Mercy Home Care
A home health agency in Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402
2740 First Avenue NE, Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52402. (319) 398-6034.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3.5of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 5of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jan 15, 2024: a complaint inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Jan 15, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
Care Planning, Coordination, Quality Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 257 words
“Care planning, coordination, quality of care CFR(s): 484.60 Condition of participation: Care planning, coordination of services, and quality of care. Patients are accepted for treatment on the reasonable expectation that an HHA can meet the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs in his or her place of residence. Each patient must receive an individualized written plan of care, including any revisions or additions. The individualized plan of care must specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment, including identification of the responsible discipline(s), and the measurable outcomes that the HHA anticipates will occur as a result of implementing and coordinating the plan of care. The individualized plan of care must also specify the patient and caregiver education and training. Services must be furnished in accordance with accepted standards of practice. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, agency policy review, patient/family interview and agency staff interview, the agency: 1) failed to ensure all services, medications and/or treatments required by the patient to meet his/her needs were included on each patient’s Plan of Care (G574); 2) failed to promptly alert the relevant physician to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or the plan of care should be altered (G590). The cumulative systemic practices resulted in the failure to ensure the organizational framework of the agency promoted and supported the coordination of safe and effective delivery of care to the agency’s 225 patients.”
-
Plan Of Care Must Include The Following
The inspectors’ words, 2,096 words
“Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, staff interview, policy review, patient and family member interview, the agency failed to ensure the accurate completion of all components comprising the Plan of Care, including types of services required and patient-specific interventions to meet their needs for 1 of 3 sampled patients (Patient #2). Failure to maintain complete and accurate Plans of Care with current orders placed the patients at risk to not receive services, medications and/or treatments according to assessed needs and physician orders. Findings include: According to the agency policy, titled Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention, dated 4/1/21, catheters are to be inserted using aseptic technique, sterile equipment and a health care worker who has shown competency in this procedure. Use the smallest bore catheter as possible, consistent with good drainage to minimize urethral trauma. Indwelling catheters should be properly secured after insertion to prevent movement and urethral traction. Assess for voiding within 6 hours of removal of catheter. According to the agency procedure from Mosby’s Nursing Skills reference, titled Male Catheter Insertion Technique, dated November 2022, an indwelling catheter is inserted through the urethral meatus, advance the catheter until urine flows through the tubing. Do not inflate the balloon until urine flow appears. Continue to advance the catheter to the bifurcation (splitting) of the tubing. Do not force the catheter against resistance. Notify the physician, if resistance to catheter insertion persists, the patient may have an enlarged prostate or a urinary abnormality. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 3/28/23 and a discharge date of 9/20/23. Clinical record review revealed: a. Plan of Care, dated 7/26/23 to 9/23/23, identified diagnoses encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device; retention of urine, unspecified; and benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms; and included physician order for skilled nursing services 1 visit every month and 3 visits PRN (as needed) for indwelling foley catheter replacement/troubleshooting/management. b. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 9/19/23, from 12:13 PM to 1:34 PM, included documentation indwelling foley catheter removed and replaced with 14 French foley catheter with 10 milliliter balloon at 1:10 PM, was not a difficult insertion but there was no urine and/or blood returned. Foley catheter balloon was inflated prior to urine flow. During the nurse visit, Staff C, RN (registered nurse), had patient drink water and walk around, patient denied pain. Assessment included: lung sounds clear bilaterally, respirations unlabored, no cough or pain with inspiration, no complaints of shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, appetite: fair, fluids: inadequate, change in appetite: unchanged, diet type: regular, oral problems: no oral problems:, and nutritional concerns: dehydration. Staff C spoke with assisted living facility Director regarding foley change and no urine return, requested assisted living staff to keep an eye on patient output and report no urine output to Staff C. During an interview on 11/21/23 at 11:25 AM, Assisted Living Facility (ALF) Director reported talking with Staff C on 9/19/23, assisted living facility nurse was not available when the home health agency staff made their visit. ALF Director received a report the foley catheter had been changed during visit and assisted living facility staff needed to follow up with the patient regarding urine output. Director documented this information in the patient record for the assisted living facility nurse to read/review and reported no concerns with education and care coordination with the home health agency staff. The Director reported Staff C did not give specific instructions for follow up on urine output or timeframe for assisted living staff to contact the home health agency. The assisted living facility nurse was unavailable for interview as he/she was no longer employed with the assisted living facility. During an interview on 11/21/23 at 8:48 AM, Patient #2’s son, reported not being at the assisted living facility during the skilled nurse visit on 9/19/23. Patient #2’s son received a call from assisted living facility staff at approximately 8:00 PM. The ALF staff reported the foley catheter was changed earlier in the day and facility staff suspected blood was in the catheter. Patient #2’s son made a visit to the facility and found Patient #2 on the toilet, bleeding, blood in the catheter bag, patient sick to his/her stomach, had diarrhea, and complained the home care nurse changed the foley catheter and left him/her like that. Patient #2 was sent to the emergency room per the request of Patient #2’s son. During an interview on 11/21/23 at 2:17 PM, Patient #2 reported the foley catheter change in September 2023, the nurse took the old catheter out, not sure what happened but they wrecked the inside (referencing bleeding), had to go to the hospital to get fixed, bled immediately when the new catheter was put in, blood was squirting all over. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 2:36 PM, Staff C, RN reported Patient #2’s catheter insertion was routine without difficulty other than no urine return, patient voiced no complaints. Staff C instructed assisted living facility staff to check on patient later, push fluids due to the potential for dehydration and notify home health nurse if the patient had no urine return. Since no call was received, home health nurse assumed the Patient had urine return. Staff C reported she did not think to notify physician about no urine return, since Staff C felt it was a routine catheter insertion. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 2:23 PM, Administrator reported she was unable to speak to the policy or procedure in regards to catheterizations without reviewing the policy or procedures first. The Administrator provided the requested policies/procedures on 11/30/23. During an interview on 1/4/24 at 3:22 PM, Staff C, RN reported it is essential to have urine return after inserting a foley catheter and the physician should have been notified, however the physician was not notified. In the future she would notify the physician if there was no urine return after inserting a foley catheter. Patient #2 had no urine or blood in the catheter bag when Staff C left the patient home. Staff C reported the assisted living facility staff check on patients only at certain times throughout the day. Staff C was not aware of this on 9/19/23 when she spoke with the assisted living facility director and requested assisted living facility staff to push fluids due to potential for dehydration, check the patient’s urine output and call Staff C if no urine output. Staff C did not give a specific timeframe for the facility to check on patient and call nurse. Staff C reported in the future she will be more specific regarding times when requesting assisted living facility staff to check on patients. During an interview on 1/15/24 at 10:49 AM, Administrator reported agency staff are instructed to give assisted living facility nurses report on patients after they have been seen by agency staff. If the assisted living facility nurse is not available at the time of the home health visit, staff may give report to another staff member that may be available, even if not a nurse. The expectation is the report or message would be passed onto the assisted living facility nurse. The Administrator reported it would be expected for staff to follow the policy/procedure for catheterization. 3. Assisted Living Facility (ALF) documentation for Patient #2 included the following: a. entry dated 9/19/23 at 2:40 PM, included documentation the home care nurse changed the patient’s foley catheter today; b. entry dated 9/19/23 at 6:11 PM, included documentation certified medication aide (CMA) called assisted living facility nurse to report blood present in foley catheter drainage bag and patient complained of discomfort. CMA instructed to administer to Patient #2, as needed Tylenol dose, encourage patient to increase water intake, and for CMA to call back with update between 7:00 PM and 8:00 PM. c. entry dated 9/19/23 at 7:50 PM, included documentation CMA contacted assisted living facility nurse and reported patient continued with dark red urinary output and blood at catheter insertion site. Patient reported some relief from Tylenol but continued to have discomfort. Assisted Living facility nurse called home health on call nurse and informed that a home health visit would be made. Assisted living facility nurse called patient’s son and notified him that patient had dark red urinary output and blood at catheter insertion site and home health nurse was to be at the facility to make a visit and assess the patient. d. entry dated 9/19/23 at 8:26 PM, included documentation CMA contacted assisted living facility nurse and reported patient’s son had arrived to assisted living facility, refused to talk with assisted living facility nurse or wait for home health nurse to assess patient, requested to have patient sent to emergency room via ambulance. CMA instructed by assisted living facility nurse to send patient to emergency room. 4. Home Health Case Communication note, dated 9/19/23 at 7:44 PM, included documentation the on call nurse received a call from assisted living facility staff, patient had blood tinged urine in foley catheter bag. Blood around urinary meatus, patient denies pain, urine draining. On call nurse instructed the assisted living staff that a skilled nursing visit would be made, nurse was at least 30 minutes away and would need to finish with current skilled nursing visit before coming to assess patient at the assisted living. Nurse arrived at the assisted living facility at 8:56 PM and was informed patient had been sent to the emergency room per family request. 5. Emergency department provider note, dated 9/19/23 at 9:04 PM, included documentation patient arrived in emergency department with complaint to ambulance staff the foley catheter didn’t feel right. Patient had blood in urine but unsure when the blood started. Patient with history of benign prostatic hypertrophy (enlarged prostate) urinary retention and chronic foley catheter, pseudomonas bacteremia (infection), presented today with complaint of blood in urine. Foley catheter changed this morning and since that time has had bleeding noticed in catheter drainage bag as well as around the urinary catheter. Patient reported he did not feel foley catheter was placed correctly. Clinical laboratory results demonstrated leukocytosis with left shift of nonspecific etiology (high white blood cell count). Emergency department physician consulted with primary physician and decision made to change foley catheter. At 10:58 PM, emergency department nursing staff changed foley catheter successfully with urine output, no obvious microscopic hematuria (blood in urine), no significant bleeding in urinary catheter or around urinary catheter. Patient having no significant discomfort with this foley catheter placement. Clinical Impression, Final diagnoses: acute hypoxemic respiratory failure; hematuria, unspecified type; pneumonia of both lungs due to infectious organism; sepsis with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Patient admitted to inpatient status. 6. Hospital discharge summary note, dated 9/26/23 at 9:02 AM, included documentation patient was admitted on 9/19/23 with an elevated white blood cell count and temperature. Given patient previous history of pseudomonas urinary tract infection patient was started on 2 antibiotics (there was concern for possible pneumonia as well). Antibiotics were later scaled back as the blood culture had grown e coli and the repeat blood culture was negative. 7 days of antibiotics were completed. Discharge exam revealed foley catheter in place draining clear urine. Staff C failed to follow standard of practice for catheter insertion. Staff C failed to replace or troubleshoot the foley catheter due to no urine output. Staff C failed to communicate specific instructions for Patient #2, to the assisted living staff when to contact the home health agency. The plan of care failed to identify patient-specific instructions regarding steps to take if foley catheter was problematic and/or uncomfortable. The agency provided no additional information prior to the end of the survey.”
-
Promptly Alert Relevant Physician Of Changes
The inspectors’ words, 1,788 words
“Promptly alert relevant physician of changes CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The HHA must promptly alert the relevant physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the plan of care should be altered. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, agency policy review, agency procedure review, patient/family interview and staff interview, the agency failed to notify the physician of changes in patient condition or needs that suggest an alteration to the Plan of Care for 1 of 2 sampled patients with indwelling foley catheters. (Patient #2) Failure to report changes in patient condition or identified needs placed agency patients at risk for inadequate or inappropriate care. Findings included: According to the agency policy, titled Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention, dated 4/1/21, catheters are to be inserted using aseptic technique, sterile equipment and a health care worker who has shown competency in this procedure. Use the smallest bore catheter as possible, consistent with good drainage to minimize urethral trauma. Indwelling catheters should be properly secured after insertion to prevent movement and urethral traction. Assess for voiding within 6 hours of removal of catheter. According to the agency procedure from Mosby’s Nursing Skills reference, titled Male Catheter Insertion Technique, dated November 2022, an indwelling catheter is inserted through the urethral meatus, advance the catheter until urine flows through the tubing. Do not inflate the balloon until urine flow appears. Continue to advance the catheter to the bifurcation (splitting) of the tubing. Do not force the catheter against resistance. Notify the physician, if resistance to catheter insertion persists, the patient may have an enlarged prostate or a urinary abnormality. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 3/28/23. Clinical record review revealed: 1. Plan of Care, dated 7/26/23 to 9/23/23, included physician orders for skilled nursing services 1 time a month for indwelling foley catheter replacement and 3 as needed for foley catheter replacement/ troubleshooting/ management. 2. Skilled nursing visit note, dated 9/19/23, from 12:13 PM to 1:34 PM, included documentation indwelling foley catheter removed and replaced with 14 French foley catheter with 10 milliliter balloon at 1:10 PM, was not a difficult insertion but there was no urine and/or blood returned. Foley catheter balloon was inflated prior to urine flow. During the nurse visit, Staff C, RN (registered nurse), had patient drink water and walk around, patient denied pain. Assessment included: lung sounds clear bilaterally, respirations unlabored, no cough or pain with inspiration, no complaints of shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, appetite: fair, fluids: inadequate, change in appetite: unchanged, diet type: regular, oral problems: no oral problems, and nutritional concerns: dehydration (due to inadequate fluid intake and no urine output). Staff C spoke with assisted living facility staff regarding foley change and no urine return, requested assisted living staff to keep an eye on patient output. Staff C failed to notify the physician of no urine output upon insertion of foley catheter. Staff C failed to follow standard of practice for catheter insertion. During an interview on 11/21/23 at 8:48 AM, Patient #2’s son, reported not being at the assisted living facility during the skilled nurse visit on 9/19/23. Patient #2’s son received a call from assisted living facility staff at approximately 8:00 PM. The ALF staff reported the foley catheter was changed earlier in the day and facility staff suspected blood was in the catheter. Patient #2’s son made a visit to the facility and found Patient #2 on the toilet, bleeding, blood in the catheter bag, patient sick to his/her stomach, had diarrhea, and complained the home care nurse changed the foley catheter and left him/her like that. Patient #2 was sent to the emergency room per the request of Patient #2’s son. During an interview on 11/21/23 at 2:17 PM, Patient #2 reported the foley catheter change in September 2023, the nurse took the old catheter out, not sure what happened but they wrecked the inside (referencing bleeding), had to go to the hospital to get fixed, bled immediately when the new catheter was put in, blood was squirting all over. During an interview on 11/21/23 at 11:25 AM, Assisted Living Facility (ALF) Director reported talking with Staff C on 9/19/23, assisted living facility nurse was not available when the home health agency staff made their visit. ALF Director received a report the foley catheter had been changed during visit and assisted living facility staff needed to follow up with the patient regarding urine output. Director documented this information in the patient record for the assisted living facility nurse to read/review and reported no concerns with education and care coordination with the home health agency staff. The Director reported Staff C did not give specific instructions for follow up on urine output or timeframe for assisted living staff to contact the home health agency. The assisted living facility nurse was unavailable for interview as he/she was no longer employed with the assisted living facility. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 2:36 PM, Staff C, RN reported Patient #2’s catheter insertion was routine without difficulty other than no urine return, patient voiced no complaints. Staff C instructed assisted living facility staff to check on patient later, push fluids due to the potential for dehydration and notify home health nurse if the patient had no urine return. Since no call was received, home health nurse assumed the Patient had urine return. Staff C reported she did not think to notify physician about no urine return, since Staff C felt it was a routine catheter insertion. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 2:23 PM, Administrator reported she was unable to speak to the policy or procedure in regards to catheterizations without reviewing the policy or procedures first. The Administrator provided the requested policies/procedures on 11/30/23. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 1:00 PM, Administrator reported staff are to contact the physician if they have difficulty inserting a foley catheter or insert a foley catheter with no urine return. During an interview on 1/4/24 at 3:22 PM, Staff C, RN reported it is essential to have urine return after inserting a foley catheter and the physician should have been notified, however the physician was not notified. In the future this RN would notify the physician if there was no urine return after inserting a foley catheter. Patient #2 had no urine or blood in the catheter bag when Staff C left the patient home. 3. Assisted Living Facility (ALF) documentation included the following: a. entry dated 9/19/23 at 2:40 PM, included documentation the home care nurse changed the patient’s foley catheter today; b. entry dated 9/19/23 at 6:11 PM, included documentation certified medication aide (CMA) called assisted living facility nurse to report blood present in foley catheter drainage bag and patient complained of discomfort. CMA instructed to administer to Patient #2, as needed Tylenol dose, encourage patient to increase water intake, and for CMA to call back with update between 7:00 PM and 8:00 PM. c. entry dated 9/19/23 at 7:50 PM, included documentation CMA contacted assisted living facility nurse and reported patient continued with dark red urinary output and blood at catheter insertion site. Patient reported some relief from Tylenol but continued to have discomfort. Assisted Living facility nurse called home health on call nurse and informed that a home health visit would be made. Assisted living facility nurse called patient’s family member and notified them that patient had dark red urinary output and blood at catheter insertion site and home health nurse was to be at the facility to make a visit and assess the patient. d. entry dated 9/19/23 at 8:26 PM, included documentation CMA contacted assisted living facility nurse and reported patient’s son had arrived to assisted living facility, refused to talk with assisted living facility nurse or wait for home health nurse to assess patient, requested to have patient sent to emergency room via ambulance. CMA instructed by assisted living facility nurse to send patient to emergency room. 4. Home Health Case Communication note, dated 9/19/23 at 7:44 PM, included documentation the on call nurse received a call from assisted living facility staff, patient had blood tinged urine in foley catheter bag. Blood around urinary meatus, patient denies pain, urine draining. On call nurse instructed the assisted living staff that a skilled nursing visit would be made, nurse was at least 30 minutes away and would need to finish with current skilled nursing visit before coming to assess patient at the assisted living. Nurse arrived at the assisted living facility at 8:56 PM and was informed patient had been sent to the emergency room per family request. 5. Emergency department provider note, dated 9/19/23 at 9:04 PM, included documentation patient arrived in emergency department with complaint to ambulance staff the foley catheter didn’t feel right. Patient had blood in urine but unsure when the blood started. Patient with history of benign prostatic hypertrophy (enlarged prostate) urinary retention and chronic foley catheter, pseudomonas bacteremia (infection), presented today with complaint of blood in urine. Foley catheter changed this morning and since that time has had bleeding noticed in catheter drainage bag as well as around the urinary catheter. Patient reported he did not feel foley catheter was placed correctly. Clinical laboratory results demonstrated leukocytosis with left shift of nonspecific etiology (high white blood cell count). Emergency department physician consulted with primary physician and decision made to change foley catheter. At 10:58 PM, emergency department nursing staff changed foley catheter successfully with urine output, no obvious microscopic hematuria (blood in urine), no significant bleeding in urinary catheter or around urinary catheter. Patient having no significant discomfort with this foley catheter placement. Clinical Impression, Final diagnoses: acute hypoxemic respiratory failure; hematuria, unspecified type; pneumonia of both lungs due to infectious organism; sepsis with acute hypoxic respiratory failure. Patient admitted to inpatient status. 6. Hospital discharge summary note, dated 9/26/23 at 9:02 AM, included documentation patient was admitted on 9/19/23 with an elevated white blood cell count and temperature. Given patient previous history of pseudomonas urinary tract infection patient was started on 2 antibiotics (there was concern for possible pneumonia as well). Antibiotics were later scaled back as the blood culture had grown e coli and the repeat blood culture was negative. 7 days of antibiotics were completed. Discharge exam revealed foley catheter in place draining clear urine. The skilled nurse failed to notify the physician regarding the indwelling foley catheter insertion without urine return. This resulted in an approximately 9 hour delay in getting the patient the appropriate care. The above findings were reviewed with the Administrator. The agency provided no additional information prior to the end of the survey.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 24, 1984.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
- Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Mercycare Service Corporation owns 100% directly since Oct 24, 1984; Mercy Medical Center owns 100% directly since Oct 24, 1984.
- 22 owners or officers are people: Gina R James (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Gregory B Dewolf (corporate officer); Gregory B Dewolf (corporate director); Gregory B Dewolf (managing employee (on the payroll)); Cheryle W Mitvalsky (corporate officer); Maurita Soukup (corporate officer); Fred J Pilcher (corporate director); Deborah M Jones (corporate director); Robert Cataldo (corporate director); Nancy L Kasparek (corporate director); Christopher D Dewolf (corporate director); Albert P Ruffalo (corporate director); Sharon Kerrigan (corporate director); Barrie W Ernst (corporate director); Barbara Allison Knapp (corporate director); Rupak H Patel (corporate director); Michele M Busse (corporate director); Tatum Buse (corporate director); Charles A Rohde (corporate director); John-Paul E Besong (corporate director); Patrick Slater (corporate director); Mary K Quass (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercycare Service Corporation | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Oct 24, 1984 |
| Mercy Medical Center | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Oct 24, 1984 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
- Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (330 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3.5 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 96.48% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 10.22% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.76% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 12 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 52402, where this agency’s office is, 8 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Unitypoint at Home | 3.5 |
| Mercy Home Care This home health agency | 3.5 |
| Comfort Care Medicare Inc. | Not given |
| Therapy Solutions Inc. | 2 |
| To the Rescue | Not given |
| Compassion North America Home Health Services Corp | Not given |
| Home Health With Heart LLC | Not given |
| In-Home Care Connection Home Health Services | 2.5 |
| Johnson County Visiting Nurse Association | 3 |
| Centerwell Home Health | 5 |
| Above and Beyond Home Health | 3.5 |
| Aveanna Healthcare | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.