Hearth Record

Intensive Home Health Care, Inc.

A home health agency in Ferriday, Louisiana 71334

1810 Ee Wallace Road, Suite 6, Ferriday, Louisiana 71334. (318) 336-9030.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 22, 2026: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 22, 2026: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 708 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the patient’s written POC (plan of care) was followed by failing to collect and document the patient’s weight or measure arm girth for 4 (#2, #4, #5, and #6) of 7 sampled patients. Findings: Review of the Agencies undated policy titled “Plan of Care/485 policy” read in part... Implementation of the plan of care: All services shall be delivered in accordance with the authorized plan of care. Patient #2 Review of Patient #2’s clinical record for the certification period of 12/20/2025- 02/17/2026 revealed the following diagnoses in part…Age related Fracture to Left Femur, Acute Embolism, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Anemia. Review of the Patient #2’s plan of care for the certification period of 12/20/2025- 02/17/2026 revealed an order for skilled nurse visits 1wk 9 (1 visit a week for 9 weeks). The POC revealed an order for weights every skilled nurse visit, and if unable to obtain weight to obtain arm girth in centimeters. Review of Patient #2’s vital sign log and nurse’s notes for the certification period of 12/20/2025- 02/17/2026 revealed no weights or arm girth documented. Patient #4 Review of Patient #4’s clinical record for the certification period of 11/27/2025-01/25/2026 revealed the following diagnoses, included in part…, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertensive Heart Disease, and Depression. Review of the Patient #4’s plan of care for the certification period of 11/27/2025-01/25/2026 revealed an order for skilled nurse visits 1wk6 and 1wk2 (1 visit a week for 6 weeks and 1 visit a week for 2 weeks). The POC revealed an order for weights every skilled nurse visit and if unable to obtain weight to obtain arm girth in centimeters. Review of Patient #4’s vital sign log and nurse’s notes for the certification period of 11/27/2025-01/25/2026 revealed no weights or arm girth documented for the following nursing visits: 12/4/2025, 12/18/2025, and 01/02/2026. Patient #5 Review of Patient #5’s clinical record for the certification period of 11/29/2025-01/27/2025 revealed the following diagnoses included in part… Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Non Pressure Chronic Ulcer, Hypertensive Heart Disease, and Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the Patient #5’s plan of care for the certification period of 11/29/2025-01/27/2025 revealed an order for skilled nurse visits 1wk8 (1 visit a week for 8 weeks). The POC revealed an order for weights every skilled nurse visit and if unable to obtain weight to obtain arm girth in centimeters. Review of Patient 5’s vital sign log and nurse’s notes for the certification period of 11/29/2025-01/27/2026 revealed no weights or arm girth documented. Patient #6 Review of Patient #6’s clinical record for the certification period of 10/17/025-12/10/2025 revealed the following diagnoses included in part…Orthopedic Aftercare of Surgical Amputation to Right above the Knee Amputation, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Hypertension. Review of the Patient #6’s plan of care for the certification period of 10/17/2025-12/10/2025 revealed an order for skilled nurse visits 1wk9 (1 visit a week for 9 weeks). The POC revealed an order for weights every skilled nurse visit and if unable to obtain weight to obtain arm girth in centimeters. Review of Patient #6’s vital sign log and nurse’s notes for the certification period of 10/17/2025-12/10/2025 revealed no weights or arm girth documented for the following nursing visits: 10/17/2025, 10/21/2025, 11/04/2025, 11/18/2025, 11/25/2025, and 12/02/2025. An interview on 01/21/2026 at 9:15 a.m. with S2LPN confirmed that she does not collect weight or arm girth every visit because at times she forgets. An interview on 01/22/2026 at 10:49 a.m. with S1DON confirmed the above weights/arm girth were not documented as collected in the patient’s charts, but should have been.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 467 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview the agency failed to ensure the skilled nurse followed accepted standards of practice for infection control for 1 (#1) of 3 patients observed during home visits as evidenced by failing to ensure the skilled nurse changed gloves and perform hand hygiene appropriately during wound care. Findings: Review of the Agency’s undated policy titled, “Infection Control Policy” read in part…Standard Transmission: All personnel will use standard precautions at all times to prevent the spread of infectious agents; this includes not limited to, hand hygiene, use of personal protective equipment, and proper disposal of sharps. Review of Patient #1’s plan of care for certification period of 12/15/2025-2/12/2026 revealed Patient #1 had a pressure ulcer to right and left foot with the following orders in place: Wound #3 Left Medial distal foot-cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply moisturizer lotion to surrounding tissue, mix and apply topical antibiotics, apply alginate, cover with dry gauze, apply abdominal pad and wrap with kerlix. Wound #7- Right foot-cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply moisturizer lotion to surrounding tissue, mix and apply topical antibiotics, apply alginate, cover with dry gauze, apply abdominal pad and wrap with kerlix. An observation on 01/21/2026 at 9:15 a.m. of S2LPN performing wound care on Patient #1’s bilateral feet revealed that S2LPN applied gloves prior to wound care on the right foot wound. S2LPN was observed removing the right foot wound dressing, discarding the old dressing, reaching over in clean the field and removing 4x4 gauze from original packaging, cleaning the wound, discarding 4x4 gauze, reaching over into clean field, grabbing clean dressing, and then appling the clean dressing to the wound bed. S2LPN at this time removed the old gloves and discarded them. S2LPN then applied new gloves and provided wound care as above to the left foot wound. S2LPN failed to change out gloves and sanitize hands between each step during wound care for both wounds. At the end of wound care, S2LPN was observed wrapping the package of gauze that she reached into with soiled gloves and placed them back with the clean wound care supplies. An interview on 01/21/2026 at 9:35 a.m. S2LPN confirmed that she did not sanitized her hands in-between gloves changes and did not change gloves more than 1 time for each wound. S2LPN stated that she was unsure how many times her gloves needed to be changed. S2LPN confirmed that she did plan to use the 4x4 gauze that she placed in her bag after reaching into them with soiled gloves, but will now throw them out.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 22, 2026Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 26, 1991.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Emily C Merrill (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Emily C Merrill (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Dan R Merrill (owns 5% or more directly, 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (43 surveys completed): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate70.14% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate16.92% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.06% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 71334, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4.25 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 71334
PlaceQuality rating
Louisiana Homecare of Miss-Lou4.5
Intensive Home Health Care, Inc. This home health agency2.5
Elara Caring4
Elara Caring4.5
Elara Caring4.5
Mangham Home Care, Inc.2.5
Allegiance Home Home Health of East LouisianaNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.