Hearth Record

Pardee Home Care

A home health agency in Flat Rock, North Carolina 28731

114 College Drive, Flat Rock, North Carolina 28731. (828) 692-1846.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 17, 2025: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 17, 2025: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 630 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, direct observations during joint visits, and staff interviews the agency failed to follow proper infections control policies for 2 of 6 patients who received a home visit [#9 and 12]. The findings included: The policy, Hand Hygiene and the Use of Skin Antiseptics [revised 9/2022] was provided by the agency director on 7/17/25 at approximately 10:52 am. The policy stated, “...Always wash/sanitize hands upon entry to the patient care area/room, and prior to departure of the patient care area/room [WASH IN/WASH OUT]...Wash/sanitize hands before having direct contact with patients, even if gloves are worn...Wash/sanitize hands after contact with inanimate objects...” The policy, Infection Control - Home Health [revised 3/24], was provided on 7/17/25 at approximately 10:52 am. The policy stated, “...Infection control includes activities at the direct care level and at the level of supporting care or services that reduce the risks of device-related and procedure related infections in patients as follows...Wound procedures...” 1.Patient # 9 had a Start of Care date of 5/22/25 with an admitting diagnosis of non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with other specified severity. Review of the clinical record revealed a resumption of care [ROC-type of visit that is made after patient has had an in-patient stay with admission for at least 24 hours] Plan of Care [POC] dated 7/11/25-7/20/25. The diagnosis associated with the ROC POC included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on circulatory system. Review of the ROC POC included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week and “SN to perform/instruct caregiver on incision care as follows: Apply sterile 4x4s folded in half secured with medipore tape daily.” 7/16/25 at approximately 9 am a joint visit was made with RN # 7 to observe wound care to the left groin area. RN # 7 removed the old dressing and cleaned the incision site to left groin. The RN then placed a folded sterile 4x4 to the area and secured the 4x4 with tape that she had adhered to her nursing uniform pants just prior to removing the old dressing. During an interview with the agency director on 7/16/25 at approximately 4 pm, the director confirmed the RN should not have used the tape she had previously stuck to her uniform pants. 2. Patient # 12 had a Start of Care date of 6/22/25 with an admitting diagnosis of infection and inflammatory reaction due to other internal prosthetic device. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 6/22/25-8/20/25 included orders for PT [physical therapy] 2 times a week for 4 weeks, 1 time a week for 1 week. On 7/16/25 at approximately 3 pm a joint visit was made with PT # 4. Upon entering the residence, PT # 4 was noted to be wearing disposable gloves. PT # 4 identified the patient and began the visit. Prior to PT # 4 obtaining vital signs, she went to visit bag and removed hand sanitizer and placed on the disposable gloves and rubbed her hand together and obtained the vital signs. PT # 4 proceeded with treatment for the patient. After completing the treatment, PT # 4 went back to the visit bag and removed hand sanitizer and placed more hand sanitizer on the same disposable gloves she had been wearing when entering the home. During an interview with the agency director on 7/16/25 at approximately 4 pm, the director confirmed this was not an acceptable manner to complete hand hygiene during a home visit.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 1,410 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy, direct observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews the Plan of Care [POC] failed to include all the correct/current medications the patient was taking for 3 of 6 patients who received a home visit [#6, 7, 10 ]; and failed to include complete interventions/goals for 1 of 1 patients [#6] with a PICC [peripherally inserted central catheter-intravenous access that can be used for a prolonged period of time] line; and resolved nursing interventions prematurely for 1 of 1 patients who had complications after an amputation [#12]. The findings included: 4. Patient # 6 had a Start of Care date of 7/7/25 with an admitting diagnosis of abscess of liver. Review of the Plan of Care for the certification period 7/7/25-9/4/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time a week for 9 weeks. Further review of the POC included the following goal: “Patient/caregiver will demonstrate proper technique for administering IV medication, flushing and maintenance of line by *”. The goal did not include a date. During an interview with the clinical manager on 7/17/25 at 2 pm the manager stated, “Yes, there should be a date there.” 5. Patient # 12 had a Start of Care date of 6/5/25 with an admitting diagnosis of other complications of amputation stump. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period /5/25-8/3/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 visit every week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 6 weeks. Review of the clinical record revealed the following nursing interventions: “Vital signs outside of established parameters will be reported to the MD in a timely fashion”. The intervention had a start date of 6/5/25 with a resolved date of 6/10/25. Review of the clinical record revealed this intervention should not have been resolved. “SN discharge planning.” The intervention had a start date of 6/5/25 with a resolved date of 6/10/25. Review of the clinical record revealed the patient was still receiving nursing services as of 6/18/25 and this intervention should not have been resolved. “SN discharge summary will be sent upon discharge.” The intervention had a start date of 6/5/25 with a resolved date of 6/5/25. Review of the clinical record revealed the patient was still receiving nursing services as of 6/18/25 and this intervention should not have been resolved. “SN to assess surgical incision site.” The intervention had a start date of 6/5/25 with a resolved date of 6/5/25. Review of the clinical record revealed the patient continued to have a wound assessment/treatment until 6/18/25. During an interview with the clinical manager on 7/17/25 at approximately 2 pm, the clinical manger stated, “We have been talking to the clinicians about resolving interventions as the patient meets each intervention, but clearly this clinician just got ahead of herself.” The clinical manager confirmed the interventions should not have been resolved. The policy, Home Health Care Planning Process [revised 1/2022], was provided by the agency director on 7/17/25 at approximately 10:52 am. The policy stated, “...A written plan of care will be initiated within five days of start of care...All clinicians will consider the conclusions of initial and ongoing assessments...not limited to...Based on the assessment and conclusions, the plan of care will include but not limited to...patient specific interventions and education...Reasonable, measurable, and individualized goals and outcomes identified...Specific services and treatments to be provided...All medications...” The policy, Home Health Medication Profile [revised 8/2024], was provided by the agency director on 7/17/25 at approximately 10:52 am. The policy stated, “...Medication profiles will be updated for each change to reflect current medications and new and/or discontinued medications...” 1. Patient #6 had a Start of Care date of 7/7/25 with an admitting diagnosis of Abscess of liver (infection in the liver that forms a puss-filled pocket). Review of the Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period 7/7/25-9/4/25 included orders for SN (skilled nursing) 1 time a week for 9 weeks. On 7/15/25 at approximately 10:15 am a joint visit was made with RN (registered nurse) #2 . During the visit a medication review was conducted using a medication profile provided by the agency. The following discrepancies were noted: The medication profile listed Magnesium Gluconate (over the counter magnesium supplement) 27.5 mg (500 mg magnesium) 1 tablet daily. The patient presented a bottle of Magnesium Tartrate 125 mg stating the patient takes 1 tablet daily. The medication profile did not list Amlodipine (used to treat high blood pressure) 5 mg 1 tablet daily, which the patient presented during the medication reconciliation and revealed she started this medication on 7/8/2025. The medication profile did not list Progesterone (hormone replacement) 100 mg daily, which the patient presented during the medication reconciliation and revealed she has been on this medication for 2 years. During an interview with the clinical manager on 7/17/25 at approximately 2:45 pm, the clinical manager confirmed the POC did not include all/correct medications. 2. Patient #7 had a Start of Care date of 6/12/25 with an admitting diagnosis of Secondary malignant neoplasm of brain (cancer that has spread to the brain). Review of the Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period 6/12/25-8/10/25 included orders for PT (physical therapy) 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 3 weeks. On 7/15/25 at approximately 11:30 am a joint visit was made with PT #3. During the visit a medication review was conducted using a medication profile provided by the agency. The following discrepancies were noted: The medication profile listed Cholecalciferol/ Vitamin D3/ Vitamin K2 (over the counter vitamin D supplement) 125 mcg 1 tablet daily. The patient’s caregiver stated the patient took 2 tablets daily. The medication profile listed Dexamethasone (a steroid) 4 mg 1 tablet every 6 hours. The patient’s caregiver revealed that the patient was on a taper-down schedule and was now only taking 0.5 tablet daily. The medication profile listed Tizanidine (used to treat muscle spasms) 4mg 1 tablet every 8 hours as needed. During an interview with the patient’s caregiver on 7/15/25 at approximately 11:55 am, the patient’s caregiver stated, “She hasn’t been taking that for a while now.” During an interview with the clinical manager on 7/17/25 at approximately 2:50 pm, the clinical manager confirmed the POC did not include all/correct medications. 3. Patient #10 had a Start of Care date of 6/18/25 with admitting diagnoses of Non-displaced fracture of second cervical vertebra, subsequent encounter (a break in the bone of the second vertebra in the neck). Review of the Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period 6/18/25-8/16/25 included orders for OT (occupational therapy) 1 time every 2 weeks for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 4 weeks. On 7/16/25 at approximately 1:15 pm, a joint visit was made with OT #1. During the visit a medication review was conducted using a medication profile provided by the agency. The following discrepancies were noted: The medication profile listed Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (Opioid pain medicine) 5-325mg 1 tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain. During an interview with the patient on 7/16/25 at approximately 1:35 pm, the patient’s caregiver stated, “She was only on that for 2 doses. That’s been stopped a couple of weeks now.” The medication profile listed Furosemide (used to treat excess fluid retention) 20 mg 1 tablet daily. The patient’s caregiver stated that on Sundays, the patient takes 2 tablets. During an interview with the clinical manager on 7/17/25 at approximately 2:40 pm, the clinical manager confirmed the POC did not include all/correct medications.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 279 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and staff interviews the agency failed to follow physician’s orders related to wound care for 1 of 5 discharged patients [#1]. The findings included: Patient # 3 had a Start of Care date of 1/3/25 with admitting diagnoses of pressure ulcer of sacral region [base of the spine] and pressure ulcer of left and right buttock, stage 4 [severe, deep wound that extends to muscle, tendon or bone]. Review of the Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 1/3/25-3/3/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 visit every week for 1 week, 3 times a week for 8 weeks, 1 visit every week for 1 week and “SN to assess wound and measure every 7 days” and “Dressing instructions: Sacrum, left and Right Ischium [buttocks]-Instructions-First layer [directly against the wound] Zinc to periwound skin, Hydrofera Blue Ready Transfer. Second layer-Abd pads and tape”. Review of the clinical record revealed the patient received 20 SN visits from 1/3/25 through 2/28/25. The clinical record revealed no visit when the wounds on the sacral region or the left/right buttock was measured or assessed by the SN. The patient would refuse to allow the SN to assess or do the dressing changes. During an interview with the clinical manager on 7/16/25 at approximately 2 pm, the clinical manager stated, “He just wouldn’t let them do that wound care.” The clinical manager confirmed the physician’s order, related to the assessment and measuring the wounds, was not followed.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

  • Communication With Physicians

    The inspectors’ words, 581 words

    “Communication with physicians CFR(s): 484.75(b)(7) Communication with all physicians involved in the plan of care and other health care practitioners (as appropriate) related to the current plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and staff interviews the skilled nurse failed to communicate with the physician when 1 of 1 patients failed to completed wound care as ordered [#9]; failed to communicate with the physician when 1 of 1 patients was noted to be smoking when wearing supplemental oxygen [#13]. The findings included: 2. Patient #13 had a Start of Care (SOC) date of 6/19/2025 with admitting diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (also known as COPD which is a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) with acute exacerbation (sudden worsening of symptoms) and Congestive Heart Failure (also known as CHF which is a condition that happens when the heart can’t pump blood well enough to give the body a normal supply). The Plan of Care for the certification period 6/19/2025 – 8/17/2025 included orders for SN (skilled nursing) 1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 4 weeks and “SN to instruct patient/caregiver compliance with oxygen and oxygen safety precautions…call for O2 sats (saturations) less than 90% at rest”. The agency oxygen (O2) safety form lists “instructions provided on … keep oxygen away from open flame…stay at least 10 feet from anyone who is smoking”. Review of the clinical record revealed the following information: On the 7/11/25 SN visit, the LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 charted “Pt smoking at the counter wearing 2.5L (liters) O2 (oxygen) via n/c (nasal canula). She extinguished the cigarette after SN entered home and upon sitting her O2 sat (saturation) was 87%, ranging 85-92% throughout visit.” Further review of the clinical record revealed no evidence of communication with the physician concerning the patient smoking with O2 on. During an interview with the clinical manager on 7/17/25 at 2:40 pm, the clinical manager confirmed the physician was not notified concerning the patient smoking while wearing O2. 1.Patient # 9 had a Start of Care date of 5/22/25 with an admitting diagnosis of non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with other specified severity. The Plan of Care [POC] for the certification period 5/22/25-7/20/25 included orders for SN [skilled nursing] 1 time week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 8 weeks and “SN to perform wound care as follows: Right 4th and 5th toe daily, SN 2 times a week; Pt [patient] can do on days SN doesn’t. First layer [directly against the wound] Floss between toes with gauze moistened with vashe. Apply betadine to 5th toe and between 4th toe [sic]. Second layer: Cut aquacell [sic] [alginate] dressing to size and weave around 5th toe and secure with tape.” Review of the clinical record revealed the following information: On 5/30/25 RN # 6 entered a communication note to RN # 7. The note stated, “Pt had not been wrapping toe with alginate but has been applying betadine...” Further review of the clinical record revealed no evidence the physician was notified that the patient was not completing wound care in accordance with the physician’s order. During an interview with the clinical manager on 7/17/25 at approximately 2 pm, the clinical manager confirmed the physician was notified when the physician’s order for wound care was not being followed.”

    Rule G0718. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 17, 2025Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 22, 1970.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Henderson County Hospital Corporation owns 100% directly since Apr 24, 1998.
  • Henderson County Hospital Corporation runs it.
  • 22 owners or officers are people: Tammy Scarborough (corporate director, 0%); Rachel Marion Forbes-Harvin (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); John Edney (corporate director); John Edney (runs it (operational or managerial control)); John Gould (corporate director, 0%); William Robert Bryant (corporate director, 0%); Marilee Bennington Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); Marilyn Allison Gordon (corporate director, 0%); Kevan Richard Hansel (corporate director, 0%); Carol Larimore (corporate director, 0%); John Waddell (corporate director, 0%); Gregory Burnette (corporate director, 0%); Johnna Suzanne Reed (corporate officer); Laura Leatherwood (corporate director, 0%); Amy Ruth Brantley (corporate director, 0%); Robert J Bryant (corporate director, 0%); Michael Lynn Sunday (corporate officer, 0%); Tamela Orr Albrecht (corporate director, 0%); Gregory S Mccarty (corporate officer, 0%); Anthony Seabastian Mcminn (corporate director, 0%); James Kirby (corporate officer); James Kirby (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Henderson County Hospital CorporationOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 24, 1998
Henderson County Hospital CorporationRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Apr 24, 1998

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (285 surveys completed): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate92.25% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate7.26% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.72% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 28731, where this agency’s office is, 5 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 28731
PlaceQuality rating
Pardee Home Care This home health agency3
Enhabit Home Health4
Carepartners Home Health Services3
Adventhealth Home Health3
Centerwell Home Health4

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.