Hearth Record

Homecall

A home health agency in Baltimore, Maryland 21215

4701 Mount Hope Drive, Suite A, Baltimore, Maryland 21215. (410) 644-0105.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 7, 2025: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 7, 2025: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on records reviewed from April 1, 2024, to March 26, 2025, the agency failed to ensure timely submission of OASIS assessments to the CMS system. The findings include: A review of the agency’s Error Report 3330 revealed that 42 OASIS assessments were submitted late, exceeding the 30-day submission requirement.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 497 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record reviews, the agency’s staff failed to complete the patient’s visit frequencies as ordered in the plan of care (POC). The missed visits were undocumented, or the patient’s physician was not notified of the missed visit. This occurred for 6 out of 17 records reviewed. Missed visits and the lack of notification to the patient’s physician placed patients at risk for not meeting outcome goals and risk for delays in appropriate treatments and care. Patients: #1, #3, #4, #6, #7, #13 Findings include: 1. On 4/7/2025, review of patient #1medical record revealed on 3/15/2025 and 3/21/2025 the patient had missed visits for skilled nursing services. No documentary evidence shows the patient’s physician was notified of the missed visits. 2. On 4/7/2025, a review of patient #3 medical record revealed on the week of 3/16/2025 of patient’s care that no skilled nursing visit occurred to follow the 1w9w ordered visit frequency. Nor is there a missed note to indicate why the visit did not occur or that the patient’s physician was notified of the missed visit. 3. On 4/7/2025, a review of patient #4 medical record revealed a home health aide (HHA) visit frequency for 2wk4 effective 3/23/2025. There is no evidence to support any aide visits occurred, and no missed notes indicating why the visits did not happen. During an interview with the agency’s Executive Director, it was found the agency had no full-time equivalent (FTE) aide. The current HHA works prn (as-needed basis). 4. On 4/7/2025, a review of patient #6 medical record revealed that a skilled nurse (SN) missed visits on 8/8 & 8/9/2024 for caregiver/patient refused does not show that notification to the patient’s physician of the missed visits. 5. On 4/7/2025, a review of patient #7’s medical record revealed HHA services ordered for 2wk3 and 1wk3 effective 2/9/2025. No HHA visit occurred during the week of 2/9/2025, and there was no missed visit note to indicate why the visit did not happen. 6. On 4/7/2025, a review of patient #13 medical record revealed SN services ordered 2wk1, 1wk5, and 2 PRN. During week 1, only one SN visit occurred with no missed note indicating why the 2nd visit did not occur. To ensure the patient’s needs are still met, the physician should be notified of missed visits, and the agency should attempt to reschedule them.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 752 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of medical records, the agency’s administration failed to ensure that an assessment of the patient by nursing or rehabilitation therapy occurs within 48 hours of referral for 9 out of 17 patients. The agency not performing assessments timely placed the patients at risk for delays in care and adverse health care outcomes. Patients: #2, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13 Findings include: 1. On 4/7/2025, a review of a patient #2 medical record revealed the referral date as 1/8/2025. The patient’s start of care (SOC) was 1/13/2025. There was no documentary evidence to support that the physician ordered the SOC. The 1/10/25 intake note indicates the physician is agreeable to 1/13/25 SOC. There is no way to recognize if the agency requested the SOC based on the agency’s availability; this should not occur. 2. On 4/7/2025, a review of a patient #13 medical record revealed the referral date as 10/8/2024. The patient’s SOC was 10/14/2024. There was no documentary evidence to support that the physician ordered this SOC. The 10/11/24 intake note indicates the physician is agreeable to the 10/14/24 SOC. There is no way to recognize if the agency requested the SOC based on the agency’s availability; this should not occur. 3. On 4/7/2025, a review of patient #12’s medical record revealed the referral date as 2/13/2025. The patient’s SOC was 2/19/2025. There was no documentary evidence to support that the physician ordered this SOC. The 2/18/2025 coordination note indicates the patient is agreeable to the 2/19/2025 SOC. There is no way to recognize if the agency requested the SOC based on the agency’s availability; this should not occur. 4. On 4/7/2025, a review of patient #11’s medical record revealed the referral date as 2/19/2025. The patient’s SOC was 2/26/2025. The 2/20/25 coordination note indicates a verbal order was received from the patient’s physician for a 2/21/25 SOC. 5. On 4/7/2025, a review of a patient #10 medical record revealed the referral date as 10/24/2024. The patient’s SOC was 10/28/2024. The 10/25/2025 intake note indicates that the physician is agreeable to 10/28/2024 to SOC. There is no way to recognize if the agency requested the SOC based on the agency’s availability; this should not occur. 6. On 4/7/2025, a review of a patient #9 medical record revealed the referral date as 10/30/2024. The patient’s SOC was 11/4/2024. The 11/1/2024 intake note indicates that the physician is agreeable to 11/4/2024 to SOC. There is no way to recognize if the agency requested the SOC based on the agency’s availability; this should not occur. 7. On 4/7/2025, a review of patient #8’s medical record revealed the referral date as 9/5/2024. The patient’s SOC was 9/9/2024. The 9/6/2024 intake note indicates that the physician is agreeable to 9/7/2024 but then agreeable to the 9/9/2024 SOC. There is no way to recognize if the agency requested the SOC based on the agency’s availability; this should not occur. 8. On 4/7/2025, a review of patient #7’s medical record revealed the referral date as 2/3/2025. The patient’s SOC was 2/8/2025. The 2/7/2025 intake note indicates that the physician is agreeable to the 2/8/2025 SOC. There is no way to recognize if the agency requested the SOC based on the agency’s availability; this should not occur. 9. On 4/7/2025, a review of a patient #5 medical record revealed the referral date as 3/10/2025. The patient’s start of care (SOC) was 3/20/2025. There was no documentary evidence to support that the physician ordered this SOC. The 3/19/25 intake note indicates the physician is agreeable to 3/20/25 SOC. There is no way to recognize if the agency requested the SOC based on the agency’s availability; this should not occur. Initial assessments must occur within 48 hours of referral, a patient’s return home, or the physician-ordered start of care date. An agency shall not request a change of the start of care to accommodate the agency’s convenience. Delays in care are a repeat deficient practice from the agency’s 2021 re-certification survey.”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • Aides Are Members Of Interdisciplinary Team

    The inspectors’ words, 195 words

    “Aides are members of interdisciplinary team CFR(s): 484.80(g)(4) Home health aides must be members of the interdisciplinary team, must report changes in the patient’s condition to a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, and must complete appropriate records in compliance with the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Home health aides are members of the interdisciplinary team. They must report changes in the patient’s condition to a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional and complete appropriate records required by the HHA. Failure to comply with regulations places patients at risk for inadequate health care. During interdisciplinary team meetings, all HHA staff involved in the patient’s care must be present and, where appropriate, should contribute to any discussion regarding the patient’s care. This did not occur. Findings include: 1. On 3/26/2025, a review of the agency’s interdisciplinary team meeting (case conference attendance records), records for the past 2 months included meetings on 2/5, 2/12, 2/19, 2/26, 3/5, 3/12, 3/19, 3/26/2025 revealed no HHA in attendance at the meetings. 2. The agency’s executive director confirmed during an interview that aides do not currently participate in the interdisciplinary team meeting.”

    Rule G0804. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 7, 2025Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 14, 1987.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this agency.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (104 surveys completed): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 74% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate86.17% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.75% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.90% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 15 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 21215, where this agency’s office is, 15 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.