Hearth Record

Mangham Home Care, Inc.

A home health agency in Mangham, Louisiana 71259

714 Broadway, Mangham, Louisiana 71259. (318) 248-2797.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Oct 15, 2024: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 15, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Care Planning, Coordination, Quality Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 266 words

    “Care planning, coordination, quality of care CFR(s): 484.60 Condition of participation: Care planning, coordination of services, and quality of care. Patients are accepted for treatment on the reasonable expectation that an HHA can meet the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs in his or her place of residence. Each patient must receive an individualized written plan of care, including any revisions or additions. The individualized plan of care must specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment, including identification of the responsible discipline(s), and the measurable outcomes that the HHA anticipates will occur as a result of implementing and coordinating the plan of care. The individualized plan of care must also specify the patient and caregiver education and training. Services must be furnished in accordance with accepted standards of practice. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to meet the Condition of Participation of Care Planning, Coordination of Services, and Quality of Care as evidenced by: The home health agency failed to ensure patients received home health services as written in their individualized plan of care, as ordered by a doctor of medicine for 3 (#1, #4, #6) of 6 (#1,#2,#3, #4, #5, #6) sampled patients. The deficient practice was evidenced by the agency failing to ensure patients received the number of skilled nursing hours, per week, as ordered by the medical director in their individualized plan of care for 3 (#1, #4, #6) of 6 (#1,#2,#3, #4, #5, #6) sampled patients. (see findings in G-572).”

    Rule G0570. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 912 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the home health agency failed to ensure patients received home health services as written in their individualized plan of care, as ordered by a doctor of medicine. The provider failed to ensure patients received the number of skilled nursing hours, per week, as ordered by the medical director in their individualized plan of care for 3 (#1, #4, #6) of 6 (#1,#2,#3, #4, #5, #6) sampled patients. Review of the policy and procedure related to staffing (revised 10/01/2024) revealed in part: All extended care patients will be staffed according to physician orders and payor authorization. Patient #1 Record review revealed Patient #1 had a start of care date with the agency on 02/22/2018. Patient #1 had a primary diagnosis of spastic quadriplegia cerebral palsy and a secondary diagnosis of infantile scoliosis. The most recent certified plan of care had a start date of 07/24/2024 and an end date of 09/17/2024. The plan of care called for Patient #1 to receive up to 84 hours per week of skilled nursing care in the home, to be rendered by the provider. Review of the employee time management system revealed the following hours recorded per week (up to 84 hours/week) worked by the skilled nurses in the certification period from 07/20/2024 -09/17/2024: 07/21/2024-07/27/2024= 59.75 hours (24.25 hours not provided) 07/28/2024-08/03/2024= 70.75 hours (13.25 hours not provided) 08/04/2024-08/10/2024= 49.75 hours (34.25 hours not provided) 08/11/2024-08/17/2024= 65.25 hours (18.75 hours not provided) Patient #1 was approved for 336 hours and the Home Health Agency provided 245.5 hours for the above referenced certification period. The provider failed to provide 90.5 skilled nursing hours. Forty - eight of the 90.5 skilled nursing hours not provided were on Sundays (07/21/2024, 07/28/2024, 08/04/2024, 08/11/2024). Patient #4 Record review revealed Patient #4 had a start of care date on 04/01/2014 with the agency. Patient #4 had a primary diagnosis unspecified convulsions and secondary diagnosis of intellectual disabilities. The most recent completed certified plan of care started on 08/11/2024 and an ended on 10/09/2024. The individualized plan of care called for up to 56 hours per week of skilled nursing care in the home to be rendered by the provider. Review of the employee time management system revealed the following hours recorded per week worked by the skilled nurses in the certification period from 08/11/2024 -10/09/2024: 08/11/2024-08/17/2024= 45.24 hours (10.76 hours not provided) 08/18/2024-08/24/2024= 48.5 hours (7.5 hours not provided) 09/01/2024-09/07/2024= 46 hours (10 hours not provided) 09/15/2024-09/21/2024= 48 hours (8 hours not provided) 09/29/2024-10/05/2024= 48 hours (8 hours not provided) Patient #4 was approved for 280 hours of skilled nursing care. The Home Health Agency provided 235.74 hours for the above referenced certification period. The Home Health Agency failed to provide 44.26 skilled nursing hours. Eight of the 44.26 hours not provided were on a Sunday (08/11/2024). Patient #6 Record review revealed Patient #6 had a start of care date on 03/31/2014. Patient #6 had a primary diagnosis of reduction deficits of unspecified lower limbs and secondary unspecified defect of radius and bilateral disabilities. The most recent completed certified plan of care started on 08/05/2024 and ended on 10/03/2024. The individualized plan of care called for up to 56 hours per week of skilled nursing care in the home to be rendered by the provider. Review of the employee time management system revealed the following hours recorded per week worked by the skilled nurses in the certification period from 08/05/2024 -10/03/2024: 08/11/2024-08/17/2024= 48 hours (8 hours not provided) 08/18/2024-08/24/2024= 48 hours (8 hours not provided) 08/25/2024-08/31/2024= 40 hours (16 hours not provided) 09/01/2024-09/07/2024= 48 hours (8 hours not provided) 09/08/2024-09/14/2024= 48 hours (8 hours not provided) 09/15/2024-09/21/2024= 48 hours (8 hours not provided) 09/22/2024-09/28/2024= 48 hours (8 hours not provided) Patient #6 was approved for 392 hours of skilled nursing care and the Home Health Agency provided hours 328 for the above referenced certification period. The Home Health Agency failed to provide 64 skilled nursing hours. Thirty - two of the 64 hours not provided were on Sundays (08/11/2024, 08/25/2024, 09/08/2024, 09/22/2024). On 10/15/2024 at 8:15 a.m., an interview with S1 Program Director confirmed skilled nurse staffing on Sundays was an issue. On 10/15/2024 at 9:50 a.m., an interview with S1 Program Director confirmed Patient #1 did not receive 84 hours per week of skilled nursing service in the certification period from 07/24/2024 to 09/17/2024. S1 Program Director also confirmed Patient #4 did not receive 56 hours per week of skilled nursing service in the certification period from 08/11/2024 to 10/09/2024. S1 Program Director further confirmed Patient #6 did not receive 56 hours per week of skilled nursing service in the certification period from 08/05/2024 to 10/03/2024. S1 Program Director confirmed the agency was dependent on family as backup staff when skilled nursing hours could not be provided by the agency.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 15, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Feb 7, 2024Recertification inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 4, 1991.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 16 owners or officers are people: Connie Gill (general partner, 25%); Connie Gill (corporate officer, 25%); Connie Gill (corporate director, 25%); Connie Gill (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Krystal G Fleming (general partner, 25%); Krystal G Fleming (corporate director, 25%); Judy Gilley (owns 5% or more directly, 0.25%); Judy Gilley (corporate officer, 0.25%); Connie Gill (owns 5% or more directly, 0.25%); Krystal G Fleming (owns 5% or more directly, 0.25%); Krystal G Fleming (corporate officer, 0.25%); Krystal G Fleming (managing employee (on the payroll), 0.25%); Colby R Gill (owns 5% or more directly, 0.25%); Colby R Gill (general partner, 0.25%); Colby R Gill (corporate officer, 0.25%); Judy Gilley (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (48 surveys completed): 94% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate70.58% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate21.20% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.00% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 71259, where this agency’s office is, 14 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.