Hearth Record

Lee County Health Department

A home health agency in Fort Madison, Iowa 52627

5001 Avenue O, Fort Madison, Iowa 52627. (319) 372-5225.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 29, 2024: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 29, 2024: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Authentication

    The inspectors’ words, 314 words

    “Authentication CFR(s): 484.110(b) Standard: Authentication. All entries must be legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated, dated, and timed. Authentication must include a signature and a title (occupation), or a secured computer entry by a unique identifier, of a primary author who has reviewed and approved the entry. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency staff interview, clinical record review and agency policy review, the agency failed to ensure clinical documents were completed within regulation time frames or per agency policy for 1 of 7 sampled patients (Patient #4). Failure to maintain timely, accurate and appropriately authenticated and completed clinical record documentation increased the risk that agency staff provided services without up to date information related to the patient’s condition, and decreased the ability of agency staff to communicate effectively in order to coordinate patient care. Findings include: According to the agency’s policy, titled Clinical Records, dated November 2023, required documentation for each service provided must be completed within the following timeframes: home health aide and contracted service notes – 14 days, nursing notes – 5 days, other assessments per specific timeframe according to assessment type. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 1:11 PM, Staff A, Administrator, after reviewing the policy, reported nursing staff had 5 days to complete documentation unless specific assessment called for a specific time frame, home health aides and contracted therapy staff had 14 days to complete documentation. Patient #4 had a start of care date of 7/30/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. Skilled nurse visit note, dated 8/2/24 and 8/7/24, was completed on 8/20/24, 18 days after the visit and 13 days late per policy. b. Skilled nurse visit note, dated 8/7/24, was completed on 8/20/24, 13 days after the visit and 8 days late per policy. The skilled nurse failed to complete visit documentation per agency policy. The above information was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule G1024. Standard-level.

  • 5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 219 words

    “5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy review, and clinical record review, the agency failed to ensure accurate completion of all pertinent components of the start of care comprehensive assessment within the regulated time frame for 1 of 7 sampled patients. (Patient #7) Failure to accurately and thoroughly complete the start of care comprehensive assessment in a timely manner increased the potential that patients might not receive services in a manner to meet individualized patient needs. According to the policy, titled Clinical Records, dated February 2023, assessments must be completed and confirmed with an electronic signature within the specific regulatory time frames to conform. 1. Patient #7 had a start of care date of 4/3/2024. Clinical record revealed the following: a. The comprehensive assessment for start of care, dated as initiated on 4/3/24, was not electronically signed as completed until 4/10/24, which exceeded the requirement by 3 days. The agency failed to complete the start of care comprehensive assessment within 5 calendar days after the start of care. The above findings were reviewed with the agency Administrator.”

    Rule G0520. Element-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 782 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency staff interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the home health agency failed to ensure the drug regimen review identified at a minimum the effectiveness of drug therapy, drug side effects, actual or potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and/or patient compliance with medications for 4 of 7 sampled patients (Patients #2, #5, #6 and #7). Failure to ensure medications reviewed at the time of each drug regimen review are current and accurate and failure to identify actual/ potential concerns increased the potential for unidentified medication interactions and side effect risks to the patient at the time of each comprehensive assessment. 3. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 8/12/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 08/12/24, included documentation of duplicate drug therapy and potential drug interactions but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy, side effects and compliance. The RN failed to complete a drug regimen review that included the 5 required components of ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy and non-compliance with therapy. 4. Patient #7 had a start of care date of 4/3/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 04/3/24, included documentation of potential drug interactions and compliance, but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy, side effects and duplicate medications. b. Recertification comprehensive assessment, dated 5/29/24, included documentation of potential drug interactions, but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy, compliance with medication, duplicate medications and side effects. c. Resumption of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 7/9/24, included documentation of duplicate drug therapy and potential drug interactions but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy, side effects and compliance. No further information was provided by the agency prior to the end of the survey. According to the agency policy, titled Drug Regimen Review and dated October 2023, on admission the Registered Nurse (RN) shall check all medications a patient may be taking to identify potential adverse effects and drug interactions, including ineffective therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy and non-compliance with therapy. The nurse shall review all medication effectiveness to ensure appropriateness, and to identify potential interactions, potential side effects, ineffective drug therapy or duplicate drug therapy. The drug regimen review (DRR) will be completed when a comprehensive assessment is completed: upon admission, every 60 days following admission, resumption of care, and discharge. During an interview on 8/27/24 at 1:11 PM, Staff B, Clinical Manager, reported RNs complete a drug regimen review at the time of start of care, resumption of care, recertification and at discharge. 1. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 11/28/23. Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 11/28/23, included documentation of duplicate drug therapy and potential drug interactions but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy, side effects and compliance. b. Resumption of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 1/23/24, included documentation of duplicate drug therapy and potential drug interactions but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy, side effects and compliance. c. Recertification comprehensive assessments, dated 3/25/24, 5/22/24 and 7/24/24, included documentation of duplicate drug therapy, potential drug interactions and compliance but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy and side effects. The RN failed to complete a drug regimen review that included the 5 required components of ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy and non-compliance with therapy. 2. Patient #6 had a start of care date of 8/25/23 and a discharge date of 2/20/24. Clinical record review revealed: a. Start of Care comprehensive assessment, dated 8/25/23, included documentation of duplicate drug therapy and potential drug interactions but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy, side effects and compliance. b. Recertification comprehensive assessment, dated 10/20/23, included documentation of duplicate drug therapy and potential drug interactions but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy, side effects and compliance. c. Recertification comprehensive assessments, dated 12/21/23, included documentation of duplicate drug therapy, potential drug interactions and compliance but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy and side effects. d. Discharge comprehensive assessment, dated 2/20/24, included documentation of duplicate drug therapy and potential drug interactions but lacked documentation of ineffective drug therapy, side effects and compliance. The RN failed to complete a drug regimen review that included the 5 required components of ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy and non-compliance with therapy.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Last 5 Days Of Every 60 Days Unless:

    The inspectors’ words, 338 words

    “Last 5 days of every 60 days unless: CFR(s): 484.55(d)(1)(i,ii,iii) The last 5 days of every 60 days beginning with the start-of-care date, unless there is a- (i) Beneficiary elected transfer; (ii) Significant change in condition; or (iii) Discharge and return to the same HHA during the 60-day episode. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and agency policy review, the agency failed to ensure accurate completion of all required components of the recertification comprehensive assessments between day 56 and 60 of each 60 day certification period for 1 of 7 sampled patients requiring a recertification assessment. (Patient #1) Failure to accurately and thoroughly complete recertification comprehensive assessments in a timely manner increased the potential that patients might not receive services in a manner to meet individualized patient needs. According to the policy, titled Clinical Records, dated February 2023, assessments must be completed and confirmed with an electronic signature within the specific regulatory time frames to conform. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 4/9/14. Clinical record review revealed: a. An update to the comprehensive assessment for recertification, dated as initiated on 4/12/24, was not electronically signed as completed until 4/20/24, 5 days into the new certification period. The assessment was not completed by day 60 as required by regulation. b. An update to the comprehensive assessment for recertification, dated as initiated on 6/12/24, was not electronically signed as completed until 6/17/24, 2 days into the new certification period. The assessment was not completed by day 60 as required by regulation. c. An update to the comprehensive assessment for recertification, dated as initiated on 8/9/24, was not electronically signed as completed until 8/17/24, 4 days into the new certification period. The assessment was not completed by day 60 as required by regulation. The agency failed to update the comprehensive assessment in the last 5 days of the 60 day episode. The above information was shared with the Agency Administrator and the Nursing Manager, prior to the end of the survey.”

    Rule G0546. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 29, 2024Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 3, 1973.
  • Ownership: government operated.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Lee County Auditor owns 100% directly since Jan 3, 1973.
  • 1 owner or officer is a person: Michele D Ross (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Lee County AuditorOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 3, 1973

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate81.86% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.22% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.63% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 52627, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 2.25 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 52627
PlaceQuality rating
Lee County Health Department This home health agency2
Southeast Iowa Regional Home Health3
Advanced Home Health Care Inc.4
Sunny Brook Home Care1.5
Optimae Home Health Services2.5
Nurse at Home1

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.