Hearth Record

St John’s United Home Health

A home health agency in Billings, Montana 59101

502 North 30th Street, Billings, Montana 59101. (406) 655-5800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 15, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 15, 2026: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 482 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure there was an initial assessment completed within 48 hours of referral or hospital discharge date for 2 (#s 2 and 3) of 10 sampled patients. Findings include: 1. Patient #2’s SOC (Start of Care) date was 8/1/25. Review of the form titled, Referral, showed the patient’s referral date was 7/18/25. The admission exceeded the required 48 hours to complete the initial assessment. Review of patient #2’s Communication note, dated 7/28/25, showed the patient was scheduled for home health admission on 7/26/25. The agency received notice from the skilled nursing facility the patient was due to be discharged on 7/28/25. The note showed the first available date for admission was 8/1/25. This was four days following the discharge from the skilled nursing facility. This admission date exceeded the required 48 hours to complete the initial assessment. During an interview on 1/12/26 at 1:00 p.m., staff member A stated the agency tried to get into the home of patient #2 within 48 hours following the date of the referral. 2. Patient #3’s SOC date was 7/23/25. The date of referral was 7/17/25. The admission exceeded the required 48 hours to complete the initial assessment. Review of patient #3’s form titled, Referral, did not show a SOC date within the required 48 hours. During an interview on 1/14/26 at 4:00 p.m., staff member G stated the agency attempted to contact the patient one time on 7/18/25 at 8:13 a.m. Staff member G stated the agency left a message detailing the times available for admission. Staff member G stated there were not any other attempts made to schedule a visit. Review of the agency policy, Initial Assessments/Comprehensive Assessment, showed: #5 Initial Assessment and Time Frame showed, “The initial assessment bridges the gap between when the first patient encounter occurs and when a plan of care can be implemented. Immediate care and support needs are those items and services that will maintain the patient’s health and safety through this interim period...” “...An agency that is unable to complete the initial assessment within 48 hours of referral or the patient’s return home will not request a different start of care date.” “A RN, PT or SLP must conduct the initial assessment visit withing 48 hours of referral within 48 hours of the patient’s return home or on the physician/practitioner-ordered start of care date.””

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 854 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review the agency failed to ensure staff member D verified, compared, and clarified medications the patient was currently taking upon admission against the listed allergies for 1 (# 7) 10 sampled patients. This deficient practice had the potential to cause adverse medication side effects to the patient. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 1/13/26 at 1:20 p.m., patient #7 was seated in a chair in her home and showed no outward signs of distress or discomfort. Patient #7 stated she was more tired since her discharge from the hospital, especially in the morning. Patient #7 had asked staff member D if tiredness was a side effect of the medications she was taking. Staff member D stated the tiredness was more than likely a result of her medical condition and recent hospitalization. Review of patient #7’s nursing communication notes, dated 1/6/26, by staff member D, showed patient #7 presented to the emergency department on 12/26/25 with facial droop, slurred speech, and weakness in her left lower extremity. Imaging was performed which showed bilateral carotid artery stenosis and patient #7 underwent right carotid endarterectomy on 12/29/25. Patient #7 was discharged home from the hospital on 1/1/26. Patient #7 had self-discontinued multiple medications prior to her admission to the hospital due to her reported unfavorable medication side effects. “She (patient #7) has 18 listed allergies/intolerances.” Patient #7 had visited her primary care physician this day, 1/6/26, with medication changes including increased carvedilol dosage due to continued high blood pressure readings. Review of patient #7’s document titled, Patient Face Sheet, as of 1/13/26, with a start of care on 1/6/26, showed seventeen allergies listed, which included but were not limited to: - aspirin, - atorvastatin, and - carvedilol. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 1:32 p.m., NF1 stated patient #7 had three nosebleeds in the last week (1/6/26 - 1/13/26). NF1 stated patient #7 would refuse to take her prescribed aspirin for a day following a nosebleed, then would resume taking the aspirin. NF1 stated aspirin was listed as an allergy for patient #7, which caused the nosebleeds. NF1 stated the nosebleeds had been self-limited. During an observation and interview on 1/13/26 at 1:35 p.m., staff member D went into patient #7’s kitchen to look at her current medications. Staff member D stated aspirin, atorvastatin, and carvedilol were currently part of patient #7’s medication regimen. Staff member D stated, “I don’t have a good answer,” when asked about patient #7 taking medications which were listed as allergies for aspirin, atorvastatin, and carvedilol. Staff member D stated she should reach out to patient #7’s primary care provider for clarity on the allergies versus intolerances but had not done it yet. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 2:20 p.m., staff member B stated medication regimen review was completed on patient #7 at the start of care on 1/6/26. Staff member B stated staff member D should have clarified patient #7’s listed allergies versus intolerances with the primary care provider when the medication regimen review was performed upon admission to the home health agency. Review of patient #7’s allergies listing from (hospital name), provided by staff member B, dated 1/13/26 at 2:42 p.m., showed but was not limited to: - aspirin, noted as of 11/5/12, causes bleeding, mainly nose bleeds that do not stop unless cauterized, - atorvastatin, noted as of 9/16/22, patient loses her balance and keeps falling, and - carvedilol, noted as of 9/22/22, leg cramps. Review of patient #7’s nursing communication notes, dated 1/13/26 at 2:28 p.m., showed staff member D had contacted patient #7’s primary care provider regarding listed allergies and current prescribed medications, specifically aspirin, atorvastatin, and carvedilol. The primary care provider’s nurse stated these medications listed as allergies should remain on patient #7’s allergies list and monitored for adverse events. The primary care provider’s nurse stated patient #7 had sensitivities and intolerances to aspirin, atorvastatin, and carvedilol in the past, but seemed to be tolerating them well at this time. The primary care provider was aware of past sensitivities and intolerances and advised patient #7 to continue currently listed medications. Review of the agency’s policy titled, Medication Reconciliation, last revised 2/24, showed: - “Policy - The Agency will reconcile patient’s medications at time of admission and on an ongoing basis in order to identify any potential adverse effect and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy and non-compliance with drug therapy. - ... Procedure - 1. At time of admission, the admitting RN, PT, or SLP will create and document a complete list of medications that patient is taking at home, including dose, strength, route, and frequency. - Any concerns or discrepancies will be reconciled by a RN with the patient’s physician/practitioner. ...” [sic]”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 15, 2026Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 30, 2014.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • St Johns Lutheran Ministries Inc. owns 66.5% directly since May 3, 2012; Billings Clinic Specialty Supplies and Services, LLC owns 28.5% directly since May 3, 2012; Big Sky Senior Services Inc. owns 5% directly since May 3, 2012.
  • St Johns Lutheran Ministries Inc. runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Gerald G Pearsall (corporate officer, 0%); Gerald G Pearsall (corporate director, 0%); Gerald G Pearsall (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Catharine B Rivera (runs it (operational or managerial control)); David Trost (corporate officer); David Trost (corporate director); David Trost (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
St Johns Lutheran Ministries Inc.Owns 5% or more directly66.5%May 3, 2012
Billings Clinic Specialty Supplies and Services, LLCOwns 5% or more directly28.5%May 3, 2012
Big Sky Senior Services Inc.Owns 5% or more directly5%May 3, 2012
St Johns Lutheran Ministries Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)May 3, 2012

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (151 surveys completed): 93% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate78.07% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate7.43% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.53% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 59101, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 59101
PlaceQuality rating
Riverstone Health2.5
St John’s United Home Health This home health agency3
Compassus Home Health - Billings4
Home and Care Billings2.5
Homestead Health LLCNot given
Cody Regional Health Home Health3.5
Campbell County Health Home Health3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.