Hearth Record

Deaconess Home Health, LLC

A home health agency in Evansville, Indiana 47715

6500 Interchange Road S, Suite A, Evansville, Indiana 47715. (812) 425-3561.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 21, 2026: a complaint and recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 21, 2026: complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Retrieval Of Records

    The inspectors’ words, 392 words

    “Retrieval of records CFR(s): 484.110(e) Standard: Retrieval of clinical records. A patient’s clinical record (whether hard copy or electronic form) must be made available to a patient, free of charge, upon request at the next home visit, or within 4 business days (whichever comes first). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure patient’s clinical records were made available to a patient within 4 business days of request for 1 of 1 active patient on the medical record request log (Patient #12). Findings include: Review of the agency’s Medical Record Daily Activity Log 2026 showed Patient #12’s Power of Attorney (POA) emailed Entity 1’s Medical Records Department on 02/26/2026 to request two years of medical records. The log showed the Medical Records Clerk documented that on 03/19/2026 the Administrator called for an update because the POA was inquiring about the status of the request. The log showed the records were pulled on 03/06/2026 but had not yet been released. The log further showed the Administrator emailed the clerk on 03/26/2026 to follow up on another inquiry from the POA. The clerk documented the records had been released to the POA on 03/19/2026. During an interview on 04/14/2026 at 10:55 AM, the Administrator stated the corporate medical records department did not notify the agency or follow up on medical record requests. She stated requestors sometimes contacted the agency when they had not received their records. She stated the corporate medical records department was responsible for sending records to patients, and she did not track requests before forwarding them to the corporate department. She stated the corporate medical records department was expected to follow the agency’s policy for record request completion and that she should be involved to ensure deadlines were met. During an interview on 04/15/2026 at 4:04 PM, the Administrator stated the request began on 02/26/2026 and the POA received the records on 03/19/2026. She stated Entity 1’s medical records department handled all home health record requests and the agency did not independently track or monitor them. She stated patients and their representatives received contact information to initiate medical record requests. She stated Entity 1 used a third‑party vendor to maintain medical records and the agency’s policy required records to be provided within 30 days of the request. 410 IAC 17-12-3(b)(3)”

    Rule G1030. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Name/Contact Information Of Clinical Manager

    The inspectors’ words, 720 words

    “Name/contact information of clinical manager CFR(s): 484.60(e)(5) Name and contact information of the HHA clinical manager. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to provide the name and contact information for the agency’s Clinical Manager for 9 of 9 home visits conducted (Patients #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9, and #25). Findings include: 3. During a home visit with Patient #2 on 04/15/2026 at 11:58 AM, a review of the patient’s folder provided by the agency failed to evidence the agency informed the patient of the name and contact information for the clinical manager. During the home visit interview, Patient #2 expressed no knowledge of a clinical manager or their name. 4. During a home visit with Patient #3 on 04/16/2026 at 10:56 AM, a review of the patient’s folder provided by the agency failed to evidence the agency informed the patient of the name and contact information for the clinical manager. During the home visit interview, Patient #3 expressed no knowledge of a clinical manager or their name. 5. During a home visit with Patient #4 on 04/16/2026 at 12:28 PM, a review of the patient’s folder provided by the agency failed to evidence the agency informed the patient of the name and contact information for the clinical manager. During the home visit interview, Patient #4 and spouse expressed no knowledge of a clinical manager or their name. 6. During a home visit with Patient #5 on 04/17/2026 at 11:33 AM, a review of the patient’s folder provided by the agency failed to evidence the agency informed the patient of the name and contact information for the clinical manager. During the home visit interview, Patient #5 expressed no knowledge of a clinical manager or their name. 7. During a home visit with Patient #7 on 04/15/2026 at 1:34 PM, a review of the patient’s folder provided by the agency failed to evidence the agency informed the patient of the name and contact information for the clinical manager. During the home visit interview, Patient #7 expressed no knowledge of a clinical manager or their name. 8. During a home visit with Patient #8 on 04/20/2026 at 8:35 AM, there was no admission folder provided by the agency that evidenced the agency informed the patient of the name and contact information for the clinical manager. During the home visit interview, Patient #8 expressed no knowledge of a clinical manager or their name. 9. During an interview with Patient #9 on 04/17/2026 at 8:30 AM, a review of the patient’s folder provided by the agency failed to evidence the agency informed the patient of the name and contact information for the clinical manager. During the home visit interview, Patient #9 and patient’s representatives expressed no knowledge of a clinical manager or their name. 1. Review of the agency’s admission packet evidenced a welcome letter provided by the agency to patients. The document specified patients should contact the agency with anything about their care they would like to discuss. The document specified management staff of the agency as the Director of Clinical Services (the title of the identified Administrator); the document failed to specify who the agency Administrator was and name/contact information for the Administrator. The packet failed to evidence the CM’s name and contact information. 2. During a home visit with Patient #1 on 04/15/2026 at 10:00 AM, a review of the patient’s folder provided by the agency failed to evidence the agency informed the patient of the name and contact information for the clinical manager. During the home visit interview, Patient #1 expressed no knowledge of the clinical manager or their name. 10. During a home visit with Patient #25 on 04/20/2026 at 9:30 AM, a review of the patient’s folder provided by the agency failed to evidence the agency informed the patient of the name and contact information for the clinical manager. During the home visit interview, Patient #25 expressed no knowledge of the clinical manager or their name. 11. During an interview on 04/15/2026 at 11:00 AM, RN 1 indicated he/she thought the Administrator was the Clinical Manager and didn’t realize she was also the Administrator of the home health. He/She indicated not being familiar with the name of the Clinical Manager for the home health agency.”

    Rule G0622. Element-level. From a complaint.

Jul 17, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • 5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 281 words

    “5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, the agency failed to have a signed POC or a verbal POC order from the primary physician before providing services and treatments to patients for 2 of 3 closed record reviews. (Patients #1, #5) Findings include: 1. A 03/25/2024 policy titled “Plan of Care and Physician and Allowed Practitioner Orders” states that staff must keep unsigned POCs in the EMR until they receive a signed POC from a physician or allowed practitioner. The policy allows staff to implement the POC with a verbal order until they receive the signed POC. 2. A review of Patient #1’s record for the certification period from 02/06/2025 to 04/06/2025 evidenced that the agency provided care without obtaining either a detailed verbal order or a physician-signed Plan of Care (POC) for visits on 02/10/2025, 02/13/2025, 02/14/2025, 02/17/2025, 02/21/2025, 02/24/2025, and 02/26/2025. The agency failed to secure these orders before delivering care. 3. A review of Patient #5’s record for the certification period from 11/20/2024 to 01/18/2025 indicated that the agency provided care without a detailed verbal order or a physician-signed Plan of Care (POC) for the visits on 11/27/2025 and 12/03/2025. The agency failed to secure orders before providing care. 4. During an interview on 07/17/2025 at 11:32 AM, the Administrator stated that she did not know staff needed to obtain a signed POC or a detailed verbal order before providing direct care and treatment.”

    Rule G0520. Element-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 21, 2026Complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited
Jul 17, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 25, 2005.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Deaconess Hospital, Inc. owns 50% directly since Nov 2, 2019; Chi National Home Care, LLC owns 50% directly since Nov 2, 2019.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Patricia Rigney Day (managing employee (on the payroll)); Rochelle Salinas (corporate officer); Patricia L Hedegard (corporate officer); Patricia Killion (corporate officer); Allison Flowers (corporate officer); Jack D Hawkins (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Commonspirit Health at Home, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2022
Chi National Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 2, 2019
Health at Home Blocker, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies67%Dec 1, 2022
Commonspirit HealthOwns 5% or more through other companies50%Nov 2, 2019
Deaconess Health System Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies50%Nov 2, 2019
Deaconess Hospital, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly50%Nov 2, 2019
Chi National Home Care, LLCOwns 5% or more directly50%Nov 2, 2019
Health at Home Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies33%Dec 1, 2022

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (310 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate80.33% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate13.00% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.86% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 47715, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 8 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 47715
PlaceQuality rating
Ascension at Home4.5
Enhabit Home Health3.5
Deaconess Home Health, LLC This home health agency4
Maxim Healthcare Services Inc.Not given
Angels Care Home Health4
Better Living Home Health Care, Inc.Not given
Horizons Home Care Inc.3.5
Interim Healthcare of SE Indiana Inc.2.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.