Hearth Record

Atrium Health at Home Lincoln

A home health agency in Lincolnton, North Carolina 28092

853 S Laurel Street, Lincolnton, North Carolina 28092. (704) 732-0943.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 15, 2025: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 15, 2025: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 297 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, direct observation, and staff interviews the registered nurse failed to follow acceptable infection control practices when completing wound care for 1 of 2 patients receving a home visit for wound care [#11]. The findings included: Patient # 11 had a Start of Care date of 9/28/24 and admitting diagnoses of disruption of external operation wound [wound reopens], infection following a procedure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD-lung disease]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification 11/27/24-1/25/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 8 weeks and “Cleanse wound with anasept, place white foam to wound bed...wound care is 3 times per week...” On 1/13/35 at approximately 12 pm a joint visit was made with RN # 4 to observe wound care. The RN removed all supplies from the nursing bag and placed the items on a clean barrier. After removing the soiled dressing, the RN proceeded to measure the midline incision. The RN removed the paper measuring device from the barrier and placed it on the arm of a visible soiled couch arm without a barrier. The RN then used the paper measuring device [which was previous placed on the arm of the couch] to measure the wound [touching the paper measuring device directly to the open wound]. During an interview with employee # 2 on 1/13/25 at approximately 3 pm it was confirmed the RN should not have placed the measuring device on the couch arm without a barrier.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 785 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, observation, client record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to include all medications on the plan of care for 3 of 6 home visits conducted (16,12, and 15). Findings included: Patient # 12 had a Start of Care [SOC] date of 12/18/24 with admitting diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension [a condition that causes a drop in blood pressure when standing up or sitting down], and permanent atrial fibrillation [abnormal heart rhythm]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 12/16/24-2/15/25 included orders for OT [occupational therapy] 1 time a week for 1 week, 1 time every other week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 6 weeks and “...therapist to monitor and follow-up regarding management of medication...” A joint visit was made with OT # 7 pm 1/14/25 at approximately 12 pm. During the visit a medication review was conducted using a medication profile provided by the agency. The following discrepancies were noted: The medication profile listed Midodrine [used to treat low blood pressure] 5 mg every 8 hours. During an interview with the patient she stated, “I am not taking that right now”. The patient presented a bottle of Docusate Sodium [stool softener] 100 mg and Miralax [stool softener] 17 grams per capful. Neither medication was listed on the POC. During the interview with the patient she stated, “I use both of those, but only when I need them.” Patient # 15 had a Start of Care date of 10/9/24 and an admitting diagnosis of fracture unspecified part of neck of right femur [thigh bone]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 12/8/24-2/5/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 9 weeks and “...review medication profile and reconcile medications as needed...” On 1/14/25 at approximately 9 am a joint visit was made with RN # 8. During the visit a medication preview was conducted using a medication profile provided by the agency. The following discrepancies were noted: The patient’s caregiver provided a bottle of pioglitazone [Actos- diabetic medication] 15 mg daily. Take daily with a start date of 11/12/24 and Escitalopram [antidepressant] 20 mg. Take 1 daily with a start date of 12/9/24. Neither medication was listed on the POC. During an interview with employee # 2 on 1/15/25 at approximately 10:30 am employee # 2 confirmed the POC was not complete with all medications. Review of a policy “MM 017 AH AH Medication Reconciliation”, revised 8/7/2024 was received from the agency director on 1/15/25 at 11:11 AM. The policy stated, “… at the time of comprehensive assessment, the clinician will create and document a complete list of medications that patient is taking including dose, route and frequency…”. 1. Patient #16 was admitted on 1/4/25 with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of hypopharynx (cancer of the lower throat), type 2 diabetes, unspecified atrial fibrillation and tracheostomy status (opening in the neck for airflow). Orders were for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week and 1 time a week for 6 weeks; physical therapy 2 times a week for 4 weeks, and 1 time a week for 2 weeks; and occupational therapy 1 time a week for 4 weeks. A virtual home visit was conducted on 1/14/25 at 9:20 AM with the physical therapy assistant. A review of current medications was conducted with the patient during the home visit. The review revealed the following discrepancies: latanoprost eye drops use 1 drop in both eyes every morning for glaucoma and dorzolamide/timolol 1 drop in both eyes 2 times a day for glaucoma were not included on the current medication list. Per interview with the patient “I have been using these drops for about 15 years”.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy review, clinical record review, direct observation, and staff interviews the Plan of Care [POC] failed to include wound care orders for 1 of 2 home visits which included wound care [#11]. The findings included: The policy, Plan of Care and Provider Orders, was provided by employee # 2 on 1/15/25 at 8:30 am. The policy stated, “Services will be provided in accordance with a Plan of Care...” Patient # 11 had a Start of Care date of 9/28/24 and admitting diagnoses of disruption of external operation wound [wound reopens], infection following a procedure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD-lung disease]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification 11/27/24-1/25/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 8 weeks and “Cleanse wound with anasept, place white foam to wound bed...wound care is 3 times per week...” On 1/13/35 at approximately 12 pm a joint visit was made with RN # 4 to observe wound care. During the visit the surveyor noted an open area on the right side of the midline wound. The RN cleaned the area and applied telfa and secured it with a piece of drape provided with the negative pressure kit. Review of the clinical record revealed no order related to the open area [right side of midline wound]. During an interview with employee # 2 on 1/15/24 at approximately 10 am it was confirmed the POC did not include an order for the wound care to the wound.”

    Rule G0576. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 656 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, client record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to include all vital signs as ordered for 4 of 17 records reviewed (16, 6, 7, and 14). Findings included: 2. Patient # 6 had a Start of Care date of 12/19/24 and an admitting diagnosis of muscle spasm of back. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 12/19/24-2/16/25 included orders for PT [physical therapy] 1 time a week for 4 weeks and “Licensed professional to report vital signs falling outside the following established parameters...temperature less than 95 or greater than 100 degrees...” Review of the clinical record revealed PT # 6 conducted routine visits on 12/23/24 and 12/30/24. Review of visit documentation revealed PT # 6 failed to obtain a temperature on the patient. During an interview with employee # 2 on 1/15/25 at approximately 10 am employee # 2 confirmed PT # 6 failed to follow the POC related to vital signs. 3. Patient # 7 had a Start of Care date of 12/9/24 with an admitting diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation [irregular heart rhythm]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 12/9/24-2/6/25 included orders for PT [physical therapy] 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 2 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week and “...Licensed professional to report vital signs falling outside the following established parameters...temperature less than 95 or greater than 100 degrees...” Review of the clinical record revealed PT # 6 conducted routine visits on 12/0/24 and 12/31/24. PT # 6 conducted a reassessment visit on 1/10/25. PT # 6 failed to obtain a temperature during these visits. During an interview with employee # 2 on 1/15/25 at approximately 10 am employee # 2 confirmed PT # 6 failed to follow the POC related to vital signs. 4. Patient # 14 had a Start of Care date of 10/20/24 and admitting diagnoses of fracture unspecified part of neck of left femur [thigh bone. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 12/9/24-2/16/25 included orders for PT [physical therapy] 2 times a week for 4 weeks and “Licensed professional to report vital signs falling outside the following established parameters...temperature less than 95 or greater than 100 degrees...” Review of the clinical record revealed PT # 6 conducted routine visits on 12/26/24, 1/2/25, 1/6/25, and 1/10/25. Review of the documentation or those dates revealed PT # 6 did not obtain a temperature. During an interview with employee # 2 on 1/15/25 at approximately 10 am employee # 2 confirmed PT # 6 failed to follow the POC related to vital signs. Review of a policy “PC 014 AH AH Plan of Care and Provider Orders”, revised 10/15/2024 was received from the agency director on 1/15/25 at 11:11 AM. The policy stated, “…care and services, including drugs and treatments, will be provided according to provider orders…” 1. Patient #16 was admitted on 1/4/25 with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of hypopharynx (cancer of the lower throat), type 2 diabetes, unspecified atrial fibrillation and tracheostomy status (opening in the neck for airflow). Orders were for skilled nursing 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week and 1 time a week for 6 weeks; physical therapy 2 times a week for 4 weeks, and 1 time a week for 2 weeks; and occupational therapy 1 time a week for 4 weeks. Review of the skilled nursing visit on 1/9/25 did not include a blood pressure as ordered by the physician. Interview with the agency director on 1/15/25 at 9:52 AM revealed, “the nurse said she must have forgotten to document the blood pressure”.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

  • Required Items In Clinical Record

    The inspectors’ words, 309 words

    “Required items in clinical record CFR(s): 484.110(a)(1) The patient’s current comprehensive assessment, including all of the assessments from the most recent home health admission, clinical notes, plans of care, and physician or allowed practitioner orders; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews the agency failed to document a wound assessment in the clinical record for 1 of 2 patients receiving a home visit for wound care [#11]. The findings included: Patient # 11 had a Start of Care date of 9/28/24 and admitting diagnoses of disruption of external operation wound [wound pulls apart], infection following a procedure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD-lung disease]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification 11/27/24-1/25/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 8 weeks and “Cleanse wound with anasept, place white foam to wed...wound care is 3 times per week...” Review of the clinical record revealed the following documentation: Routine visit dated 12/2/24 by RN # 4, “...Patient continues to areas of maceration/skin breakdown to hernia/right side of wound...” 12/18/24 by RN # 4, “...Several areas of skin breakdown, unchanged since last RN visit...” 12/30/24 by RN # 4, “...Patient continues to have multiple areas of skin breakdown and maceration to periwound, especially on hernia side...” 1/6/25 by RN # 4, “...Patient continues to have multiple areas of skin breakdown and maceration to periwound, especially on hernia side...” 1/13/25 by RN # 4, “Multiple small areas of skin breakdown...”Review of the clinical record revealed no wound assessment or measurements completed related to the breakdown on the right side of the hernia. During an interview with RN # 2 on 1/15/25 at approximately 10 am RN # 2 confirmed the RN failed to document an assessment of the skin breakdown.”

    Rule G1012. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 15, 2025Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 2, 1992.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2009.
  • The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority and Atrium Health Inc. and Advocate Health Inc. run it.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Suzanne Kauserud (managing employee (under contract)); Suzanne Kauserud (corporate officer); Suzanne Kauserud (corporate director); Daniel Edwin Davis (corporate officer); Rodney E Ball (corporate officer); Michael A Stolzenbach (corporate officer); Michael A Stolzenbach (corporate director); Katherine A Ketner (corporate officer); Erin P Snyder (corporate officer); Janie Curtis (managing employee (under contract)); Jennifer Diane Sullivan (corporate officer); Jennifer Diane Sullivan (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 1, 2009
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 1, 2009
Atrium Health Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Oct 9, 2020
Advocate Health Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Dec 2, 2022

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (190 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.56% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.03% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.27% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28092, where this agency’s office is, 14 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.