Hearth Record

Perspective Home Health Inc.

A home health agency in Las Vegas, Nevada 89148

6045 S Fort Apache Rd Ste 110, Las Vegas, Nevada 89148. (702) 948-5095.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 6, 2026: a complaint and recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 6, 2026: complaint and recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 649 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review, policy review, and interview, the agency failed to ensure Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) records were submitted to the internet Quality Evaluation and Improvement System (iQIES) within 30 days after completion of each assessment. The deficient practice resulted in non-compliance with federal regulations that require agencies to encode and transmit OASIS records within 30 days after completion. Findings include: (For Submission Only) Review of the HHA “Error Summary Report” located with the “Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (iQIES)” reports dated 05/01/2026 revealed, the HHA had been non-compliant with CMS requirements as evidenced by the late transmissions of OASIS. Review of the iQIES agency report of “OASIS” assessments, revealed OASIS data was not transmitted to CMS within thirty days of completing the assessment for the following quarters: 120 of 690 OASIS assessments submitted during Quarter 1 of 2025, 88 of 636 OASIS assessments submitted during Quarter 3 of 2025, and 100 of 712 OASIS assessments submitted during Quarter 4 of 2025. Review of the agency’s policy titled, “Reporting of OASIS Information” dated 03/2019, approved by the Administrator and Registered Nurse/Director of Patients Care Services on 01/06/2026, revealed, “The agency will report electronically all OASIS data according to current federal and/or state requirements. Agency must encode and have the capability of transmitting OASIS data for each patient within thirty (30) days of completing any required OASIS data set assignment. The Agency will periodically conduct clinical and data entry audits to verify that collected OASIS data is consistent with reported OASIS data.” Review of the CMS “Home Health (HH) Quality Reporting Program (QRP) Quick Reference Guide” dated 04/25/2024, located at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/pac-hh-quickreferenceguide-20240425.pdf indicated, OASIS data must be transmitted within 30 days of the assessment date. During an interview on 05/05/2026 at 3:40 PM, the Administrator confirmed the OASIS data had late entries. The Administrator revealed audits were conducted on a biweekly basis to see if there were any outstanding flags for inconsistencies and ensures accurate. However, there were no documented audits. Review of the Home Health Error Summary Report, dated 05/01/2026 (from the iQIES database), revealed the agency had multiple timeframes in which OASIS were not submitted as required. According to the report, the agency submitted late OASIS records as follows: During the third quarter of Calendar Year 2025, a total of 13.8% (88 of 636) OASIS records were transmitted more than 30 days after the completion date. During the fourth quarter of Calendar Year 2025, a total of 14.0% (100 of 712) OASIS records were transmitted more than 30 days after the completion date. During the first quarter of Calendar Year 2026, a total of 17.4% (120 of 690) OASIS records were transmitted more than 30 days after the completion date. The agency’s policy, “Reporting of OASIS Information” dated 03/2019, approved by the Administrator and Director of Patient Care Services on 01/06/2026, indicated “The agency will report electronically all OASIS data according to current federal and/or state requirements. Agency must encode and have the capability of transmitting OASIS data for each patient within thirty (30) days of completing any required OASIS data set assignment. The Agency will periodically conduct clinical and data entry audits to verify that collected OASIS data is consistent with reported OASIS data.” On 05/05/2026 at 3:40 PM during an interview, the Administrator confirmed OASIS data had been entered late. The Administrator indicated audits were conducted on a bi-weekly basis to see if there were any outstanding flags for inconsistencies and to ensure accuracy. The Administrator was unable to produce documentation of any completed audits.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Hha Administrator Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 272 words

    “HHA administrator contact information CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(ii) (ii) Contact information for the HHA administrator, including the administrator’s name, business address, and business phone number in order to receive complaints. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and document review the agency failed to provide patients and/or representatives with the name of the HHA’s Administrator, the Administrator’s business address, and the Administrator’s business phone number so patients and/or representatives could voice concerns or complaints for three of three home visits with patients (Patient (P)1, P2, and P17). This deficient practice had the potential to place all patients and/or their representatives at risk of having a complaint or concern and not knowing who to speak with to voice their concerns. Findings include: Review of the HHA’s admission packet, (undated) failed to include the Administrator’s name for patients and/or their representatives to contact if they have a complaint or concern. On 05/05/2026 at 11:00 AM during a home visit, P1 revealed they were not provided with contact information for the Administrator if they had a concern or complaint. On 05/06/2026 at 2:30 PM during a home visit, P2 revealed they were not provided with contact information for the Administrator if they had a concern or complaint. On 05/06/2026 at 12:30 PM during a home visit, P17 revealed they were not provided with contact information for the Administrator if they had a concern or complaint. On 05/06/2026 at 2:30 PM, the Administrator confirmed the HHA failed to include the Administrator’s name in the admission packet for patients and/or their representatives to contact if they have a complaint or concern regarding the HHA’s care.”

    Rule G0414. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordinate Care Delivery

    The inspectors’ words, 488 words

    “Coordinate care delivery CFR(s): 484.60(d)(4) Coordinate care delivery to meet the patient’s needs, and involve the patient, representative (if any), and caregiver(s), as appropriate, in the coordination of care activities. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, record review, document review, and policy review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure coordination of care delivery was provided to 1 of 12 patients (Patient (P)6) related to infusion therapy provided by an outside service company to meet the patient’s needs. The failure to coordinate and provide oversight of the outside service had the potential to place patients at risk for negative outcomes. Findings include: P6’s “Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) Resumption of Care (ROC)” assessment dated 04/22/2025 for the certification period of 04/13/2025-06/11/2025 revealed diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, chronic pancreatitis, cholestasis (decreased bile flow), pulmonary embolism, and dehydration. The ROC “Assessment Summary” dated 04/22/2025 included from Registered Nurse (RN)4 revealed, “Received a call from patients inpatient nephrologist who stated he is ordering IV [intravenous] hydration with 1000ML [milliliters] of LR [lactated ringers-used to replace water and electrolyte loss in patients with low blood pressure] via IV to be done twice a week x [times] 4 weeks at home. Order will be faxed to the office for review.” The ROC assessment, last section, no title, following the section of “Verbal Orders” included the frequency of nursing visits, one time a week for eight weeks and one PRN (as needed), and responsibilities of the nurse regarding care and services to the patient. Administration of IV therapy was not included as a service. Nursing Progress Notes dated 04/28/2025, 05/15/2025, 05/22/2025 and 05/26/2025 did not include administration of IV therapy. The Nursing Progress Note on 06/11/2025 included “IV Therapy Administered.” A Care Coordination Plan from the (name) infusion company dated 06/09/25 provided by the Intake Coordinator revealed a delineation of responsibilities for the (name) infusion company and those to be completed by the HHA. Responsibilities of the infusion company included but not limited to “Ongoing communication/Patient Care Conferences.” There was no care coordination between 04/22/25, the date when the nephrologist first ordered IV hydration up until 06/11/25 when the first day the IV therapy was administered to P6. On 05/04/2026 at 11:00 AM, the Administrator confirmed there was no coordination of care between the infusion companies and the HHA and that P6 missed several days of ordered IV therapy. The Administrator revealed this agency performs skilled care and therapies. The Administrator did not provide policies and procedures, nor an agreement or contract with the infusion companies. The agency’s policy titled, “Coordination of Patient Care” dated 03/2019, approved by the Administrator and Registered Nurse/Director of Patients Care Services on 01/06/2026, revealed, “Integrate services, whether services are provided directly or under arrangement, to assure the identification of patient needs and factors that could affect patient safety and treatment effectiveness and the coordination of care provided by all disciplines.””

    Rule G0608. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Patients Receive Education And Training

    The inspectors’ words, 465 words

    “Patients receive education and training CFR(s): 484.60(d)(5) Ensure that each patient, and his or her caregiver(s) where applicable, receive ongoing education and training provided by the HHA, as appropriate, regarding the care and services identified in the plan of care. The HHA must provide training, as necessary, to ensure a timely discharge. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the agency failed to ensure 1 of 17 sampled patients (Patient (P)6) received education and training by the HHA regarding the procedures to follow if complications arose during intravenous (IV) infusion therapy. This had the potential to create a medical complication. Findings include: P6’s Home Health Certification and Plan of Care dated 06/09/2025 for the certification period of 06/12/2025 to 08/10/2025 included diagnoses of “encounter for change or removal of drains [biliary duct drain], chronic pancreatitis, and chronic kidney disease.” P6’s “60 Day Summary” included on the “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” dated 06/09/2025 revealed P6 was unable to safely and effectively provide their own biliary duct drain care and PICC [peripherally inserted central catheter] line care due to the location, poor compliance with proper infection control measures, poor living conditions, and hx [history] of infections when care is under patient. There was no documentation in the electronic medical record P6 could demonstrate procedures to implement in case of an emergency related to the IV infusion when left alone. On 05/06/2026 at 2:34 PM, Registered Nurse (RN)5 revealed performing a lot of teaching/education and P6 was not grasping the information. RN5 revealed staying with P6 to administer IV therapy for one to two hours, left, and returned later to disconnect P6’s IV. On 05/06/2026 at 4:54 PM the Administrator revealed there was no policy that a Nurse could not leave a patient during an IV infusion. The best practice is if the patient is able to demonstrate knowledge of emergencies related to the IV. There was no documentation that P6 demonstrated knowledge of what to do in the event of an emergency while the IV infusion was running and they were home alone. There was no documentation was provided information if they had a need while waiting for a return visit from the Nurse to unhook the IV. Coordination of patient care was not provided during the four-hour time frame when the nurse departed the home of P6 while the IV infusion was running. There was no responsible person to assist in case of an emergency. Review of the agency’s policy titled, “Coordination of Patient Care” dated 01/2026, revealed Integrate services, whether services are provided directly or under arrangement, to assure the identification of patient needs and factors that could affect patient safety and treatment effectiveness and the coordination of care provided by all disciplines.”

    Rule G0610. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 6, 2026Complaint and recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 3, 2003.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Christopher I Estiandan (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Christopher I Estiandan (corporate director, 100%); Christopher I Estiandan (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate64.17% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 158 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89148, where this agency’s office is, 124 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.