Hearth Record

Harmony Home Health

A home health agency in Las Vegas, Nevada 89102

2820 W Charleston Blvd, Las Vegas, Nevada 89102. (702) 880-7525.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 15, 2025: a complaint and recertification inspection.

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 15, 2025: complaint and recertification inspection8 deficiencies
  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 491 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and review of the facility’s Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP), the Agency failed to maintain a current list of names and contact information in an “Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan” that included all facility staff members, patient physicians and providers, and all entities providing services to the agency under arrangement. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the 101 patients receiving care from the agency. Findings include: Review of the facility’s EPP on 05/15/25 at 1:30 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the EPP did not contain an effective communication plan, including accurate identification of all the agency’s staff and their contact information. In an interview on 05/15/25 at 1:45 PM, the DON confirmed many of the staff names and contact numbers on the agency’s communication plan were not accurate. The DON confirmed the contact information had not been updated since the emergency plan was last reviewed by the agency’s governing board on 11/22/23.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Primary/Alternate Means For Communication

    The inspectors’ words, 335 words

    “Primary/Alternate Means for Communication CFR(s): 484.102(c)(3) §403.748(c)(3), §416.54(c)(3), §418.113(c)(3), §441.184(c)(3), §460.84(c)(3), §482.15(c)(3), §483.73(c)(3), §483.475(c)(3), §484.102(c)(3), §485.68(c)(3), §485.542(c)(3), §485.625(c)(3), §485.727(c)(3), §485.920(c)(3), §486.360(c)(3), §491.12(c)(3), §494.62(c)(3). [(c) The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following: (3) Primary and alternate means for communicating with the following: (i) [Facility] staff. (ii) Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(c):] (3) Primary and alternate means for communicating with the ICF/IID’s staff, Federal, State, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and review of the facility’s Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP), the Agency failed to maintain a current method of alternate communication with staff and outside agencies in the event the usual methods of communication were not available during a disaster. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the 101 patients receiving care from the agency. Findings include: Review of the facility’s EPP on 05/15/25 at 1:30 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the EPP, most recently reviewed by the agency’s Governing Board on 11/22/23, indicated a HAM (amateur radio) radio system would be used for communication with staff and outside resources in the event the usual methods of communication were not available during a disaster. Observations, conducted at the agency’s office on 05/15/25 at 1:15 PM of available resources to be used during a disaster, revealed nothing to indicate the agency had access to a HAM radio. In an interview on 05/15/25 at 1:45 PM, the DON confirmed the agency did not have access to a HAM radio. The DON stated this resource had not yet been put into place. The DON stated all resources listed in the agency’s EPP were expected to be available during a potential disaster, including the HAM radio indicated in the current EPP.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Ep Testing Requirements

    The inspectors’ words, 2,084 words

    “EP Testing Requirements CFR(s): 484.102(d)(2) §416.54(d)(2), §418.113(d)(2), §441.184(d)(2), §460.84(d)(2), §482.15(d)(2), §483.73(d)(2), §483.475(d)(2), §484.102(d)(2), §485.68(d)(2), §485.542(d)(2), §485.625(d)(2), §485.727(d)(2), §485.920(d)(2), §491.12(d)(2), §494.62(d)(2). *[For ASCs at §416.54, CORFs at §485.68, REHs at §485.542, OPO, “Organizations” under §485.727, CMHCs at §485.920, RHCs/FQHCs at §491.12, and ESRD Facilities at §494.62]: (2) Testing. The [facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan annually. The [facility] must do all of the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based every 2 years; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct a facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the [facility] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the actual event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise at least every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For Hospices at 418.113(d):] (2) Testing for hospices that provide care in the patient’s home. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community based every 2 years; or (A) When a community based exercise is not accessible, conduct an individual facility based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospital is exempt from engaging in its next required full scale community-based exercise or individual facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (3) Testing for hospices that provide inpatient care directly. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospice is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop led by a facilitator that includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the hospice’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the hospice’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For PRFTs at §441.184(d), Hospitals at §482.15(d), CAHs at §485.625(d):] (2) Testing. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an [additional] annual exercise or and that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For PACE at §460.84(d):] (2) Testing. The PACE organization must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The PACE organization must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the PACE experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the PACE is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the PACE’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the PACE’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(d):] (2) The [LTC facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year, including unannounced staff drills using the emergency procedures. The [LTC facility, ICF/IID] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise. (B) If the [LTC facility] facility experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the LTC facility is exempt from engaging its next required a full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [LTC facility] facility’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [LTC facility] facility’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(d)]: (2) Testing. The ICF/IID must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year. The ICF/IID must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or. (B) If the ICF/IID experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the ICF/IID is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the ICF/IID’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the ICF/IID’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For HHAs at §484.102] (d)(2) Testing. The HHA must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The HHA must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or. (B) If the HHA experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the HHA is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the HHA’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the HHA’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For OPOs at §486.360] (d)(2) Testing. The OPO must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The OPO must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise or workshop at least annually. A tabletop exercise is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. If the OPO experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the OPO is exempt from engaging in its next required testing exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Analyze the OPO’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [RNHCI’s and OPO’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[ RNCHIs at §403.748]: (d)(2) Testing. The RNHCI must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The RNHCI must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise at least annually. A tabletop exercise is a group discussion led by a facilitator, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (ii) Analyze the RNHCI’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the RNHCI’s emergency plan, as needed. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP) review and interview, the Agency failed to participate in a community-wide functional exercise at least every two years. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 101 patients receiving services from the agency. Findings include: Review of the agency’s “Emergency Preparedness Disaster Plan,” dated 11/22/23, failed to reveal documentation to show the agency participated in a community-wide functional exercise every two years. Review of the EPP revealed no current policy to indicate when and how the facility was to perform biannual EPP functional exercises. During an interview on 05/15/25 at 1:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the agency had not participated in a community-wide functional exercise at least every two years. The DON was unable to provide documentation to show that any exercise had ever been performed.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 205 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure the timely submission of OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) to IQIES (Internet Quality and Improvement and Evaluation System). The deficient practice had the potential to affect all 101 patients receiving services from the HHA who require evaluation and care. Findings include: The facility’s OASIS submission data for calendar year 2024 was reviewed and revealed nine out of a total of 49 assessments were coded as being transmitted to IQIES more than 30 days late during that time period. This resulted in an error code of -3330 (late submission) for 18.37% of all assessments submitted in the 2024 calendar year. During an interview on 05/15/25 at 1:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed some OASIS submissions were likely transmitted late due to nursing staff not locking their assessments of patients on time.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Be Free From Abuse

    The inspectors’ words, 307 words

    “Be free from abuse CFR(s): 484.50(c)(2) Be free from verbal, mental, sexual, and physical abuse, including injuries of unknown source, neglect and misappropriation of property; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure the agency completed a criminal background check for one employee out of a total of 10 sampled employee records (Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA1) upon hire and prior to the employee working directly with patients. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 101 patients receiving services from the HHA. Findings include: The agency’s “Personnel Records Policy,” revised 02/2024 read, “. . . Personnel files will be established and maintained for all staff . . . The personnel record or personnel information for an employee will include, but not be limited to, the following: criminal history check, if required by law; and National Sex Offender check; and OIG’s (Officer of Inspector General’s) Exclusion list.” Review of PTA 1’s employee record revealed PTA 1 was hired by the agency on 05/10/24. The record indicated PTA 1’s initial background check was not completed until 05/23/24 (almost two weeks after the PTA 1 began working with the agency and after PTA 1 began seeing patients independently in their homes to provide services). During an interview on 05/15/25 at 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the agency was not able to provide evidence to show a criminal background check had been completed for PTA 1 after their hire and prior to PTA 1 working directly with patients. The DON confirmed PTA 1 was currently employed with the facility and was providing direct care and treatment for patients. The DON stated the expectation was that criminal background checks would be completed for all staff prior to staff working directly with patients.”

    Rule G0430. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 353 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) conducted a medication reconciliation during homecare visits for one of five sampled patients (Patient (P) 1) reviewed for medication reconciliation. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 101 patients receiving services from the HHA. Findings include: Observation during a homecare visit performed by Physical Therapist (PT) 1 on 05/13/25 at 4:00 PM revealed that P1’s “Medication List,” found in P1’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR), did not accurately reflect the medications being administered to the patient in the group home. Medications found in P1’s home and reflected as being given in the patient’s home Medication Administration Record (MAR) included Vitamin B12 2000 Micrograms (mcg) by mouth daily, Vitamin C 1000 Milligrams (mg) by mouth daily, and Vitamin D3 4000 International Units (IUs) by mouth daily. The Agency’s “Patient Medication Profile,” found in the EMR and dated 05/13/25, revealed orders that indicated P1 was to receive Vitamin B12 1000 mcg by mouth daily, Vitamin C 500 mg by mouth daily, and Vitamin D3 2000 IUs by mouth daily. The medications administered in the home did not match the orders in place in the Agency’s EMR. During an interview on 05/13/24 at 4:30 PM, P1’s group home caregiver confirmed P1’s current prescribed medications and confirmed P1 was being given the medications indicated on the group home MAR routinely per physician’s order. During an interview on 05/15/25 at 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed P1 was receiving weekly skilled nursing visits and indicated that medications were expected to be reconciled by the nurse at every visit. The DON stated the expectation was that the medications being administered to residents in their homes should match the Agency’s medication order set.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 301 words

    “All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure that a physician’s order for routine central intravenous (IV) catheter line dressing changes to be performed by skilled nursing staff was in place and current for one Patient (P) P7 of a total of 10 sampled patients reviewed during the survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 101 patients receiving services from the HHA who have physician’s orders in place for care. Findings include: Review of the agency’s “Physician’s Plan of Care – CMS 485 and Physician/Practitioners Orders Policy,” revised 02/2024 revealed, “Skilled nursing and other home health services will be in accordance with a Plan of Care based on the patient’s diagnosis and assessment of immediate and long-range needs and resources. Each plan of care must be signed and dated by the physician/allowed practitioner . . . The individualized plan of care must specify the care and services necessary to meet patient-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment.” Review of P7’s medical record revealed no current orders were in place for P7’s central IV line dressing changes. Review of the patient’s record revealed the central IV catheter dressing was being changed by skilled nursing staff with each weekly nursing visit. During an interview on 05/15/25 at 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no current order in place in P7’s record for the central IV catheter dressing changes. The DON stated the expectation was an order would be in place for all nursing care provided for patients, including P7’s central IV catheter dressing changes.”

    Rule G0576. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Reviewed, Revised By Physician Every 60 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 588 words

    “Reviewed, revised by physician every 60 days CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The individualized plan of care must be reviewed and revised by the physician or allowed practitioner who is responsible for the home health plan of care and the HHA as frequently as the patient’s condition or needs require, but no less frequently than once every 60 days, beginning with the start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure physician’s orders/plan of care were reviewed and signed timely at least every 60 days by the Patient’s physician for three of 10 sampled patients (Patients (P) P1, P4, and P6) reviewed during the survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 101 patients receiving services from the HHA. Findings include: Review of the agency’s Physician’s Plan of Care – CMS 485 and Physician/Practitioners Orders Policy,” revised 02/2024, revealed, “. . . Skilled nursing and other home health services will be in accordance with a Plan of Care based on the patient’s diagnosis and assessment of immediate and long-range needs and resources. Each plan of care must be signed and dated by the physician/allowed practitioner . . .” 1. Review of P1’s medical record revealed the patient’s CMS 485 (Home Health Certification and Plan of Care) was most recently initiated for continuation of home health services for the 60-day period of 03/18/25 through 05/16/25. The document indicated P1 was to receive skilled nursing and physical therapy services throughout the certification period. Review of the record revealed P1 was receiving services according to the plan of care (CMS 485), however there was no evidence to show the document had been reviewed and signed by the patient’s physician to validate the patient’s need for services and establish orders for the patient to receive the services. 2. Review of P4’s medical record revealed the patient’s CMS 485 was most recently initiated for continuation of home health services for the 60-day period of 04/04/25 through 06/02/25. The document indicated P4 was to receive skilled nursing and physical therapy services throughout the certification period. Review of the record revealed P4 was receiving services according to the plan of care (CMS 485), however there was no evidence to show the document had been reviewed and signed by the patient’s physician to validate the patient’s need for services and establish orders for the patient to receive the services. 3. Review of P6’s medical record revealed the patient’s CMS 485 was most recently initiated for continuation of home health services for the 60-day period of 04/02/25 through 05/31/25. The document indicated P6 was to receive skilled nursing, physical therapy, and occupational therapy services throughout the certification period. Review of the record revealed P6 received services according to the plan of care (CMS 485), however there was no evidence to show the document had been reviewed and signed by the patient’s physician to validate the patient’s need for services and establish orders for the patient to receive the services. During an interview on 05/15/25 at 1:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the CMS 485 form had not been signed by P1, P4, or P6’s physician. The DON confirmed the CMS 485 was expected to be signed by each patient’s physician within 30 days of the initiation or continuation of services for each 60-day certification period. The DON stated physicians were often difficult to reach to ensure review and implementation of valid and current orders for patient services.”

    Rule G0588. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 15, 2025Complaint and recertification inspection8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 13, 1990.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Mark Wells (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Mark Wells (corporate officer, 50%); Mark Wells (corporate director, 50%); Mark Wells (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Mark Wells (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Annelle Anderson Wells (owns 5% or more directly, 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (41 surveys completed): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 172 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89102, where this agency’s office is, 133 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.5 of 5, and this one is rated 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.