Hearth Record

Southern Home Health

A home health agency in Lake Charles, Louisiana 70605

3417 Patrick Street, Lake Charles, Louisiana 70605. (337) 479-2233.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 18, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 18, 2026: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 488 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the patient’s written individualized POC (Plan of Care) was followed as evidenced by the PT (Physical Therapist) failing to record/monitor blood sugar readings for 2 (#7, #16) out of 17 sampled patients. Findings: 1. Patient #7. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 12/20/2025. The patient’s diagnoses included diabetes, hypertensive heart disease with heart Failure and hemiplegia following cerebral infarction. The certification period reviewed was 02/18/2026 to 04/18/2026. Review of the patient’s POC (Plan of Care) for certification period 02/18/2026 to 04/18/2026 revealed an order for “PT effective 02/22/2026 1wk8wk, (physical therapy effective the week of 02/22/2026 visit one time a week for eight weeks). Further review of the POC revealed orders for, “…report falling outside the following established parameters… FBS (fasting blood sugar) (greater than) 200 RBS (random blood sugar) 300.” There were no orders for skilled nurse visits. Review of the patient’s PT visit notes dated 02/25/2026, 03/04/2026, and 03/11/2026 revealed there was no evidence the PT recorded or monitored the patient’s blood sugar readings. On 03/17/2026 at 1:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director). S1ED reviewed the patient’s electronic clinical record and confirmed there was no evidence the PT recorded or monitored the patient’s blood sugar readings and should have. 2. Patient #16. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 11/14/2025. The patient’s diagnosis included diabetes. The certification period reviewed was 01/13/2026 to 03/13/2026. Review of the patient’s POC (Plan of Care) for certification period 01/13/2026 to 03/13/2026 revealed an order for “PT 1wk8wk, (physical therapy visit one time a week for eight weeks). Further review of the POC revealed orders for, “…report falling outside the following established parameters… FBS 200 RBS 300.” There were no orders for skilled nurse visits. Review of the patient’s PT visit notes dated 01/15/2026, 01/23/2026, 01/30/2026, 02/06/2026, 02/10/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/27/2026, and 03/04/2026 revealed there was no evidence the PT recorded or monitored the patient’s blood sugar readings. On 03/17/2026 at 9:23 a.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director). S1ED reviewed the patient’s electronic clinical record and confirmed there was no evidence the PT recorded or monitored the patient’s blood sugar readings and should have.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Integrate All Services

    The inspectors’ words, 646 words

    “Integrate all services CFR(s): 484.60(d)(3) Integrate services, whether services are provided directly or under arrangement, to assure the identification of patient needs and factors that could affect patient safety and treatment effectiveness and the coordination of care provided by all disciplines. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview, the agency staff failed to demonstrate that effective coordination of care occurred when the HHA (Home Health Aide) failed to inform the nursing staff of Patient #7’s complaint of exhaustion after straining to have a bowel movement for an hour for 1 (#7) out of 7 patients (#1-#7) seen for home visits out of a total sample of 17 patients. Findings: Review of the agency policy titled, “Coordination of Care, From Admit through Discharge” with a revision date of 12/01/2025 read in part, Purpose: To establish processes and criteria so that the coordination of patient care will be optimal from admit through discharge. Procedure: Coordination of Care among disciplines and between in-person and virtual clinicians: Patient care is coordinated among various disciplines and services through care planning processes to ensure continuity of care from admission to discharge. This includes: c. Appropriate, timely communication with the patient, caregivers, and staff involved in the patient’s care regarding patient needs, goals, and care as well as changes in these… Significant changes in the patient’s condition (i.e. new or worsening symptoms…) i.e. (in other words). Patient #7. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 12/20/2025. The patient’s diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure and hemiplegia following cerebral infarction. The certification period reviewed was 02/18/2026 to 04/18/2026. Review of the patient’s POC (Plan of Care) for certification period 02/18/2026 to 04/18/2026 revealed an order for “HHA effective 02/22/2026 1wk4wk, (home health aide effective the week of 02/22/2026 visit one time a week for four weeks). On 03/17/2026 at 11:05 a.m., a home visit was made to Patient #7’s home and S3HHA was present. The patient was observed sitting up in his recliner during the home visit. During the home visit, the patient refused his shower. The patient stated that he was so exhausted from straining to have a bowel movement (BM) prior to S3HHA arrival to his home. The patient stated that he had to manually remove the BM which took an hour. The patient stated that 4 days had passed since his last BM and that it was hard. He stated the stool softeners and Miralax (laxative) did not work. S3HHA stated she would bathe him in the recliner in place of the shower. The patient did not complain of pain during the home visit, but S3HHA was still present with the patient when the surveyor left the home. Review of the patient’s HHA note dated 03/17/2026 at 12:11 p.m. revealed S3HHA documented, “Chair bath. Pt complained of hurting too much.” Review of the patient’s coordination note dated 03/17/2026 with no time and documented by S2PCM (Program Case Manager) revealed, “Received call from (S3HHA) stating patient was having increased generalized pain and didn’t want to get in shower during her visit.” There was no evidence that S3HHA informed S2PCM about the patient not having a BM for 4 days and straining for an hour to have a BM, which exhausted him along with the pain that he was experiencing during his bath. On 03/17/2026 at 3:22 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2PCM. S2PCM stated that S3HHA did call and informed her that Patient #7 was having pain all over when she was changing his position to bathe him in the chair. S2PCM stated that S3HHA did not report the patient was straining to have a bowel movement and had to manually remove it and was too exhausted to get up out of his chair to shower. S2PCM confirmed that S3HHA should have reported it.”

    Rule G0606. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 18, 2026Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 31, 2000.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Louisiana Health CARE Group LLC owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2003.
  • LHC Group Inc. runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Stephanie F Hyatt (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Stephanie F Hyatt (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
Louisiana Health CARE Group LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2003
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companiesFeb 9, 2005
LHC Group Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Feb 9, 2005

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (206 surveys completed): 94% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate92.13% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.20% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.21% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70605, where this agency’s office is, 12 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.