Hearth Record

MD Home Health

A home health agency in Phoenix, Arizona 85020

7500 Dreamy Draw Drive, Suite 200, Phoenix, Arizona 85020. (602) 266-9971.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 18, 2025: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 18, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 658 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to include names and contact information for staff, patient physicians and entities providing services under arrangement in the facility communications plan. Failure to provide contact information that could be needed during an emergency event in the facility communication plan can result in vital services being interrupted during an emergency event for staff and patients. Findings include: Review of facility Policy titled “Emergency Preparedness Response Plan EC.40” revealed, “...Purpose...I. To ensure the Agency complies with all applicable federal, state, and local emergency preparedness requirements. II. To ensure the Agency develops, establishes, maintains....communication plan...IV. Continuity of Operations Business Plan...1, Communication a. The Agency will maintain a current list of staff, and volunteers, and all applicable contact numbers...b. The Agency will also develop, maintain... a current list of names and contact information for patients’/clients’ physicians....” Review of facility emergency preparedness documentation presented on July 16, 2025, revealed staff contact list, not dated, did not include employees #3, #4 and included employee #12 who terminated on 5/14/2025, employee #13 who terminated 2/14/2025 and employee #14 who terminated on 11/11/2024. On July 17, 2025 at 11:15 am, an updated staff list was presented to surveyors inclusive of employees #3 and #4 and excluding employees #12, #13, and #14. Review of facility emergency preparedness documentation presented on July 16, 2025, revealed Active Census Report patient dated 5/12/2025 with a sticky note attached: “UPDATE weekly Every Monday”. This list was not inclusive of patients #2,#14, #15, #16. No documentation presented evidencing any patient physician’s name and contact information including patients #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, and #16. Employee #1 confirmed in an interview on July 18, 2025, the emergency preparedness staff contact list and active patients and their physicians’ names and contact information should be kept up to date in the agency’s emergency preparedness documentation.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 297 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of facility policies and procedures, documentation and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure all personnel have documentation of a negative Mantoux skin test or other tuberculosis screening test dated within 12 months before the date the individual begins providing services on behalf of the healthcare institution. This deficient practice has the potential to place patients, colleagues, and members of the community at risk of unnecessary exposure to infectious tuberculosis. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, “Exposure Control Plan - Addendum...IC.5-AZ” revealed: “...Procedure...II...A. HCP must provide one of the following on or before the date the individual begins providing services at or on behalf of the Agency as evidence of freedom from infectious disease....” Review of personnel records revealed: Employee #2 No evidence of initial TB testing in personnel record Employee #4 TB testing is invalid as read time is not documented Employee #5 No evidence of initial TB testing in personnel record Employee #6 TB testing is invalid as administration and read times are not documented Employee #8 No evidence of initial TB testing in personnel record Employee #9 TB testing is invalid as administration and read times are not documented Employee #10 TB testing is invalid as administration and read times are not documented Employee #11 No evidence of initial TB testing in personnel record In an interview conducted on July 15, 2025 with employee #1, it was acknowledged that some steps in the hiring process had been missed for several employees during tenure of previous HR employee.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 18, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Sep 15, 1992.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • David, Lauren and Danielle Family Trust Dated 09/16/2010, David Hildeb owns 36.08% directly since Sep 11, 2024; Mary Maguire Family Trust owns 36.08% directly since Sep 11, 2024.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Mary Danielle Hildebrandt (owns 5% or more directly, 13.96%); Lauren Hildebrandt (owns 5% or more directly, 13.88%); Matthew Debruyne (managing employee (on the payroll), 10%); Alisa F Jeffcoat (managing employee (on the payroll), 10%); David Donald Hildebrandt (corporate officer); David Donald Hildebrandt (corporate director); Mary Danielle Maguire (corporate officer); Mary Danielle Maguire (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
David, Lauren and Danielle Family Trust Dated 09/16/2010, David HildebOwns 5% or more directly36.08%Sep 11, 2024
Mary Maguire Family TrustOwns 5% or more directly36.08%Sep 11, 2024

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (216 surveys completed): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 73% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate85.59% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.60% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.90% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 68 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85020, where this agency’s office is, 61 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.