Hearth Record

Elara Caring Xx

A home health agency in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112

3030 NW Expressway, Suite 1204a, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112. (405) 949-9984.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 19, 2024: a recertification inspection.

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 19, 2024: recertification inspection9 deficiencies
  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 416 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan included updated required information related to the staff contact information for the agency for all patients and staff. Findings: A review of emergency preparedness records showed no updated Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan which included current staff contact information for the agency. On 01/19/24 at 2:00 p.m., Staff B stated the Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan was not updated to include contact information for current staff of the agency.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level.

  • Patient/Payer Will No Longer Pay For Services

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Patient/payer will no longer pay for services CFR(s): 484.50(d)(2) The patient or payer will no longer pay for the services provided by the HHA; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure advance beneficiary notice and/or HHCOC notice prior to discharge from agency services were provided to two (Patients #12 and 15) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #12 A review of the clinical record showed no advance notice of discharge or home health change of care notice prior to discharge from the agency on 11/06/23 for non-compliance. On 01/19/24 at 2:35 p.m., Staff B stated there was no ABN or HHCOC notices in the clinical record for patient #12 prior to being discharged from the agency for non-compliance. Patient #15 A review of the clinical record showed no advance notice of discharge or home health change of care notice prior to discharge from the agency on 11/12/23 for non-compliance. On 01/19/24 at 2:35 p.m., Staff B stated there was no ABN or HHCOC notices in the clinical record for patient #15 prior to being discharged from the agency for non-compliance.”

    Rule G0456. Element-level.

  • Patient Refuses Services

    The inspectors’ words, 388 words

    “Patient refuses services CFR(s): 484.50(d)(4) The patient refuses services, or elects to be transferred or discharged; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview the agency failed to: 1. Educate the patient on potential health outcomes related to refusal of and/or missed visits prior to the patient’s discharge from HHA services for noncompliance and; 2. Notify the physician of the patient’s continued refusal of and/or missed visits prior to the patient’s discharge from HHA services for noncompliance for two (Patients #12 and 15) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #12 A review of a POC for 09/10/23 to 11/08/23 showed a SN visit frequency of one time a week for nine weeks. A review of visit notes showed missed SN visits on 09/22/23, 09/25/23, 09/28/23, 10/09/23 and on 10/19/23. Documentation showed no communication or education attempts to the patient for potential health outcomes related to refusal of and/or missed SN visits and no documentation of follow up communications to the physician of the patient’s continued refusal of and/or missed SN visits prior to the patient’s discharge from HHA services for noncompliance. On 01/19/24 at 2:43 p.m., Staff B stated documentation showed no: 1. Attempts to educate the patient of potential health outcomes related to refusal of and/or missed SN visits and; 2. No physician notification of the patient’s continued refusal of and/or missed SN visits prior to the patient’s discharge from HHA services for noncompliance. Patient #15 A review of a POC for 10/04/23 to 12/02/23 showed a SN visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks. A review of visit notes showed missed SN visits on 10/26/23, 10/31/23, 11/14/23, 11/22/23, 11/24/23 and on 11/25/23. Documentation showed no communication or education attempts to the patient for potential health outcomes related to refusal of and/or missed SN visits and no documentation of follow up communications to the physician of the patient’s continued refusal of and/or missed SN visits prior to the patient’s discharge from HHA services for noncompliance. On 01/19/24 at 2:55 p.m., Staff B stated documentation showed no: 1. Attempts to educate the patient of potential health outcomes related to refusal of and/or missed SN visits and; 2. No physician notification of the patient’s continued refusal of and/or missed SN visits prior to the patient’s discharge from HHA services for noncompliance.”

    Rule G0460. Element-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure medication regimen changes were updated on the medication profile for one (Patient #5) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #5 A review of the plan of care dated 11/27/23 to 01/25/24 documented a principal diagnosis of laceration to left lower leg. A physician’s order dated 12/20/23 documented Bactrim DS (an antibiotic) twice daily times for five days, Keflex (an antibiotic) 500 milligrams three times a day for five days for infection. A review of the clinical record showed no update to the medication profile for the medication Bactrim DS and Keflex and showed no review for potential/adverse effects, drug reactions, side effects, interactions and duplicate drug therapy On 01/19/24 at 2:20 p.m., Staff B stated the medication profile for Patient #5 should have been added to the medication profile and reviewed for potential/adverse effects, drug reactions, side effects, interactions and duplicate drug therapy.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Communication With All Physicians

    The inspectors’ words, 299 words

    “Communication with all physicians CFR(s): 484.60(d)(1) Assure communication with all physicians or allowed practitioners involved in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure care was coordinated between the agency and physician for one (Patient #4) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of a plan of care dated 12/18/23 to 02/15/24 documented a primary diagnosis of stage 2 pressure ulcer and secondary diagnosis of hypertension and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and showed a physician reporting parameter of weight gain of 2 pounds in day or 5 pounds in one week. Documentation showed an SN visit note dated 12/21/23 showed a weight of 265 pounds, the vital sign alert was auto-faxed to the physician with no follow up; an SN visit note dated on 12/29/23 showed a weight of 265 pounds, the vital sign alert was auto-faxed to the physician with no follow up; a SN visit note dated 01/03/24 showed a weight of 268 pounds, the vital sign alert was auto-faxed to the physician with no follow up; and an SN visit note dated on 01/09/24 showed a weight of 270 pounds, the vital sign alert was auto-faxed to the physician with no follow up. Documentation showed no direct physician coordination of care communications as follow up to the changes in the patient’s weight status, no changes in orders and the patient was admitted to inpatient hospital services for exacerbation of congestive heart failure.. On 01/19/24 at 2:15 p.m., Staff B stated the weight gain vital sign alerts for patient #5 that were auto-faxed by the computer system should have had follow up coordination of care communications to ensure the physician was aware of the patient’s change in weight status.”

    Rule G0602. Element-level.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 488 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: 1. SN conducted visit frequency as ordered on the POC for four (Patients #1, 4, 10 and #12) of 17 patients and; 2. SN conducted wound site care ordered on the POCs for one (Patient #4) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the POC dated 12/16/23 to 02/13/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency one time a week for one week, two times a week for four weeks, then one time a week for five weeks. Documentation showed during the weeks of 12/17/23 to 12/23/23 SN visit was conducted on 12/20/23 (two visit ordered, one visits conducted), 12/24/23 to 12/30/23 (two visit ordered, no visits conducted), 12/31/23 to 01/06/24 SN visit was conducted on 01/06/23 (two visit ordered, one visits conducted). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of care, physician notification or change in orders. On 01/19/24 at 2:10 p.m., Staff B stated SN should have conducted SN visits as ordered in the POC. Patient #4 A review of the POC dated 12/18/23 to 02/15/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency two times a week for nine weeks for SN to assess, instruct caregiver and perform wound site care to buttock of cleanse with normal saline, apply barrier cream and cover with Optifoam. Documentation showed during the weeks of 12/24/23 to 12/30/23 a SN visit was conducted on 12/29/23 (two visit ordered, one visits conducted) and during SN visits conducted on 12/20/23 and 12/21/23 SN documentation showed no wound site assessment or care to buttock was conducted. Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of care, physician notification or change in orders. On 01/19/24 at 2:15 p.m., Staff B stated SN should have conducted SN visits as ordered in the POC. Patient #10 A review of the POC dated 11/14/23 to 01/12/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency one time a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed during the weeks of 12/17/23 to 12/23/23 (one visit ordered, no visits conducted), 12/24/23 to 12/30/23 (two visit ordered, no visits conducted). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of care, physician notification or change in orders. On 01/19/24 at 2:25 p.m., Staff B stated SN should have conducted SN visits as ordered in the POC. Patient #12 A review of the POC dated 09/10/23 to 11/08/23 showed orders for SN visit frequency one time a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed during the weeks of 10/08/23 to 10/15/23 (one visit ordered, no visits conducted) and 10/29/23 to 11/04/23 (one visit ordered, no visits conducted). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of care, physician notification or change in orders. On 01/19/24 at 2:35 p.m., Staff B stated SN should have conducted SN visits as ordered in the POC.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level.

  • Participate In The Hha’S Qapi Program;

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Participate in the HHA’s QAPI program; CFR(s): 484.75(b)(8) Participation in the HHA’s QAPI program; and This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure multi-disciplined skilled professional staff were available to participate and provide input into the agency’s QAPI program for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative records showed no multi-disciplined skilled professional staff participation in QAPI activities for calendar years 2022 and 2023. On 01/19/24 at 2:00 p.m., Staff B stated documentation showed no evidence of multi-disciplined skilled professional staff participation in ongoing QAPI program activities for the agency for calendar years 2022 and 2023.”

    Rule G0720. Element-level.

  • Interventions And Patient Response

    The inspectors’ words, 420 words

    “Interventions and patient response CFR(s): 484.110(a)(2) All interventions, including medication administration, treatments, and services, and responses to those interventions; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure SN visit note documentation was completed within 24 hours (agency timeline requirements) for four (Patients #1, 5, 15 and #16) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the POC dated 12/16/23 to 02/13/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency one time a week for one week, two times a week for four weeks, then one time a week for five weeks. Documentation showed SN visit dated 01/09/24 was completed/submitted on 01/15/24. Documentation showed no coordination of care or communication of why visit note was not completed and submitted within 24 hours of the visit. On 01/19/24 at 2:10 p.m., Staff B stated non-oasis SN visit documentation for 10/06/23 was not completed within 24 hours of the visit per agency policy Patient #5 A review of the plan of care dated 11/27/23 to 01/25/24 documented a SN visit frequency of two times a week for four weeks, then one time a week for five weeks. Documentation showed SN visit dated 12/22/23 was completed/submitted on 01/04/24. Documentation showed no coordination of care or communication of why visit note was not completed and submitted within 24 hours of the visit. On 01/19/24 at 2:20 p.m., Staff B stated non-oasis SN visit documentation for 10/06/23 was not completed within 24 hours of the visit per agency policy. Patient #15 A review of a POC for 10/04/23 to 12/02/23 showed a SN visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks. Documentation showed SN visit dated 11/12/23 was completed/submitted on 12/06/23. Documentation showed no coordination of care or communication of why visit note was not completed and submitted within 24 hours of the visit. On 01/19/24 at 2:55 p.m., Staff B stated non-oasis SN visit documentation for 10/06/23 was not completed within 24 hours of the visit per agency policy. Patient #16 A review of the POC dated 10/02/23 to 11/30/23 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed SN visit dated 10/06/23 was completed/submitted on 10/09/23. Documentation showed no coordination of care or communication of why visit note was not completed and submitted within 24 hours of the visit. On 01/19/24 at 2:58 p.m., Staff B stated non-oasis SN visit documentation for 10/06/23 was not completed within 24 hours of the visit per agency policy.”

    Rule G1014. Element-level.

  • Discharge And Transfer Summaries

    The inspectors’ words, 273 words

    “Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interview, the agency failed to ensure a completed transfer/discharge summary was provided for two (Patients #14 and #15) of 17 patients. Findings: Patient #14 A review of the clinical record documented discharge from the agency on 08/23/23 for non-compliance. Documentation showed discharge summary was provided to the physician on 09/05/23 (12 days after discharge). On 01/19/24 at 2:40 p.m., Staff B stated discharge summary was sent to the physician 12 days after discharge. Patient #15 A review of the clinical record documented discharge from the agency on 11/12/23 (desk discharge back dated to the date of the last SN visit) for non-compliance. Documentation showed discharge summary was provided to the physician on 12/06/23 (24 days after discharge). On 01/19/24 at 2:55 p.m., Staff B stated discharge summary was sent to the physician 24 days after discharge.”

    Rule G1022. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 19, 2024Recertification inspection9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 8, 2002.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Healthcare Innovations in Home Services LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 30, 2013.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer, 0%); Ananth P Mohan (corporate director); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Katie Klopfenstein (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Katie L Monastiere (corporate officer); Joshua Gotbaum (corporate director); Harvey Tepner (corporate director); Lori Clark (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Angel Stansbury (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Airjaguar Holdco, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Airjaguar Acquisition, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
HCI Holdings CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2012
Healthcare Innovations Private Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2013
Bw Homecare Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Hci Parent Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2013
Elara Holdings, L.L.C.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 30, 2019
Jhh/Cima Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2013
Healthcare Innovations in Home Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 30, 2013
Hci In-Home Services Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2013
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Bw Nhhc Co-Invest, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies42.85%Jul 1, 2023
Kia Ix (Hh) Investor, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies40.27%Jul 1, 2023
Kelso Hh Co-Investment, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies19.2%Dec 30, 2019
Kelso Investment Associates Ix, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.68%Dec 30, 2019
Blue WOLF Capital Fund III L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies11.13%Jul 1, 2023
Bw III Homecare Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies11.13%Jul 1, 2023
Stepstone H Opportunities Fund, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.78%Dec 30, 2019
Stepstone K Strategic Opportunities Fund II L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies5.48%Dec 30, 2019
Ironsides Direct Investment Fund IV, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies4.94%Dec 30, 2019
Uss-Constitution Co-Investment Fund II, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies4.94%Dec 30, 2019
Kep VI LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies4.52%Dec 30, 2019

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (336 surveys completed): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 70% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate81.80% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.52% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.01% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 60 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73112, where this agency’s office is, 51 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.