Integrity Home Health Care Services, LLC
A home health agency in Phoenix, Arizona 85029
4150 West Peoria Avenue, Suite 112, Phoenix, Arizona 85029. (602) 997-0500.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 4of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 9, 2024: a recertification inspection.
9 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 9, 2024: recertification inspection9 deficiencies
-
Quality Assessment/Performance Improvement
The inspectors’ words, 513 words
“Quality assessment/performance improvement CFR(s): 484.65 Condition of participation: Quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI). The HHA must develop, implement, evaluate, and maintain an effective, ongoing, HHA-wide, data-driven QAPI program. The HHA’s governing body must ensure that the program reflects the complexity of its organization and services; involves all HHA services (including those services provided under contract or arrangement); focuses on indicators related to improved outcomes, including the use of emergent care services, hospital admissions and re-admissions; and takes actions that address the HHA’s performance across the spectrum of care, including the prevention and reduction of medical errors. The HHA must maintain documentary evidence of its QAPI program and be able to demonstrate its operation to CMS. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interviews it was determined the HHA failed to HHA must develop, implement, evaluate, and maintain an effective, ongoing, HHA-wide, data-driven QAPI program. This deficient practice has the potential that issues regarding patient care, agency needs, and infections are not being identified, addressed, and corrected posing the risk for negative outcomes. Findings include: A white binder was presented labeled “QM”. A document titled, “INTEGRITY HOME HEALTH CARE QM 2023”, revealed “Infection Control...WOUNDS...UTI...OTHER...ANTIBIOTICS...INCIDENT REPORTS...INSERVICES...STAFF REQUIREMENTS...FINANCIALS...CAHPS....”. A white binder was presented labeled Performance Improvement Project(PIP). There was no evidence of PIPs being completed since 2019. Additional documentation was asked for and not received. A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-100, titled, “Governing Body”, revealed, “...Appoint the Professional Advisory Board(Quality Control) as required by State licensure and/or Medicare Conditions of Participation to guide the organization in the formulation and review of policies and procedures to ensure the highest quality of care....”. A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-160, titled, “PROFESSIONAL ADVISORY BOARD”, revealed, “...The Professional Advisory Board shall review the findings of the quarterly...Performance Improvement activities....”. Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-200, titled, “ORIENTATION GUIDELINES FOR ADVISORY BOARD ADN GOVERNING BODY MEMBERS”, revealed, “... Planning Function: c. Quality improvement measures..,,”. A review of the Governing Board Meeting dated, May 25, 2022, revealed no documentation of QAPI being reported or reviewed. A review of the Governing Board Meeting dated April 5, 2023, revealed no documentation of QAPI being reported or reviewed. A review of Professional Advisory Board Committee meeting minutes and agenda dated, May 25, 2022, revealed no documentation of QAPI being discussed, reviewed, or a report presented. A review of Professional Advisory Board Committee meeting minutes and agenda dated, April 5, 2023, revealed no documentation of QAPI being discussed, reviewed, or a report presented. In an interview conducted on May 9, 2024, with Employee #1, he/she confirmed that there was no evidence that a QAPI program report was discussed or reviewed in the documentation presented in the aforementioned binders or meeting minutes. He/she also confirmed that no PIP’s have been made or documented since 2019. In an interview with Employee #2, he/she confirmed that no evidence of a continuing QAPI program and PIP’s were present in the aforementioned presented material and no additional information could be provided or was available.”
-
Hha Comprehensive Assessment In Disaster
The inspectors’ words, 431 words
“HHA Comprehensive Assessment in Disaster CFR(s): 484.102(b)(1) §484.102(b)(1) Condition for Participation: [(b) Policies and procedures. The HHA must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (1) The plans for the HHA’s patients during a natural or man-made disaster. Individual plans for each patient must be included as part of the comprehensive patient assessment, which must be conducted according to the provisions at §484.55. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the home health agency failed to implement and document Individual plans for each patient and include as part of the comprehensive patient assessment and document that these discussions occurred and also keep a copy of the individualized emergency plan in the patient’s file as well as provide a copy to the patient and or their caregiver. This deficient practice has the potential that patients and their caregivers would not be prepared in the event of an emergency posing the risk of negative patient outcomes. Findings include: A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy C-140, titled, “Client Admission Process”, revealed, “...Admission criteria are standards by which a client can be deemed appropriate for admission. These standards include...10.The admission professional will...l. Develop an Emergency Plan with the client/caregiver....”. A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy C-655, titled, “Emergency Care”, revealed, “...Each client admitted to the agency will be asked to develop and authorize an emergency plan the agency staff can implement...2.The Admitting professional shall discuss emergency care with the clients, and complete the Authorization for Emergency Preparedness Plan...6. The original Authorization for Emergency Procedure Plan shall be retained in the clinical record....”. A review of a document titled “ Integrity Home Health Care Services Emergency Preparedness Plan”, revealed, “... Patient Emergency Preparedness Plan...Family Emergency Preparedness Plan....”. A review of 10 patient medical records revealed that ten(10) of ten(10) patient records had no evidence of an Emergency Preparedness Plan in the clinical record(s). A request was made for additional documentation for the required individualized emergency plans. No additional documentation could be provided. In an interview with Employee #1, he/she acknowledged that no Emergency Preparedness Plans were present in the medical records for the 10 aforementioned patients. No additional information could be provided.”
-
Methods For Sharing Information
The inspectors’ words, 339 words
“Methods for Sharing Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(4)-(5) §403.748(c)(4)-(6), §416.54(c)(4)-(6), §418.113(c)(4)-(6), §441.184(c)(4)-(6), §460.84(c)(4)-(6), §441.184(c)(4)-(6), §460.84(c)(4)-(6), §482.15(c)(4)-(6), §483.73(c)(4)-(6), §483.475(c)(4)-(6), §484.102(c)(4)-(5), §485.68(c)(4), §485.542(c)(4)-(6), §485.625(c)(4)-(6), §485.727(c)(4), §485.920(c)(4)-(6), §491.12(c)(4), §494.62(c)(4)-(6). [(c) The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following: (4) A method for sharing information and medical documentation for patients under the [facility’s] care, as necessary, with other health providers to maintain the continuity of care. (5) A means, in the event of an evacuation, to release patient information as permitted under 45 CFR 164.510(b)(1)(ii). [This provision is not required for HHAs under §484.102(c), CORFs under §485.68(c)] (6) [(4) or (5)]A means of providing information about the general condition and location of patients under the [facility’s] care as permitted under 45 CFR 164.510(b)(4). *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] (4) A method for sharing information and care documentation for patients under the RNHCI’s care, as necessary, with care providers to maintain the continuity of care, based on the written election statement made by the patient or his or her legal representative. *[For RHCs/FQHCs at §491.12(c):] (4) A means of providing information about the general condition and location of patients under the facility’s care as permitted under 45 CFR 164.510(b)(4). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and document review it was determined that the Hone Health agency failed to develop an Emergency Preparedness communication plan for sharing information. This deficiency has the potential to put patients and families at risk for follow up care needed in the time of an emergency. Findings include: A review of the Emergency Preparedness plan “Emergency Management Policy”, B-400, item #7- “Clients and staff should use local radio station to listen for updates..” When asked during an interview on May 8, 2024 for direction on which radio station is listed for emergency information updates, Employee #1 confirmed that no specific information was present.”
-
Ep Testing Requirements
The inspectors’ words, 2,086 words
“EP Testing Requirements CFR(s): 484.102(d)(2) §416.54(d)(2), §418.113(d)(2), §441.184(d)(2), §460.84(d)(2), §482.15(d)(2), §483.73(d)(2), §483.475(d)(2), §484.102(d)(2), §485.68(d)(2), §485.542(d)(2), §485.625(d)(2), §485.727(d)(2), §485.920(d)(2), §491.12(d)(2), §494.62(d)(2). *[For ASCs at §416.54, CORFs at §485.68, REHs at §485.542, OPO, “Organizations” under §485.727, CMHCs at §485.920, RHCs/FQHCs at §491.12, and ESRD Facilities at §494.62]: (2) Testing. The [facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan annually. The [facility] must do all of the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based every 2 years; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct a facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the [facility] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the actual event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise at least every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For Hospices at 418.113(d):] (2) Testing for hospices that provide care in the patient’s home. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community based every 2 years; or (A) When a community based exercise is not accessible, conduct an individual facility based functional exercise every 2 years; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospital is exempt from engaging in its next required full scale community-based exercise or individual facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (3) Testing for hospices that provide inpatient care directly. The hospice must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The hospice must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the hospice experiences a natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the hospice is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop led by a facilitator that includes a group discussion using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the hospice’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the hospice’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For PRFTs at §441.184(d), Hospitals at §482.15(d), CAHs at §485.625(d):] (2) Testing. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan twice per year. The [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the [PRTF, Hospital, CAH] experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the [facility] is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an [additional] annual exercise or and that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [facility’s] response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the [facility’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[For PACE at §460.84(d):] (2) Testing. The PACE organization must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The PACE organization must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) If the PACE experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the PACE is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or individual, a facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the PACE’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the PACE’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For LTC Facilities at §483.73(d):] (2) The [LTC facility] must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year, including unannounced staff drills using the emergency procedures. The [LTC facility, ICF/IID] must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise. (B) If the [LTC facility] facility experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the LTC facility is exempt from engaging its next required a full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the [LTC facility] facility’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [LTC facility] facility’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(d)]: (2) Testing. The ICF/IID must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least twice per year. The ICF/IID must do the following: (i) Participate in an annual full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise; or. (B) If the ICF/IID experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the ICF/IID is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility-based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional annual exercise that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the ICF/IID’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the ICF/IID’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For HHAs at §484.102] (d)(2) Testing. The HHA must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan at least annually. The HHA must do the following: (i) Participate in a full-scale exercise that is community-based; or (A) When a community-based exercise is not accessible, conduct an annual individual, facility-based functional exercise every 2 years; or. (B) If the HHA experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the HHA is exempt from engaging in its next required full-scale community-based or individual, facility based functional exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Conduct an additional exercise every 2 years, opposite the year the full-scale or functional exercise under paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section is conducted, that may include, but is not limited to the following: (A) A second full-scale exercise that is community-based or an individual, facility-based functional exercise; or (B) A mock disaster drill; or (C) A tabletop exercise or workshop that is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (iii) Analyze the HHA’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the HHA’s emergency plan, as needed. *[For OPOs at §486.360] (d)(2) Testing. The OPO must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The OPO must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise or workshop at least annually. A tabletop exercise is led by a facilitator and includes a group discussion, using a narrated, clinically relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. If the OPO experiences an actual natural or man-made emergency that requires activation of the emergency plan, the OPO is exempt from engaging in its next required testing exercise following the onset of the emergency event. (ii) Analyze the OPO’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the [RNHCI’s and OPO’s] emergency plan, as needed. *[ RNCHIs at §403.748]: (d)(2) Testing. The RNHCI must conduct exercises to test the emergency plan. The RNHCI must do the following: (i) Conduct a paper-based, tabletop exercise at least annually. A tabletop exercise is a group discussion led by a facilitator, using a narrated, clinically-relevant emergency scenario, and a set of problem statements, directed messages, or prepared questions designed to challenge an emergency plan. (ii) Analyze the RNHCI’s response to and maintain documentation of all tabletop exercises, and emergency events, and revise the RNHCI’s emergency plan, as needed. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of facility documentation and interview on May 8, 2024, it was determined that the facility has failed to participate in a community full scale exercise or a comprehensive table top emergency preparedness drill in the past calendar year. This deficiency poses a risk to staff and patient welfare in the event of an emergency event, as gaps in procedure, patient care and preparedness are not being updated. Findings include: A review of the “Emergency Preparedness Policy” B-400 for the facility failed to include documentation of a community full scale exercise or comprehensive table top participation in the last 12 calendar months. Interview with Employee #1 on May 8, 2024 confirmed that the facility had not participated in either a community full scale exercise or a comprehensive table top exercise in the previous 12 calendar months.”
-
Accessibility
The inspectors’ words, 621 words
“Accessibility CFR(s): 484.50(f)(1,2) Standard: Accessibility. Information must be provided to patients in plain language and in a manner that is accessible and timely to- (1) Persons with disabilities, including accessible web sites and the provision of auxiliary aids and services at no cost to the individual in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. (2) Persons with limited English proficiency through the provision of language services at no cost to the individual, including oral interpretation and written translations.Standard: Accessibility Information must be provided to patients in plain language and in a manner that is accessible and timely to- This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, observation, and staff interview it was determined the home health agency failed to provide Information must be provided to patients in plain language and in a manner that is accessible and timely to persons with disabilities, including accessible websites and the provision of auxiliary aids and services at no cost to the individual following the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and Persons with limited English proficiency through the provision of language services at no cost to the individual, including oral interpretation and written translations. This deficient practice has the potential that patients are not allowed to participate in the development of their plan of care posing the risk for patient and Civil Rights violations. Findings include: A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy C-400, titled, “CLIENT/FAMILY EDUCATION”, revealed, “...Planning and providing for educational needs of clients and allocation the resources necessary to meet these needs...To provide education and information in a format easily understood and in consideration of cultural and personal preferences...f. Information presented in the appropriate language(written/verbal) as necessary to assure teaching goals are met....”. A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy C-860, titled, “COMMUNICATION WITH LIMITED-ENGLISH-PROFICIENCY PERSONS”, revealed, “...Agency shall provide for communication with limited-English-proficient persons...We will contact TeleInterpreters at (800) 811-7881. When required, this service will be provided at no extra cost to the patient..... Family members or friends of clients may be used as translators only if the client requests them, and after the agency has offered to provide a translator....The offer to provide a translator and client response shall be documented on the Deaf or Hearing-Impaired Client Information Sheet and retained in the clinical record....”. A phone call was placed to TeleInterpreters, (800) 811-7881. The phone number was no longer in service. A request was made for the contract for TeleInterprerters, one could not be provided. A review of the Integrity Home Health Care Services admission folder revealed no information on how a patient or the patient caregiver shall have free access to language, auxiliary aides, and services. Observation during a home visit made on 05/08/2024 revealed the patient did not read or speak English. Family was relied upon to interpret between the clinician and the patient. A review of Patient #9’s medical record revealed that the patient primary language preference was English. Further review of the medical record revealed the patient was Arabic. No evidence was documented in the medical record that access to a free language interpreter/assistance was made. In an interview conducted on 05/08/2024, with Employee #1, he/she stated that the Home Health Agency(HHA) has a contract with LanguageLine. A request was made for the contract with LanguageLine. One could not be produced. Employee #1 presented an Electronic Mail(E-Mail) dated 10/10/2016 that was provided in place of an executed contract. Employee #1 stated customer service was unable to provide one as the system was down. There was no information that TTY services were available for sensory-impaired clients using the updated LanguageLine information provided in the email.”
-
Performance Improvement Projects
The inspectors’ words, 244 words
“Performance improvement projects CFR(s): 484.65(d)(1)(2) Standard: Performance improvement projects. Beginning July 13, 2018 HHAs must conduct performance improvement projects. (1) The number and scope of distinct improvement projects conducted annually must reflect the scope, complexity, and past performance of the HHA’s services and operations. (2) The HHA must document the quality improvement projects undertaken, the reasons for conducting these projects, and the measurable progress achieved on these projects. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview it was determined the home health agency failed to develop and conduct performance improvement projects. this deficient practice has the potential that patient care agency needs are not being identified addressed and corrected posing the risk for negative outcomes. Findings include A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-150 titled “Professional Advisory Board” revealed, “...The Professional Advisory Board shall review the findings of the quarterly clinical record review and other Performance improvement activities....”. A review of the “Performance Improvement Program” binder revealed most recent documents provided are titled “... Integrity Home Health Care Services QM2019....” In an interview conducted on May 9, 2024, with employee # 1, he/she confirmed that no performance improvement project(s) have been conducted or created since 2019. No additional documentation could be provided. In an interview conducted on May 9, 2024, with employee # 2, he/she confirmed that no performance improvement project(s) have been conducted or created since 2019. No additional documentation could be provided.”
-
Executive Responsibilities For Qapi
The inspectors’ words, 357 words
“Executive responsibilities for QAPI CFR(s): 484.65(e)(1)(2)(3)(4) Standard: Executive responsibilities. The HHA’s governing body is responsible for ensuring the following: (1) That an ongoing program for quality improvement and patient safety is defined, implemented, and maintained; (2) That the HHA-wide quality assessment and performance improvement efforts address priorities for improved quality of care and patient safety, and that all improvement actions are evaluated for effectiveness; (3) That clear expectations for patient safety are established, implemented, and maintained; and (4) That any findings of fraud or waste are appropriately addressed. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Findings include: A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-100, titled, “Governing Body”, revealed, “...Appoint the Professional Advisory Board(Quality Control) as required by State licensure and/or Medicare Conditions of Participation to guide the organization in the formulation and review of policies and procedures to ensure the highest quality of care....”. A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-160, titled, “PROFESSIONAL ADVISORY BOARD”, revealed, “...The Professional Advisory Board shall review the findings of the quarterly...Performance Improvement activities....”. Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-200, titled, “ORIENTATION GUIDELINES FOR ADVISORY BOARD ADN GOVERNING BODY MEMBERS”, revealed, “... Planning Function: c. Quality improvement measures..,,”. A review of the Governing Board Meeting dated, May 25, 2022, revealed no documentation of QAPI being reported or reviewed. A review of the Governing Board Meeting dated April 5, 2023, revealed no documentation of QAPI being reported or reviewed. A review of Professional Advisory Board Committee meeting minutes and agenda dated, May 25, 2022, revealed no documentation of QAPI being discussed, reviewed, or a report presented. A review of Professional Advisory Board Committee meeting minutes and agenda dated, April 5, 2023, revealed no documentation of QAPI being discussed, reviewed, or a report presented. In an interview conducted on May 9, 2024, with Employee #1, he/she confirmed no evidence that a QAPI program report was discussed or reviewed in the documentation presented in the aforementioned binders or meeting minutes. In an interview with Employee #2, he/she confirmed no evidence of a continuing and ongoing QAPI program. He/she further confirmed that no additional documentation could be provided.”
-
Contact Info Federal/State-Funded Entities
The inspectors’ words, 282 words
“Contact info Federal/State-funded entities CFR(s): 484.50(c)(10)(i,ii,iii,iv,v) Be advised of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the following Federally-funded and state-funded entities that serve the area where the patient resides: (i) Agency on Aging (ii) Center for Independent Living (iii) Protection and Advocacy Agency, (iv) Aging and Disability Resource Center; and (v) Quality Improvement Organization. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interviews it was determined the HHA failed to advise patients and patient representatives of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the required federally and state-funded entities. This deficient practice has the potential that patients are not being adequately informed and educated on resources posing the risk of negative outcomes and patient rights violations. Findings include: A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services policies and procedures were reviewed and no policy was present to address the required Federally and State funded entities. A request was made for additional policies, none were received. A review of the Integrity Home Health Care Services admission folder revealed a document titled, “PHONE NUMBERS & EMERGENCY INSTRUCTIONS”, revealed, “...IN CASE OF EMERGENCY 911...INTEGRITY HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICES...ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES...ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES HOME HEALTH HOTLINE...D.E.S. ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES...AZ AGENCY CENTER ON AGING/SENIOR HELP LINE...ARIZONA CENTER FOR DISABILITY LAW...GOVERNOR’S OFFICE FOR AMERICAN’S WITH DISABILITY...INFORMATION ON ADVANCE DIRECTIVES DOROTHY GARSKE CENTER... RED CROSS...MARICOPA COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT...PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT....”. No addresses for the mentioned agencies were located in the document. In an interview conducted on March 28, 2024, with Employee #1, he/she confirmed that the required agencies were not listed in the patient admission folder. No additional information could be provided. No additional documentation could be provided.”
-
Participate In The Hha’S Qapi Program;
The inspectors’ words, 450 words
“Participate in the HHA’s QAPI program; CFR(s): 484.75(b)(8) Participation in the HHA’s QAPI program; and This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interviews it was determined the HHA failed to include all skilled professional staff to provide input into and participate in the HHA’s QAPI program. This deficient practice poses the risk that issues regarding patient care, and patient services would not be identified, addressed, and corrected posing the risk for negative and poor patient outcomes. Findings include: A white binder was presented labeled “QM”. A document titled, “INTEGRITY HOME HEALTH CARE QM 2023”, revealed “Infection Control...WOUNDS...UTI...OTHER...ANTIBIOTICS...INCIDENT REPORTS...INSERVICES...STAFF REQUIREMENTS...FINANCIALS...CAHPS....”. A white binder was presented labeled Performance Improvement Project(PIP). There was no evidence of PIPs being completed since 2019. Additional documentation was asked for and not received. A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-100, titled, “Governing Body”, revealed, “...Appoint the Professional Advisory Board(Quality Control) as required by State licensure and/or Medicare Conditions of Participation to guide the organization in the formulation and review of policies and procedures to ensure the highest quality of care....”. A review of Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-160, titled, “PROFESSIONAL ADVISORY BOARD”, revealed, “...The Professional Advisory Board shall review the findings of the quarterly...Performance Improvement activities....”. Integrity Home Health Care Services Policy B-200, titled, “ORIENTATION GUIDELINES FOR ADVISORY BOARD ADN GOVERNING BODY MEMBERS”, revealed, “... Planning Function: c. Quality improvement measures..,,”. A review of the Governing Board Meeting dated, May 25, 2022, revealed no documentation of QAPI being reported or reviewed. A review of the Governing Board Meeting dated April 5, 2023, revealed no documentation of QAPI being reported or reviewed. A review of Professional Advisory Board Committee meeting minutes and agenda dated, May 25, 2022, revealed no documentation of QAPI being discussed, reviewed, or a report presented. A review of Professional Advisory Board Committee meeting minutes and agenda dated, April 5, 2023, revealed no documentation of QAPI being discussed, reviewed, or a report presented. No documentation that all skilled professional staff has been providing input at any time since 2017 to the QAPI program. Additional documentation was asked for an not received. In an interview conducted on May 9, 2024, with Employee #1, he/she confirmed that there was no evidence that a QAPI program report was discussed or reviewed in the documentation presented in the aforementioned binders or meeting minutes. He/she also confirmed that no PIP’s have been made or documented since 2019. No additional documentation could be provided. In an interview with Employee #2, he/she confirmed that no evidence of a continuing QAPI program and PIP’s were present in the aforementioned presented material and no additional information could be provided or was available.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024 | Recertification inspection | 9 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 12, 2007.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 4 owners or officers are people: Mehlanie P Chaimungkla (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Mehlanie P Chaimungkla (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Christopher J Facto (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Christopher J Facto (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (107 surveys completed): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 78% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 79.74% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 10.30% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.48% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 71 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85029, where this agency’s office is, 62 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| American Premier Home Health Care | 4 |
| Integrity Home Health Care Services, LLC This home health agency | 4 |
| Covenant Home Health | 4.5 |
| Divine Favour Health Services, LLC | Not given |
| Grand Canyon Home Health Care, Inc. | 1.5 |
| Heart to Heart Home Health Care Agency, LLC | Not given |
| Synergy Health Services Inc. | 2 |
| Centerwell Home Health | 3 |
| Amedisys Home Health Care | 4.5 |
| MD Home Health | 2 |
| Nightingale Homecare | 5 |
| Thema Health Services | 2.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.