Hearth Record

Heights Home Health, Inc.

A home health agency in Mapleton, Iowa 51034

114 North 4th Street, Suite C, Mapleton, Iowa 51034. (712) 881-7144.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 11, 2026: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 11, 2026: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Home Health Aide Assignments And Duties

    The inspectors’ words, 357 words

    “Home health aide assignments and duties CFR(s): 484.80(g)(1) Standard: Home health aide assignments and duties. Home health aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, with written patient care instructions for a home health aide prepared by that registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional (that is, physical therapist, speech-language pathologist, or occupational therapist). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on staff interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy review, the agency failed to ensure the registered nurse (RN) developed home health aide instructions for patient care that were specific and individualized to the patient’s needs for 1 of 2 sampled patients receiving home health aide services (Patient #3). Failure to identify specific tasks for the home health aide to perform or a specific frequency for the task increases the potential risk that patients may fail to receive necessary services ordered on the plan of care in a safe and effective manner. Findings include: According to the agency policy titled Home Health Aide Instructions & Notes, dated 3/4/22, home health aide tasks and instructions are developed at the time of admission by the admitting registered nurse (RN) and the tasks are updated by the RN as needed. During an interview on 2/11/26 at 10:03 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated the admitting RN is responsible for completing the home health aide care plan. The home health aide care plan is reviewed at recertifications, resumptions of care and as needed. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 11/11/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 11/11/25 to 1/9/26, identified the patient had diagnoses of Sepsis due to Escherichia coli and included physician orders for skilled nurse and home health aide services. b. The aide care plan, dated 11/11/25, included aide instructions to transfer the patient. The assignment failed to include specific instructions on what assistive devices were needed to transfer the patient. The home health RN failed to include specific instructions to the aide on what assistive devices were needed to transfer the patient. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule G0798. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 651 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, patient interviews, staff interview, clinical record reviews and agency policy review, the agency failed to complete an accurate drug regimen review with each comprehensive assessment for 2 of 3 sampled patients with home observation visits (Patients #2 and #3). Failure to ensure medications reviewed at the time of each drug regimen review are current and accurate placed the patients at risk for increased potential unidentified medication interactions, side effects and duplication of medications. Findings include: According to the agency policy titled Drug Regimen Review (DRR), dated 2/28/22, a medication reconciliation along with a DRR is completed at start of care, resumption of care, recertification, significant change in condition and discharge. During an interview on 2/11/26 at 10:03 AM, Staff A, Administrator stated the registered nurse (RN) completes a DRR at all assessment time points and when new medications are added. 1.Patient #2 had a start of care date of 1/26/26. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 1/26/26 to 3/26/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and included physician orders for medication set up and skilled nursing services. b. The comprehensive assessment at start of care, dated 1/26/26, completed by Staff B, RN, included documentation a DRR was completed. c. During a home observation visit on 2/9/26 at 11:50 AM with Staff B, RN, the patient interview revealed the following medication discrepancy orders and patient stated medication schedule: 1) The agency medication list identified Calcium 600 milligram (mg) -D3 tablet twice a day. Patient stated he/she takes Calcium 500mg twice a day and his/her bottle of medication was over half gone. 2) The agency medication list identified Hydroxyzine hydrochloride 10mg tablet within instructions to take 88 micrograms (mcg) in the morning. Patient reported he/she takes Levothyroxine 88 mcg daily in the morning. The RN failed to accurately identify the patient was taking Levothyroxine 88 mcg daily. 3) The agency medication list identified Montelukast 10 mg tablet with instructions to get 0.4 milliliters (ml) subcutaneous monthly. Patient reported he/she gets a monthly Nucala injection (for COPD). The RN failed to accurately identify the route and name of the medication the patient received for monthly injections. 4) The agency medication list identified Oxycodone-Acetaminophen 5 mg/325 mg tablet every 6 hours as needed for pain. Patient reported he/she had not taken the medication since weeks prior to admission and does not have any of the medication in his/her home. The DRR failed to include an accurate review of all medications taken by the patient. 2. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 11/11/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 1/10/26 to 3/10/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of cellulitis of the face and included physician orders for medications and skilled nursing services. b. The resumption of care comprehensive assessment, dated 2/2/26, completed by Staff B, RN, included documentation a DRR was completed. c. During a home observation visit on 2/10/26 at 10:50 AM with Staff B, RN, the patient/caregiver interview revealed the following medication discrepancy orders and patient/caregiver stated medication schedule: 1) The agency medication list identified Acetaminophen 500 mg oral tablet, two tablets twice daily. Patient/caregiver reported patient takes Tylenol 650 mg, two tablets twice daily. 2) The agency medication list identified Prednisone 10 mg oral tablet daily. Patient/caregiver reported patient does not take this medication and does not have it available in the home. The DRR failed to include an accurate review of all medications taken by the patient. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 877 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on home observation visits, patient interviews and clinical record reviews, the agency failed to ensure accurate completion of all components comprising the Plan of Care, including all medical supplies/equipment used by the patient for 5 of 7 sampled patients (Patients #2, #3, #4, #6 and #7). Failure to maintain complete and accurate Plans of Care placed patients at risk to not receive services, supplies, medications and/or treatments according to assessed needs and physician orders. Findings include: 1.Patient #2 had a start of care date of 1/26/26. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 1/26/26 to 3/26/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and included physician orders for medical supplies and equipment used by the patient. The POC included the following medical supplies and equipment used by the patient: cane, grab bars, respiratory equipment, tub/shower bench, walker, medication planner, nebulizer, bath mat and hand held shower. b. During a home observation visit on 2/9/26 at 11:50 AM with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), the surveyor identified a heating pad on the couch. The patient stated during the same home visit he/she uses the heating pad for pain relief. The agency failed to include all medical supplies/equipment on the patient’s POC, including the heating pad. 2. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 11/11/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 1/10/26 to 3/10/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of cellulitis of the face and included physician orders for medical supplies and equipment used by the patient. The POC included the following medical supplies and equipment used by the patient: bedside commode, dressing supplies, elevated toilet seat, grab bars, tub/shower bench, walker, wheelchair, wound supplies, lift stand, medication planner, lift chair and support hose. b. The resumption of care comprehensive assessment, dated 2/2/26, completed by Staff B, RN, identified the patient utilizes incontinence products. c. During a home observation visit on 2/10/26 at 10:50 AM with Staff B, RN, the patient’s caregiver identified the patient wears incontinence products. The agency failed to include all medical supplies/equipment on the patient’s POC, including incontinence products. 3. Patient #4 had a start of care date of 1/16/26. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 1/16/26 to 2/14/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of sepsis and included physician orders for medical supplies/equipment used by the patient. The POC included the following medical supplies/equipment used by the patient: grab bars, tub/shower bench, walker, wheelchair, medication planner, bath mat, lift chair and grabber. b. The start of care comprehensive assessment, dated 1/16/26, completed by Staff B, RN, identified the patient utilizes incontinence products. The agency failed to include all medical supplies/equipment on the patient’s POC, including incontinence products. 4. Patient #6 had a start of care date of 9/8/25 and a discharge date of 10/6/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 9/8/25 to 11/6/25, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the central nervous system and included physician orders for medical supplies/equipment used by the patient. The POC included the following medical supplies/equipment used by the patient: cane, grab bars, tub/shower bench, walker, wound supplies, medication planners, hand held shower and outdoor ramp. b. The start of care comprehensive assessment, dated 9/8/25, completed by Staff B, RN, identified the patient utilizes a spirometer and incontinence products. The agency failed to include all medical supplies/equipment on the patient’s POC, including spirometer and incontinence products. 5. Patient #7 had a start of care date of 7/2/25 and a discharge date of 8/1/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The POC, dated 7/2/25 to 8/30/25, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of head of pancreas and included physician orders for medical supplies/equipment used by the patient. The POC included the following medical supplies/equipment used by the patient: cane, grab bars, tub/shower bench, walker, medication planner, and glucometer and supplies. b. The physical therapy evaluation, dated 7/3/25, completed by Staff D, Physical Therapist, identified the patient wears compression stockings to reduce edema and also identified the patient has a ramp entrance into the home. The agency failed to include all medical supplies/equipment on the patient’s POC, including compression stockings and ramp. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 385 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency staff interview, clinical record review and agency policy review, the agency failed to ensure a registered nurse or other appropriate health care professional completed home health aide supervision at least every 14 days for 1 of 2 sampled patients who received hands on personal care services in conjunction with a skilled service provision (Patient #3). The agency reported 1 patient who received home health aide services with every 14 days supervision. Failure to supervise home health aide services at least every 14 days, increased the risk that patients received unsatisfactory or inappropriate care from home health aides. Findings include: According to the agency policy titled Home Health Aide Instructions & Notes, dated 3/4/22, home health aide supervision will be provided and documented every 14 days while the patient receives skilled nursing services. During an interview on 2/11/26 at 10:03 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated aide supervision is required every 14 days for patients receiving skilled services and aide supervision is documented within the registered nurse’s visit note in the electronic medical record. Patient #3 had a start of care date of 11/11/25. Clinical record review revealed: a. The Plan of Care (POC), dated 11/11/25 to 1/9/26, identified the patient had a primary diagnosis of Sepsis due to Escherichia coli and included physician orders for skilled nurse and home health aide services. b. Skilled nurse visits notes, dated 11/14/25, 11/17/25, 11/24/25, 12/2/25 and 12/11/25, completed by Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), failed to document home health aide supervision. The agency failed to provide home health aide supervision every 14 days. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 11, 2026Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 10, 2006.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Mapleton Progress Inc. owns 100% directly since Apr 13, 2004.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Curtis R Hesse (corporate director); Donald E Petersen (corporate director); Richard G Nichols (corporate officer); Richard G Nichols (corporate director); Tarra Bohm (corporate officer); Tarra Bohm (managing employee (on the payroll)); Tarra Bohm (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Thomas J Swanson (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Mapleton Progress Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Apr 13, 2004

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.74% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.11% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.15% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 51034, where this agency’s office is, 3 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 3 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 51034
PlaceQuality rating
Heights Home Health, Inc. This home health agency2
Burgess Home Health3
Angels Care Home Health of Iowa4

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.