Hearth Record

Bayada Home Health Care, Inc.

A home health agency in Charlotte, North Carolina 28262

8801 J M Keynes Drive Suite 350, Charlotte, North Carolina 28262. (704) 423-9449.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 10, 2024: a complaint and recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 10, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Responsibilities Of Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 959 words

    “Responsibilities of skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(b) Standard: Responsibilities of skilled professionals. Skilled professionals must assume responsibility for, but not be restricted to, the following: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy review, clinical record review and staff interviews the SN [skilled nurse] failed to assess the PICC [peripherally inserted central line catheter used to access large veins to prevent repeated sticks for medications] line site for 2 of 2 patients with a PICC line [#10,14] and failed to obtain wound measurements for 1 of 5 [#10] patients with a wound. The findings included: The agency procedure guide, PICC [peripherally inserted central line catheter used to access large veins to prevent repeated sticks for medications] Line Management [no date], was provided by employee # 4 on 4/10/24 at 8:30 am. The procedure stated, “…Verify that external length visible outside corresponds to initial placement measurement. If it does not, notify physician before continuing use…Assess for signs of infection, including redness, swelling, inflammation, tenderness, or exudate. Assess for catheter migration. Observe the external catheter length and compare it to the insertion record…” The policy, Wound Care-Assessment and Treatment [9/9/21], was provided by employee # 4 on 4/10/24 at 8:30 am. The policy stated, “…Wounds should be measured in centimeters [cm] once per week and/or as physician’s order…” 1. Patient # 10 had a Start of Care date of 3/11/24 and admitting diagnoses of infection/inflammation reaction due to internal left knee prothesis, methicillin resistant staphylococcus [type of bacteria] infection causing diseases classified elsewhere, and encounter for adjustment and management of VAD [vascular access device- a device which allows repeated and long-term access to the bloodstream for frequent or regular administration of drugs]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/11/24-5/9/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 4 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week and “PICC [peripherally inserted central line catheter used to access large veins to prevent repeated sticks for medications] care as follows: …cleanse PICC site with alcohol/betadine swab sticks…provide dressing change weekly…” Review of the clinical record revealed the patient received SN visits on 3/18/24, 3/25/24, and 4/1/24. Further review of the clinical record revealed no PICC line assessment was completed. During an interview with employee # 1 on 4/10/24 at approximately 12:30 pm, employee # 1 confirmed the PICC line should have been assessed with each visit. 2A. Patient # 14 had a Start of Care date of 3/4/24 with admitting diagnoses of encounter for change or removal of surgical wound dressing, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, and acquired absence of other right toe. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/4/24-5/2/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 3 times a week for 8 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week and “SN will apply negative pressure wound therapy to right 5th toe amputation site…set device at 125 mmHg …change 3 times per week…educate and monitor for signs and symptoms of infection.” Review of the clinical record revealed the patient had an inpatient stay from 3/18/24-3/26/24. The patient was discharged home with a PICC [peripherally inserted central line catheter used to access large veins to prevent repeated sticks for medications] line. The resumption of care [ROC-assessment after patient is admitted inpatient for at least 24 hours] visit was completed on 3/27/24 by RN # 3. Review of the ROC orders included the following orders “skilled nurse will collect/perform blood sample via venipuncture/PICC line…perform IV site care with PICC supplies using aseptic technique weekly and prn [as needed] …” RN # 3 obtained PICC line measurements during the ROC visit. Review of the clinical record revealed the patient received 5 SN visits from 3/27/24-4/8/24. Review of the visit documentation revealed no PICC line assessment was completed for 3 of the 5 SN visits. During an interview with employee # 1 on 4/10/24 at approximately 2 pm, employee # 1 confirmed the PICC line should be assessed/measured with each visit to prevent complications. 2B. Patient # 14 had a Start of Care date of 3/4/24 with admitting diagnoses of encounter for change or removal of surgical wound dressing, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation and acquired absence of other right toe. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/4/24-5/2/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 3 times a week for 8 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week and “SN will apply negative pressure wound therapy to right 5th toe amputation site…set device at 125 mmHg …change 3 times per week…educate and monitor for signs and symptoms of infection.” Review of the clinical record revealed the amputation site measured 5.5 cm x 4 cm x 1.5 cm on 3/4/24. LPN # 2 made routine visits the week of 3/11/24. The clinical record revealed no wound measurements for that week. The patient was hospitalized from 3/18/24-3/26/24 with the resumption of care [ROC-assessment after patient is admitted inpatient for at least 24 hours] visit completed on 3/27/24 by RN # 3. RN # 3 documented wound measurements of 3.5 cm x 0.5 cm x 0.2 cm on 3/27/24. Further review of the clinical record revealed LPN # 2 conducted a routine visit on 4/1/24 and 4/8/24. RN # 3 conducted a PRN visit on 4/1/24. No wound measurements were obtained for any of those visits. During an interview with employee # 1 on 4/10/24 at approximately 10:30 am, employee # 1 stated, “Wounds are to be measured weekly. The patient should have at least 1 RN visit each week so they could have obtained the wound measurements.” During the interview, employee # 1 confirmed the patient’s wound was not measured weekly.”

    Rule G0704. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Preparing Clinical Notes

    The inspectors’ words, 1,034 words

    “Preparing clinical notes CFR(s): 484.75(b)(6) Preparing clinical notes; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and staff interview the SN [skilled nurse] failed to document communication with physician in the clinical record regarding administration of an enema for 1 of 1 patient with an order for an enema [#1]; failed to document communication with the physician regarding bleeding around a G [gastrostomy] tube site for 1 of 1 patient with a G tube [#1]; failed to document communication with the physician regarding an order to discontinue a wound vac for 1 of 1 patient with a wound vac [#14]; failed to document communication with the physician regarding change in a wound for 1 of 5 patients with a wound [#14]. The findings included: 1A. Patient # 1 had a Start of Care date of 8/4/23 and admitting diagnoses of Ileus [obstruction in part of the intestines] and dysphagia [difficulty swallowing] following cerebral infarction [stroke]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 8/4/23-10/2/23 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 2 weeks, 1 time every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week. Review of the clinical record revealed a physician’s verbal order dated 8/11/23 to “…assist client with enema due to constipation to be followed by impaction removal if enema is unsuccessful.” RN # 5 conducted a routine visit on 8/11/23 and documented, “Family states patient had a bowel movement prior to my visit use of enema…” Further review of the clinical record revealed no evidence the physician was notified that the RN did not administer the enema. During an interview with RN # 5 on 4/10/24 at approximately 1:15 pm, the RN stated she did notify the physician, however, she failed to document the notification in the client’s record. 1B. Patient # 1 had a Start of Care date of 8/4/23 and admitting diagnoses of Ileus [obstruction in part of the intestines] and dysphagia [difficulty swallowing] following cerebral infarction [stroke]. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 8/4/23-10/2/23 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 2 weeks, 1 time every 2 weeks for 4 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week. Review of the clinical record revealed a coordination note dated 8/12/23 entered by RN # 5. The coordination note stated, “Returned call to patient’s daughter regarding bleeding from G tube [gastrostomy]. Noted patient is on blood thinner and explained to daughter the tube can rub the tissue and it will cause bleeding. Instructed daughter to keep watch and let me know if it continues and a visit can be made to assess.” Further review of the clinical record revealed no evidence the RN advised the physician of the bleeding around the G tube site. During an interview with RN # 5 on 4/10/24 at 1:15 pm, the RN stated she had called the physician about the bleeding, but “forget to document it”. 2A. Patient # 14 had a Start of Care date of 3/4/24 with admitting diagnoses of encounter for change or removal of surgical wound dressing, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation and acquired absence of other right toe. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/4/24-5/2/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 3 times a week for 8 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week and “SN will apply negative pressure wound therapy to right 5th toe amputation site…set device at 125 mmHg …change 3 times per week…” Review of the clinical record revealed LPN # 2 conducted a routine visit on 3/13/24 and documented the following information, “…Per PT [patient], wound vac discontinued and pt is now doing daily wet to dry dressings…” Review of the clinical record revealed no physician’s order to discontinue the negative pressure wound therapy. During an interview with LPN # 2 on 4/10/24 at approximately 2:30 pm, the LPN confirmed there was no order to discontinue the wound vac but reported, “I called and spoke with the physician and he did actually give that order. I just failed to note that in the clinical record.” 2B. Patient # 14 had a Start of Care date of 3/4/24 with admitting diagnoses of encounter for change or removal of surgical wound dressing, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation and acquired absence of other right toe. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 3/4/24-5/2/24 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 3 times a week for 8 weeks, 2 times a week for 1 week and “SN will apply negative pressure wound therapy to right 5th toe amputation site…set device at 125 mmhg …change 3 times per week…educate and monitor for signs and symptoms of infection. “Review of the clinical record revealed LPN # 2 conducted a routine visit on 8/3/24 and documented, “…wound care was provided as ordered. Redness around wound as well as on right leg, warmth noted a well…called to report to doctor’s office. Spoke directly to Doctor ______ [name] who states patient has been recently on a large regiment of antibiotics and he is not concerned about an infection. LPN made a visit on 3/11/24 and documented, “Pt continues to have redness around wound. Pt states that his doctor prescribed abx [antibiotic] for possible infection to wound site…” LPN completed a routine visit on 3/15/24 and documented, “Wound care was provided as ordered. Pt continues to have redness around wound. Some drainage from suture site. Pt has another appointment with wound dr. on Monday to evaluate wound…” Review of the clinical record revealed no evidence the LPN notified the physician of her findings on 3/11/24 or 3/15/24. The patient was admitted to _____ [name of hospital] on 3/18/24 for an abscess located at the suture site. During an interview with LPN # 2 on 4/10/24 at approximately 2:30 pm, the LPN stated, “I called the physician and told him about my concerns related to the wound, I just didn’t document the call.””

    Rule G0716. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 10, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 11, 1978.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Bayada Health, LLC. owns 100% directly since Dec 31, 2018.
  • Bayada Home Health Care, Inc. runs it.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: Shirlee Sharkey (corporate director); Thomas Considine (corporate director); David L Baiada (corporate director); Jennifer Joana (managing employee (on the payroll)); Thomas J. Saporito (corporate director); Robert Edmund (corporate officer); Anthony J Mazzarelli (corporate director); Joseph Mark Baiada (corporate officer); Teresa Carroll (corporate director); Winselow Tucker (corporate director); Robert Briglia (corporate officer); Bryony Winn (corporate officer); Bryony Winn (managing employee (on the payroll)); Gavin Robert Kerr (corporate director); Ryan Michael (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ryan Michael (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brian Ford (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
BayadaOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 31, 2018
Bayada Home Health Care, Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Dec 31, 2018
Bayada Health, LLC.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 31, 2018

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (294 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate88.22% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.38% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.06% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 15 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28262, where this agency’s office is, 15 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.