Hearth Record

Amberwell Health at Home

A home health agency in Atchison, Kansas 66002

705 Commercial St, Atchison, Kansas 66002. (913) 360-5520.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Oct 2, 2025: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 2, 2025: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,194 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure that when receiving a general referral for home health services that the physician was contacted for orders based off of assessment finding when developing patient plans of care for 8 of 10 sample patients (Patients 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,10). This deficient practice placed all patients at risk for unmet care needs, and adverse outcomes related to the lack of care coordination with the physician regarding the plan of care. Findings Include: Patient 1 Review of Patient 1’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 09/12/25 was based off of a general referral verbal order. Review of the Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment note showed that the Registered Nurse developed the plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the orders and treatments listed on the plan of care. The Occupational Therapist completed their evaluation on 09/12/25 and developed the OT plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the ordered frequency and treatments listed. There was no documented evidence of any communication with the physician who would sign/approve the plans of care at the time of their development. Patient 2 Review of Patient 2’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 09/19/25 was based off of a general referral verbal order. Review of the Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment note showed that the Registered Nurse developed the plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the orders and treatments listed on the plan of care. The Occupational Therapist completed their evaluation on 09/19/25 and developed the OT plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the ordered frequency and treatments listed. There was no documented evidence of any communication with the physician who would sign/approve the plans of care at the time of their development. Patient 3 Review of Patient 3’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 09/27/25 was based off of a general referral verbal order. Review of the Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment note showed that the Registered Nurse developed the plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the orders and treatments listed on the plan of care. The Occupational Therapist completed their evaluation on 09/29/25 and developed the OT plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the ordered frequency and treatments listed. There was no documented evidence of any communication with the physician who would sign/approve the plans of care at the time of their development. Patient 4 Review of Patient 4’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 09/04/25 was based off of a general referral verbal order. Review of the Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment note showed that the Registered Nurse developed the plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the orders and treatments listed on the plan of care. The Occupational Therapist completed their evaluation on 09/04/25 and developed the OT plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the ordered frequency and treatments listed. There was no documented evidence of any communication with the physician who would sign/approve the plans of care at the time of their development. Patient 6 Review of Patient 6’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 09/18/25 was based off of a general referral verbal order. Review of the Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment note showed that the Registered Nurse developed the plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the orders and treatments listed on the plan of care. The Occupational Therapist completed their evaluation on 09/18/25 and developed the OT plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the ordered frequency and treatments listed. There was no documented evidence of any communication with the physician who would sign/approve the plans of care at the time of their development. Patient 7 Review of Patient 7’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 09/06/25 was based off of a general referral verbal order. Review of the Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment not showed that the Registered Nurse developed the plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the orders and treatment listed on the plan of care. The Occupational Therapist completed their evaluation on 09/08/25 and developed the OT plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the ordered frequency and treatments listed. There was no documented evidence of any communication with the physician who would sign/approve the plans of care at the time of their development. Patient 8 Review of Patient 8’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 07/14/25 was based off of a general referral verbal order. Review of the Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment showed that the Registered Nurse developed the plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the orders and treatment listed on the plan of care. There was no documented evidence of any communication with the physician who would sign/approve the plans of care at the time of their development. Patient 10 Review of Patient 10’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 06/11/25 was based off of a general referral verbal order. Review of the Start of Care Comprehensive Assessment showed that the Registered Nurse developed the plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the orders and treatment listed on the plan of care. The Occupational Therapist completed their evaluation on 06/11/25 and developed the OT plan of care but failed to contact the physician for approval of the ordered frequency and treatments listed. There was no documented evidence of any communication with the physician who would sign/approve the plans of care at the time of their development. During an interview on 10/02/25 at 9:15 AM, Staff A, Agency Director confirmed the above finding of lack of care coordination with the physician regarding the plan of care.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Hha Administrator Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 202 words

    “HHA administrator contact information CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(ii) (ii) Contact information for the HHA administrator, including the administrator’s name, business address, and business phone number in order to receive complaints. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and document review, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure the patient’s right to receive the contact information for the HHA’s administrator, including the administrator’s name, business address, and business phone number in order to receive complaints for 10 of 10 sample patients (Patients 1-10). The agency’s failure to ensure the patient’s right to receive the contact information for the administrator, placed all patients currently on service, at risk for unmet needs due to not being able to contact the home health agency’s administrator. Findings Include: Review of all admission documents for Patients 1 through 10, showed the agency failed to document any evidence the Agency’s Administrator contact information was provided to the patients during the admission process or thereafter. Review of Agency Admission packet and all admission documents provided, showed the agency failed to provide any written information regarding the Agency’s Administrator contact information, such as name, address or business phone number, being giving during the admission process or thereafter.”

    Rule G0414. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 510 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to ensure all patients plans of care included all required elements, such as all safety measures for all medications they were taking for 4 of 10 sample patients (Patients 5, 6, 9, 10). This deficient practice placed all patients at risk for unmet care needs, and adverse outcomes. Findings Include: Patient 5 Review of Patient 5’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 08/22/25. The Principle Diagnosis showed; Metabolic Encephalopathy. The listed medications showed; Aspirin 81 mg oral tab once daily. Review of the safety measures listed on the plan of care lacked evidence of bleeding precautions for the patient. Patient 6 Review of Patient 6’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 09/18/25. The Principle Diagnosis showed; Acute Cystitis with Hematuria. The listed medications showed; Plavix 75 mg oral tab once daily. Review of the safety measures listed on the plan of care lacked evidence of bleeding precautions for the patient. Patient 9 Review of Patient 9’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 06/24/25. The Principle Diagnosis showed; Displaced Fracture of Femur. The listed medications showed; Aspirin 81 mg oral tab once daily. Review of the safety measures listed on the plan of care lacked evidence of bleeding precautions for the patient. Patient 10 Review of Patient 10’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 06/11/25. The Principle Diagnosis showed; Compression Fracture of T11 and T12 Vertebra. The listed medications showed; Aspirin 81 mg oral tab once daily. Review of the safety measures listed on the plan of care lacked evidence of bleeding precautions for the patient. During an interview on 10/02/25 at 9:50 AM, Staff A, Agency Director confirmed the above findings of not having all the specific requirements, treatments, and safety measures included as a part of the patient’s plans of care.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Discharge And Transfer Summaries

    The inspectors’ words, 433 words

    “Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, and staff interview, it was determined the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to send a transfer summary to the facility where the patient was receiving in-patient health care services for 1 of 10 sample patients (Patient 10). The HHA also failed to send a discharge summary to the primary care physician responsible for patient’s health care services, within 5 business days from the date of discharge for 1 of 10 sample patients (Patient 8). This deficient practice had the potential to affect patient safety and to place the patients at risk for adverse outcomes related to the lack of care coordination with other health care services. Findings Include: Patient 10 Review of Patient 10’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 06/11/25. Review of visit notes for the current certification period showed a transfer to the hospital on 07/03/25. The HHA completed an OASIS/Transfer to In-Patient Facility (TIF) on 07/03/25 however, there was no evidence of a Transfer Summary being completed with the TIF. There was no evidence of a Transfer Summary being sent to the receiving facility. Patient 8 Review of Patient 8’s clinical record showed the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care with a Start of Care date of 07/14/25. Review of the visit notes for the current certification period showed the patient was discharged on 07/28/25 and a discharge summary was completed at that time. However, the summary was not sent to the physician until 08/11/25 which was greater than 5 business days from the discharge date of 07/28/25. During an interview on 10/02/25 at 10:05 AM, Staff A, Agency Director, confirmed the above findings of the agency not providing Transfer/Discharge Summaries in a timely manner to the receiving health care providers.”

    Rule G1022. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 2, 2025Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 6, 1987.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 28 owners or officers are people: Chase Dudzinski (corporate officer); Taylor Hausmann (corporate director); Alicia Sorensen (corporate officer); Alicia Sorensen (corporate director); Alicia Sorensen (managing employee (on the payroll)); Lorin Affield (corporate officer); Lorin Affield (corporate director); Tyler Alan Darland (corporate officer); Tyler Alan Darland (corporate director); Tyler Alan Darland (managing employee (on the payroll)); Norma E Green (corporate officer); Norma E Green (corporate director); Norma E Green (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jordan Hawk (corporate officer); Jordan Hawk (corporate director); Gerald Henry (corporate officer); Gerald Henry (corporate director); Kelli R Mccarty (managing employee (on the payroll)); Amy Folsom (corporate officer); Amy Folsom (corporate director); Amy Folsom (managing employee (on the payroll)); Renee Nugent (corporate officer); Renee Nugent (corporate director); Stan Sluder (corporate director); Douglass Adair (corporate director); Jared Abel (corporate officer); Jared Abel (corporate director); Jared Abel (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (73 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 76% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.81% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate6.60% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.16% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 66002, where this agency’s office is, 10 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.