Tugaloo Home Health Agency, An Amedisy Company
A home health agency in Gainesville, Georgia 30501
2565 Thompson Bridge Rd, Ste 204 & 205, Gainesville, Georgia 30501. (770) 532-2013.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 4of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Oct 1, 2025: a complaint inspection.
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Oct 1, 2025: complaint inspection5 deficiencies
-
Care Planning, Coordination, Quality Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 593 words
“Care planning, coordination, quality of care CFR(s): 484.60 Condition of participation: Care planning, coordination of services, and quality of care. Patients are accepted for treatment on the reasonable expectation that an HHA can meet the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs in his or her place of residence. Each patient must receive an individualized written plan of care, including any revisions or additions. The individualized plan of care must specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment, including identification of the responsible discipline(s), and the measurable outcomes that the HHA anticipates will occur as a result of implementing and coordinating the plan of care. The individualized plan of care must also specify the patient and caregiver education and training. Services must be furnished in accordance with accepted standards of practice. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy titled “Plan of Care (POC) /Care Planning Process,” review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the agency failed to follow the plan of care by not providing continuous oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula and oxygen therapy interventions for one patient (P) (P#3) of five sampled patients. Findings include: Review of policy titled “AA-014 Plan of Care (POC) /Care Planning Process,” with last review date 1/31/25 revealed the following: Purpose: A plan of care will be developed through a care planning process, which is designed to provide care, treatment, and services that are appropriate to the patient’s individual needs. 7. The Clinical Manager is responsible for facilitating coordination among all disciplines. Review of document titled “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” dated 9/13/24 revealed orders for oxygen 2 Liters per minute continuous via nasal cannula for P#3 and interventions that the Physical Therapist (PT) and the Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) were to educate patient/caregiver on oxygen management. During an interview with the Executive Director of Operations on 9/30/25 at 12:30 p.m., the Executive Director of Operations acknowledged that the care plan for P#3 contained an order for oxygen. She stated that she was unaware P#3 was not receiving oxygen as ordered on the plan of care. She confirmed the Physical Therapist was assessing pulse oximetry (a measurement of the amount of oxygen that is in the blood, normal generally between 95% and 100%) on room air for P#3. The EDO confirmed that the agency failed to provide oxygen therapy and interventions as ordered on the plan of care. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 12:45 p.m. with the Physical Therapist (PT) PT AA states that he completed the recertification assessment for the period of 9/13/24 to 11/11/24 and was aware that oxygen 3 liters per minute continuous via nasal cannula had been ordered but failed to ensure that it was provided. During an interview with the Clinical Manager (CM) on 9/30/25 at 12:35 p.m. confirms that oxygen 3 Liters per nasal canula was ordered and listed on the plan of care for P#3. She was unaware that the oxygen was not available to P#3. She stated oxygen saturation levels were taken on room air. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 1:00 p.m. with Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA), PTA BB stated that there was no oxygen provided for P#3. She states that she looked for the oxygen but failed to report that the oxygen had not been provided to P#3. The PTA BB stated P#3 would have oxygen saturation levels below 90 while active and the levels would recover to the 90’s after she rested.”
-
Skilled Professional Services
The inspectors’ words, 446 words
“Skilled professional services CFR(s): 484.75 Condition of participation: Skilled professional services. Skilled professional services include skilled nursing services, physical therapy, speech-language pathology services, and occupational therapy, as specified in §409.44 of this chapter, and physician or allowed practitioner and medical social work services as specified in §409.45 of this chapter. Skilled professionals who provide services to HHA patients directly or under arrangement must participate in the coordination of care. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy titled “AA-014 Plan of Care (POC) Care Planning Process,” record review, and family and staff interviews, it was determined the home health agency failed to provide services as ordered by the physician as indicated in the plan of care for one patient (P) (P#3) of five sampled patients. Findings include: Review of the policy titled “AA-014 Plan of Care (POC)/Care Planning Process,” revised January 2025 revealed the following: PURPOSE: To provide physician/allowed practitioner ordered care, treatment, and services through an organized process and plan Review of document titled “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” dated 9/13/24 revealed orders for oxygen 2 Liters per minute via nasal cannula for P#3 and interventions that the Physical Therapist (PT) of Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) were to educate patient/caregiver on Oxygen management. Review of PTA BB visit note report dated 10/23/24, PTA BB obtained oxygen saturation level on room air for P#3 with results of 65% saturation. (Normal oxygen saturation rates are typically between 95% and 100%.) PTA BB provided 10 minutes of rest time after exercises, and after recovery period of 10 minutes oxygen saturation returned to above 90% on room air. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 12:45 p.m. with the Physical Therapist (PT) PT AA states that he completed the recertification assessment for the period of 9/13/24 to 11/11/24 and was aware that Oxygen 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula had been ordered but failed to ensure that it was provided. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 1:00 p.m. with Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) BB, PTA BB stated that there was no oxygen provided for P#3. She states that she looked for the oxygen but failed to report that the oxygen had not been provided to P#3. The PTA BB stated P#3 would have oxygen saturation levels below 90 while active and the levels would recover to the 90’s after she rested. During an interview with the Clinical Manager (CM) on 9/30/25 at 12:35 p.m. confirms that oxygen 3 Liters per nasal canula was ordered and listed on the plan of care for P#3. She was unaware that the Oxygen was not available to P#3. She stated oxygen saturation levels were taken on room air.”
-
Communication With All Physicians
The inspectors’ words, 316 words
“Communication with all physicians CFR(s): 484.60(d)(1) Standard: Coordination of Care. The HHA must: (1) Assure communication with all physicians or allowed practitioners involved in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy titled “Coordination of Care,” record review and family and staff interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure communication to the physician involved in the plan of care. Specifically, the agency failed to notify the physician that P#3 was not receiving oxygen therapy and oxygen therapy interventions as ordered on the plan of care for one patient (P) (P#3) of five sampled patients. Findings include: Review of policy titled “TX-002 Coordination of Care,” last reviewed 7/10/25 revealed the following: Purpose: The patients’ care and services will be coordinated among staff and branches. To ensure consistent documentation, communication, retrieval of significant administrative and patient/family information. Procedure: 6. The overseeing physician is notified promptly of any changes in patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and /or the pan of care should be altered. 7. Agency staff involved in the patient’s plan of care provides patient related updates in a timely manner to the physician and includes as appropriate: Patient’s current condition Changes in patient’s condition Patient response to treatment, if negative will be reported to the physician immediately During an interview with the Clinical Manager (CM) on 9/30/25 at 12:35 p.m. confirms that oxygen 3 Liters per nasal canula was ordered and listed on the plan of care for P#3. She was unaware that the oxygen was not available to P#3. She stated oxygen saturation levels (a measurement of oxygen found in the blood) were taken on room air. CM denies notifying the physician that P#3 did not receive oxygen as ordered. The agency failed to notify the physician that P#3 was not receiving oxygen therapy and oxygen therapy interventions as ordered.”
-
Coordinate Care Delivery
The inspectors’ words, 285 words
“Coordinate care delivery CFR(s): 484.60(d)(4) Coordinate care delivery to meet the patient’s needs, and involve the patient, representative (if any), and caregiver(s), as appropriate, in the coordination of care activities. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interviews, the agency failed to ensure that oxygen was initiated for one patient (P) (P#3) of five sampled patients (P) (P#3). Findings include: Review of visit note report dated 10/23/24, Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) BB obtained pulse oximetry (a measurement of the amount of oxygen that is in the blood, normal generally between 95% and 100%) on room air for P#3 with results of 65% saturation. P#3 had ambulated to the bathroom. PTA BB waited 10 minutes of rest time, and the recovery time returned to above 90% on room air. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 12:45 p.m. with Physical Therapist (PT) PT AA confirmed that the care plan did contain orders for oxygen 3 liters per minute continuous via nasal cannula for P#3, but he failed to coordinate care with other disciplines to ensure that P#3 received the oxygen. He stated that he assessed P#3’s pulse oximetry on room air and did not provide interventions for oxygen therapy. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 1:00 p.m. with Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA), PTA BB stated that there was no oxygen provided for P#3. She states that she looked for the oxygen but failed to report that the oxygen had not been provided to P#3. The PTA BB stated P#3 would have oxygen saturation levels below 90 while active and the levels would recover to the 90’s after she rested. The agency failed to coordinate care delivery to meet patient’s needs.”
-
Provide Services In The Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 447 words
“Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on the policy titled “AA-014 Plan of Care (POC)/Care Planning Process,” record review and staff interviews, the agency failed to provide services ordered by the physician as indicated on the plan of care. Specifically, the agency did not follow the plan of care of one patient (P) P#3 to provide Oxygen 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. Findings include: Review of the policy titled “AA-014 Plan of Care (POC)/Care Planning Process,” revised January 2025 revealed the following: PURPOSE: · To provide physician/allowed practitioner ordered care, treatment, and services through an organized process and plan Review of document titled “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” dated 9/13/24 revealed orders for oxygen 3 Liters per minute continuously via nasal cannula for P#3 and interventions that the Physical Therapist (PT) of Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) were to educate patient/caregiver on oxygen management. The plan of care also lacked oxygen saturation parameters to notify the physician of potential complications. Review of PTA BB visit note report dated 10/23/24, PTA BB obtained oxygen saturation level on room air for P#3 with results of 65% saturation. (Normal oxygen saturation rates are typically between 95% and 100%.) PTA BB provided 10 minutes of rest time after exercises, and after a recovery time of 10 minutes oxygen saturation returned to above 90% on room air. The agency staff failed to follow physician’s orders to oxygen administration as outlined in the plan of care. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 12:45 p.m. with Physical Therapist (PT), AA states that he completed the recertification assessment for the period of 9/13/24 to 11/11/24 and was aware that oxygen 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula had been ordered but failed to ensure that it was provided. During an interview on 9/30/25 at 1:00 p.m. with Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA), PTA BB stated that there was no oxygen provided for P#3. She states that she looked for the oxygen but failed to report that the oxygen had not been provided to P#3. The PTA BB stated P#3 would have oxygen saturation levels below 90 while active and the levels would recover to the 90’s after she rested. During an interview with the Clinical Manager (CM) on 9/30/25 at 12:35 p.m., CM confirms that oxygen 3 Liters per nasal canula was ordered and listed on the plan of care for P#3. She was unaware that the oxygen was not available to P#3. She stated oxygen saturation levels were taken on room air.”
Jan 28, 2025: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
Discharge Or Transfer Summary Content
The inspectors’ words, 361 words
“Discharge or Transfer Summary Content CFR(s): 484.58(b)(1) Standard: Discharge or transfer summary content. The HHA must send all necessary medical information pertaining to the patient’s current course of illness and treatment, post-discharge goals of care, and treatment preferences, to the receiving facility or health care practitioner to ensure the safe and effective transition of care. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the policy “Discharge of Patients,” record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to provide the patient with written notice of discharge and send all necessary medical information to the receiving healthcare practitioner upon discharge for one patient (P) (P#5) of four sampled discharged patients. Findings include: A review of the policy titled, “Discharge of Patients”, Policy AA-016, reviewed 10/10/2024 reveals the following: Procedure: 7. The physician/allowed practitioner will be notified of the patient’s discharge from the home health agency. Documentation of physician/allowed practitioner communications/notification will be evident in the patient’s medical record. 11. A completed discharge summary is sent to the primary care physician/allowed practitioner, receiving facility or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge. 16. C. Verbal notification to non-institutionalized patients not in jeopardy will be followed by written notice- Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (for traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage patients.) A copy of this written notice shall be placed in the patient’s chart. A review of P#5’s clinical record revealed the patient was admitted on 8/13/2024 and discharged on 10/15/2024 due to no further skilled needs. A clinical chart review failed to reveal a signed Medicare Notice of Non-Coverage, documentation of physician notification of the discharge, or evidence the discharge summary was sent to the physician. The Executive Director of Operations (EDOO) provided the surveyor with a document titled “Event-Stages History Report”, which revealed that P#5’s discharge summary was faxed to an unnamed physician on 11/13/2024, 27 days after discharge. An interview on 1/28/2024 at approximately 10:45 a.m. was conducted with the EDOO, who agreed the clinical record lacked documentation of the discharge process.”
-
Governing Body
The inspectors’ words, 554 words
“Governing body CFR(s): 484.105(a) Standard: Governing body. A governing body (or designated persons so functioning) must assume full legal authority and responsibility for the agency’s overall management and operation, the provision of all home health services, fiscal operations, review of the agency’s budget and its operational plans, and its quality assessment and performance improvement program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of policies, record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined the hospice governing body failed to assume responsibility for the agency’s management and operation by failing to process and resolve complaints, failing to provide patients with written notice of discharge and send discharge summaries to the receiving healthcare practitioner upon discharge for one patient (P) (P#5). Findings include: A review of an unnumbered policy titled, “Complaint Documentation”, revised 7/2023 reveals the following: 7) The Administrator/DOO is responsible for reviewing every complaint, determining the necessary action, communicating the resolution with the person filing the complaint no later than 30 calendar days following receipt of the complaint. A review of the policy titled, “Discharge of Patients”, Policy AA-016, reviewed 10/10/2024 reveals the following: Procedure: 7. The physician/allowed practitioner will be notified of the patient’s discharge from the home health agency. Documentation of physician/allowed practitioner communications/notification will be evident in the patient’s medical record. 11. A completed discharge summary is sent to the primary care physician/allowed practitioner, receiving facility or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge. 16. C. Verbal notification to non-institutionalized patients not in jeopardy will be followed by written notice- Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (for traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage patients.) A copy of this written notice shall be placed in the patient’s chart. A review of complaint logs revealed a document titled, “Complaint Report”, dated 11/12/2024, which revealed complaints were received by P#5. The report failed to reveal documentation of a resolution to the complaint. A review of P#5’s clinical record revealed the patient was admitted on 8/13/2024 with a diagnosis of pneumonia and co-morbidities of cellulitis (a bacterial infection that affects the skin and underlying tissues) of both legs. The patient was discharged on 10/15/2024 due to no further skilled needs. The clinical record failed to reveal documentation of communication with the patient regarding the complaint. The Executive Director of Operations (EDOO) provided copies of several emails between upper-level agency management and revealed calls from P#5 were received on 11/9/2024 and twice on 11/11/2024. The Complaint Report and the clinical record failed to reveal documentation of the content of these calls or the resolution of the complaints. Further review of P#5’s clinical chart review failed to reveal a signed Medicare Notice of Non-Coverage, documentation of physician notification of the discharge, or evidence the discharge summary was sent to the physician. The Executive Director of Operations (EDOO) provided the surveyor with a document titled “Event-Stages History Report, which revealed discharge summary was faxed to an unnamed physician on 11/13/2024, 27 days after discharge. An interview on 1/28/2024 at approximately 10:45 a.m. was conducted with the EDOO, who confirmed that all documentation related to the discharge and the complaint had been provided, and agreed the clinical record lacked documentation of the discharge process.”
-
Make Complaints To The Hha
The inspectors’ words, 341 words
“Make complaints to the HHA CFR(s): 484.50(c)(3) Make complaints to the HHA regarding treatment or care that is (or fails to be) furnished, and the lack of respect for property and/or person by anyone who is furnishing services on behalf of the HHA; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of policy “Complaint Documentation,” record reviews, and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to process and resolve complaints for one patient (P) (P#5) of two patients sampled who submitted complaints to the agency. Findings include: A review of the policy titled “Complaint Documentation,” revised 7/2023 reveals the following: The Home Health Agency should be able to produce documentation for each complaint received that confirms an investigation was conducted and records the investigation findings as well as the ultimate resolution of the complaint. 7) The Administrator/DOO is responsible for reviewing every complaint, determining the necessary action, communicating the resolution with the person filing the complaint no later than 30 calendar days following receipt of the complaint. A review of P#5’s clinical record revealed the patient was admitted on 8/13/2024 with a diagnosis of pneumonia and co-morbidities of cellulitis (a bacterial infection that affects the skin and underlying tissues) of both legs. The patient was discharged on 10/15/2024 due to no further skilled needs. A review of complaint logs revealed a document titled, “Complaint Report”, dated 11/12/2024, which revealed complaints were received by P#5. The report failed to reveal documentation of a resolution to the complaint. The clinical record failed to reveal documentation of communication with the patient regarding the complaint. The Executive Director of Operations (EDOO) provided copies of several emails between upper-level agency management and revealed calls from P#5 were received on 11/9/2024 and twice on 11/11/2024. The Complaint Report and the clinical record failed to reveal documentation of the content of these calls or the resolution of the complaints. An interview on 1/28/2024 at approximately 10:45 a.m. was conducted with the EDOO, who confirmed that all documentation related to this complaint had been provided.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 5 deficiencies cited |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
| Apr 3, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 1, 1979.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Amedisys Holding LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 1, 1998.
- 11 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Julie Berkshire (managing employee (on the payroll)); Julie Berkshire (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Kristina J Braud (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Aug 14, 2025 |
| Amedisys Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 20, 2015 |
| Amedisys Holding LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Dec 1, 1998 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (327 surveys completed): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 81.74% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 12.78% (worse than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 3.88% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 5 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 30501, where this agency’s office is, 5 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Enhabit Home Health | 2 |
| Pruitthealth at Home - Gainesville | 3.5 |
| Northeast Georgia Home Health | 4.5 |
| Tugaloo Home Health Agency, An Amedisy Company This home health agency | 4 |
| Accentcare Home Health of Northeast Georgia | 3.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.