Hearth Record

Davita Pageland Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Pageland, South Carolina 29728

505 A South Pearl Street, Pageland, South Carolina 29728. (843) 672-3491.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 31, 2024: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 31, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Ic - Handling Infectious Waste

    The inspectors’ words, 210 words

    “IC-HANDLING INFECTIOUS WASTE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(i) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing-] (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the- (i) Handling, storage and disposal of potentially infectious waste; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22313 Based on observations, interview, and facility policy, entitled, “Segregation of Medical Waste”, the staff failed to ensure medical waste was placed in the proper container. (RN#1) The Findings include: Observations in the dialysis treatment room on 01/31/2024 at 10:30 AM revealed Registered Nurse (RN)#1 attending to a patient at dialysis station 6 with Patient Care Technician (PCT) #3. The patient begins bleeding at the discontinuation of his/her dialysis treatment. During patient care, a gauze pad soaked with blood was tossed into the chairside regular trash container by RN#1. On 01/31/2024 at 11:00 AM, RN #1 stated, “It (blood soaked gauze)should go into the red container.” The finding was confirmed in an interview with the Facility Administrator on 01/31/2024 at 1:15 PM, the FA stated, “That was wrong. It goes in the red container.” Facility policy, entitled, “Segregation of Medical Waste”, read, “1. Medical waste is contained separately from other noninfectious waste generated in the facility”.”

    Rule V0121. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 248 words

    “IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41743 Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the dialysis staff failed to properly clean and empty the prime waste container by 2 of 3 Patient Care Technicians (PCT #1 and #4). The Finding includes: Observations on 01/31/2024 for dialysis station #2 revealed PCT #1 at 09:00 AM cleaned the dialysis machine and dialysis station #2 but failed to empty and sanitize the prime waste container and failed to disinfect the shelf behind dialysis station #2 where the patient’s belongings had been stored during the dialysis treatment. At 9:06 AM, observations inside the prime waste container revealed fluid and a plastic needle cap in the container. At 9:16 AM, PCT #4 sets up the dialysis machine in dialysis station #2 for the next patient treatment, but failed to empty and sanitize the prime waste container. At 9:40 AM, the prime waste container still had the plastic needle cap and fluid in the container. Facility policy, entitled, “INFECTION CONTROL FOR DIALYSIS FACILITIES”, revealed, “Priming containers are to be emptied. The interior and exterior should be wiped down with 1:100 (one to one hundred) bleach solution before using on next patient treatment.””

    Rule V0122. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Catheters; General

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “IC-CATHETERS:GENERAL CFR(s): 494.30(c)(2) (2) The “Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections” entitled “Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children” parts I - IV; and “Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, volume 51 number RR-10, pages 16 through 18, August 9, 2002. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. This publication is available for inspection as the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Central Building, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Copies may be obtained at the CMS Information Resource Center. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_regulations/ibr_locations.html This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 22313 Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy, entitled, “Central Venous Catheter (CVC) Care”, one of one Registered Nurses (RN) observed failed to ensure that central line dressings remain clean and dry before/during treatment. (RN#1) The Findings include: Observations on 01/30/2024 at 9:50 AM revealed RN#1 performed a dressing change on Patient #6. The clean dressing was wetted with saline while flushing the Central Venous Catheter (CVC). RN #1 reported, “Oh, well, I have to change it again when (the patient) is finished. At the end of the patient’s dialysis treatment, the wet dressing was removed and a clean dressing was applied. In an interview with the Facility Administrator on 01/30/2024 at 1:25 PM, she/he responded, “Should have changed the wet dressing ....”. Facility policy, entitled, “Central Venous Catheter (CVC) Care”, read,: “3. Keep exit site dressing clean and dry”.”

    Rule V0146. Standard-level.

  • Carbon Adsorption - Monitoring, Testing Frequency

    The inspectors’ words, 326 words

    “CARBON ADSORP-MONITOR, TEST FREQUENCY CFR(s): 494.40(a) 6.2.5 Carbon adsorption: monitoring, testing freq Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be performed at the beginning of each treatment day prior to patients initiating treatment and again prior to the beginning of each patient shift. If there are no set patient shifts, testing should be performed approximately every 4 hours. Results of monitoring of free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine should be recorded in a log sheet. Testing for free chlorine, chloramine, or total chlorine can be accomplished using the N.N-diethyl-p-phenylene-diamine (DPD) based test kits or dip-and-read test strips. On-line monitors can be used to measure chloramine concentrations. Whichever test system is used, it must have sufficient sensitivity and specificity to resolve the maximum levels described in [AAMI] 4.1.1 (Table 1) [which is a maximum level of 0.1 mg/L]. Samples should be drawn when the system has been operating for at least 15 minutes. The analysis should be performed on-site, since chloramine levels will decrease if the sample is not assayed promptly. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41743 Based on observations, interviews, and review of manufacture’s guideline, the dialysis staff failed to follow correct procedure when performing Chlorine checks by 1 of 1 Registered Nurses (RN) #1 observed. The finding includes: Observations on 01/30/2024 at 10:20 AM revealed RN #1 obtained 30 ml (milliliters) of quality water, but failed to use a timer of any source for wait time of 30 seconds before checking test strip results. The finding was verified with RN #1 at 10:25 AM. Manufacturer’s instructions, entitled, “ E-Z Chek Sensitive Total Chlorine & Chloramines Test Strips”, revealed, “Rinse standard sample cup provided with water to be tested. Re-fill with approximately 20ml of test water ...Remove strip from water, do not shake. Wait a full 30 seconds. After 30 second wait period, immediately compare the strip to the K100-0106 color chart to determine the Total Chlorine level in the sample.””

    Rule V0196. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 31, 2024Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 11, 2003.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 16 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, better than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Chesterfield County, 2 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceStar rating
Fresenius Medical Care Cheraw2

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.