Hearth Record

Select Home Health Services, Inc.

A home health agency in Carmel, Indiana 46032

650 E Carmel Dr, Ste 400, Carmel, Indiana 46032. (317) 804-8996.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 12, 2026: a recertification inspection.

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 12, 2026: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Development Of Ep Policies And Procedures

    The inspectors’ words, 474 words

    “Development of EP Policies and Procedures CFR(s): 484.102(b) §403.748(b), §416.54(b), §418.113(b), §441.184(b), §460.84(b), §482.15(b), §483.73(b), §483.475(b), §484.102(b), §485.68(b), §485.542(b), §485.625(b), §485.727(b), §485.920(b), §486.360(b), §491.12(b), §494.62(b). (b) Policies and procedures. [Facilities] must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(b):] Policies and procedures. The LTC facility must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least annually. *Additional Requirements for PACE and ESRD Facilities: *[For PACE at §460.84(b):] Policies and procedures. The PACE organization must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must address management of medical and nonmedical emergencies, including, but not limited to: Fire; equipment, power, or water failure; care-related emergencies; and natural disasters likely to threaten the health or safety of the participants, staff, or the public. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. *[For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(b):] Policies and procedures. The dialysis facility must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. These emergencies include, but are not limited to, fire, equipment or power failures, care-related emergencies, water supply interruption, and natural disasters likely to occur in the facility’s geographic area. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview the agency failed address the agencies communication plan in 1 of 1 emergency preparedness plan. Findings include: A undated document titled “Select Home Health Services Disaster Planning” failed to evidence the communication plan in case of a disaster. During an interview on 08/13/2026 at 11:56 AM, the Interim Administrator stated the Administrator would provide the communication plan for the emergency preparedness program. An email dated 08/12/2026 at 12:05 PM from the Interim Administrator states the communication plan would be to utilize radio stations to make announcements to staff and patients. The agency did not include this in the emergency plan or in a separate communication plan.”

    Rule E0013. Standard-level.

  • Written Instructions To Patient Include:

    The inspectors’ words, 691 words

    “Written instructions to patient include: CFR(s): 484.60(e) Standard: Written information to the patient. The HHA must provide the patient and caregiver with a copy of written instructions outlining: This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure that a copy of the home health aide (HHA) plan of care instructions was provided and accessible to the patient for 1 of 1 HHA home visit observation. (Patient #18); failed to ensure written home exercise instruction was provided and accessible to the patient for 1 of 1 home observations with physical therapy (Patient #1); failed to ensure written home exercise instruction was provided and accessible to the patient for 1 of 1 home observations with occupational therapy (Patient #7); and failed to provide written treatment instructions to patients for 3 of 3 RN home visits. (Patient # 2, #3, #11) Findings include: 1. During a home visit observation on 08/10/2026 at 2:00 PM, the surveyor reviewed Patient #1’s admission packet. The packet did not include home exercise instructions. During an interview on 08/10/2026 at 2:20 PM, PT 1 stated he did not provide Patient #1 a written instructions for the home exercise program. At that time, Patient #1’s Power of Attorney (POA) stated they did not need a copy of exercise instructions. During an interview on 08/12/2026 at 8:56 AM, the DON stated the agency required a written and accessible copy of the patients home exercise program in the home. 3. During a home visit observation on 08/11/2026 at 1:00 PM, HHA 3 was unable to locate Patient #18’s admission packet or any document outlining the home health aide plan of care instructions within the home. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 1:30 PM, HHA 3 stated she could not locate any agency-provided documentation in the home outlining the specific services she was assigned to provide to Patient #18. HHA 3 confirmed she was performing care without a physical copy of the plan of care available in the patient’s home. HHA 3 stated she had access to the aide plan of care on her tablet but it was not accessible to the patient. During an interview on 08/12/2026 at 8:56 AM, the DON confirmed the agency required a copy of the aide plan of care to remain in the home. The DON was not able to provide a copy of acknowledgement verifying the aide plan of care had been delivered to the patient. 2. During an observation on 08/11/2026 at 6:53 AM, the Surveyor reviewed the agency admission folder in Patient #2’s home; the agency failed to provide the patient with home exercise instructions or written treatment instructions. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 6:53 AM, RN 2 stated the paperwork in the agency folder is for the patient to fill out, not the agency staff; no other documents were provided. 3. During an observation on 08/11/2026 at 7:30 AM, the Surveyor reviewed the agency admission folder in Patient #3’s home; the agency failed to provide the patient with written treatment instructions. 4 . During an observation on 08/11/2026 at 9:45 AM, the Surveyor reviewed the agency admission folder in Patient #7’s home; the agency failed to provide the patient with an exercise program or written treatment instructions. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 9:45 AM, Patient #7 stated she did not have any other documentation from the agency besides the agency folder. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 9:45 AM, the OT stated exercise programs are to be in the patient’s home. The OT stated he reviews the plan of care at the start of services, but the agency does not provide written treatment instructions to the patient. 8. During an observation on 08/11/2026 at 12:40 AM, the Surveyor reviewed the agency admission folder in Patient #11’s home; the agency failed to provide the patient with an exercise program or written treatment instructions. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 12:40 AM, Patient #11 stated the admission packet and calendar provided by RN 1 during the visit are the documents she received from the agency; no other documents were in the home.”

    Rule G0612. Standard-level.

  • Infection Control

    The inspectors’ words, 597 words

    “Infection control CFR(s): 484.70(b)(1)(2) Standard: Control. The HHA must maintain a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance, identification, prevention, control, and investigation of infectious and communicable diseases that is an integral part of the HHA’s quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. The infection control program must include: (1) A method for identifying infectious and communicable disease problems; and (2) A plan for the appropriate actions that are expected to result in improvement and disease prevention. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview, the agency staff failed to follow infection control techniques regarding hand hygiene with wound care for 1 of 2 wound care observations (RN 1); and failed to remove gloves and perform hand hygiene for 2 of 3 home visit observations with a nurse (RN 1, RN 2) and 1 of 1 home visits with a HHA (HHA 1); and failed to maintain appropriate bag technique for 3 of 8 home visit observations. (PT 1, RN 1, RN 2). Findings include: Xx. During a home visit on 08/10/2026 at 2:00 PM, PT 1 placed his supply bag on top of two plastic barriers on Patient #1’s couch. Patient #1’s cats walked and sat on top on the two barriers and supply bag. PT 1 proceeded to disinfect a blood pressure cuff, oxygen saturation device, and thermometer and placed it on top of one plastic barrier. PT 1 failed to replace the contaminated plastic barriers prior to disinfecting equipment or ask the family to remove the cats from the work area. During an interview on 08/10/2026 at 2:30 PM, PT 1 acknowledged the cats should not have walked or sit on the plastic barriers and that the barriers were considered contaminated. Xx. During a home visit on 08/11/2026 at 1:00 PM, HHA 1 washed Patient #18’s buttocks with a soapy loofah sponge with gloved hands. She then rinsed Patient #18 with water and dried them with a towel. She then proceeded to dress the patient and transfer them to a wheel chair with the same soiled gloves. HHA 1 failed to remove gloves and perform hand hygiene after completing the patients shower and before touching clean clothing and the patient’s wheelchair. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 1:30 PM, HHA 1 stated she probably did not remove gloves and perform hand hygiene as she was supposed to after washing the patient’s buttocks and touching clean items. 2. During an observation on 08/11/2026 at 6:53 AM, RN 2 documented on electronic device and placed the device on a clean barrier with clean vital‑sign equipment. RN 2 then collected the vital‑sign equipment and used it on Patient #2. RN 2 failed to keep dirty electronic devices separate from clean equipment on a different barrier, and RN 2 failed to clean the equipment after it had been placed on the drape with the dirty electronic device and before using it on Patient #2. 3. During an observation on 08/11/2026 at 12:40 PM, RN 1 touched an electronic device and then entered the nursing bag to collect supplies. RN 1 failed to perform hand hygiene before entering the nursing bag. RN 1, while gloved, cleaned Patient #11’s wound on the left lateral calf and left shin; applied Xeroform to both wounds; and placed 2x2 dressings over each wound. RN 1 failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene between providing care to each wound. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 12:40 PM, RN 1 stated gloves and hand hygiene are not required when moving from one wound to another. 410 IAC 17-12-1(m)”

    Rule G0684. Standard-level.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 455 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to complete an initial assessment within 48 hours of a referral for 4 of 14 active records reviewed. (Patients #6, #10, #12, #17) Findings include: xx . A review of Patient #6’s record evidenced an OASIS referral receipt date of 07/01/2026. The record failed to evidence documentation of a physician-ordered alternative start of care date, patient unavailability, or clinical justification to delay care. The agency failed to conduct the initial assessment visit within the mandated 48-hour timeframe, delaying the assessment until the Start of Care (SOC) visit on 07/07/2026. xx. A review of Patient #10’s record evidenced an OASIS referral receipt date of 06/04/2026. The record failed to evidence documentation of a physician-ordered alternative start of care date, patient unavailability, or clinical justification to delay care. The agency failed to conduct the initial assessment visit within the mandated 48-hour timeframe, delaying the assessment until the Start of Care (SOC) visit on 07/06/2026. During an interview on 08/12/2026 at 1:27 PM, the Interim Administrator acknowledged the documented referral dates represented when the agency was first notified of the patients. She confirmed that the agency lacked any documented clinical justification, communication log notes, or alternative physician orders to account for the delayed initial assessment timelines. 3. A review of Patient #11’s record evidenced an OASIS referral receipt date of 06/17/2026, with no physician‑ordered alternative start date specified. The agency failed to conduct the initial assessment visit within 48 hours of receiving the referral, delayed care, and completed the initial assessment on the start of care (SOC) date of 06/17/2026. 4. A review of Patient #12’s record evidenced an OASIS referral receipt date of 02/11/2026, with no physician‑ordered alternative start date specified. The agency failed to conduct the initial assessment visit within 48 hours of receiving the referral, delayed care, and completed the initial assessment on the SOC date of 02/26/2026. 5. A review of Patient #17’s record evidenced an OASIS referral receipt date of 06/15/2026, with no physician‑ordered alternative start date specified. The agency failed to conduct the initial assessment visit within 48 hours of receiving the referral, delayed care, and completed the initial assessment on the SOC date of 06/18/2026. 410 IAC 17-14-1(a)(1)(A)”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 943 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to have a signed POC or a verbal POC order from the primary physician before providing services and treatments to patients for 6 of 18 records reviewed, potentially affecting all patient records. (Patients #2, #3, #4, #9, #11, #17); and failed to follow wound care orders as order by the physician for 3 of 4 records reviewed with wounds. (Patients #2, #3, #11). Findings include: Xx. The review of Patient #9’s record for the certification period 06/16/2026 to 08/14/2026 showed the agency provided skilled nursing services on 06/17/2026, 06/19/2026, 06/20/2026, and 06/22/2026; and HHA services on 06/18/2026 before obtaining a detailed verbal order or a signed POC from the physician Wound Care 1. During an observation on 08/11/2026 at 6:53 AM, the Surveyor observed no bilateral buttocks wounds on Patient #2. RN 2 cleaned the area and applied a new dressing to the bilateral buttocks. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 6:53 AM, RN 2 confirmed there was no dressing in place at the start of wound care. RN 2 confirmed there were no open areas on Patient #2’s buttocks, but still provided wound care. RN 2 indicated that during the nurse’s visit on 08/09/2026, the area looked the same with no wound present. 2. A review of Patient #3’s record included a “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” that indicates a skilled nurse is to perform/teach wound care to the skin tear on the right lower extremity and left lower extremity. Cleanse with wound cleanser. Pat dry with clean gauze. Apply silver alginate. Cover with a bordered dressing and secure with Tubigrip (elasticated tubular support bandage) using clean/aseptic technique. Change dressing 2x/week and PRN for soilage or dislodgement. During an observation on 08/11/2026 at 7:30 AM, RN 2 applied Cetaphil lotion to the bilateral legs. RN 2 failed to perform wound care as ordered by the physician. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 7:30 AM, RN 2 stated the cream is not part of the wound care order. RN 2 confirmed that during the last RN visit on 08/09/2026 she did not provide wound care as ordered on the POC and did not call the physician for new orders. 3. A review of Patient #11’s record included an order dated 08/11/2026 at 8:05 AM that indicates a skilled nurse is to perform/teach wound care to right shin scattered skin tears. Cleanse with normal saline and pat dry with clean gauze. Apply Xeroform (a sterile, non-adhering wound dressing made of fine-mesh gauze impregnated with petrolatum (vaseline) and 3% bismuth tribromophenate). Cover with bordered foam or 2 x 2 island dressing using clean/aseptic technique. SN to change dressing 1x/week and PRN for soilage or dislodgement. Patient/caregiver to change dressing every three days and PRN for soilage or dislodgement. During an observation on 08/11/2026 at 12:40 PM, RN 1 provided wound care to Patient #11’s left shin and left calf. RN 1 failed to provide care to the wounds on the right leg as ordered by the physician and provided care to the left leg without an order. 4. During an interview on 08/12/2026 at 8:55 AM, the DON stated staff should follow the orders provided by the physician. The DON stated that if wound care orders need changes, staff should call the physician for different orders, and if no wounds are present, staff should notify the physician and request new orders. Plan of Care 1. The review of Patient #2’s record for the certification period 07/12/2026 to 09/09/2026 showed the agency provided skilled nursing services on 07/12/2026 and 07/14/2026 before obtaining a detailed verbal order or a signed POC from the physician. 2. The review of Patient #3’s record for the certification period 07/22/2026 to 09/20/2026 showed the agency provided skilled nursing services on 07/26/2026, 07/28/2026, 08/02/2026, 08/04/2026, and 08/09/2026 before obtaining a detailed verbal order or a signed POC from the physician. 3. The review of Patient #4’s record for the certification period 07/08/2026 to 09/05/2026 showed the agency provided skilled nursing services on 07/08/2026 before obtaining a detailed verbal order or a signed POC from the physician. 5 The review of Patient #11’s record for the certification period 06/17/2026 to 08/15/2026 showed the agency provided skilled nursing services on 06/17/2026, 06/24/2026, and 07/01/2026 before obtaining a detailed verbal order or a signed POC from the physician. 6. The review of Patient #17’s record for the certification period 06/18/2026 to 08/16/2026 showed the agency provided skilled nursing services on 06/25/2026, 06/29/2026, 07/02/2026, and 07/06/2026 before obtaining a detailed verbal order or a signed POC from the physician. 7. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 7:00 AM, RN 2 stated the physician is called after the start of care is completed to inform the physician of treatment provided and any changes in the POC. 8. During an interview on 08/11/2026 at 12:40 PM, RN 1 stated she notifies the physician by phone the same day the start of care is completed. RN 1 stated she does not speak to the physician directly and normally leaves a message with after‑hours staff indicating the patient’s name, her name, and that the patient was seen either for start of care or recertification. 9. During an interview on 08/12/2026 at 8:55 AM, the DON stated the agency obtains eval‑and‑treat orders from the physician for start of care. Staff call the physician after start‑of‑care visits and obtain verbal orders for the care to be provided. 410 IAC 17-13-1(a)”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

Jan 5, 2024: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Standard: Initial Assessment Visit.

    The inspectors’ words, 332 words

    “Standard: Initial assessment visit. CFR(s): 484.55(a) Standard: Initial assessment visit. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the home health agency failed to ensure an initial assessment was completed within 48 hours of referral for 3 of 4 active patient records reviewed (Patient #19, #20, and #23). Findings include: 1. Policy #6.019.1, Comprehensive Assessment of Patients (OASIS), indicated a comprehensive assessment will be performed on patients within 48 hours of referral or the patient’s return to home or on the physician-ordered start of care date. 2. Patient #19’s clinical record evidenced a referral date of 12/14/23 and a hospital discharge date of 12/15/23. The clinical record included an initial assessment of Patient #19 on 12/23/23. The clinical record failed to evidence a physician order to delay the initial assessment. During an interview on 01/05/24 beginning at 2:12 PM, the Clinical Manager relayed he/she could not find a reason Patient #19’s initial assessment was performed over 48 hours after referral. 3. Patient #20’s clinical record evidenced a referral date of 11/22/23 and evidenced a discharge date from a skilled nursing facility on 11/25/23. The clinical record included an initial assessment of Patient #20 on 11/29/23. The clinical record failed to evidence a physician order to delay the initial assessment. During an interview on 01/05/24 beginning at 2:12 PM, the Clinical Manager relayed there was no documentation in the clinical record to show why the initial assessment had been performed more than 48 hours after Patient #20’s return home from the skilled nursing facility. 4. Patient #23’s clinical record evidenced a referral date of 12/01/23. The clinical record included an initial assessment on 12/05/23. The clinical record failed to evidence a physician order to delay the initial assessment. During an interview on 01/05/24 beginning at 2:12 PM, the Clinical Manager relayed there was no documentation in the clinical record to show why the initial assessment had been performed more than 48 hours after Patient #23’s referral date.”

    Rule G0512. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 12, 2026Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited
Jan 5, 2024Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 7, 2011.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Shh Holdco, Inc. owns 100% directly since Nov 19, 2021.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Derek Stotz (managing employee (under contract), 100%); Lauren G Levinger (corporate officer); Derek Stotz (corporate officer); Robert Radics (corporate officer); Robert Radics (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dominique Smith (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Fortis Home Health and Hospice, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 19, 2021
Shh Holdco, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Nov 19, 2021
Gac-Fortis, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies77.5%Nov 19, 2021
Eref Special Situations, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies22.86%Nov 19, 2021
East Rock Victoria Fund, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies22.56%Nov 19, 2021
Tmm Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies13.9%Nov 19, 2021
East Rock Djmd Fund, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.77%Nov 19, 2021
Texas Emerging Managers Private Markets Program, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies6.86%Nov 19, 2021
East Rock Granite Fund, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5.94%Nov 19, 2021
East Rock Lorelei Fund, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies5.49%Nov 19, 2021

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (294 surveys completed): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate75.76% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.16% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.82% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 35 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46032, where this agency’s office is, 31 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.