Hearth Record

Assured Home Health

A home health agency in Tucson, Arizona 85705

17 W Wetmore Rd Ste 202, Tucson, Arizona 85705. (520) 441-9914.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 22, 2024: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 22, 2024: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Communication With Physicians

    The inspectors’ words, 796 words

    “Communication with physicians CFR(s): 484.75(b)(7) Communication with all physicians involved in the plan of care and other health care practitioners (as appropriate) related to the current plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on agency policy and procedure, medical record review for Patient #1 and administrator interview conducted on March 22, 2024, the Department determined that the home health agency failed to ensure that communication and coordination occurred between the patient’s physician, infusion pharmacy staff, and the home health (HHA) skilled nursing (SN) team providing home care to the patient. The failure to communicate and coordinate orders between the three entities caused the failure by the home health agency to obtain specifically timed laboratory work from the patient for the physician’s evaluation of the effectiveness of the intravenous antibiotic treatment of the condition of sepsis. The agency job description entitled “ Executive Director” contained, “...Supervises and ensures high quality patient care services throughout the episode of care. This includes overseeing: referral coordination, assuring that patient needs are continually assessed and assuring the development implementation and updates of the patient’s individualized plan of care. Ensures coordination with physician, family and other clinicians involved in care as appropriate....” The agency policy entitled “Plan of Care” contained “...Each patient has an individualized Plan of Care (POC) developed in consultation with the patient, physician, or authorized practitioner and staff that integrates comprehensive assessment findings to address patient problems, needs and goals as well as to address specific services being provided....” Patient # 1’s medical record was reviewed. The review revealed that the patient was discharged from the hospital on February 9, 2024 with a midline catheter in her arm and orders to receive home health service to receive teaching and education on the self administration of intravenous antibiotics (three times daily) and SN cardio pulmonary assessment and teaching. The insurance company authorized the HHA to provide a skilled nursing visits at a frequency of 1 time a week for 9 weeks with 2 PRN (Pro Re Nata (as needed) ) visits for cardiac complications. The Plan of Care (POC) revealed “...SN to perform site care for infusion access device midline to left upper arm with transparent dressing changes 1 x (time) week and PRN for loose or soiled dressing using sterile technique cleanse site with chloraprep injection cap change once a week and with each lab draw and PRN for contamination or malfunction, extension tube change once a week and with each lab draw and PRN problems....” The POC failed to contain an order for the timing and frequency at which the lab draws were to be conducted. The SN Start of Care (SOC) for Patient #1 was conducted on February 10, 2024. The documentation revealed that the SN had conducted a comprehensive assessment which addressed OASIS E questions. Th OASIS E form addressed the question of whether labs were drawn on that visit. The answer was marked as no. The medical record further revealed that on February 13, 2024, the HHA received orders from the patient’s physician for “lab draws and blood cultures to be drawn today”. The SN informed the physician that the HHA was unable to draw the labs and blood cultures today due to receiving the orders late in the day and no available staff. It was documented that the Physician verbalized understanding and approved for the labs to be drawn on February 15, 2024. On February 15, 2024, the SN attempted to draw the patient’s labs and blood cultures after trying several different repositioning techniques. The SN was unable to obtain an adequate amount of blood for the specimens and the patient was sent to the Emergency Department on 02/19/2024. The Emergency Department (ED) removed the midline catheter and obtained the additional laboratory work. The ED was interviewed on March 22, 2024 and provided the following information. “...The MD office called the agency, requesting to add on orders, the CD (Clinical Director) spoke to the Infectious Disease provider and obtained Verbal Plan of Care approval, and blood cultures to be added to the weekly lab draws...Provider agreed for lab collection to be on 02/15/24...(On February 13) Patient called in to the agency informing them that a nurse is supposed to be coming to her home between 3-7 pm...The CD apologized and told the patient that it wasn’t our office that offered that time frame....” The ED stated that it was unknown who provided the incorrect information onto the patient, the ED stated that it may have been the physician’s office or the infusion company. The home health agency failed to communicate and coordinate with all individuals and companies involved in the patient’s care leading to a series of avoidable events that created stress and unnecessary hospital visits for the patient.”

    Rule G0718. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 22, 2024Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 16, 2015.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Af-Ch-Hh, LLC owns 100% directly since Nov 1, 2014.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer, 0%); Robin Meyers Rapley (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Wendy Daigle (corporate director); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer, 0%); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 22, 2023
Af-Ch-Hh, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 1, 2014
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 1, 2018
Almost Family, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 31, 2016
National Health Industries, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 31, 2016

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (69 surveys completed): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 76% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate89.78% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate10.42% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.98% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 28 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85705, where this agency’s office is, 24 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.