Hearth Record

Burgess Home Health

A home health agency in Onawa, Iowa 51040

1600 Diamond Street, Onawa, Iowa 51040. (712) 423-2311.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 7, 2024: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 7, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Promptly Alert Relevant Physician Of Changes

    The inspectors’ words, 762 words

    “Promptly alert relevant physician of changes CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The HHA must promptly alert the relevant physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the plan of care should be altered. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, agency policy review and staff interview, the agency failed to notify the physician of changes in patient condition or needs that suggest an alteration to the Plan of Care for 2 of 3 sampled patients with medications set up/monitoring (Patient #1 and #2) and 3 of 4 sampled patients with monitoring of weights (Patient #2, #6 and #7). The deficient practices was identified in the Onawa parent office. Failure to report changes in patient condition or identified needs placed agency patients at risk for inadequate or inappropriate care. Findings include: According to the agency policy, titled Documentation-Patient Plan of Care, dated 11/2017, the physician that is primarily involved will have an opportunity to review all orders. The agency will be responsible for assuring communication with all physicians involved in the plan of care as well as integrating orders to assure the coordination of all services and interventions are provided to the patient. 1. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 2/21/22. Clinical record review revealed: Plan of Care, dated 12/13/23-2/10/24, included physician orders for skilled nursing services 1-2 times a week for medication set up. Home visit observation and Interview on 2/5/24 at 1:30 PM with Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN) reported the medication set up in the medication planner was 2 times a week due to Patient #1’s noncompliance with taking medications. a. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 12/19/23, documentation included missed 2 morning prefilled medication slots in 3 days. b. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 1/2/24, documentation included missed 1 morning and 1 evening prefilled medication slots. c. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 1/23/24, documentation included did not take any medications for Sunday, Monday, Tuesday or Saturday bedtime prefilled medication slots. d. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 1/26/24, documentation included missed 3 bedtime and 1 morning prefilled mediation since 1/23/24. e. Home visit observation and Skilled nursing visit note, dated 2/5/24, documentation included missed 1 morning prefilled medication. The HHA failed to notify the physician when Patient #1 had missed taking their medications as ordered. 2. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 6/2/23. Clinical record review revealed: Plan of Cares, dated 11/29/23-1/27/24 and 1/28/24-3/7/24, included physician orders for skilled nursing services 2-3 times that included weigh patient weekly on routine visits. Report weight gain of 4 pounds in 1 week or 2 pounds in 24 hours. Home visit observation and Interview on 2/5/24 at 11:30 AM with Patient #2, reported their mother helps with setting up their medications and the Lasix medication is set up a noon, so they remember to take the Lasix. Interview on 2/5/24 during home visit with Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), reported the Lasix and weight are monitored because of Patient #2’s swelling in their legs. a. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 12/29/23, documentation included Lasix not taken on Tuesday or Thursday. b. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 1/2/24, Patient #2’s weight 360.8 pounds, up 5 pounds 4 ounces. c. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 1/15/24, Patient #2’s weight 363 pounds, up 3 pounds. The HHA failed to notify the physician when Patient #2 had missed taking Lasix as ordered and when Patient #2 had an increase in their weight. 3. Patient #6 had a start of care date of 10/19/23. Clinical record review revealed: Plan of Care, dated 10/19/23-12/18/23, included physician orders for skilled nursing services 1-2 times a week that included to check weight every visit. a. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 10/24/23, documentation lacked a weight. b. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 10/29/23, documentation lacked a weight. The HHA failed to notify the physician when Patient #6 weight was not obtained as ordered. 4. Patient #7 had a start of care date of 7/11/23. Clinical record review revealed: Plan of Care, dated 7/11/23-9/8/23, included physician orders for skilled nursing services 1-2 times a week that included to check weight every visit. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 7/31/23, documentation included assisted living staff weighed Patient #7, weight down 5 pounds. The HHA failed to notify the physician when Patient #7 weight had decreased. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Staff B, Clinical Manager. The agency provided no further information prior to the end of the survey.”

    Rule G0590. Element-level.

  • Interdisciplinary Assessment Of The Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 474 words

    “Interdisciplinary assessment of the patient CFR(s): 484.75(b)(1) Ongoing interdisciplinary assessment of the patient; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, agency policy review, home visit observation and agency staff interview, the agency failed to ensure skilled professional staff involved in the patient’s plan of care completed an ongoing interdisciplinary wound assessment as required by agency policy and expectation for 1 of 2 sampled patients with wounds (Patient #2). The agency reported a current census of 108 patients at the time of the survey, including 7 patients who had a wound. Including 102 patients receiving services from the parent office in Onawa and 6 patients receiving services from the Decatur, Nebraska Branch office at the time of the survey. The deficient practice was identified in the Onawa parent office. Failure to complete an ongoing interdisciplinary assessment of wounds placed patients at risk unidentified worsening of the wounds. Findings include: According to the agency policy, titled Wound Assessment and Photography, dated 6/2020, wounds will be measured weekly and more often if wound deterioration is noticed. Do depth measurement first. Complete measurement with length and width. During an interview on 2/5/24 at 2:30 PM, Staff B, Clinical Manager, reported wound measurements should be completed weekly. The measurements include depth, length and width of the wound. The wound measurements would be documented in the clinical record under assessment. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 6/2/23. Clinical record review revealed: Plan of Care, dated 11/29/23-1/27/24 and 1/28/24-3/7/24, included physician orders for skilled nursing services 2-3 times a week that included wound care to left lower extremity. Home visit observation and Interview on 2/5/24 at 11:30 AM with Patient #2, reported they take a shower before the skilled nurse visit and removed the dressing on the wound when they shower. Interview during home visit with Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) reported wounds are measured at the first visit of the week a. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 12/11/23, documentation included a length and width of the wound, but lacked a depth measurement. b. Skilled nursing visit notes, dated 1/7/24 and 1/10/24, documentation did not include a length, width and depth of the wound. No wound measurements were completed for the week of 1/7/24. c. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 1/22/24, documentation included a length and width of the wound, but lacked a depth measurement. d. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 2/5/24, documentation included a length and width of the wound, but lacked a depth measurement. Home visit observation with Staff D, LPN, of wound measurements did not include a depth measurement. The agency RN/LPNs failed to follow their agency policy and measure wounds weekly. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator and Staff B, Clinical Manager. The agency provided no further information prior to the end of the survey.”

    Rule G0706. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 7, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 21, 1984.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 20 owners or officers are people: Andrew Tirevold (corporate director); Rachel M Martian (managing employee (on the payroll)); Rachel M Martian (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Beau T Hupke (corporate director); Shelia M Duarte (corporate director); Jeffrey R Pratt (corporate director); Lynn R Wold (corporate officer); Lynn R Wold (managing employee (on the payroll)); Lynn R Wold (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Terry Murrell (corporate director); James L Gobell (managing employee (on the payroll)); James L Gobell (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Mari B Miller (corporate officer); Mari B Miller (corporate director); Keith A Schrunk (corporate officer); Keith A Schrunk (corporate director); Paul E Dudley (corporate director); Amy Maule (corporate officer); Amy Maule (corporate director); Matthew Minnihan (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (70 surveys completed): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 79% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate84.88% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.00% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.09% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 51040, where this agency’s office is, 5 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 51040
PlaceQuality rating
Burgess Home Health This home health agency3
Wel-Home Health of Sergeant Bluff2
Angels Care Home Health of Iowa4
Aveanna Healthcare4.5
Heights Home Health, Inc.2

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.