Hearth Record

Fresenius Medical Care Cheraw

A dialysis facility in Cheraw, South Carolina 29520

104 Grace Lane, Cheraw, South Carolina 29520. (843) 537-6801.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 20, 2025: a standard inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 20, 2025: standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 587 words

    “IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all environmental surfaces in the dialysis treatment stations were or could be disinfected at the end of each dialysis treatment during 3 of 3 observations. This failure had the potential to affect 80 patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. Findings included: 1. An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 03/18/2025 at 9:50 AM revealed Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (CCHT) #8 failed to disinfect the sanitizer bottle and bracket attached to the hemodialysis machine while disinfecting Station 19. An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 03/18/2025 at 10:20 AM revealed CCHT #11 failed to disinfect the sanitizer bottle and bracket attached to the hemodialysis machine while disinfecting Station 10. During an interview on 03/18/2025 at 10:25 AM, CCHT #11 stated he did not disinfect the sanitizer bottle and bracket. CCHT #11 stated he was trained and expected to disinfect all surfaces in the treatment station. During an interview on 03/18/2025 at 10:27 AM, CCHT #8 stated she did not disinfect the sanitizer bottle and bracket. CCHT #8 stated she was trained and expected to disinfect all surfaces in the treatment station. During an interview on 03/18/2025 at 10:28 AM, the Clinical Manager (CM) stated staff were trained and expected to disinfect “everything” in the dialysis treatment stations after each dialysis treatment. 2. An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 03/19/2025 at 11:55 AM revealed tape and tape adhesive residue on the chairside tables of each dialysis chair in all 28 hemodialysis stations and on an additional chair stored near the supply room door. During an interview on 03/19/2025 at 3:28 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #5 acknowledged the chairside tables were unable to be thoroughly disinfected due to the tape and tape adhesive residue. During an interview on 03/19/2025 at 3:30 PM, Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (CCHT) #7 acknowledged the chairside tables were unable to be thoroughly disinfected due to the tape and tape adhesive residue. During an interview on 03/19/2025 at 3:35 PM, the Clinical Manager (CM) acknowledged the chairside tables were unable to be thoroughly disinfected due to the tape and tape adhesive residue. During an interview on 03/20/2025 at 10:28 AM, the Medical Director confirmed staff should disinfect all environmental surfaces in the dialysis treatment stations. A facility policy titled, “Cleaning and Disinfection of the Dialysis Station,” published 11/02/2020, indicated, “Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has regulations that in order to prevent cross contamination, a dialysis station must be cleaned and disinfected between dialysis patients. The chair and dialysis equipment are used by multiple patients during a treatment day and it is critical that these items be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected between uses.” The policy also indicated “Definition,” “Dialysis Station,” and “Area including the dialysis machine, chair/bed and other reusable equipment or supplies utilized during dialysis treatment, patient training, and/or patient clinic visits. Equipment in the dialysis station may include (but is not limited to) the following: - Dialysis machine/cycler and attachments such as IV [intravenous] pole, BP [blood pressure] cuff and hand sanitizer/holder, organizer - Chair/bed - [Brand name hemodialysis system] - Individual television and remote.””

    Rule V0122. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 608 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 35949 Based on observation, facility policy review, review of manufacturer’s instructions for use (IFU), and interviews, the facility failed to maintain arterial drip chamber fluid levels at 85% to 95% full and venous drip chamber fluid levels at 65% to 75% full during 3 of 3 observations. This failure had the potential to affect 80 patients who received dialysis treatments at the facility. Findings included: An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 03/17/2025 at 9:28 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were less than (<) 85% full in Stations 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 26, 27, and 28, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were greater than (>) 75% full in Stations 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, and 28. An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 03/19/2025 at 8:44 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 85% full in Stations 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 26, 27, and 28, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 75% full in Stations 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28. An observation of the hemodialysis treatment area on 03/19/2025 at 11:37 AM revealed the arterial drip chamber fluid levels were < 85% full in Stations 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 21, 22, 23, 26, and 28, and the venous drip chamber fluid levels were > 75% full in Stations 2, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 28. A facility policy titled, “Initiation of Treatment Using an Arteriovenous Graft or Fistula and [Brand name] Dialyzer,” published 05/26/2024, indicated, “Final Machine Verification - Prior to starting the blood pump, verify the following... 5. The arterial chamber is 85-95% full, and venous chamber is 65-75% full. ...” The manufacturer’s IFU titled, “[Brand name] Hemodialysis Blood Tubing Set with Priming Set and Transducer Protectors,” indicated, “...2. During Treatment a. Periodically check the extracorporeal [out of the body] circuit for any evidence of possible Separation [sic] or leaks. b. Maintain fluid level in pre-pump arterial chamber at 85 to 95% full, post-pump arterial and venous chambers at 65 to 75% full. Levels may rise or drop during the treatment due to changes in pressure or flow rate. Readjust levels as needed. Air Leaks [sic] will also cause the chamber levels to fluctuate.” During an interview on 03/19/2025 at 11:40 AM, Certified Clinical Hemodialysis Technician (CCHT) #7 stated “three quarters” full when asked the required level of blood in the arterial and venous drip chambers. CCHT #7 confirmed the arterial and venous drip chamber fluid levels were not maintained according to the manufacturer’s IFU. During an interview on 03/19/2025 at 11:44 AM, the Clinical Manager (CM) stated “full to three quarters” full when asked the required level of blood in the arterial and venous drip chambers. The CM reviewed the manufacturer’s IFU and confirmed the arterial and venous drip chamber fluid levels were not maintained according to the IFU. During an interview on 03/20/2025 at 10:28 AM, the Medical Director confirmed the staff should follow the manufacturer’s IFU.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 20, 2025Standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 18, 2008.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 21 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Chesterfield County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Davita Pageland Dialysis3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.