Hearth Record

Atrium Health at Home Charlotte

A home health agency in Charlotte, North Carolina 28232

5040 Airport Center Parkway, Charlotte, North Carolina 28232. (704) 512-2300.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 21, 2025: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 21, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Accuracy Of Encoded Oasis Data

    The inspectors’ words, 855 words

    “Accuracy of encoded OASIS data CFR(s): 484.45(b) Standard: The encoded OASIS data must accurately reflect the patient’s status at the time of assessment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews, the agency failed to ensure OASIS [Outcome and Assessment Information Set] accuracy related to N0415 [high risk medications for 4 of 17 records reviewed [ # 1, 15, 16 and 8]. The findings included: 4. Patient #8 had an admission date of 5/12/2025 with a diagnosis of Acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (long-term “chronic” severe impairment of the respiratory system causing low blood oxygen levels and a sudden “acute” worsening of symptoms including shortness of breath). The Plan of Care (POC) for 5/12/2025-7/10/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 4 weeks and physical therapy (PT) 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 3 weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed PT #4 completed the Start Of Care (SOC) OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set-collection of data elements that home health agencies use to assess and report on patient quality) on 5/12/25. Review of the OASIS question NO415 [high risk medications] indicated the patient’s only high-risk medication was a hypoglycemic (used to reduce blood sugar level). Review of the POC revealed the patient was also using Morphine extended release (opioid) 30 mg 1 tablet every 12 hours and Morphine 15mg 1 tablet every 4 hours as needed for pain. NO415 did not capture the use of an opioid. During an interview with the agency director on 5/21/25 at approximately 2:00 pm, the director confirmed the OASIS information was not accurate. 1. Patient # 1 had a Start of Care [SOC] date of 2/11/24 with an admitting diagnosis of encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device. Review of the clinical record revealed RN # 10 completed the SOC OASIS [Outcome and Assessment Information Set-assessment tool used to collect data on patient’s demographics, clinical status, functional status and service needs] on 2/11/24. Review of OASIS question N0415 related to high-risk medications indicated the patient was receiving an antipsychotic [psychiatric medication] medication. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 2/11/24-4/10/24 revealed no antipsychotic medication was ordered for the patient. During an interview with RN # 9 on 5/21/25 at approximately 2 pm, RN # 9 confirmed the OASIS [N0415] was answered incorrectly. 2. Patient # 3 had a Start of Care date of 2/6/24 with an admitting diagnosis of age-related osteoporosis [condition related to aging where bone density and strength decline]. Review of the clinical record revealed RN # 2 completed the SOC OASIS [Outcome and Assessment Information Set-assessment tool used to collect data on patient’s demographics, clinical status, functional status and service needs] on 2/6/24. Review of OASIS question N0415 revealed RN # 2 indicated the patient was not taking any high risk medications. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 2/6/24-4/5/24 revealed the patient was ordered an antiplatelet [aspirin 81 mg two times per day]. During an interview with RN # 9 on 5/21/25 at approximately 2 pm, RN # 9 confirmed the OASIS [N0415] was answered incorrectly. 3. Patient # 15 had a Start of Care [SOC] date of 5/7/25 with an admitting diagnosis of infection/inflammation response due to internal fixator of right femur. Review of the clinical record revealed RN # 8 completed the SOC OASIS [Outcome and Assessment Information Set-assessment tool used to collect data on patient’s demographics, clinical status, and service needs] on 5/7/25. Review of OASIS question N0415 revealed RN # 8 indicated the patient was taking an antibiotic and hypoglycemic medication. The OASIS did not indicate the patient was ordered an opioid [pain medication] or antiplatelet medication [medication that reduces the blood’s ability to form platelets. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 5/7/25-7/5/25 indicated the patient was ordered children’s aspirin [antiplatelet] 81 mg two times a day and oxycodone [opioid] 5 mg every 6 hours. During an interview with RN # 9 on 5/21/25 at approximately 2 pm, RN # 9 confirmed the OASIS [N0415] was answered incorrectly. 4. Patient # 16 had a Start of Care [SOC] date of 4/23/25 with an admitting diagnosis of intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma [cancer]. Review of the clinical record revealed RN # 6 completed the SOC OASIS [Outcome and Assessment Information Set-assessment tool used to collect data on patient’s demographics, clinical status, functional status and service needs] on 4/23/25. Review of OASIS question N0415 related to high-risk medications indicated the patient was receiving an antipsychotic [psychiatric medication]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 4/23/25-6/21/25 revealed no antipsychotic medications were ordered. Further review of the OASIS question N0415 revealed RN # 6 did not include the patient being ordered an opioid [pain medication]. Review of the POC revealed the patient was ordered Fentanyl 25 mcg/hr. transdermal patch. During an interview with RN # 9 on 5/21/25 at approximately 2 pm, RN # 9 confirmed the OASIS [N0415] was answered incorrectly.”

    Rule G0374. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 265 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, observations, and staff interviews, the agency failed to perform proper hand hygiene for 1 of 7 home visits (#8); and failed to use a thermometer sheath for a thermometer used for other patients for 1 of 7 home visits (#8). Findings included: Patient #8 had an admission date of 5/12/2025 with a diagnosis of Acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (long-term “chronic” severe impairment of the respiratory system causing low blood oxygen levels and a sudden “acute” worsening of symptoms including shortness of breath). The plan of care for 5/12/2025 – 7/10/2025 included orders for skilled nurse (SN) visits 2 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 4 weeks. During a joint visit on 5/19/2025 at approximately 2:30pm with RN #2 and the clinical team lead, RN #2 applied an excessive amount of hand sanitizer to her hands and then wiped the excess sanitizer off on her scrubs. RN #2 was observed using a thermometer without a sheath (clear, sanitary cover) while obtaining a temperature by mouth. During an interview conducted on 04/30/2025 at approximately 3:10 pm, the clinical team lead was asked what the expectations were in this situation. She acknowledged that based on agency policy, RN #14 should not have wiped her hands on her scrubs and should have used a protective sheath on the thermometer.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 21, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 30, 1982.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority owns 100% directly since Nov 16, 2007.
  • The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority and Atrium Health Inc. and Advocate Health Inc. run it.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Suzanne Kauserud (corporate officer); Suzanne Kauserud (corporate director); Daniel Edwin Davis (corporate officer); Daniel Edwin Davis (corporate director); Rodney E Ball (corporate officer); Michael A Stolzenbach (corporate officer); Michael A Stolzenbach (corporate director); Susan Mccarter- Frohna (managing employee (under contract)); Katherine A Ketner (corporate officer); Erin P Snyder (corporate officer); Jennifer Diane Sullivan (corporate officer); Jennifer Diane Sullivan (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 16, 2007
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 1, 2009
Atrium Health Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Oct 9, 2020
Advocate Health Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Dec 2, 2022

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (414 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.17% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.28% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.21% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • There aren’t enough agencies serving patients in ZIP code 28232 with a quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceQuality rating
Atrium Health at Home Charlotte This home health agency3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.