Hearth Record

Excellent Home Health Care, Inc.

A home health agency in Skokie, Illinois 60076

3901 West Oakton, Skokie, Illinois 60076. (847) 674-3202.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 26, 2024: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 26, 2024: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Clinical Records

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “Clinical records CFR(s): 484.110 Condition of participation: Clinical records. The HHA must maintain a clinical record containing past and current information for every patient accepted by the HHA and receiving home health services. Information contained in the clinical record must be accurate, adhere to current clinical record documentation standards of practice, and be available to the physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) issuing orders for the home health plan of care, and appropriate HHA staff. This information may be maintained electronically. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of Clinical Records, Agency Policy, and staff interviews, it was determined the Agency failed to ensure the contents of the Clinical Records were safeguarded against unauthorized use. This has the potential to affect all patients being served by the Agency. Findings included: 1. The Agency failed to ensure that Clinical records were safeguarded against unauthorized use (G1028). The cumulative effect of these systemic practices resulted in the Agency’s inability to protect and maintain confidential patient information.”

    Rule G1008. Condition-level.

  • Conformance With Physician Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 324 words

    “Conformance with physician orders CFR(s): 484.60(b) Standard: Conformance with physician or allowed practitioner orders. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on the clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that for 3 of 7 clinical records reviewed (Pts. #1, 5 and 6), the Agency failed to ensure staff conform with the physician orders. Findings include: 1.Pt.#1 was admitted to Home Health Services on 10/04/23 with diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications. The clinical record was reviewed on 01/23/24 at 11:30 AM. The clinical record contained a POC dated 12/03/23, that required the SN service 1 time a week for 9 weeks. The SN orders included to notify the doctor of abnormal blood glucose results. The clinical record lacked the blood glucose results for 10/04/23 (week #1) and 12/20/23 (weeks #3). 2. Pt.#5 was admitted to Home Health Services on 10/04/23 with diagnosis of Polyosteoarthritis, Unspecified. The clinical record was reviewed on 01/23/24 at 12:15 PM. The clinical record contained a POC dated 10/04/23, that required the SN service 1 time a week for 9 weeks. The SN orders included to notify the doctor of pain greater than 6. The SN did not notify the doctor of the Patient’s pain level of 8 on 10/11/23 and 10/30/23. 3. Pt.#6 was admitted to Home Health Services on 09/01/23 with Diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease, Unspecified. The clinical record was reviewed on 01/23/24 at 1:00 PM. The clinical record contained a recertification POC dated 10/31/23, that required the SN service 1 time a week for 9 weeks. The clinical record lacked the SN visits after 11/20/23 (week #3) for 2 weeks. The same recertification period included orders for the OT and PT services. The clinical record lacked the OT visits and PT visits for the recertification period of 10/31/23. 4. The above findings were confirmed during the interview, with the Clinical Manager on 01/24/24 between 12:30 PM and 1:30 PM.”

    Rule G0578. Standard-level.

  • Protection Of Records

    The inspectors’ words, 380 words

    “Protection of records CFR(s): 484.110(d) Standard: Protection of records. The clinical record, its contents, and the information contained therein must be safeguarded against loss or unauthorized use. The HHA must be in compliance with the rules regarding protected health information set out at 45 CFR parts 160 and 164. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical records review, Agency policy review and staff interview, it was determined that for 7 of 7 clinical records reviewed (Pts. #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7), the Agency failed to safeguard clinical records against unauthorized use. Findings include: 1. The following clinical records were reviewed between 01/23/24 and 01/25/24. Pt # 1 SOC 10/04/23 Pt# 2 SOC 01/16/24 Pt# 3 SOC 11/23/23 Pt# 4 SOC 10/27/23 Pt# 5 SOC 10/04/23 Pt# 6 SOC 09/01/23 Pt# 7 SOC 10/12/23 The paper clinical records included clinical assessments and notes that contained clinical information pertaining to the patient being reviewed on the front side of the paper, and on the reverse side, included clinical information not pertaining to the patient being reviewed. 2. During an interview with the Clinical Manager on 01/24/24 at 11:30 AM, the Clinical Manager stated “we have some field nurses that are not efficient with charting in the computer. So we have computer and paper clinical files. When the clinician does paper documentation I load and do the data entry in the computer. Once I do the data entry, I print the OASIS and documents and put everything in the paper chart. We print the documents with recycle paper.” The Agency was recycling their own paper utilizing the office copy machine and printing patient documents for clinical records on the back of other clinical documents belonging to other patients. 3. The Agency policy titled “Clinical record contents and maintenance” was reviewed on 01/25/24 at 9:30 AM. The policy required.... “ The clinical record will be maintained in such a manner that all information is assembled and filed in a timely manner and in accordance with law and regulation...” 4. During interviews with the Clinical Manager on 01/24/24 at 11:00 AM and on 01/25/24 at 9:30 AM finding of Agency maintaining paper clinical records utilizing recycled paper, with information not pertaining specifically to the individualized patient was confirmed.”

    Rule G1028. Standard-level.

  • Have A Confidential Clinical Record

    The inspectors’ words, 353 words

    “Have a confidential clinical record CFR(s): 484.50(c)(6) Have a confidential clinical record. Access to or release of patient information and clinical records is permitted in accordance with 45 CFR parts 160 and 164. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical records review, Agency policy review and staff interview, it was determined for 7 of 7 clinical records reviewed (Pts. #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7), the Agency failed to ensure patient confidentiality was maintained with clinical documents. Findings include: 1. The following clinical records were reviewed between 01/23/24 and 01/25/24. Pt # 1 SOC 10/04/23 Pt# 2 SOC 01/16/24 Pt# 3 SOC 11/23/23 Pt# 4 SOC 10/27/23 Pt# 5 SOC 10/04/23 Pt# 6 SOC 09/01/23 Pt# 7 SOC 10/12/23 The paper clinical records included clinical assessments and notes containing clinical information pertaining to the patient being reviewed on the front side of the paper, and on the reverse side, included clinical information not pertaining to the patient being reviewed. 2. During an interview with the Clinical Manager on 01/24/24 at 11:30 AM. the Clinical Manager stated “we have some field nurses that are not efficient with charting in the computer. So, we have computer and paper clinical files. When the clinician does paper documentation I load and do the data entry in the computer. Once I do the data entry, I print the OASIS and documents and put everything in the paper chart. We print the documents with recycle paper.” The Agency was recycling their own paper utilizing the office copy machine and printing patient documents for clinical records on the back of other clinical documents belonging to other patients. 3. The Agency policy titled “Clinical record contents and maintenance” was reviewed on 01/25/24 at 9:30 AM. The policy required.... “ The clinical record will be maintained in such a manner that all information is assembled and filed in a timely manner and in accordance with law and regulation...” 4. During interviews with the Clinical Manager on 01/24/24 at 11:00 AM and on 01/25/24 at 9:30 AM finding of Agency not having confidential clinical records was confirmed.”

    Rule G0438. Element-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 317 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech-language pathology services, a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in §484.80(g), must make an onsite visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days. The home health aide does not have to be present during this visit. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined the RN failed to supervise the Aide in the home every 14 days. This was found in 2 of 2 (Pts. #1 and 4) clinical records reviewed with the Aide services. 2. Pt.# 4 was admitted to Home Health Services on 10/27/23 with diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications. The clinical record was reviewed on 01/23/24 at 1:00 PM. The POC for certification period 12/27/23 to 02/24/24 contained orders to provided Aide services of 1 time a week for 9 weeks. The clinical record contained completed Aide visits for weeks 1 to week 4 of certification period with no RN supervision. 3. Finding of RN not completing Aide supervision every 14 days was confirmed during an interview with the Clinical Manager on 01/24/24 at 11:30 AM. Findings include: 1.Pt.#1 was admitted to Home Health Services on 12/03/23 with diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications. The clinical record was reviewed on 01/23/24 at 11:30 AM, with orders for the Aide services of 2 times a week for 2 weeks and 1 time a week for 7 weeks (10/10/23 – 11/23/23). The clinical record lacked the Aide supervision by the RN, on 11/21/23 (week #8). The last documented Aide Supervision was 11/05/23 (week #6, more than 14 days).”

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 26, 2024Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 22, 2003.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Fructuosa Lising (owns 5% or more directly, 51%); Fructuosa Lising (managing employee (on the payroll), 51%); Benjamin Lising (owns 5% or more directly, 49%); Benjamin Lising (managing employee (on the payroll), 49%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate71.66% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.86% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.39% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 162 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60076, where this agency’s office is, 152 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.