2026Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Apr 30, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 8, 1984.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Cornerstone Healthcare Inc. owns 100% directly since Oct 1, 2025.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Attilla Barnett (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Brent Mills (corporate officer, 0%); Brent Guerisoli (corporate director, 0%); John Gochnour (corporate officer, 0%); Amber L Tueller (corporate officer, 0%); Elliot Mcmillan (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cornerstone Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Oct 1, 2025
The Pennant Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 1, 2025

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (284 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate83.63% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.25% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.65% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 38305, where this agency’s office is, 10 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.