Hearth Record

Patient Care

A home health agency in Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067

400 Capital Boulevard, Ste 103, Rocky Hill, Connecticut 06067. (860) 257-2739.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 16, 2024: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 16, 2024: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Services By Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 518 words

    “Services by skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(a) Standard: Provision of services by skilled professionals. Skilled professional services are authorized, delivered, and supervised only by health care professionals who meet the appropriate qualifications specified under §484.115 and who practice according to the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews, review of an agency policies and interview with agency personnel, for one of three patients (Patient #5) who required wound care and one of three patients (Patient #1) who required blood glucose monitoring in the survey sample, the agency’s licensed personnel failed to measure wounds and monitor blood glucose levels in accordance with agency policies. The findings include: 1. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 7/14/23 and diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease with failure, acute congestive heart failure and type II diabetes mellitus. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 11/11/23 through 1/09/24 included nursing services two times a week for assessments and wound care to the right upper back. i. Interview and review of LPN #1’s nursing note dated 11/20/23 with the Administrator on 1/10/24 at 11:50 AM identified the patients’ left heel was noted with a large necrotic area with intact skin but failed to identify measurements of the left heel necrotic area. ii. Interview and review of the clinical record with the Administrator on 1/10/24 at 11:40 AM identified twice weekly nursing visits but failed to identify documentation of wound measurements by LPN #1 for the weeks of 12/17/23, 12/24/23 and 12/31/23 (LPN #1 visited on 12/19/23, 12/22/23, 12/26/23, 12/29/23, 1/03/24 and 1/05/24) and failed to follow agency policies. Review of agency policy for Wound Assessment and Documentation directed the clinician will assess wounds at least weekly. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 08/19/2020 with diagnosis that included laceration to the right shoulder, retention of urine, type II diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease and falls. The physician’s orders for the home health recertification period of 12/02/2023 to 01/30/2024 included nursing services twice per week for eight weeks for assessments, wound care to the right shoulder, bladder irrigation twice weekly through the indwelling foley catheter and monthly changes of the indwelling foley catheter. Interview and review of Patient #1’s recertification nursing assessment summary and care plan dated 11/27/2023 with the Administrator on 01/11/2024 at 10:00 AM, identified the Patient and caregiver would understand and demonstrate compliance with the treatment regimen for diabetes by week nine but failed to identify who was responsible for checking the Patient’s blood glucose levels, the frequency of the blood glucose checks and obtained blood glucose parameters from a health care provider in order to report glucose levels falling outside of the established parameters. Interview and review of Patient #1’s clinical nurses’ notes dated 12/04/2023, 12/07/2023, 12/12/2023, 12/19/2023, 12/27/2023, 12/29/2023, 01/02/2024, 01/04/2024 and 01/08/2024 with the Administrator on 01/11/2024 at 10:15 AM, identified the Assisted Living Services Agency (ALSA) nurses’ checked the Patient’s blood glucose every other day, but failed to identify the home health agency nurses’ documented blood glucose levels in Patient #1’s clinical notes.”

    Rule G0702. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 473 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review and interview with agency personnel, for two of ten patients (Patient #1 and #5) in the survey sample, the agency Registered Nurse/RN failed to ensure the plan of care addressed the patient’s individual needs. The findings include: P Patient #5 had a start of care date of 7/14/23 and diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease with failure, acute congestive heart failure and type II diabetes mellitus. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 11/11/23 through 1/09/24 included nursing services two times a week for assessments and wound care to the right upper back. Interview and review of the plan of care with the Administrator on 1/10/24 at 1:30 PM failed to identify the development of a comprehensive care plan that included frequency of weight monitoring and specific parameters for reporting weight fluctuations to the physician. a. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 08/19/2020 with diagnosis that included laceration to the right shoulder, retention of urine, type II diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease and falls. The physician’s orders for the home health recertification period of 12/02/2023 to 01/30/2024 included nursing services twice per week for eight weeks for assessments, wound care to the right shoulder, bladder irrigation twice weekly through the indwelling foley catheter and monthly changes of the indwelling foley catheter. i. Interview and review of Patient #1’s recertification nursing assessment summary and care plan dated 11/27/2023 with the Administrator on 01/11/2024 at 10:00 AM, identified the Patient and caregiver would understand and demonstrate compliance with the treatment regimen for diabetes by week nine but failed to identify the development of a comprehensive care plan that included who was responsible for checking the Patient’s blood glucose levels, the frequency of the blood glucose checks and obtained blood glucose parameters from a health care provider in order to report glucose levels falling outside of the established parameters.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Coordinate Care Delivery

    The inspectors’ words, 213 words

    “Coordinate care delivery CFR(s): 484.60(d)(4) Coordinate care delivery to meet the patient’s needs, and involve the patient, representative (if any), and caregiver(s), as appropriate, in the coordination of care activities. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews and interview with agency personnel, for one of three patients (Patient #5) who required wound care, the agency’s licensed personnel failed to coordinate wound care with the private caregiver. The findings include: Patient #5 had a start of care date of 7/14/23 and diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease with failure, acute congestive heart failure and type II diabetes mellitus. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 11/11/23 through 1/09/24 included nursing services two times a week for assessments and wound care to the right upper back. Interview and review of LPN #1’s nursing notes with the Administrator on 1/10/24 at 12:30 PM, identified the patient’s privately hired caregiver performed wound care prior to the nurses’ visits on 12/19/23, 12/22/23, 12/29/23 and 1/03/24 , and failed to identify nursing communication and understanding with the privately hired caregiver responsible for wound care, to allow the visiting nurse to visualize the wound status and directly perform wound care during nursing visits, in order to accurately document the wound progress and/or deterioration.”

    Rule G0608. Element-level.

  • Interdisciplinary Assessment Of The Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 569 words

    “Interdisciplinary assessment of the patient CFR(s): 484.75(b)(1) Ongoing interdisciplinary assessment of the patient; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews, review of an agency policies and interview with agency personnel, for one of three patients (Patient #5) who required wound care and one of three patients (Patient #1) who required blood glucose monitoring, the agency’s licensed personnel failed to assess wounds and monitor blood glucose in accordance with the agency’s policy. The findings include: 1. Patient #5 had a start of care date of 7/14/23 and diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease with failure, acute congestive heart failure and type II diabetes mellitus. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 11/11/23 through 1/09/24 included nursing services two times a week for assessments and wound care to the right upper back. On 11/21/23 through 12/15/23, the patient was transferred to a Skilled Nursing Facility/SNF for a three-week respite stay. RN #1’s resumption of care nursing note dated 12/16/23 identified a new stage II coccyx pressure ulcer, a stage II lower buttock pressure ulcer and an unstageable left heel pressure ulcer. Interview and review of LPN #1’s nursing notes with the Administrator on 1/10/24 at 12:30 PM identified the patient’s privately hired caregiver performed wound care prior to the nurses’ visits on 12/19/23, 12/22/23, 12/29/23 and 1/03/24 therefore, the wounds were not assessed or measured by a nurse since the resumption of care on 12/16/2023. Review of the agency’s Wound Assessment and Documentation policy identified the RN would perform the initial assessment for open wounds and surgical incisions upon admission. Wound assessments would be performed every visit, documented in the Wound Assessment Tool and include general observations, measurement of length, width and depth, undermining and tunneling drainage, wound bed appearance and surrounding skin condition. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 08/19/2020 with diagnosis that included laceration to the right shoulder, retention of urine, type II diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease and falls. The physician’s orders for the home health recertification period of 12/02/2023 to 01/30/2024 included nursing services twice per week for eight weeks for assessments, wound care to the right shoulder, bladder irrigation twice weekly through the indwelling foley catheter and monthly changes of the indwelling foley catheter. Interview and review of Patient #1’s recertification nursing assessment and care plan dated 11/27/2023 with the Administrator on 01/11/2024 at 10:00 AM, identified Patient #1’s care plan indicated the Patient and caregiver would understand and demonstrate compliance with the treatment regimen for diabetes by week nine but failed to identify who was responsible for checking the Patient’s blood glucose levels, the frequency of the blood glucose checks and obtained blood glucose parameters from a health care provider in order to report glucose levels falling outside of the established parameters. Interview and review of Patient #1’s clinical nurses’ notes dated 12/04/2023, 12/07/2023, 12/12/2023, 12/19/2023, 12/27/2023, 12/29/2023, 01/02/2024, 01/04/2024 and 01/08/2024 with the Administrator on 01/11/2024 at 10:15 AM, identified the Assisted Living Services Agency nurses’ checked the Patient’s blood glucose every other day, but the home health agency nurses failed to document blood glucose levels in Patient #1’s clinical notes. Review of the agency’s policy for Plan of Care, identified the qualified clinician would develop and revise the plan of care under the direction of the health care provider. The patient would be monitored for response to treatment and progress toward goals.”

    Rule G0706. Element-level.

  • Communication With Physicians

    The inspectors’ words, 350 words

    “Communication with physicians CFR(s): 484.75(b)(7) Communication with all physicians involved in the plan of care and other health care practitioners (as appropriate) related to the current plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the clinical record, interview with agency personnel and review of agency policies, for two of ten patients (Patient #1 and Patient #5) in the survey sample, the agency nurses failed to communicate with the physician involved in the plan of care. The findings include: Patient #5 had a start of care date of 7/14/23 and diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease with failure, acute congestive heart failure and type II diabetes mellitus. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 11/11/23 through 1/09/24 included nursing services two times a week for assessments and wound care to the right upper back. Interview and review of LPN #1’s nursing note dated 11/20/23 with the Administrator on 1/10/24 at 11:50 AM identified the patients’ left heel was noted with a large necrotic area with intact skin but failed to identify communication with the physician for wound care orders. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 08/19/2020 with diagnosis that included laceration to the right shoulder, retention of urine, type II diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease and falls. The physician’s orders for the home health recertification period of 12/02/2023 to 01/30/2024 included nursing services twice per week for eight weeks for assessments, wound care to the right shoulder, bladder irrigation twice weekly through the indwelling foley catheter and monthly changes of the indwelling foley catheter. Interview and review of Patient #1’s recertification nursing assessment summary and care plan dated 11/27/2023 with the Administrator on 01/11/2024 at 10:00 AM, identified the Patient and caregiver would understand and demonstrate compliance with the treatment regimen for diabetes by week nine but failed to identify who was responsible for checking the Patient’s blood glucose levels, the frequency of the blood glucose checks and obtained blood glucose parameters from a health care provider in order to report glucose levels falling outside of the established parameters.”

    Rule G0718. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 16, 2024Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 24, 2008.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Tennessee Health CARE Group LLC owns 100% directly since Nov 1, 2021.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Christina Mormile (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Robin Kipple (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate director); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
Tennessee Health CARE Group LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 1, 2021
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 1, 2021

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Zero, or very few, patients met the survey’s rules for inclusion.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate85.91% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.67% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.47% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 29 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 06067, where this agency’s office is, 26 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.