Hearth Record

Acacia Home Health Agency

A home health agency in Lombard, Illinois 60148

2200 S. Main Street Suite 308, Lombard, Illinois 60148. (630) 613-8747.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 11, 2025: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 11, 2025: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on the review of the Error Summary report and staff interview, it was determined in 915 of 1,116 assessments submitted for the last 12 months, the Agency failed to submit all reports within 30 days, resulting in a warning. Findings include: 1. The Agency’s Error Summary report for 03/01/24 to 03/26/25, was reviewed on 04/08/25. The report included an error for 915 of 1,116 of OASIS assessments submitted (81.99 %) were submitted more than 30 days after the assessment was completed. 2. During an interview with the Administrator on 04/10/25 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator confirmed the late submissions.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 495 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined for 4 of 7 (Pts. #5, #7, #1 and #4) clinical records reviewed, the Agency failed to ensure care was provided as ordered by the Physician as indicated in the POC. 3. Pt. #1 was admitted to home health services on 3/5/25 with diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. The clinical record was reviewed on 4/8/25 and included the POC effective 3/5/25 which required: “Notify Physician of vital sign parameters out of range - Fasting Blood Sugar: greater than (>) 250mg/dl Less than () 300 mg/ dl”. The SN visit notes dated 3/12 and 3/19/25 lacked blood sugar assessment. 4. Pt. #4 was admitted to home health services on 11/26/24 with diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. The clinical record was reviewed on 4/8/25 and included the POC effective 01/25/25 to 03/25/25 which required: “Notify Physician of vital sign parameters out of range - Fasting Blood Sugar: greater than (>) 250mg/dl Less than () 300 mg/ dl”. The SN visit notes dated 3/05 and 3/11/25 lacked blood sugar assessment. 5. During interviews with the Administrator and Agency Supervisor on 04/09/25 at 11:00 AM and on 04/10/25 at 10:30 AM, the findings of Agency staff not providing care as ordered by the Physicians in the POC were confirmed. Findings include: 1. Pt. #5 was admitted to home health services on 3/7/25 with the diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy. The clinical record was reviewed on 4/7/25 and included the POC effective 3/7/25 which required: “Orders/Treatment… blood glucose monitoring…Nursing Goals: Patient will maintain blood sugar within normal range by the end of episode as evidenced by readings within therapeutic range.” The record also included the initial comprehensive assessment completed by the RN on 3/7/25, which included the documentation, “SN will continue to monitor vital signs and blood sugar every visit and notify MD of any significant findings…” As of 4/9/25, the SN Teaching/Training notes dated 3/11/25, 3/18/25, 3/25/25 and 4/1/25 lacked documentation of blood glucose monitoring results. 2. Pt. #7 was admitted to home health services on 7/19/24 with the diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. The clinical record was reviewed on 4/8/25. The record included a POC for the certification period of 7/19/24 to 9/16/24, which was lacked the Physician’s signature.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Rn Performs Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 396 words

    “RN performs assessment CFR(s): 484.55(a)(1) A registered nurse must conduct an initial assessment visit to determine the immediate care and support needs of the patient; and, for Medicare patients, to determine eligibility for the Medicare home health benefit, including homebound status. The initial assessment visit must be held either within 48 hours of referral, or within 48 hours of the patient’s return home, or on the physician or allowed practitioner - ordered start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews, Agency policy review, and staff interviews, it was determined that for 2 of 7 (Pts. #5 and #7) clinical records reviewed, the Agency failed to ensure that the RN conducted the initial comprehensive assessment within 48 hours of the referral. Findings include: 1. Pt. #5 was admitted to home health services on 3/7/25 with the diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy. The clinical record was reviewed on 4/8/25. The clinical record contained a Physician Encounter document with the service date of 3/1/25, which received by the Agency on 3/3/25 with orders for SN, PT, Home Health Aide and MSW services. The clinical record lacked an RN initial comprehensive assessment within 48 hours of the referral, or a Physician-ordered SOC date. 2. Pt. #7 was admitted to home health services on 7/19/24 with the diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. The clinical record was reviewed on 4/8/25. The clinical record contained a Physician Encounter document with the service date of 7/11/24 with orders for SN and PT (refused). The clinical record lacked an RN initial comprehensive assessment with 48 hours of the referral, or a Physician-ordered SOC date. 3. The Agency policy titled “Client Admission Process” was reviewed on 4/9/25 and required, “7. Each client referred to the agency shall be evaluated by a Registered Nurse/Therapist to determine the immediate care and support the needs of the client…The initial assessment will be completed within 48 hours of referral or within 48 hours of the client’s return home, or on the physician ordered start of care date…” 4. During an interview with the Administrator and Agency Supervisor on 4/9/25 at 10:30 AM, it was stated that the RN should conduct the initial comprehensive assessment within 48 hours of the referral or the Physician-ordered SOC date. During the same interview, the above findings were confirmed.”

    Rule G0514. Element-level.

  • Integrate All Services

    The inspectors’ words, 346 words

    “Integrate all services CFR(s): 484.60(d)(3) Integrate services, whether services are provided directly or under arrangement, to assure the identification of patient needs and factors that could affect patient safety and treatment effectiveness and the coordination of care provided by all disciplines. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, Agency policy review and staff interview, it was determined that for 1 of 1 (Pt. #5) Pts. wherein MSW services were provided, the Agency failed to ensure that concerns are communicated/coordinated within the healthcare team to ensure Pt. needs were identified and addressed. Findings include: 1. Pt. #5 was admitted to home health services on 3/7/25 with the diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy. The clinical record was reviewed on 4/8/25. The MSW note “Social Work Discharge” dated 3/22/25 included the documentation, “Summary/Problem Resolved/Status: A service referral was completed with Pathlight Program at (phone number) to help patient get assistance to help decrease the stressors that is affecting the patient health. MSW also left message for patient’s daughter to contact ADDUS Homecare to be the preferred caretaker at (phone number) …” The clinical record lacked documentation of coordination between the Home Health Agency, the Pt. or Pt. representative and the external organizations related to the referral of services made by the MSW. 2. The Agency policy “Coordination of Client Services” was reviewed on 4/9/25 and required, “To ensure services are coordinated between members of the interdisciplinary team…To establish effective interchange, reporting and coordination of client care does occur. 6. Care conference will be documented on the Care Conference Summary form or in the progress note. A written summary report of services provided and response to care for each client shall be sent to the Physician...” 3. During an interview with the Administrator and Agency Supervisor on 4/9/25 at 11:00 AM, both stated that the clinical record should contain documentation of the follow up and information related to the referral to the above-mentioned program and external organizations for the recommended services. During the same interview, the above finding was confirmed.”

    Rule G0606. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 11, 2025Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Nov 1, 2007.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Metro Health Management owns an unstated share directly since Mar 6, 2007.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Michelle Canet (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Rana Fatima (owns 5% or more directly, 16.67%); Mirza F Baig (owns 5% or more directly, 16.67%); Joel Papa (owns 5% or more directly, 16.66%); Robert Raymond B Soriano (owns 5% or more directly, 16.66%); Michelle Canet (managing employee (on the payroll)); Victor Tomaneng (corporate director); Robert Raymond B Soriano (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate80.43% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.14% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.89% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 155 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60148, where this agency’s office is, 141 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.