Hearth Record

Green Country Home Care, Inc.

A home health agency in Poteau, Oklahoma 74953

1207 N. Paul Mathis Dr., Poteau, Oklahoma 74953. (918) 426-1005.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 25, 2025: a recertification inspection.

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 25, 2025: recertification inspection13 deficiencies
  • Organization And Administration Of Services

    The inspectors’ words, 269 words

    “Organization and administration of services CFR(s): 484.105 Condition of participation: Organization and administration of services. The HHA must organize, manage, and administer its resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable functional capacity, including providing optimal care to achieve the goals and outcomes identified in the patient’s plan of care, for each patient’s medical, nursing, and rehabilitative needs. The HHA must assure that administrative and supervisory functions are not delegated to another agency or organization, and all services not furnished directly are monitored and controlled. The HHA must set forth, in writing, its organizational structure, including lines of authority, and services furnished. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the governing body provided oversight of the agency’s Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program for all patients and staff. This failed practice placed all employees and 38 current patients at risk for unidentified health and safety issues. See G0942 Based on record review and interview, the governing body failed to ensure professional direction was provided in the agency’s daily functions by an appointed administrator for all patients and staff. This failed practice placed all employees and 38 current patients at risk of poor oversight of their health care needs. See G0946 Based on record review and interview, the governing body failed to ensure a pre-designated person was available, in the absence of the administrator, to provide continuity to the agency for all employees and patients. This failed practice placed all employees and 38 current patients at risk of necessary services not being available or provided. See G0954 .”

    Rule G0940. Condition-level.

  • Develop Ep Plan, Review And Update Annually

    The inspectors’ words, 299 words

    “Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually CFR(s): 484.102(a) §403.748(a), §416.54(a), §418.113(a), §441.184(a), §460.84(a), §482.15(a), §483.73(a), §483.475(a), §484.102(a), §485.68(a), §485.542(a), §485.625(a), §485.727(a), §485.920(a), §486.360(a), §491.12(a), §494.62(a). The [facility] must comply with all applicable Federal, State and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [facility] must develop establish and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section. The emergency preparedness program must include, but not be limited to, the following elements: (a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [reviewed], and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do all of the following: * [For hospitals at §482.15 and CAHs at §485.625(a):] Emergency Plan. The [hospital or CAH] must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [hospital or CAH] must develop and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section, utilizing an all-hazards approach. * [For LTC Facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. * [For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(a):] Emergency Plan. The ESRD facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [evaluated], and updated at least every 2 years. . This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to maintain a patient centered Emergency Preparedness Program for all current patients and employees. Findings: A review of emergency preparedness records showed no maintenance of the Emergency Preparedness Program. No updated documents were found in the record for 2023, 2024 or 9:00 am - February 25, 2025. On 2/25/25 at 1:50 pm Staff A stated the Emergency Preparedness Program records did not reflect updates in several years.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 396 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to update the Communication Plan for the Emergency Preparedness Program for all current patients and employees. A review of emergency preparedness records showed no updates for staff or patients. On 2/25/25 at 1:50 pm Staff A stated the Communication Plan was not updated and did not contain all current patients or updated employee information.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level.

  • Ep Training And Testing

    The inspectors’ words, 470 words

    “EP Training and Testing CFR(s): 484.102(d) §403.748(d), §416.54(d), §418.113(d), §441.184(d), §460.84(d), §482.15(d), §483.73(d), §483.475(d), §484.102(d), §485.68(d), §485.542(d), §485.625(d), §485.727(d), §485.920(d), §486.360(d), §491.12(d), §494.62(d). *[For RNCHIs at §403.748, ASCs at §416.54, Hospice at §418.113, PRTFs at §441.184, PACE at §460.84, Hospitals at §482.15, HHAs at §484.102, CORFs at §485.68, REHs at §485.542, CAHs at §486.625, “Organizations” under 485.727, CMHCs at §485.920, OPOs at §486.360, and RHC/FHQs at §491.12:] (d) Training and testing. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(d):] (d) Training and testing. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least annually. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(d):] Training and testing. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. The ICF/IID must meet the requirements for evacuation drills and training at §483.470(i). *[For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(d):] Training, testing, and orientation. The dialysis facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training, testing and patient orientation program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training, testing and orientation program must be evaluated and updated at every 2 years. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure emergency drills were completed at least bi-annually for all current patients and all employees. Findings: A review of Emergency Preparedness and administrative records showed no annual Emergency Preparedness Tabletop Exercise, no community-based exercise and no full-scale exercise to demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures. On 02/25/25 at 1:50 pm, Staff A stated they did not have documented drills since 2019.”

    Rule E0036. Standard-level.

  • Performance Improvement Projects

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Performance improvement projects CFR(s): 484.65(d)(1)(2) Standard: Performance improvement projects. Beginning July 13, 2018 HHAs must conduct performance improvement projects. (1) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the HHA’s services and operations. (2) The HHA must document the quality improvement projects undertaken, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to document/create a PIP for 2024 through their QAPI Program for all employees and 38 current patients. Findings: A review of records showed no PIP initiated or documented for 2024. On 02/25/25 at 2:16 pm, Staff A stated they were unable to provide a PIP for 2024.”

    Rule G0658. Standard-level.

  • Executive Responsibilities For Qapi

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Executive responsibilities for QAPI CFR(s): 484.65(e)(1)(2)(3)(4) Standard: Executive responsibilities. The HHA’s governing body is responsible for ensuring the following: (1) That an ongoing program for quality improvement and patient safety is defined, implemented, and maintained; (2) That the HHA-wide quality assessment and performance improvement efforts address priorities for improved quality of care and patient safety, and that all improvement actions are evaluated for effectiveness; (3) That clear expectations for patient safety are established, implemented, and maintained; and (4) That any findings of fraud or waste are appropriately addressed. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the QAPI program was approved by the governing body for all current patients and all employees. Findings: A review of administrative records showed no governing body documentation and no ongoing governing body oversight of the QAPI Program for 2024. On 02/25/25 at 2:55 pm, Staff A stated, they had no Governing Body records for 2024.”

    Rule G0660. Standard-level.

  • Competency Evaluation

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “Competency evaluation CFR(s): 484.80(c)(1)(2)(3) Standard: Competency evaluation. An individual may furnish home health services on behalf of an HHA only after that individual has successfully completed a competency evaluation program as described in this section. (1) The competency evaluation must address each of the subjects listed in paragraph (b)(3) of this section. Subject areas specified under paragraphs (b)(3)(i), (iii), (ix), (x), and (xi) of this section must be evaluated by observing an aide’s performance of the task with a patient or pseudo-patient. The remaining subject areas may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination, or after observation of a home health aide with a patient, or with a pseudo-patient as part of a simulation. (2) A home health aide competency evaluation program may be offered by any organization, except as specified in paragraph (f) of this section. (3) The competency evaluation must be performed by a registered nurse in consultation with other skilled professionals, as appropriate. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure two (Staff E and F) of two CHHAs had a competency evaluation. Findings: Staff E A review of personnel records showed no competency evaluation in the personnel record. Staff F A review of personnel records showed no competency evaluation in the personnel record. On 02/25/25 at 1:45 pm, Staff A stated there was no competency evaluation in the personnel records for Staff E and F.”

    Rule G0768. Standard-level.

  • 12 Hours Inservice Every 12 Months

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “12 hours inservice every 12 months CFR(s): 484.80(d) Standard: In-service training. A home health aide must receive at least l2 hours of in-service training during each 12-month period. In-service training may occur while an aide is furnishing care to a patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure CHHA completion of 12 hours of annual training for two (Staff E and F) of two CHHAs. Findings: Staff E A review of personnel records showed six hours of training in 2024. Staff F A review of personnel records showed six hours of training in 2024. On 02/25/25 at 1:45 am, Staff A stated Staff E and F had not completed the 12 hours of required training for 2024.”

    Rule G0774. Standard-level.

  • Governing Body

    The inspectors’ words, 150 words

    “Governing body CFR(s): 484.105(a) Standard: Governing body. A governing body (or designated persons so functioning) must assume full legal authority and responsibility for the agency’s overall management and operation, the provision of all home health services, fiscal operations, review of the agency’s budget and its operational plans, and its quality assessment and performance improvement program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the governing body provided oversight of the agency’s Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Program for all patients and staff. This failed practice placed all employees and 38 current patients at risk for unidentified health and safety issues. Findings: A review of administrative records showed no governing body documentation and no ongoing governing body oversight of the QAPI Program for 2024. On 02/25/25 at 1:55 pm, Staff A stated they had no Governing Body records for 2024.”

    Rule G0942. Standard-level.

  • All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the correct wound care orders for one (Pt #2) of seven patients. Findings: A review of the POC dated 12/02/24 - 01/30/25 showed orders on page 3 under Medical Necessity for wound care three times a week. On Page 4 under patient centered Intervention documentation showed orders for the caregiver to perform wound care daily and prn. On 02/25/25 at 2:15 pm, Staff A stated the orders should have read three times a week not daily.”

    Rule G0576. Element-level.

  • Preparing Clinical Notes

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a skilled nurse completed clinical notes for one (Pt. #3) of seven patients. Findings: Pt #3 A review of the POC dated 01/23/25 - 03/23/25 showed orders for skilled nurse visits once a week for eight weeks effective 01/27/25. Clinical records showed skilled nurse visits made on 02/04/25, 02/13/25, and 02/17/25 were “not started” (undocumented). On 02/25/25 at 2:40 pm, Staff A stated the nurses notes for 02/04/25, 02/13/25, and 02/17/25 were not completed for Pt #3 at the time of record review.”

    Rule G0716. Element-level.

  • Administrator Appointed By Governing Body

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Administrator appointed by governing body CFR(s): 484.105(b)(1)(i) Standard: Administrator. The administrator must: (i) Be appointed by and report to the governing body; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the governing body failed to ensure professional direction was provided in the agency’s daily functions by an appointed administrator for all patients and staff. This failed practice placed all employees and 38 current patients at risk of poor oversight of their health care needs. Findings: A review of the governing body records showed no appointment of an administrator. 02/25/25 at 2:45 pm Staff A stated she thought a new administrator had been appointed by the governing body.”

    Rule G0946. Element-level.

  • Ensures Qualified Pre-Designated Person

    The inspectors’ words, 141 words

    “Ensures qualified pre-designated person CFR(s): 484.105(b)(2) When the administrator is not available, a qualified, pre-designated person, who is authorized in writing by the administrator and the governing body, assumes the same responsibilities and obligations as the administrator. The pre-designated person may be the clinical manager as described in paragraph (c) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the governing body failed to ensure a pre-designated person was available to provide continuity to the agency, in the absence of the administrator, for all employees and patients. This failed practice placed all employees and 38 current patients at risk of necessary services not being available or provided. Findings: A review of governing body documents showed no appointment of an agency administrator. 02/25/25 at 2:45 pm Staff A stated there is no current administrator.”

    Rule G0954. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 25, 2025Recertification inspection13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 27, 1997.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Med Corp Health Services Inc. owns 100% directly since Apr 10, 1998.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Alfred Ezell (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Alfred Ezell (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Alfred Ezell (corporate officer, 50%); Kim Ezell (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Kim Ezell (corporate officer, 50%); Alfred Ezell (corporate director); Marianna Casebolt (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Kim Ezell (owns 5% or more directly); Kim Ezell (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Med Corp Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Apr 10, 1998

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate56.72% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.13% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74953, where this agency’s office is, 19 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 1.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.