Hearth Record

Elite Home Health

A home health agency in Creve Coeur, Missouri 63141

2 City Place Drive, Suite 430, Creve Coeur, Missouri 63141. (314) 993-7035.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 4, 2025: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 4, 2025: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 1,291 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, clinical record review, and interview, the provider failed to ensure that each patient’s written individualized plan of care (POC) included all safety measures regarding high-risk medications in three of six full records reviewed (Records/Patients #2, #3, and #5). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the patients served by the provider. Review of the provider’s policy titled, “Plan of Care (POC),” revised 04/01/2025, showed in part: - Each patient has an individualized POC developed in consultation with the patient, physician or authorized practitioner, and staff that integrates comprehensive assessment findings to address patient problems, needs, and goals, as well as to address specific services being provided; - The POC is developed for all patients and updated no less than every 60 days; - The POC includes: * Medications and treatments; * Safety measures to protect against injury; and * Patient specific interventions and education, measurable outcomes and goals identified by the provider and patient. Review of the provider’s policy titled, “High Risk Medications,” revised 12/01/2023, showed in part: - Patients receive oral and written information regarding high-risk medications prescribed for the patient on an ongoing basis while being cared for by the provider; - The provider identifies the following drug categories as high risk. Medications in these categories would be considered high risk medications: * Anticoagulants including Xarelto and Eliquis (medications used to thin the blood); * Hypoglycemics including Insulins (medications used to lower blood sugar); and - Upon review of the medication list, the clinician will identify any high-risk medications, assess patient/caregiver’s knowledge, and obtain physician/authorized practitioner’s orders and educate as needed per identified knowledge deficit. RECORD/PATIENT #2: Review of the clinical record showed the patient was admitted to home health services on 03/06/2025, with primary diagnosis of age-related osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density) with current left femur (bone in the thigh) fracture (a break in a bone), and additional diagnosis which included long term (current) use of anticoagulant (medication that stop blood from clotting too easily) and history of falls. The patient resided at an assisted living facility apartment with caregivers checking on him/her. Review of the Plan of Care (POC), dated 03/06/2025 to 05/04/2025, showed in part the following: - Diagnosis which included age-related osteoporosis with current left femur fracture; - Long term (current) use of anticoagulants; - History of falls; - Xarelto (anticoagulant) 15 milligram tablet, take one by mouth every night; and - Physical Therapy (PT) ordered for gait training, exercise therapeutic exercises and balance training. Review of the PT recert note dated 04/30/2025, showed a verbal order was received for POC and frequency approval to continue PT to further address deficits and achieve maximal functional level. Review of the Plan of Care (POC), dated 05/05/2025 to 07/03/2025, showed in part the following: - Diagnosis which included age-related osteoporosis with current left femur fracture; - Long term (current) use of anticoagulants; - History of falls; - Xarelto 15 milligram tablet, take one by mouth every night; and - Physical Therapy ordered for gait training, exercise therapeutic exercises and balance training. Per interview conducted during observation, on 06/03/2025 at 10:52 AM, the patient stated he/she had no new bruising or bleeding with the Xarelto. Review of the POC dated 03/06/2025 to 05/04/2025 and 05/05/2025 to 07/03/2025, failed to show individualized interventions for high-risk medications (the patient has had previous falls, and is prescribed Xarelto, an anticoagulant medication. During an interview on 06/03/2025 at 10:16 AM, clinical manager A stated that best practice would be for the Xarelto to be on the POC, but it was not the primary focus is why it was not on the POC with interventions of bleeding precautions. RECORD/PATIENT #5: Review of the clinical record showed the patient was admitted to home health services on 04/10/2025, with primary diagnosis of unspecified fracture of left patella (a break in the bone that covers the knee joint), subsequent encounter for a closed fracture with routine healing, and additional diagnosis which included type I diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that results in too much sugar in the blood) with diabetic polyneuropathy (many nerves throughout the body are damaged), and problems related to health literacy (inability to understand and use health information). The patient resided alone in his/her own home and received assistance from family members. Review of the Plan of Care (POC), dated 04/10/2025 to 06/08/2025, showed in part the following: - Diagnosis which included unspecified fracture of left patella, subsequent encounter for a closed fracture with routine healing, Type I diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, and problems related to health literacy; - Insulin Lispro (fast acting insulin used to lower blood sugar levels) 100 unit/milliliter (ml) subcutaneous pen, inject 14 units subcutaneously at breakfast, 10 units at lunch, 10 units at dinner (Max=50 units daily); - Lantus (long-acting insulin used to lower blood sugar levels) U-100 insulin 100 unit/ml subcutaneous solution, inject 33 units subcutaneously every morning; and - PT ordered for gait training, transfers, and therapeutic exercises. Review of the PT OASIS admission note dated 04/10/2025, showed a verbal order was received to continue PT at one time per a week for eight weeks. Review of the POC dated 04/10/2025 to 06/08/2025, failed to show individualized interventions for high-risk medications (the patient had problems related health literacy, and is prescribed two different insulins) to lower blood sugars. During an interview on 06/04/2025 at 09:38 AM, clinical manager A stated that best practice would be for the insulin, a high-risk medication to be on the POC with interventions. RECORD/PATIENT #3: Review of the clinical record showed the patient was admitted to home health services on 05/12/2025, with a primary diagnosis of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm characterized by rapid and irregular heartbeat), and additional diagnosis which included a cardiac pacemaker implant, Chronic Kidney Failure, and long term / current use of anticoagulant medication (medication that stop blood from clotting too easily). The patient lived at home alone. Review of the Plan of Care (POC) , dated 05/12/2025 to 07/10/2025, showed in part the following: - Diagnoses which included Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, cardiac pacemaker implant, and long term / current use of anticoagulant medication; - A history of falls; and - Physical Therapy ordered for transfer, gait, and fall prevention. Review of the POC dated 09/05/2023 to 11/03/20233, failed to show: - Individualized interventions for high-risk medications ( the patient has had previous falls, and is prescribed Apixaban, sold under the brand name Eliquis, an anticoagulant medication). During an interview on 06/03/2023 at 09:16 AM, the Clinical Manager A stated that Patient #3 was currently prescribed the anticoagulant medication, and had been prescribed anticoagulant medication on a long term basis. Clinical Manager A stated that this medication should have been addressed in the initial POC, but was not addressed.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 4, 2025Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 25, 2006.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Health at Home Holdings-St. Louis, LLC owns 100% directly since Nov 1, 2021.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Kathryn Scherrer (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
Health at Home Holdings-St. Louis, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 1, 2021
Health at HOME Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 1, 2021
Tennessee Health CARE Group LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 1, 2021
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 1, 2021

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (232 surveys completed): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate92.46% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.89% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.57% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 26 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 63141, where this agency’s office is, 26 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.