Hearth Record

Ardent Home Health Care Agency Corp

A home health agency in Las Vegas, Nevada 89102

4412 W Charleston Blvd #a, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102. (702) 476-5258.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 31, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 31, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Plan Based On All Hazards Risk Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 416 words

    “Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment CFR(s): 484.102(a)(1)-(2) §403.748(a)(1)-(2), §416.54(a)(1)-(2), §418.113(a)(1)-(2), §441.184(a)(1)-(2), §460.84(a)(1)-(2), §482.15(a)(1)-(2), §483.73(a)(1)-(2), §483.475(a)(1)-(2), §484.102(a)(1)-(2), §485.68(a)(1)-(2), §485.542(a)(1)-(2), §485.625(a)(1)-(2), §485.727(a)(1)-(2), §485.920(a)(1)-(2), §486.360(a)(1)-(2), §491.12(a)(1)-(2), §494.62(a)(1)-(2) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following:] (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach.* (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. * [For Hospices at §418.113(a):] Emergency Plan. The Hospice must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing residents. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(a):] Emergency Plan. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing clients. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and review of the facility’s Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP), the agency failed to ensure the EPP policies were based on an all hazards-based facility and/or community risk assessment. This failure had the potential to affect the current 43 patients receiving care provided by the agency as well as all agency staff. Findings include: Review of the facility’s EPP on 01/31/25 at 4:00 PM with the Administrator, revealed the EPP policies were not developed on an all hazards-based facility and/or community risk assessment. During an interview with the Administrator on 01/31/25 at 4:15 PM, he confirmed there was no hazard risk assessment in the EPP.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 224 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure the timely submission of OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) to IQIES (Internet Quality and Improvement and Evaluation System). The failure had the potential to affect all 43 patients receiving services from the HHA who require evaluation and care. Findings include: The facility’s OASIS submission data for calendar year 2024 was reviewed and revealed two out of a total of 383 assessments were coded as being transmitted to IQIES more than 30 days late during that time period. This resulted in an error code of -3330 (late submission) for 0.32% of all assessments submitted in the 2024 calendar year. During an interview on 01/31/25 at 1:00 PM, the Administrator stated the staff member who was responsible for the data transmission was not available for interview, but stated had transmitted data when the staff member was not available. The Administrator was not able to say why the agency’s OASIS data was transmitted late.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 379 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure the Registered Nurse (RN) conducted a medication reconciliation during homecare visits for one of five sampled patients (Patient (P) 2) reviewed for medication reconciliation. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 43 patients receiving services from the HHA. Findings include: Observation during a homecare visit performed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 on 01/30/25 at 2:00 PM revealed that P2’s Medication List, found in P2’s electronic medical record (EMR), did not accurately reflect the medications being administered to the patient in his/her group home. Medications observed in P2’s home, and reflected as being given in the patient’s home Medication Administration Record (MAR) included Loperamide (an antidiarrheal medication) 4 milligrams (MG) with each loose stool not to exceed 16 MG in 24 hours, Pantoprazole (an acid reducing medication) 40 MG twice daily, Alprazolam (an antianxiety medication) 0.25 MG twice daily as needed, and Risperdal (an antipsychotic medication) 1 MG daily. Review of the HHA’s Patient Medication Profile, found in the EMR and dated 01/04/25 through 03/04/25, revealed orders that did not indicate the Loperamide, and indicated P2 was to receive Pantoprazole 40 MG once daily, Alprazolam 0.25 MG three times daily as needed, and Risperdal 1 MG twice daily. The medications administered in the home did not match the orders - in the HHA’s EMR. During an interview on 01/30/24 at 2:30 PM, P2’s group home caregiver confirmed P2’s current prescribed medications and confirmed P2 was being given the medications indicated on the group home MAR routinely per physician’s order. During an interview on 01/30/25 at 3:15 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed P2 was receiving routine skilled nursing visits and indicated that medications were expected to be reconciled by the nurse at every visit. The DON indicated the expectation was that the medications being administered to residents in their homes would match the HHA’s medication order set.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 31, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 25, 2017.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Victor Tomaneng (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Victor Tomaneng (corporate officer, 100%); Victor Tomaneng (corporate director, 100%); Victor Tomaneng (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Victor Tomaneng (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate84.01% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate13.98% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.14% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 172 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89102, where this agency’s office is, 133 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 1.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.