Hearth Record

Visiting Nurse & Hospice of Litchfield County, Inc.

A home health agency in Winsted, Connecticut 06098

32 Union St, Winsted, Connecticut 06098. (860) 379-8561.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 29, 2026: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 27, 2024: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Services By Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 776 words

    “Services by skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(a) Standard: Provision of services by skilled professionals. Skilled professional services are authorized, delivered, and supervised only by health care professionals who meet the appropriate qualifications specified under §484.115 and who practice according to the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews, review of an agency policy and interview with agency personnel, for two of seven patients (Patient #1 and #2) who required wound care in the survey sample, the agency failed to assess wounds in accordance with the agency’s policy. The findings include: a. Patient #1 had a start of care date of 02/12/2024 with diagnosis that included an unstageable pressure ulceration to the coccyx, cellulitis to the right ear, Parkinson’s disease, and dementia. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 02/12/2024 to 04/11/2024 included nursing services two to three times per week for eight weeks for nursing assessments and wound care to the coccyx. Additionally, the Patient received physical and occupational therapy services weekly. Review of Patient #1’s start of care nursing summary dated 02/12/2024, identified while in the hospital, Patient #1 developed a stage three (3) pressure ulceration (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat maybe visible) to the coccyx area. The nursing summary further identified the pressure ulceration to the coccyx was 1 cm (centimeter) in length, 0.4 cm in width and depth was unknown due to 95% of the wound being covered by slough (a yellowish/white material in the wound bed) and was unstageable. Review of Patient #1’s start of care OASIS (The Outcome and Assessment Information Set is a group of data points collected during comprehensive assessments) dated 02/12/2024, identified Patient #1’s pressure ulceration to the coccyx as stage three (3). Review of Patient #1’s nursing notes dated 02/14/2024, 02/16/2024, 02/19/2024, 02/21/2024, 02/23/2024, 02/26/2024 and 02/28/2024, identified the Patient’s pressure ulceration to the coccyx as stage two (2) (partial thickness loss of dermis, presenting as a shallow opened wound, without slough). b. Patient #2 had a start of care date of 07/04/2023 and a home health agency recertification date of 02/26/2024 with diagnosis that included a stage four (IV) pressure ulceration (tissue injury that extend to muscle, tendon and bone) to the right hip, malignant neoplasm to the bladder, neurogenic bladder, spina bifida and colostomy. The physician’s orders for the certification period of 02/29/2024 to 04/28/2024 included nursing services two to three times per week for eight weeks for nursing assessments and wound care to the right hip. Review of Patient #2’s start of care nursing summary dated 02/26/2024, identified the Patient underwent a surgical debridement (removal of dead/damaged tissue) to the right hip pressure ulceration in the hospital on 02/22/2024. Patient #2’s pressure ulceration to the right hip measured 6 cm in length x 6 cm in width x 5 cm depth and required the application of a wound vacuum device (a device applied to the wound, that uses suction to remove fluid and infection from the wound and promoting healing). Review of Patient #2’s resumption of care nursing summary dated 03/06/2024, identified the Patient visiting nurse services were resumed after being admitted to the hospital and returned home on 03/05/2024. The physician’s resumption of care orders dated 03/06/2024 included nursing services two to three times per week for nursing assessments and wound care to the right hip pressure ulceration. Review of Patient #2’s nursing notes dated 03/11/2024, 03/13/2024, 03/13/2024, 03/18/2024 and 03/20/2024, identified the right hip pressure ulceration as stage two. i. Interview and review of Patient #1 and #2’s clinical documentation with the Quality Assurance Nurse Manager on 03/27/2024 at 11:30 AM, identified the agency’s nurses failed to utilize the National Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurse Society (WOCN) wound staging guidelines in accordance with the agency’s Wound Assessment policy. Review of the agency’s Wound Care Assessment and Treatment policy identified a licensed skilled nurse would be responsible for the assessment and care of wounds. Inspection of the patient’s skin would be completed at minimum upon admission, resumption of care and recertification using the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment. The nurse would document wound appearance, drainage amount and type, signs/symptoms of infection, as well as education provided, physician or other qualified licensed practitioner notifications and other relevant data, at every visit. The agency would use online procedures and current best practice resources for specific wound procedures. Additional resources included the National Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurse Society (WOCN) guidelines. Wound care documentation would be reviewed on a regular basis by the Home Health Clinical Manager or designee as part of the agency’s quality improvement program.”

    Rule G0702. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 29, 2026Recertification inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 27, 2024Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Michael Caselas (corporate officer); Michael Caselas (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ellen Durstin (corporate director); Alan S Colavecchio (corporate director); Monica Diulio (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (355 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate93.16% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.46% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.67% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 7 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 06098, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 7 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 06098
PlaceQuality rating
Visiting Nurse & Hospice of Litchfield County, Inc. This home health agency3
Hartford Healthcare at Home3.5
Middlesex Health Care at Home and Hospice Program3.5
Elara Caring5
Centerwell Home HealthNot given
All About You Home Care Services3.5
Atrinity Home Health3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.