Hearth Record

Faith Home Healthcare, Inc.

A home health agency in Overland Park, Kansas 66210

11827 W 112th St., Ste 100, Overland Park, Kansas 66210. (913) 296-7636.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 22, 2024: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 22, 2024: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process

    The inspectors’ words, 293 words

    “Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process CFR(s): 484.102(a)(4) §403.748(a)(4), §416.54(a)(4), §418.113(a)(4), §441.184(a)(4), §460.84(a)(4), §482.15(a)(4), §483.73(a)(4), §483.475(a)(4), §484.102(a)(4), §485.68(a)(4), §485.542(a)(4), §485.625(a)(4), §485.727(a)(5), §485.920(a)(4), §486.360(a)(4), §491.12(a)(4), §494.62(a)(4) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The plan must do the following:] (4) Include a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State, and Federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation. * * [For ESRD facilities only at §494.62(a)(4)]: (4) Include a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State, and Federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation. The dialysis facility must contact the local emergency preparedness agency at least annually to confirm that the agency is aware of the dialysis facility’s needs in the event of an emergency. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) and interview the Home Health agency (HHA) failed to include information addressing the process for cooperation and collaboration with local, regional, state and federal emergency preparedness officials in their EPP. This affects all residents and could result in a delayed response to an emergency situation. Findings Include: Review of the agencies Emergency Preparedness Program updated in 2023 failed to provide a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, regional, state and federal emergency preparedness officials. During an interview on 02/21/24 between 11:00 AM and 12:00 PM, the Administrator stated that there was no process in place which provides a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, regional, state and federal emergency preparedness officials in the Emergency Preparedness Program.”

    Rule E0009. Standard-level.

  • Ep Testing Requirements

    The inspectors’ words, 2,060 words

    “EP Testing Requirements CFR(s): 484.102(d)(2) §416.54(d)(2), §418.113(d)(2), §441.184(d)(2), §460.84(d)(2), §482.15(d)(2), §483.73(d)(2), §483.475(d)(2), §484.102(d)(2), §485.68(d)(2), §485.542(d)(2), §485.625(d)(2), §485.727(d)(2), §485.920(d)(2), §491.12(d)(2), §494.62(d)(2). *[For ASCs at §416.54, CORFs at §485.68, REHs at §485.542, OPO, “Organizations” under §485.727, CMHCs at §485.920, RHCs/FQHCs at §491.12, and ESRD Facilities at §494.62]: (2) Testing. The [facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan annually. The [facility] must do all of the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based every 2 years; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct a facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the [facility] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the actual event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise at least every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For Hospices at 418.113(d):] (2) Testing for hospices that provide care in the patient’s home. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community based every 2 years; or (A) When a community based exercise is not accessible, conduct an individual facility based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospital is exempt from engaging in its next required full scale community-based exercise or individual facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (3) Testing for hospices that provide inpatient care directly. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospice is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop led by a facilitator that includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the hospice’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the hospice’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For PRFTs at §441.184(d), Hospitals at §482.15(d), CAHs at §485.625(d):] (2) Testing. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an [additional] annual exercise or and that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For PACE at §460.84(d):] (2) Testing. The PACE organization must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The PACE organization must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the PACE experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the PACE is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the PACE’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the PACE’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(d):] (2) The [LTC facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year, including unannounced staff drills using the emergency procedures. The [LTC facility, ICF/IID] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise. (B) If the [LTC facility] facility experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the LTC facility is exempt from engaging its next required a full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [LTC facility] facility’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [LTC facility] facility’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(d)]: (2) Testing. The ICF/IID must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year. The ICF/IID must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or. (B) If the ICF/IID experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the ICF/IID is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the ICF/IID’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the ICF/IID’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For HHAs at §484.102] (d)(2) Testing. The HHA must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The HHA must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or. (B) If the HHA experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the HHA is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the HHA’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the HHA’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For OPOs at §486.360] (d)(2) Testing. The OPO must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The OPO must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise or workshop at least annually. A tabletop exercise is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. If the OPO experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the OPO is exempt from engaging in its next required testing exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Analyze the OPO’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [RNHCI’s and OPO’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[ RNCHIs at §403.748]: (d)(2) Testing. The RNHCI must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The RNHCI must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise at least annually. A tabletop exercise is a group discussion led by a facilitator, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (ii) Analyze the RNHCI’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the RNHCI’s emergency plan, as needed. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the agency’s Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) and interview, the Home Health agency (HHA) failed to conduct or participate in exercises to test the EPP. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients at risk for harm or injury during an emergency situation. Findings Include: Review of the agencies Emergency Preparedness Program, the agency failed to include a training and testing program which included a full-scale community-based emergency preparedness exercise. During an interview on 02/21/24 between 11:00 AM and 12:00 PM, the Administrator stated that there was no full-scale community-based emergency preparedness program or exercise which was conducted in the past 2 years for the Emergency Preparedness Program.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Visit Schedule

    The inspectors’ words, 944 words

    “Visit schedule CFR(s): 484.60(e)(1) Visit schedule, including frequency of visits by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide the patient and/or caregiver with a copy of written instruction outlining the visit schedule for 5 (Patients 1-5) of 17 sample patients. Failure to provide clear written communication with patient regarding scheduled visits does not allow the patient to identify when to expect each discipline or how often they will receive service. Findings Include: Patient 1 Review of Patient 1’s record showed an admission date of 07/09/23 with a primary diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the corpus uteri (uterine cancer). Review of Patient 1’s plan of care (POC) for the certification period of 01/25/24 to 03/04/24 showed Patient 1 was to receive skilled nurse (SN) visits 3 times weekly for 8 weeks then decrease SN visits to 1 time weekly for 1 week with 3 as needed visits, and physical therapy (PT) visits 1 time weekly for 7 weeks. A physician order effective on 02/17/24 stated a change in visit frequencies to SN visits 1 time weekly for 1 week, then increase SN visits on 02/18/24 to 3 times weekly for 3 weeks, then decrease SN visits on 03/03/24 to 1 time weekly for 1 week. The 02/17/24 physician order also stated a change in PT visits to 1 time a week for 2 weeks. Observation during a home visit on 02/21/24 at 9:35 AM, revealed there was no HHA folder found with written discipline visit schedules in Patient 1’s home. During an interview at the time of the home visit, Patient 1 stated that she did not know where the folder was since moving. Patient 2 Review of Patient 2’s record showed an admission date of 03/12/23 with a primary diagnosis of encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device. Review of Patient 2’s POC for the certification period of 01/06/24 to 03/05/25 showed SN visits 1 time weekly for 8 weeks and 3 as needed visits. Observation during a home visit on 02/21/24 at 2:10 PM, revealed the folder provided to Patient 2 by the HHA had an incomplete “In Home Patient Calendar” showing initial admission date 03/12/23 with listed SN frequency but no updated “In Home Patient Calendar” to reflect the visit schedule changes for the current certification period or any other certification periods. Patient 3 Review of Patient 3’s record showed an admission date of 12/07/23 with a primary diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of Patient 3’s POC for the certification period of 02/05/24 to 04/04/24 showed SN 1 time weekly and PT 2 times a week for 2 weeks, then decrease PT to 1 time a week for 2 weeks, then increase PT to 2 times a week for 1 week, then decrease PT to 1 time a week for 4 weeks. Observation during a home visit on 02/21/24 at 10:20 AM, revealed the folder provided to Patient 3 by the HHA had an “In Home Patient Calendar” that had no date, and it only had the physical therapy (PT) schedule. There were no other discipline schedules documented on the “In Home Patient Calendar”. During an interview at the time of the home visit, Patient 3 and his spouse stated that they did not have a written calendar and waited for a phone call from HHA to know when their next visit would be. Patient 4 Review of Patient 4’s record showed and admission date of 02/04/24 with a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with chronic kidney disease. Review of Patient 4’s POC for the certification period of 02/04/24 to 04/03/24 showed SN 1 time weekly for 6 weeks and 3 as needed visits, PT 1 time weekly for 8 weeks, and Occupational Therapy (OT) 1 time weekly for 6 weeks. Observation during a home visit on 02/21/24 at 3:25 PM, revealed the folder provided to Patient 4 by the HHA had an “In Home Patient Calendar” that did not reflect of all disciplines the patient was currently receiving. There was no schedule for OT or SN written on the “In Home Patient Calendar”. Patient 5 Review of Patient 5’s record showed and admission date of 02/02/24 with a primary diagnosis of displaced bimalleolar (inner and outer ankle) fracture of the right lower leg. Review of Patient 5’s POC for the certification period of 02/02/24 to 04/01/24 showed SN visits 1 time weekly for 6 weeks and 3 as needed visits, PT visits 1 time weekly for 6 weeks, and OT visits 1 time weekly for 4 weeks. Observation during home visit on 02/22/24 at 9:00 AM, revealed the folder provided to Patient 4 by the HHA had an “In Home Patient Calendar” that was not reflective of all disciplines the patient was currently receiving. There was no schedule for OT or SN written on the HHA provided “In Home Patient Calendar”. During an interview on 02/22/24 at 3:45 PM, Staff A, HHA Administrator/ Director of Nursing, stated that all materials within the patient folder should be completed at time of admission or with care plan update by all patient care staff performing visits to home. In review of findings, Staff A stated that every patient is to have a folder and all forms are to be filled out at time of admission. Staff A stated that there is no specific policy in place regarding completion of the “In Home Patient Calendar”, but each staff is trained during orientation to fill out each form when admitting patients or updating plan of care.”

    Rule G0614. Element-level.

  • Patient Medication Schedule/Instructions

    The inspectors’ words, 1,011 words

    “Patient medication schedule/instructions CFR(s): 484.60(e)(2) Patient medication schedule/instructions, including: medication name, dosage and frequency and which medications will be administered by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview, the Home Health Agency (HHA) failed to provide the patient and/or caregiver a copy of written instructions outlining medication schedule and instructions, including medication name, dosage, frequency, and which medications would be administered by HHA personnel for 5 (Patients 1-5) of 17 sample patients. The HHA failure to provide a written medication list and instruction regarding administration increases the risk of adverse medication events to occur and inadequate management of symptoms for patients. Findings Include: Review of HHA policy titled “Medication Management- Patient Information” dictates “The patient/family/caregiver is instructed about the patient’s medications verbally or in written format understandable to the patient/family/caregiver.” … “The patient’s medications are reviewed and assessed during each skilled visit. Any changes to the medications or changes in the patient’s response to the medications are conveyed to the ordering physician.” … “Agency will mail out updated medication list as indicated.” Patient 1 Review of Patient 1’s record showed an admission date of 07/09/23 with a primary diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the corpus uteri (uterine cancer) with a current certification period of 01/25/24 to 03/04/24. Observation during home visit on 02/21/24 at 9:35 AM, revealed there was no HHA folder found in the patient home with written instructions outlining medication schedule and instructions, including medication name, dosage, frequency, and which medications would be administered by HHA personnel. During an interview at the time of the home visit, Patient 1 stated that she did not know where the folder was since moving. Patient 2 Review of Patient 2’s record showed an admission date of 03/12/23 with a primary diagnosis of encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device with a current certification period of 01/06/24 to 03/05/25. Observation during home visit on 02/21/24 at 2:10 PM, revealed the folder provided by the HHA had no HHA written instructions outlining medication schedule and instructions, including medication name, dosage, frequency, and which medications would be administered by HHA personnel. A blank in-home medication form was noted in the HHA folder. A medication list in the folder was noted to be a discharge list from the prior hospitalization that did not reflect the current POC medication list. During an interview at the time of the home visit, Patient 2’s caregiver stated that there were no other medication lists provided by the HHA since the care for her mother had started. Patient 3 Review of Patient 3’s record showed an admission date of 12/07/23 with a primary diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with a current certification period of 02/05/24 to 04/04/24. Observation during home visit on 02/21/24 at 10:20 AM, revealed the folder provided by the HHA had no written instructions outlining medication schedule and instructions, including medication name, dosage, frequency, and which medications would be administered by HHA personnel. A blank in-home medication form was noted in HHA folder. A medication list in folder noted to be a discharge list from prior hospitalization that did not reflect the current POC medication list. During an interview at the time of the home visit, Staff C Registered Nurse, stated that an HHA medication list was provided to patient at time of admission and then asked Patient 3’s spouse where the list was. Patient 3’s spouse stated that if a list had been provided by HHA at time of admission and restart of care it would be in his folder where she puts all his documents related to the HHA. Patient 4 Review of Patient 4’s record showed and admission date of 02/04/24 with a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with chronic kidney disease with a current certification period of 02/04/24 to 04/03/24. Observation during home visit on 02/21/24 at 3:25 PM, revealed the folder provided by the HHA had no written instructions outlining medication schedule and instructions, including medication name, dosage, frequency, and which medications would be administered by HHA personnel. A blank in-home medication form was noted in HHA folder. A medication list in folder noted to be a discharge list from the prior hospitalization matching the current POC medication list. During an interview at the time of the home visit, Patient 4 stated that all the information that she has received from the HHA would be in her folder. Patient 5 Review of Patient 5’s record showed and admission date of 02/02/24 with a primary diagnosis of displaced bimalleolar (inner and outer ankle) fracture of the right lower leg with a current certification period of 02/02/24 to 04/01/24. Observation during home visit on 02/22/24 at 9:00 AM, revealed the folder provided by the HHA had no written instructions outlining medication schedule and instructions, including medication name, dosage, frequency, and which medications would be administered by HHA personnel. A blank in-home medication form was noted in HHA folder. A medication list found in the folder noted to be a discharge list from the prior hospitalization matching the current POC medication list. During an interview at the time of the home visit, Patient 5 stated that the current hospital medication list is her most current copy of her medications. During an interview on 02/22/24 at 3:45 PM with Staff A, HHA Administrator/ Director of Nursing, stated that all medications are reviewed at time of admission or resumption of care and a HHA in-home medication list is to be filled out and a carbon copy left with patient/caregiver at that time. Then after the medication review is finished by the primary care provider a copy of the HHA medication list is sent by mail with a copy of the care plan to each patient according to the HHA medication management policy. In review of findings, Staff A stated that every patient is supposed to have a carbon copy of the medication list left in home at time of admission followed by fully reviewed copy by mail.”

    Rule G0616. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 22, 2024Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 13, 2016.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Sacred Heart Health, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2021.
  • Sacred Heart Health, Inc. runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Beverly A Kimzey (corporate officer, 100%); Bill E Creach (corporate director, 100%); Bill Creach (owns 5% or more through other companies, 37.8%); Sharla Creach (owns 5% or more through other companies, 35.9%); Beverly A Kimzey (managing employee (on the payroll)); Charles R Creach (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Frederick R Creach (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Bill E Creach (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cfh01 Sacred Heart, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 22, 2024
Sacred Heart Health, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2021
Sacred Heart Health, Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Jan 1, 2021
Bill Creach Irrevocable Trust for Charles R CreachOwns 5% or more through other companies6.5%Aug 22, 2024
Bill Creach Irrevocable Trust for Bill E CreachOwns 5% or more through other companies5.9%Aug 22, 2024
Bill Creach Irrevocable Trust for Frederick R CreachOwns 5% or more through other companies5.8%Aug 22, 2024

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (184 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate89.74% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.52% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.84% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 26 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 66210, where this agency’s office is, 25 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.