Hearth Record

Valley Med Home Health Care, LLC

A home health agency in Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104

2200 Hamilton Street Suite 310, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104. (484) 656-7176.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 6, 2026: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 6, 2026: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 406 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, a review of clinical records, and an interview with the agency Administrator, the agency failed to ensure that services ordered by a nurse practitioner included a collaborating or supervising physician identified in the patients written plan of treatment for one (1) of seven (7) clinical records (CR) reviewed that included orders by a nurse practitioner (CR#1). ‘House Bill No. 2401, Session of 2022’ section (2) “ Home health care services may be ordered by nurse practitioners and physician assistants as provided under section 1814(a) and 1835(a) of the Social Security Act (49, Stat. 620, 42 U.S.C. § 1395 et. seg.), if the nurse practitioners (CRNP) or physician assistants (PA) collaborating or supervising physician is identified in the patients written plan of treatment. ... “ Agency policy/procedure reviewed on February 5, 2026 at approximately 1:45 p.m. Policy ‘Supervision When the physician Listed on Plan of Treatment is a CRNP or PA’ ‘Policy Statement’ “If the physician identified on the plan of treatment is a CRNP or PA, the following supervision requirements must be met: ‘Supervisory Physician Identification:’ The plan of treatment must clearly identify the supervising physician responsible for overseeing the CRNP or PA.” ‘Documentation:’ All plans of treatment must include the name, credentials, and contact information of both the CRNP/PA and their supervising physician.” A review of CRs was completed on February 5, 2026 at approximately 1:45 p.m. The patients start of care (SOC) is listed below. CR#1 SOC 02/03/26: Verbal order from a nurse practitioner was taken by a registered nurse on 02/03/26 for the certification period 02/03/26 - 04/03/26. The nurse practitioners collaborating/supervising physician was not identified in the patients written plan of treatment. An interview conducted with agency Administrator on February 5, 2026 at approximately 2:00 p.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 371 words

    “Infection control CFR(s): 484.70(b)(1)(2) Standard: Control. The HHA must maintain a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the HHA’s quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. The infection control program must include: (1) A method for identifying infectious and communicable disease problems; and (2) A plan for the appropriate actions that are expected to result in improvement and disease prevention. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, review of employee files, and an interview with the agency Administrator, the agency failed to conduct TB (tuberculosis) testing and/or TB screening, per policy, for five (5) out of seven (7) employee files (EFs) initial documentation reviewed (EF#3 - EF#7). Agency policy/procedure reviewed on February 5, 2026 at approximately 1:45 p.m. Policy ‘Employees Health Assessments’ ‘Procedure’ “ ... (B) “The written health assessment report shall: .... (4) Tuberculosis screening shall be required for staff with direct patient contact as follows: (a) A baseline TB screening upon hire, using a two-step TST (tuberculin skin test) or a single BAMT (blood assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis) to test for infection with M. tuberculosis. .... (d) ..... After baseline testing, tuberculosis screening must: (i) Be completed annually; (ii) if no exposure to TB is suspected a TB questionnaire may be utilized to determine the need for a TST. .... “ A review of EFs was conducted on February 4, 2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m. The employees date of hire (DOH) is listed below. EF#3 DOH 11/05/24: Documentation provided of a one-step TST being conducted on 06/21/24. No documentation provided of the second-step TST being conducted. EF#4 DOH 11/26/24: Documentation provided of a one-step TST being conducted on 11/19/24. No documentation provided of the second-step TST being conducted. No documentation provided of a 2025 TB symptom screening questionnaire. EF#5 DOH 11/13/24: No documentation provided of a 2025 TB symptom screening questionnaire. EF#6 DOH 10/25/24: No documentation provided of a 2025 TB symptom screening questionnaire. EF#7 DOH 10/23/23: No documentation provided of a 2024 TB symptom screening questionnaire. An interview conducted with agency Administrator on February 5, 2026 at approximately 2:00 p.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0684. Standard-level.

  • Classroom And Supervised Practical Training

    The inspectors’ words, 393 words

    “Classroom and supervised practical training CFR(s): 484.80(b)(1) Home health aide training must include classroom and supervised practical training in a practicum laboratory or other setting in which the trainee demonstrates knowledge while providing services to an individual under the direct supervision of a registered nurse, or a licensed practical nurse who is under the supervision of a registered nurse. Classroom and supervised practical training must total at least 75 hours. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of agency policy, review of employee files, and an interview with the agency Administrator, the agency failed to ensure home health aides completed a minimum of 75 hours of classroom and supervised practical training, per policy, for one (1) of one (1) employee files (EF) reviewed (EF#7). Agency policy/procedure reviewed on February 5, 2026 at approximately 1:45 p.m. Policy ‘Certified Nursing Aide/Home Health Aide’ ‘Qualifications/Educational Requirements’ “A qualified home health aide is a person who has successfully completed: (1) A training and competency evaluation program as specified in this policy; or (2) A nurse aide training and competency evaluation program approved by the state as meeting the requirements of Chapter 483.151 through Chapter 484.154 of this chapter, and is currently listed in good standing on the state nurse aide registry; or (3) The requirements of a state licensure program that meets the provisions of the training and competency requirements. “ (A) Training Requirement: Content and duration of home health aide classroom and supervised practical training. (1) .... Classroom and supervised practical training must total at least 75 hours. .... (4) The HHA must maintain documentation that demonstrates that the requirements of this standard have been met. (B) Competency Requirement: An individual may furnish home health aide services on behalf of an HHA only after that individual has successfully completed a competency evaluation program as described in this section. ....” A review of EFs was conducted on February 4, 2026 at approximately 11:00 a.m. The employees date of hire (DOH) is listed below. EF#7 DOH 10/23/23: Employees first work shift as a home health aide was on 10/30/23. No documentation provided of the employee meeting the agency policy requirements of a minimum of (75) hours of a combination of classroom and supervised practical training. An interview conducted with agency Administrator on February 5, 2026 at approximately 2:00 p.m. confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule G0760. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 6, 2026Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 5, 2020.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Michelle E Wagner (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Michelle E Wagner (corporate director, 100%); Allan Say (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (92 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate95.59% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.55% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.81% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 18104, where this agency’s office is, 16 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.