Homecare Maryland, LLC
A home health agency in Owings Mills, Maryland 21117
10090 Red Run Blvd, Fl 3, Owings Mills, Maryland 21117. (410) 566-5015.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jan 13, 2025: a recertification inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 13, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
-
Encoding And Transmitting Oasis
The inspectors’ words, 151 words
“Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview with AD, the agency failed to transmit completed OASIS assessments to the CMS system within 30 days of completing initial assessments, as required by regulation 484.45(a). This failure to adhere to the required time frame for OASIS transmission has the potential to compromise the accuracy and timeliness of data reporting and impact compliance with federal regulations. Review of the agency’s Error Summary Report for the period of 1/1/24 through 1/6/25 revealed error #3330 with one hundred twelve (112) records being transmitted beyond the 30-day requirement time frame.”
-
Infection Prevention
The inspectors’ words, 373 words
“Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation during a home visit with agency clinical staff, the clinical supervisor and the Registered Nurse (RN) clinician, adequate infection control prevention was not implemented during the provision of wound care. The RN failed to demonstrate adequate infection control practices. Failure to adhere to infection control standards placed patients at risk for infection. Patient: 16 Employee: 2 Findings included: Infection prevention practices require the separation between dirty (contaminated: covered with disease-causing organisms) and clean (reduced level of contamination) tasks and areas during a dressing change an invasive procedure to prevent the transmission (cross-contamination) of bacteria/viruses, which can lead to infection. It means that hands must be washed or sanitized in addition to glove changes between dirty (for example, removing a soiled dressing, cleansing a wound, removing used clinical supplies, cleansing before an invasive procedure and touching a cellular telephone). Clean procedures (for example, inserting a urinary catheter applying new dressing materials or handling new clinical supplies, including medications). Additionally, every attempt should be made to avoid the contamination of sterile (free of bacteria) or clean items. The regulation for standard infection prevention states that the home health agency must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This did not occur. During the care visit, on 1/9/25, with patient #16, the RN performed wound care to the patient right heel. The Employee #2 RN gathered and laid the wound care dressing and bandage supplies on a barrier, the patient’s affected part was placed on a barrier, the wound cleanser and paper measuring tape were placed on the floor with no barrier, and a trash bag was placed within reach of the RN. The RN cleansed and treated the wound as ordered; however, when measuring the wound the RN used the contaminated paper measuring tape (that had been placed directly on the floor) to measure the open wound. During the interview on 1/9/25, the clinical supervisor acknowledged the breaches in universal precautions.”
-
Rn Performs Assessment
The inspectors’ words, 340 words
“RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of patient records and interviews with agency staff, the agency staff did not communicate delays in care for 2 out of 17 patients placing the patients at risk for adverse or negative health care outcomes. Patients: #4 and #13 Findings included: The home health agency furnishing services must maintain communication to ensure that their efforts are coordinated effectively and support the objectives outlined in the patients plan of care. 1.All clinical staff members have the responsibility to communicate or refer patient care related issues to other professional disciplines to ensure the provision of optimal health care services and to prevent adverse outcomes. This did not occur, as evidenced by the review of patient records on 1/13/25. During record review on 1/13/25, Patient number four had an order for Occupational Therapy (OT) was dated 1/5/25; the OT evaluation had not been completed as of 1/13/25. When asked the agency staff had no further documentation or explanation for the delay in care. During record review on 1/13/25 for patient number thirteen, a referral for care was accepted by the agency on 9/24/24. Patient admission to the agency was scheduled for 9/27/24. The admission was rescheduled to 9/29/24 due to the patient’s doctor’s appointment on 9/27/24. There was no documentation noting why the admission did not occur on 9/29/24. Patient thirteen was noted as admitted to the agency on 10/3/24. There was no documentation for the care delay from 9/29/24-10/3/24. When asked the agency staff had no further documentation or explanation for the delay in care.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2025 | Recertification inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 8, 1984.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Lifebridge Investments, Inc. owns 51% directly since Jan 1, 2011.
- Lifebridge Investments, Inc. runs it.
- 8 owners or officers are people: Leonard J Attman (owns 5% or more directly, 32.68%); Leonard J Attman (corporate director, 32.68%); Gary L Attman (owns 5% or more directly, 16.32%); Gary L Attman (corporate director, 16.32%); Brian Finglass (corporate officer); David H Krajewski (corporate director); David H Krajewski (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jonathan B Binder (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lifebridge Investments, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 51% | Jan 1, 2011 |
| Lifebridge Health Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 51% | Jan 1, 2011 |
| Lifebridge Investments, Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | Jan 1, 2011 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (303 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 89.65% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 9.20% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.36% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 14 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 21117, where this agency’s office is, 14 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| VNA of Maryland | 3 |
| Homecentris Home Health II | 5 |
| Homecare Maryland, LLC This home health agency | 3.5 |
| Phr of Baltimore, Inc. | 4.5 |
| Adoration Home Health | 4.5 |
| Medstar Health Home Care | 3.5 |
| Centerwell Home Health | 5 |
| Stella Maris, Inc. | 4 |
| The Johns Hopkins Home Health Services, Inc. | 3.5 |
| Bayada Home Health Care, Inc. | 3.5 |
| Amedisys Home Health of Maryland LLC | 4.5 |
| Home Call | 3.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.