Hearth Record

Lake Norman Home Health

A home health agency in Mooresville, North Carolina 28117

170 Medical Park Road , Suite 208, Mooresville, North Carolina 28117. (704) 660-4480.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Oct 16, 2024: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 16, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 639 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, home visits, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the Plan of Care [POC] failed to include all medications the patient was using for 2 of 4 home visits [# 8 and 9]. The findings included: The policy, Plan of Care [POC] [9/1/24], was provided by the agency administrator on 10/16/24 at approximately 8:30 am. The policy stated, “...The POC includes...medications and treatments...all patient care orders...” 1. Patient # 8 had a Start of Care date of 9/16/24 with admitting diagnoses of secondary and unspecified malignant neoplasm of nodes of multiple regions, secondary malignant neoplasm of right lung, and acute diastolic [congestive] heart failure [heart doesn’t pump effectively]. The patient was hospitalized from 10/4/24-10/7/24. Review of the resumption of care [comprehensive assessment completed after in patient stay] POC included orders for PT [physical therapy] 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1, 1 time a week for 3 weeks. A joint visit was conducted with PT # 4 on 10/15/24 at 11:30 am. During the visit, a medication review was conducted using a medication profile provided by the agency. The following discrepancy was noted: The medication profile listed Omeprazole [reflux] 2o mg daily. During an interview with the caregiver, the caregiver reported the patient no longer takes the medication and “has not taking it since coming home from the hospital”. During an interview with employee # 1 on 10/16/24 at approximately 11 am, employee # 1 confirmed the POC did not include all medications the patient was taking. 2. Patient # 9 had a Start of Care date of 9/5/24 with an admitting diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 9/5/24-11/3/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 3 weeks, 1 time every 2 weeks for 4 weeks. On 1016/24 at approximately 9 am a joint visit was made with RN # 3. During the visit a medication review was conducted using a medication profile provided by the agency. The following medications were not included on the patient’s POC: Imodium [antidiarrheal] 2 mg. Take 1 tablet every 6 hours for diarrhea for up to 10 days. The bottle of medication included a start date of 3/6/23. During an interview with the patient, the patient reported she continues to use the Imodium as needed for diarrhea. Aleve PM [sleep aid]. Take 2 tablets as needed at bedtime for sleep. During an interview with the patient, the patient advised she has been taking the Aleve PM as needed to help with sleep and pain. During an interview with employee # 1 on 10/16/24 at approximately 11 am, employee # 1 confirmed the POC did not include all medications the patient was taking.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 961 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, clinical record review, and staff interviews the agency failed to change the infusion cap for 1 of 1 patient with a vascular assess device [medical device that provides access to a patient’s blood stream for administration of medications or obtain blood for lab work] [#5] in accordance with the physician’s order; and failed to flush a vascular access device with the correct amount of normal saline after obtaining a blood specimen in accordance with the physician’s order for 1 of 1 patient with a vascular access device [#5]; and failed to obtain the patient’s weight each visit in accordance with the physician’s order for 1 of 4 patients who received a home visit [#8]; and failed to obtain oxygen saturations in accordance with the physician’s order for 1 of 4 patients who received a home visit [#8]. The findings included: The policy, Physician Orders [10/1/23], was provided by the agency administrator on 10/16/24 at 8:30 am. The policy stated, “...No medications, treatments, diagnostic studies...will be administered without the order of a qualified physician or authorized practitioner...” 1A. Patient # 5 had a Start of Care [SOC] date of 9/18/24 with admitting diagnoses of infection/inflammation reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis and encounter for adjustment and management of VAD [vascular access device [ medical device that provides access to a patient’s blood stream for administration of medications or obtain blood for lab work]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 9/18/24-11/16/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 5 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week and “Skilled nurse to perform site care for infusion access device...once a week and prn [as needed]…injection cap change once a week and with each lab draw...” Review of the clinical record revealed RN # 6 conducted a routine visit on 9/20/24. The clinical record revealed the RN did complete site care for the infusion access device. The RN failed to change the injection cap in accordance with the POC. During an interview with employee # 1 on 10/16/24 at approximately 11 am, employee # 1 confirmed the injection cap was not changed in accordance with the physician’s order. 1B. Patient # 5 had a Start of Care [SOC] date of 9/18/24 with admitting diagnoses of infection/inflammation reaction due to internal right knee prosthesis and encounter for adjustment and management of VAD [vascular access device [ medical device that provides access to a patient’s blood stream for administration of medications or obtain blood for lab work]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 9/18/24-11/16/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 5 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week and “Skilled nurse to perform lab draw...in 2-3 days from SOC and every week...Skilled nurse to flush with 10 ml of normal saline prior to specimen draw...flush with 20 ml of normal saline...after specimen draw...” Further review of the clinical record revealed LPN # 5 conducted a routine visit on 9/23/24 to obtain labs via the vascular access device. Review of the documentation by the LPN revealed she flushed the access device with 10 ml of saline after obtaining the specimen instead of 20 ml of saline. During an interview with employee # 1 on 10/16/24, employee # 1 confirmed the LPN failed to flush the device in accordance with the physician’s order. 2A. Patient # 8 had a Start of Care date of 9/16/24 with admitting diagnoses of secondary and unspecified malignant neoplasm of nodes of multiple regions, secondary malignant neoplasm of right lung, and acute diastolic [congestive] heart failure [heart doesn’t pump effectively]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 9/16/24-11/14/24 included the orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 3 weeks, 1 time a week every 2 weeks for 6 weeks and “Skilled nurse to obtain weight every visit and notify RN/Physician of weight gain or loss of 3 pounds within 1 day or 5 pounds within 1 week”. Review of the clinical record revealed RN # 3 conducted SN visits on 9/24/24 and 10/3/24. The clinical record revealed no evidence of a weight was obtained. During an interview with employee # 1 on 10/16/24 at approximately 11 am, employee # 1 confirmed the weight was not obtained in accordance with the physician’s order. 2B. Patient # 8 had a Start of Care date of 9/16/24 with admitting diagnoses of secondary and unspecified malignant neoplasm of nodes of multiple regions, secondary malignant neoplasm of right lung, and acute diastolic [congestive] heart failure [heart doesn’t pump effectively]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 9/16/24-11/14/24 included the orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 3 weeks, 1 time a week every 2 weeks for 6 weeks. A supplemental order was written on 9/25 24 for SN to “check 02 sat [saturation] next visit while at rest, while exercising and with oxygen in use, while exercising with oxygen not in use...Fax results...” Review of the clinical record revealed LPN # 5 completed a routine visit on 10/1/24 [this was the first SN visit after the order was obtained]. The clinical record does not include any documentation related to the 02 sat related to the supplemental order. During an interview with employee # 1 on 10/16/24 at 11 am, employee # 1 confirmed the 02 saturation was not obtained in accordance with the physician’s order.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 253 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, client record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to provide home health aide supervision for 1 of 1 home health aide records reviewed [#7]. Findings included: Review of policy “Home Health Aide Supervision” revised 6/1/24 was received from the agency director on 10/16/24 at 8:35 AM. The policy stated,” …at least every 14 days with or without aide present with an onsite visit with aide at least annually…” Patient #7 had a SOC (start of care) of 7/12/24 and included diagnoses of pressure ulcer of sacral region; stage 2; major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, hypokalemia (low potassium), and hypertension. Home health aide orders were for 1 time a week for 9 weeks. Review of home health aide visits for 9/13/24, 9/20/24, 9/27/24, and 10/2/24 revealed no aide supervision visits were made until 10/9/24.”

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 16, 2024Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 8, 1996.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • AFAM Holding Co VI, LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 1, 2024.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer, 0%); Casey Perkins (managing employee (on the payroll)); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 1, 2018
Almost Family, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 31, 2016
AFAM Holding Co VI, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 1, 2024
National Health Industries, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies80%Dec 31, 2016
Afam Sub I LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies20%Apr 1, 2024

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (134 surveys completed): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate88.41% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.15% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.09% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28117, where this agency’s office is, 10 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.