Hearth Record

Elara Caring IV

A home health agency in Chickasha, Oklahoma 73018

328 South 29th Street, Suite 320, Chickasha, Oklahoma 73018. (405) 224-0012.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 3, 2025: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 3, 2025: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process

    The inspectors’ words, 277 words

    “Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process CFR(s): 484.102(a)(4) §403.748(a)(4), §416.54(a)(4), §418.113(a)(4), §441.184(a)(4), §460.84(a)(4), §482.15(a)(4), §483.73(a)(4), §483.475(a)(4), §484.102(a)(4), §485.68(a)(4), §485.542(a)(4), §485.625(a)(4), §485.727(a)(5), §485.920(a)(4), §486.360(a)(4), §491.12(a)(4), §494.62(a)(4) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The plan must do the following:] (4) Include a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State, and Federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation. * * [For ESRD facilities only at §494.62(a)(4)]: (4) Include a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State, and Federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation. The dialysis facility must contact the local emergency preparedness agency at least annually to confirm that the agency is aware of the dialysis facility’s needs in the event of an emergency. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure that Emergency Preparedness documents were updated every two years for all patients and all employees. Findings: A review of administrative records showed a document dated 11/28/19 titled, “MERC Response Team Names and Phone Numbers.” The surveyor compared information contained in “MERC Response Team Names and Phone Numbers” with current RMRS map including names of RMRS staff, titles, and telephone numbers. The contact information for agency staff to use was not updated. On 12/03/25 at 1:45 pm, Staff A stated the information in the document titled, “MERC Response Team Names and Phone Numbers” had not been updated in the last two years.”

    Rule E0009. Standard-level.

  • Responsibilities Of Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Responsibilities of skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(b) Standard: Responsibilities of skilled professionals. Skilled professionals must assume responsibility for, but not be restricted to, the following: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure assessments were completed and uploaded in a timely manner for one (Pt #2) of twelve patients. Findings: A review of a POC dated 11/19/25 to 01/17/26 showed orders for PT effective 11/23/25 once a week for one week. The record did not contain a PT assessment for the week of 11/23/25. On 12/03/25 at 2:20 pm Staff A stated the PT assessment should have been turned in within 48 hours of the evaluation.”

    Rule G0704. Standard-level.

  • Patient’S Needs

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Patient’s needs CFR(s): 484.55(c)(4) The patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, social, and discharge planning needs; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to include orders in the POC for one (Pt #2) of twelve patients. Findings: A review of the SOC assessment dated 11/19/25 documented in part, “She has trouble arranging her medications and will need a weekly med planner fill...” The review showed a POC dated 11/19/25 to 01/17/26 that did not show orders for a medication planner or a weekly med planner fill. On 12/03/25 at 2:20 pm, Staff A stated the orders for a weekly medication planner being filled should have been included in the POC orders.”

    Rule G0534. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 305 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to provided the ordered wound care for one (Pt #9) of twelve patients. Findings: Pt #9 A review of the record showed a certification period dated 09/20/25 - 11/18/25 with a ROC dated 09/26/25. The orders for wound care from the ROC read as follows: “Incisional wound vac dressing is in place. Keep this in place for seven days and do not get the dressing wet. Reinforce with adhesive sheets as needed. After seven days, remove the wound vac dressing and replace with silver island dressing.” The nurses’ notes documented the followings. 10/02/25 - Wound care provided; Incisional wound vac dressing is in place. Keep this in place for seven days and do not get the dressing wet, reinforce with adhesive sheets, as needed after seven days remove the wound vac dressing replace with silver island dressing. 10/08/25 - Wound care not provided; covered by non-removable dressing or device. 10/15/25 - Wound care not provided; covered by non-removable dressing or device. 10/22/25 - Wound care provided; Incisional wound vac dressing is in place. Keep this in place for seven days and do not get the dressing wet, reinforce with adhesive sheets, as needed after seven days remove the wound vac dressing replace with silver island dressing. 10/29/25 - Wound care provided; Incisional wound vac dressing is in place. Keep this in place for seven days and do not get the dressing wet, reinforce with adhesive sheets, as needed after seven days remove the wound vac dressing replace with silver island dressing. On 12/03/25 at 2:50 pm, Staff A stated wrong wound dressings had been documented.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

  • Coordinate Care Delivery

    The inspectors’ words, 256 words

    “Coordinate care delivery CFR(s): 484.60(d)(4) Coordinate care delivery to meet the patient’s needs, and involve the patient, representative (if any), and caregiver(s), as appropriate, in the coordination of care activities. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: 1) A current POC was provided to the Assisted Living Facility for one (Pt #5) of one patients residing in an Assisted Living Facility; 2) A physician was notified of an oxygen saturation below parameters for one (Pt #6) of twelve patients. Findings: Pt #5 A review of the home health agency record at the assisted living showed no current plan of care for the certification period of 11/14/25 - 01/12/25. Pt #6 A review of the record showed a POC dated 10/26/25 - 12/2/24/25 with orders to report an oxygen saturation of less than 90%. A nursing assessment dated 10/27/25 did not show physician notification of an oxygen saturation of 84% with the patient receiving oxygen at 5 L/min per minute via nasal cannula on the day the patient assessment was conducted. On 12/03/25 at 10:25 am Assisted Living Staff #1 stated there was no current plan of care for Pt #5. On 12/03/2 at 2:50 pm Staff B stated the POC should be provided to a facility within 5 days of the SOC or recertification assessment. On 12/03/25 at 2:45 pm Staff B stated the nurse should have notified the physician of the oxygen saturation of 84% at the time of assessment for Pt #6.”

    Rule G0608. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 3, 2025Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 21, 2005.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Alliance Health Inc. owns 100% directly since Sep 1, 2017.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer, 0%); Ananth P Mohan (corporate director); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Katie L Monastiere (corporate officer); Lori Clark (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Hugh B Mcbride (corporate director); Crystal Berdinner (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Angel Stansbury (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Airjaguar Holdco, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Airjaguar Acquisition, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings Intermediate, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
HCI Holdings CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 1, 2017
Healthcare Innovations Private Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 1, 2017
Hci Parent Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 1, 2017
Jhh/Cima Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 1, 2017
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 20, 2026
Alliance Health Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Sep 1, 2017
Acof VII Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies49.3%Jul 20, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies35.8%Jul 20, 2026
Davita Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 20, 2026
Total Renal Care, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 20, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII Parallel (Te), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies9.07%Jul 20, 2026
Dawson Holdings (Armstrong), LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 20, 2026
Acof VII Axiom Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 20, 2026

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (69 surveys completed): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 70% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 52 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate89.99% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.75% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.47% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 34 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73018, where this agency’s office is, 34 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.