Prime Home Care - Joliet
A home health agency in Joliet, Illinois 60435
50 Uno Circle, Suite East, Joliet, Illinois 60435. (815) 741-7371.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 3, 2025: a recertification inspection.
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jul 3, 2025: recertification inspection8 deficiencies
-
Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 771 words
“Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, policy review and staff interviews, the Agency failed to ensure care and services were provided as ordered by the Physician in the POC for 3 of 17 (Pts. #7, 9 and 12) clinical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Pt. #7 was admitted to home health services on 05/12/25 with the diagnosis of but not limited to Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage 4, Pressure Ulcer of Other Site Stage 2, and End Stage Chronic Kidney Disease. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/01/25 and included the POC effective 05/12/25. The POC required, “Notify Physician if VS (vital sign) parameters out of range: Pulse greater than 120 or less than 55.” The Nursing Routine Visit note dated 05/19/25 in the record included the documentation: “Pulse: 52. Physician Contact: No contact required/made. Case Coordination: Not applicable this visit.” The record lacked Physician notification of the vital sign which was out of range. The POC also required, “Wound Care to: Between left great toe and second toe: Cleanse with saline, pat dry. Apply Hydrofera blue, dry gauze and secure with tape. To be done twice weekly and prn (as needed) for drainage by PCG or SN at visit…” The Nursing Routine Visit note dated 05/26/25 in the record included the documentation, “Between left great and second toe site location…Dressing Changed this Visit: Dressing changed as described: Cleansed with saline, pat dry. Apply this layer of triad paste and leave open to air.” The wound treatment was not in accordance with the POC. 2. Pt. #9 was admitted to home health services on 05/09/25 with the diagnosis of but not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer and Non-Pressure Chronic ulcer of Other Part of Right Foot with Bone Involvement Without Evidence of Necrosis. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/02/25 and included the POC effective 05/09/25. The POC required, “Wound Care to - right 3rd toe daily and as needed for soilage by PCG/SN. Cleanse with saline or wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply Iodosorb gel. Cover with gauze. Secure with tape; left hallux pressure ulcer daily and as needed or soilage by PCG/SN. Cleanse with wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply Medihoney. Cover with gauze. Secure with tape.” The Nursing Routine Visit note on 5/12/25 included the following documentation, “Right 3rd toe site location…Dressing changed this visit: Dressing changed as described: Cleansed with saline or wound cleanser. Pat dry. Applied Xeroform. Covered with gauze and secure with tape…Left Hallux site location… Dressing changed this visit: Dressing changed as described: Cleanse with saline or wound cleanser. Pat dry. Applied Xeroform. Covered with gauze and secure with tape. Medihoney not in home at this time…. Care coordination, not applicable. Physician contact: No contact required/made.” The wound treatment was not in accordance with the POC. 3. Pt. #12 was admitted to home health services on 03/26/25 with the diagnoses of but not limited to Non-pressure Chronic Ulcer of Right Calf with Fat Layer Exposed, Non-pressure Chronic Ulcer of Other Part of Left Lower Leg with Fat Layer Exposed and Heart Failure. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/02/25. The POC effective 05/25/25 required, “Weigh every visit, if stable and able…Notify Physician for weight gain of 2 pounds in a day or 5 pounds in a week…” The Nursing Routine Visit Notes for the following dates: 05/02/25, 05/15/25, 05/27/25 and 06/26/25 lacked documentation of the patient’s weight; Weekly weight gain monitoring and reporting was not implemented. 4. The Policy, “Wound Care Guidelines: Home Health” dated 2/2022 was reviewed on 07/02/25, and required, “1. Wound Care is to be performed per physician orders.” 5. The Policy, “Physician Participation in Plan of Care” dated 11/2024 was reviewed on 07/02/25 and required, “The care will be provided in compliance with his/her therapeutic and diagnostic orders and accepted standards and practice…” 6. During an interview with the E#2 (Director /Administrator), E#3 (Agency Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#4 (Nursing Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#5 (Therapy Supervisor) on 07/03/25 at 3:30 PM, the above findings were confirmed.”
-
Infection Prevention
The inspectors’ words, 192 words
“Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on the onsite observations, Policy review and staff interviews, the Agency failed to ensure in 1 of 7 home visits (Pt.#7) that Standard Precautions were followed. Findings include: 1.A home visit was conducted on 07/01/25 with E#1 (Home Health Aide) for Pt. #7. It was observed E#1 failed to change gloves between tasks on the same patient. During the same home visit, it was observed that E#1 used the same gloves, towel, and water when cleaning and rinsing the Pt. during the bed bath. 2. The Policy, “Standard Precautions” dated 11/2024 was reviewed on 07/02/25, and required, “…1. Gloves: … 11…C. Gloves are to be changed: 1. Between tasks and procedures on the same patient 2. After changing or cleaning an incontinent patient…” 3. During an interview with the E#2 (Director /Administrator), E#3 (Agency Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#4 (Nursing Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#5 (Therapy Supervisor) on 07/03/25 at 3:30 PM, the above findings were confirmed.”
-
Home Health Aide Assignments And Duties
The inspectors’ words, 278 words
“Home health aide assignments and duties CFR(s): 484.80(g)(1) Standard: Home health aide assignments and duties. Home health aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, with written patient care instructions for a home health aide prepared by that registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional (that is, physical therapist, speech-language pathologist, or occupational therapist). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on the onsite observations, policy review and staff interviews, the Agency failed to ensure in 1 of 9 Pts. (Pt.#7) with Home Health Aide services, that the written patient care instructions were individualized. Findings include: 1. A home visit was conducted on 07/01/25 with E#1 (Home Health Aide) for Pt. #7. Pt. #7 was admitted to home health services with the diagnosis of but not limited to End Stage Renal Disease and was observed to have a dialysis access/arteriovenous shunt (AV Shunt) on the right upper arm. It was observed the E#1 failed to properly take the blood pressure reading. E#1 was observed to use the patient’s right forearm. The Aide Care plan lacked individualized instructions regarding how the Aide should take the blood pressure reading for a patient on dialysis with an AV shunt. 2. The Policy, “Home Health Aide Plan of Care” dated 11/2024 was reviewed on 07/02/25, and required, “… POLICY Each patient receiving home health aide services will have an individualized plan developed and utilized to direct care performed by the assigned aide.” 3. During an interview with the E#2 (Director /Administrator), E#3 (Agency Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#4 (Nursing Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#5 (Therapy Supervisor) on 07/03/25 at 3:30 PM, the above findings were confirmed.”
-
Hha Administrator Contact Information
The inspectors’ words, 345 words
“HHA administrator contact information CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(ii) (ii) Contact information for the HHA administrator, including the administrator’s name, business address, and business phone number in order to receive complaints. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the Agency’s Pt. admission folder, observation and interview during home visits, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, the Agency failed to provide the Pt./patient’s representative information regarding the Administrator for 17 of 17 (Pts. #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ,13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) clinical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. The Agency’s Pt. admission folder was reviewed on 06/30/25. The folder lacked the Administrator’s name, address, and phone number to file a complaint and/or grievance. 2. The following home visits were conducted on 06/30/25 and 07/01/25: Pt. #1. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #2. SOC 05/15/25 Pt. #3. SOC 06/18/25 Pt. #4. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #5. SOC 06/21/25 Pt. #6. SOC 05/22/25 Pt. #7. SOC 05/12/25 During the home visits, the Pt. admission folders were observed, and lacked the name and contact information of the Administrator. Interviews were conducted with the Pt./patient’s representative, they were not aware of the name and contact information of the Administrator. 3. The following clinical records were reviewed from 06/30/25 to 07/02/25: Pt. #1. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #2. SOC 05/15/25 Pt. #3. SOC 06/18/25 Pt. #4. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #5. SOC 06/21/25 Pt. #6. SOC 05/22/25 Pt. #7. SOC 05/12/25 Pt. #8. SOC 05/05/25 Pt. #9. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #10. SOC 04/04/25 Pt. #11. SOC 05/22/25 Pt. #12. SOC 03/26/25 Pt. #13. SOC 05/08/25 Pt. #14. SOC 05/20/25 Pt. #15. SOC 04/11/25 Pt. #16. SOC 04/04/25 Pt. #17. SOC 04/14/25 The clinical records lacked documentation that the Pt./patient’s representative was provided the name and contact of the Administrator to file a complaint or grievance. 4. On 07/02/25, during multiple separate interviews between 10:06 AM to 4:00 PM, with the E#2 (Director /Administrator), E#3 (Agency Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#4 (Nursing Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#5 (Therapy Supervisor) and E#6 (Office Manager), E#2 (Director/Administrator) confirmed the above findings.”
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 517 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation during home visits, clinical record reviews, policy review and staff interviews, the Agency failed to ensure Plans of Care for 2 of 17 (Pts. # 7 and 9) clinical records reviewed included all the requirements. Findings include: 1. Pt. #7 was admitted to home health services on 05/12/25 with the diagnosis of but not limited to Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Stage 4, Pressure Ulcer of Other Site Stage 2, and End Stage Chronic Kidney Disease. A home visit was conducted on 07/01/25 with E#1 (Home Health Aide). During the home visit, it was observed the Pt. had contractures on the left elbow and hand and bilateral lower extremities; the Pt. also had an arteriovenous shunt/access on the right upper arm covered with a dressing, and an off-loading heel and ankle foam boot on the left foot. During the home visit, E#1 stated that the off-loading boot has been used by the Pt. “for a long time”, and the contractures have been present “for a long time.” The clinical record was reviewed on 07/01/25 and the POC lacked documentation of the interventions, use and care of the off-loading boot, safety measures and Pt./care giver education, for the arteriovenous shunt/access, Pt. and caregiver education, specific interventions for Pt.’s contractures. 2. Pt. #9 was admitted to home health services on 05/09/25 with the diagnosis of but not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer and Non-Pressure Chronic ulcer of Other Part of Right Foot with Bone Involvement Without Evidence of Necrosis. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/02/25. The clinical record included the POC effective 05/09/25 which lacked documentation of Pt./caregiver education on blood glucose parameters to report to the clinician or Physician. 3. The Policy, “Physician Participation in Plan of Care” dated 11/2024 was reviewed on 07/02/25 and required, “Physician…orders will be individualized, based on patient’s needs and include: B. Treatments and/or procedures needed, including…goals…D. A description of equipment and related supplies provided by the organization…” 4. During an interview with the E#2 (Director /Administrator), E#3 (Agency Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#4 (Nursing Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#5 (Therapy Supervisor) on 07/03/25 at 3:30 PM, the above findings were confirmed.”
-
Only As Ordered By A Physician
The inspectors’ words, 481 words
“Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews, policy review and staff interviews, the Agency failed to ensure that wound treatment provided for 2 of 17 (Pts. #9 and #12) was ordered by the Physician. Findings include: 1. Pt. #9 was admitted to home health services on 05/09/25 with the diagnosis of but not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer and Non-Pressure Chronic ulcer of Other Part of Right Foot with Bone Involvement Without Evidence of Necrosis. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/02/25. The Nursing Routine Visit note in the clinical record dated 5/27/25 included documentation, “right shin, site location…right 3rd toe, site location… Dressing Changed this visit: Dressing changed as described: Cleansed with saline, pat dry. Vaseline gauze applied to wound with adhesive bordered foam.” The Nursing Routine Visit note dated 06/03/25 included the documentation, “left shin site location, Dressing Changed this visit: Dressing changed as described: Cleansed with saline, pat dry. Vaseline gauze to wound and covered with bordered gauze.” The Nursing Routine Visit note dated 06/27/25 included the documentation for a new wound onset, “left mid shin site location, Dressing Changed this visit: Dressing changed as described: Cleansed with wound cleanser, pat dry. Applied border foam dressing.” The clinical record lacked documentation the Physician was notified of new onset of wounds and lacked documentation Physician orders were obtained for the use of the above-mentioned wound treatment. 2. Pt. #12 was admitted to home health services on 03/26/25 with the diagnoses of but not limited to Non-pressure Chronic Ulcer of Right Calf with Fat Layer Exposed, Non-pressure Chronic Ulcer of Other Part of Left Lower Leg with Fat Layer Exposed and Heart Failure. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/02/25. The clinical record included Nursing Routine Visit notes. The Nursing Routine Visit notes dated 05/23/25 and 05/27/25 included documentation the wound on the right posterior calf was healed. The Nursing Routine Visit notes dated 05/30/25 included the documentation of the recurrence of the wound, “right posterior calf, site location: Dressing Changed this Visit, Cleansed with saline, pat dry. Hydrofera Blue ready applied to wound and covered with dry gauze, rolled gauze, secured with tape and Tubi grip.” The clinical record lacked documentation the Physician was notified of the recurrence of the wound that had previously healed and lacked documentation Physician orders were obtained for the use of the above-mentioned wound treatment. 3. The Policy, “Wound Care Guidelines: Home Health” dated 02/2022 was reviewed on 07/02/25, and required, “1. Wound Care is to be performed per physician orders.” 4. During an interview with the E#2 (Director /Administrator), E#3 (Agency Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#4 (Nursing Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#5 (Therapy Supervisor) on 07/03/25 at 3:30 PM, the above findings were confirmed.”
-
Name/Contact Information Of Clinical Manager
The inspectors’ words, 314 words
“Name/contact information of clinical manager CFR(s): 484.60(e)(5) Name and contact information of the HHA clinical manager. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the Agency’s Pt. admission booklet, observation during home visits, clinical record reviews, and staff interviews, the Agency failed to provide the Pt./patient’s representative the Agency Clinical Manager’s name for 17 of 17 (Pts. #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17) clinical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. The Agency’s Pt. admission folder was reviewed on 06/30/25. The folder lacked the name of the Agency Clinical Manager. 2. The following home visits were conducted on 06/30/25 and 07/01/25: Pt. #1. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #2. SOC 05/15/25 Pt. #3. SOC 06/18/25 Pt. #4. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #5. SOC 06/21/25 Pt. #6. SOC 05/22/25 Pt. #7. SOC 05/12/25 During the home visits, the Pt. admission folders were observed, and lacked the name of the Agency Supervisor. During the home visits, the Pt/patient’s representative was not aware of the Agency Clinical Manager’s name. 3. The following clinical records were reviewed on 06/30/25 and 07/02/25: Pt. #1. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #2. SOC 05/15/25 Pt. #3. SOC 06/18/25 Pt. #4. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #5. SOC 06/21/25 Pt. #6. SOC 05/22/25 Pt. #7. SOC 05/12/25 Pt. #8. SOC 05/05/25 Pt. #9. SOC 05/09/25 Pt. #10. SOC 04/04/25 Pt. #11. SOC 05/22/25 Pt. #12. SOC 03/26/25 Pt. #13. SOC 05/08/25 Pt. #14. SOC 05/20/25 Pt. #15. SOC 04/11/25 Pt. #16. SOC 04/04/25 Pt. #17. SOC 04/14/25 The clinical records lacked documentation that the Pt./patient’s representative was provided the name of the Agency Clinical Manager. 4. On 07/02/25, during multiple separate interviews between 10:06 AM to 4:00 PM, with the E#2 (Director /Administrator), E#3 (Agency Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#4 (Nursing Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#5 (Therapy Supervisor) and E#6 (Office Manager), E#2 (Director/Administrator) confirmed the above findings.”
-
Discharge And Transfer Summaries
The inspectors’ words, 317 words
“Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the Agency failed to ensure that the Physician was sent a copy of the Discharge summary for 2 of 5 (Pts. #14 and 16) discharged clinical records reviewed. Findings include: 1. Pt. #14 was admitted to home health services on 05/20/25 with the diagnosis of Atrioventricular Block, First Degree. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/02/25. The record included a discharge summary indicating Pt. #14 was discharged from the Agency on 06/18/25. The discharge summary lacked documentation that it was sent to the Physician. 2. Pt. #16 was admitted to home health services on 04/04/25 with the diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection, Site not Specified. The clinical record was reviewed on 07/01/25. The record included a discharge summary indicating Pt. #16 was discharged from the Agency on 05/13/25. The discharge summary lacked documentation that it was sent to the Physician. 3. During an interview with E#2 (Director /Administrator), E#3 (Agency Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#4 (Nursing Supervisor/Nurse Manager), E#5 (Therapy Supervisor) and E#6 (Office Manager) on 07/02/25 between 1:30 PM and 2:20 PM, E#2 (Director/Administrator) confirmed the above findings.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2025 | Recertification inspection | 8 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 27, 1988.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Prime Healthcare Home CARE Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since Mar 23, 2026.
- 16 owners or officers are people: Courtney D Durall (corporate officer, 0%); Stuart Bradley Keller (corporate officer, 0%); Celeste Mellet (corporate officer, 0%); Daniel K Feld (corporate officer, 0%); Caleb Gallifant (corporate officer, 0%); Robert M Marcoux (corporate officer, 0%); Sharday Merdja (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Valerie Talkers (corporate officer, 0%); Richard Lindsay-Jones (corporate officer, 0%); Cassie Houff (corporate officer, 0%); Gayle Melby (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Amaka Agumadu (corporate officer, 0%); Casey Mckeon (corporate officer, 0%); Casey Mckeon (corporate director, 0%); Kendra Clark (corporate officer, 0%); Sean Turner (corporate officer, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 23, 2026 |
| Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 23, 2026 |
| Centerwell Health Services Holding Corp | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 23, 2026 |
| Humana Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 23, 2026 |
| Centerwell Health Services USA, LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 23, 2026 |
| Centerwell Health Services Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Mar 23, 2026 |
| Prime Healthcare Home CARE Holdings LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Mar 23, 2026 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (144 surveys completed): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 74% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, worse.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 90.97% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 7.96% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 5.91% (worse than the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 117 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60435, where this agency’s office is, 106 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Interim Healthcare Services of Joliet Inc. | Not given |
| Prime Home Care - Joliet This home health agency | 3.5 |
| Newsome Home Health Care & Purpose Care of Illinois - Joliet | 4.5 |
| Visiting Nurse Assocation of Fox Valley | 2 |
| Prime Healthcare Home Care and Hospice, LLC | 3.5 |
| Advocate Home Health Care Serv | 4 |
| Interim Healthcare of Chicago | 3 |
| Absolute Home Health LLC | 3.5 |
| Loyola Medicine Home Care | 4.5 |
| At Home Quality Care - Morris | 3 |
| Enhabit Home Health | 3 |
| Journeycare Home Health | 4.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.