Fkc Southside Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
1005 Harvard Avenue, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015. (610) 997-8350.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 17 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Nov 8, 2023: a standard inspection.
6 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Nov 8, 2023: standard inspection6 deficiencies
-
Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols
The inspectors’ words, 554 words
“IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on a review of facility policy/procedure, observations, and an interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager, the facility failed to ensure the staff followed infection control protocols, included but not limited to, cleaning and disinfecting surfaces and equipment, for three (3) of four (4) treatment area observations (Observation #2 - Observation #4). Findings include: A review was conducted of facility policy/procedure on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:00 p.m.. ‘Cleaning and Disinfection of the Dialysis Station’ ‘Purpose’ “The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance to prevent the spread of infectious disease in accordance with appropriate regulations, and to maintain a clean, safe, and aesthetically pleasant environment for patients,, staff, and visitors.” ‘Background’ “The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services(CMS) has regulations that in order to prevent cross contamination, a dialysis station must be cleaned and disinfected between dialysis patients.” (‘CMS ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease) Core Survey Version 1.6’ ‘Cleaning and disinfection of the Dialysis Station’ ‘Action’ “Remove all bloodlines and disposable equipment, ....” “Empty prime waste receptacle, if present on the machine.” Remove gloves, hand hygiene, don clean gloves.” “Use disinfectant-soaked cloth/wipe to visibly wet all machine top, front, and side surfaces ....” Wipe wet all internal and external surfaces of the prime waste container ...”) (‘Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Checklist: Dialysis Station Routine Disinfection’ ‘Part A: Before beginning routine disinfection of the dialysis station:’ “..... Ensure that the priming bucket has been emptied. .....” ‘Part B: Routine Disinfection of the Dialysis Station-After patient has left station:’ “,.... Apply disinfectant to all surfaces ........ Disinfect all surfaces of the priming bucket. ...... “) Observations conducted in the patient treatment area on November 6, 2023 between approximately 8:40 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. revealed the following: Observation #2: The observation on 11/06/23 at approximately 11:14 a.m. of ‘Cleaning and Disinfection of the Dialysis Station’ for station O, employee #4 did not empty the prime waste receptacle (bucket/container) and remove gloves/perform hand hygiene/don clean gloves prior to the disinfection of the dialysis machine/chair. Employee #4 emptied the prime waste receptacle after initiating disinfection of the dialysis machine/chair. Observation #3: The observation on 11/06/23 at approximately 11:20 a.m. of ‘Cleaning and Disinfection of the Dialysis Station’ for the isolation room, employee #2 did not empty the prime waste receptacle (bucket/container) and remove gloves/perform hand hygiene/don clean gloves prior to the disinfection of the dialysis machine. Employee #2 emptied the prime waste receptacle after after initiating disinfection of the dialysis machine/chair. Observation #4: The observation on 11/06/23 at approximately 11:20 a.m. of ‘Cleaning and Disinfection of the Dialysis Station’ for for station Q, employee #4 did not empty the prime waste receptacle (bucket/container) and remove gloves/perform hand hygiene/don clean gloves prior to the disinfection of the dialysis machine. Employee #4 emptied the prime waste receptacle after after initiating disinfection of the dialysis machine/chair. An interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”
-
Ic - Staff Education Re Catheters/Catheter Care
The inspectors’ words, 795 words
“IC-STAFF EDUCATION-CATHETERS/CATHETER CARE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(2) Recommendations for Placement of Intravascular Catheters in Adults and Children I. Health care worker education and training A. Educate health-care workers regarding the ... appropriate infection control measures to prevent intravascular catheter-related infections. B. Assess knowledge of and adherence to guidelines periodically for all persons who manage intravascular catheters. II. Surveillance A. Monitor the catheter sites visually of individual patients. If patients have tenderness at the insertion site, fever without obvious source, or other manifestations suggesting local or BSI [blood stream infection], the dressing should be removed to allow thorough examination of the site. Central Venous Catheters, Including PICCs, Hemodialysis, and Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Adult and Pediatric Patients. VI. Catheter and catheter-site care B. Antibiotic lock solutions: Do not routinely use antibiotic lock solutions to prevent CRBSI [catheter related blood stream infections]. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on a review of facility policy/procedure, observations, and an interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager, the facility failed to ensure that clinical staff maintain aseptic technique for the care of vascular accesses, including intravascular catheters for two (2) of two (2) ‘Central Venous Catheter (CVC) Exit Site Care’ and ‘Initiation of Dialysis with Central Venous Catheter’ observations (Observation #1, Observation #2) and one (1) of two (2) ‘Discontinuation of Dialysis with Central Venous Catheter’ observations (Observation #1). Findings: A review was conducted of facility policy/procedure on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:00 p.m.. Policy ‘Changing the Catheter Dressing Procedure’ (Setting: IC, HT) ‘Timing of Exit Site Dressing Change’ states “Catheter exit site disinfection and dressing change is to be completed prior to cap and hub connector disinfection.” ‘Removal of dressing and inspection of Site’ ‘Important note: The patient and caregiver must wear a mask for all procedures that required accessing the catheter.’ Step (8) states “Discard dressing and remove gloves. Perform hand hygiene. ‘Cleaning the Site’ step (1) states “Perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves.” Step (2) states “Remove swabstick from package by stick end without touching foam applicator ....” Policy ‘Initiation of Treatment using a Central Venous Catheter (CVC) and Optiflux Single Use Ebeam Dialyzer’ (Setting: IC, IPS) ‘Prior to Initiation: Assessment and Machine Parameters’ step (9) states “.... doff (remove) gloves, perform hand hygiene then don new gloves.” ‘Preparing the Catheter: Disinfection of the Catheter Connections, Heparin Removal, Flushing the Catheter and Heaprin Administration’ step (1) states “Check to make sure catheter clamps are closed. Step (2) states “Remove cap from clamped arterial limb.” Step (3) states “Using a sterile alcohol pad .....” Observations conducted in the patient treatment area on November 6, 2023 between approximately 8:40 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. revealed the following: Observation #1: On 11/06/23 at approximately 12:05 p.m. while observing ‘Central Venous Catheter Exit Site Care’ observation #1, for patient #6, station G; the patients face mask was not covering their nose during the procedure. Employee #6 did not secure the patients clothing (shirt/sweatshirt) away from the access site. The patient held up their clothing with their left hand. During the procedure the patients clothing made contact with the access site. The site was not cleansed again after contact. Observation #2: On 11/06/23 at approximately 12:35 p.m. while observing ‘Central Venous Catheter Exit Site Care’ observation #2, for patient #7, isolation room; employee #1 did not remove gloves/perform hand hygiene/don clean gloves after removing the old dressing and prior to cleansing the area around the CVC exit site. Employee #1 removed gloves/performed hand hygiene/donned clean gloves after applying antiseptic to the access site. Policy ‘Termination of Treatment Using a Central Venous Catheter and Optiflux Single Use Ebeam Dialyzer’ ‘Termination: Disinfection of Catheter and Disconnecting the Patient’ “Threads and end of the luer lock (hub) must be scrubbed with 70% sterile alcohol pad .......for 10-15 seconds any time caps are removed, or bloodlines are disconnected (i.e. End of treatment or treatment interruption) to reduce the risk of contamination.” Step #6 states “Using a sterile alcohol pad, .....scrub the sides (threads) and end of hub thoroughly with friction, making sure to remove any residual (e.g. blood) ... (This should take 10-15 seconds.)” Step #7 states “Hold the limb while allowing the antiseptic to dry.” Step #8 states :Immediately attach a prefilled saline syringe to the catheter limb.” Observation #1: On 11/06/23 at approximately 11:19 a.m. while observing ‘Discontinuation of Dialysis with Central Venous Catheter’ observation #1, for patient #8, station A; employee #3 removed the patient blood lines and scrubbed the hubs for approximately 5 seconds prior to attaching sterile syringes. Employee #3 removed the syringes and scrubbed the hubs for approximately 5 seconds prior to attaching port caps. An interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”
-
Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments
The inspectors’ words, 329 words
“PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on a review of facility policy/procedure, observations, and an interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager, the facility failed to ensure the vascular access site and bloodline connections were seen by staff members throughout the dialysis treatment for three(3) of three (3) treatment floor observations (Observation #1 - Observation #3) Findings include: A review was conducted of facility policy/procedure on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:00 p.m.. ‘Clinical Services’ ’’Patient Assessment and Monitoring’ ‘General Observation/Mental Status’ “Ensure each patients face is visible and uncovered.” ‘Access’ “ ... Ensure access remains uncovered throughout the treatment.” Observations conducted in the patient treatment area on November 6, 2023 between approximately 8:40 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. revealed the following: Observation #1: During treatment floor observations on 11/06/23 at approximately 8:30 a.m., patient #10, at station E; The patients AV Fistula access site was covered by a blanket from approximately 8:30 a.m. - 9:04 a.m. ( approximately 34 minutes). Observation #2: During treatment floor observations on 11/06/23 at approximately 9:00 a.m., patient #11, isolation room; The patients AV Fistula access site was covered by a blanket from approximately 9:00 a.m. - 9:37 a.m. ( approximately 37 minutes). Observation #3: During treatment floor observations on 11/06/23 at approximately 12:30 p.m., patient #6, station G; The patients Central Venous Catheter access site was connected to the blood lines while the patient was holding their clothing up away from the access site. The patients then let go of his clothing and the clothing draped over the bloodlines. The access was covered with the patients clothing from approximately 12:05 p.m. - 12:27 p.m. ( approximately 22 minutes). An interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”
-
Manage Volume Status
The inspectors’ words, 581 words
“POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on a review of facility policy/procedure, a review of medical records, and an interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager, the facility failed to ensure the staff followed facility procedure for early termination of treatment for two (2) of five (5) medical records (MR) reviewed (MR#4, MR#5). Findings include: A review was conducted of facility policy/procedure on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:00 p.m.. Policy ‘Early Termination or Arriving Late for Treatment’ ‘Policy: Early Termination: “If a patient requests to leave treatment early: *The RN who evaluates the patient must document the rationale for early termination.....*The RN is responsible to notify the physician and document on the ‘AMA’ (Against medical advice) form.’ ‘Requirement Documentation- AMA Forms: AMA Forms are “Signed by the patient” and “Signed with each early termination event and filed in the patients medical record”. ‘Arriving Late’ states “There may be times when a patients transportation is delayed and arrives late for their scheduled time. If patient arrives after their scheduled time for dialysis treatment start the patients treatment as soon as possible. Staff should do their best to accomodate the patients prescribed treatment time. If this is not possible ....the physician must be notified to review the time delay and determine the appropriate intervention. ......” A review of medical records conducted on November 8, 2023 between approximately 9:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. revealed the following: MR#4 Date of admission 04/16/18: Physician orders for Hemodialysis state treatment time “Scheduled Hours: 4:00 hours”. Patient treatment flow sheet date 10/23/23 reviewed. Flow sheet stated “Hours On: “02:27”. No documentation by registered nurse of rationale for early treatment termination nor of the AMA Form being signed and/or the physician being notified. Patient treatment flow sheet date 10/25/23 reviewed. Flow sheet stated “Hours On: “03:13”. No documentation by registered nurse of rationale for early treatment termination nor of the AMA Form being signed and/or the physician being notified. Patient treatment flow sheet date 10/27/23 reviewed. Flow sheet stated “Hours On: “02:44”. No documentation by registered nurse of rationale for early treatment termination nor of the AMA Form being signed and/or the physician being notified. Patient treatment flow sheet date 11/01/23 reviewed. Flow sheet stated “Hours On: “03:38”. No documentation by registered nurse of rationale for early treatment termination nor of the AMA Form being signed and/or the physician being notified. Patient treatment flow sheet date 11/03/23 reviewed. Flow sheet stated “Hours On: “03:02”. No documentation by registered nurse of rationale for early treatment termination nor of the AMA Form being signed and/or the physician being notified. MR#5 Date of admission 07/12/23: Physician orders for Hemodialysis state treatment time “Scheduled Hours: 4:00 hours”. Patient treatment flow sheet date 10/20/23 reviewed. Flow sheet stated “Hours On: “03:41”. No documentation by registered nurse of rationale for early treatment termination nor of the AMA Form being signed and/or the physician being notified. Patient treatment flow sheet date 11/03/23 reviewed. Flow sheet stated “Hours On: “03:30”. No documentation by registered nurse of rationale for early treatment termination nor of the AMA Form being signed and/or the physician being notified. An interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”
-
Vascular Access - Monitor/Referrals
The inspectors’ words, 381 words
“POC-VASCULAR ACCESS-MONITOR/REFERRALS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(5) The interdisciplinary team must provide vascular access monitoring and appropriate, timely referrals to achieve and sustain vascular access. The hemodialysis patient must be evaluated for the appropriate vascular access type, taking into consideration co-morbid conditions, other risk factors, and whether the patient is a potential candidate for arteriovenous fistula placement. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on a review of facility policy/procedure, observations, and an interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager, the facility failed to ensure that the staff performed proper aseptic technique while initiating treatment for two (2) of two (2) ‘Access of AV Fistula or Graft for Initiation of Dialysis’ observations (Observation #1, Observation #2). Findings include: A review was conducted of facility policy/procedure on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:00 p.m.. Policy ‘Clinical Services’ ‘Access Assessment and Cannulation’ ‘Assessment of Vascular Assess’ (Setting: IC, HT) ‘Assessment of Vascular Access’ Step (1) states “Prior to treatment, ask patient to wash area with soap per hand hygiene procedure. Wash access (per above) if patients unable to clean their access.” Step (5) states “LOOK:......” Step (6) states “LISTEN:.....”, Step (7) states “FEEL: ...”, Step (9) states “Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene. Don clean gloves.” Observations conducted in the patient treatment area on November 6, 2023 between approximately 8:40 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. revealed the following: Observation #1: On 11/06/23 at approximately 11:45 a.m., patient #9 at station K, employee #2 began to initiate dialysis treatment. Employee #2 did not wash skin over access with soap and water or antibacterial scrub, prior to evaluating access site, nor verbally confirm that the patient had cleansed the access site. The patient was not observed washing their own access site upon entry into the treatment area. Observation #2: On 11/08/23 at approximately 11:52 a.m., patient #1 at station N, employee #4 began to initiate dialysis treatment. Employee #4 did not wash skin over access with soap and water or antibacterial scrub, prior to evaluating access site, nor verbally confirm that the patient had cleansed the access site. The patient was not observed washing their own access site upon entry into the treatment area. An interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 1,283 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36372 Based on a review of facility policy/procedure, a review of medical records, and an interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager, it was determined the facility failed to ensure facility water logs were completed per policy/procedure for one (1) of one (1) water logs reviewed (Log Review #1) and failed to ensure the nurse in charge was made aware of patient hypertension/change in patients condition during treatment for two (2) of five (5) in-center patient medical records (MR) reviewed (MR#2, MR#4). Findings include: ‘Manufacturers Instructions for Use’ ‘AquaBplus’ RO (reverse osmosis) System’ ‘10.6.7.1 Documentation/Releasing the System’ states “Finally, the completed Disinfection Report is signed by the Clinic Technician and the system is released for dialysis. The Disinfection Report is filed in the documentation accompanying the system, which is kept with the reverse osmosis system.” Policy ‘Reverse Osmosis Water Purification, Operations, and Maintenance’ ‘Installation and Maintenance’ states “The RO machine will be installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with FKC policies and Procedures, and the manufacturers instructions for use (IFU).” ‘Membrane Cleaning and Disinfection’ states “RO machines membranes will be cleaned and/or disinfected in accordance with manufacturers instructions for use, or at a minimum of monthly, ....” Facility ‘RO Post Disinfection Checking for Negative Minncare’ form with staff directions for after system disinfection (this form is attached to the RO system by the BioMed after disinfection) state “A disinfection was performed on the RO and Loop. Please check for Negative Minncare at the following sample ports with residual Minncare strips (on top of the RO). We no longer are filling out the ROCS-AQB log. We now only need to document in TMS Tablet Post RO Disinfection Residual Testing Log. .....” Facility ‘RO Post Disinfection Checking for Negative Minncare’ form with staff directions for after system disinfection (this form is attached to the RO system by the BioMed after disinfection) state “A disinfection was performed on the RO and Loop. Please check for Negative Minncare at the following sample ports with residual Minncare strips (on top of the RO). We no longer are filling out the ROCS-AQB log. We now only need to document in TMS Tablet Post RO Disinfection Residual Testing Log. .....” A review of facility water logs conducted on November 7, 2023 between approximately 9:00 a.m.- 11:30 a.m. revealed the following: Water Log #1: The ‘AquaBplus RO Logs’ April 2023 - October 2023 were reviewed. Documentation provided of monthly RO disinfection being performed on July 11, 2023 and on August 8, 2023. There were no ‘Post RO Disinfection Residual Testing’ forms completed after monthly RO system disinfection for the months of July 2023 and August 2023. The form contains but is not limited to the following instructions/ranges: ‘Is RO Permeate Negative for Residual Disinfectant? (Minncare= <1ppm, Bleach = < 0.5 ppm). Using the proper test strips test for residual at the RO permeate test port. ...’ ‘Are all disinfection signs removed ? .....’ ‘Employee ID’. Policy ‘Patient Assessment and Monitoring’ ‘During treatment’ ‘Follow the steps below for monitoring patient and machine parameters during treatment:’ Step (1) Blood pressure. Record blood pressure. ‘Report to the nurse:’ “Systolic blood pressures greater than 180 mm/Hg. Diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mm/Hg. Blood pressure less than or equal to 100 mm/hg systolic.” ‘Data Collection’ “..... if the PCT/LPN note any changes or abnormal findings in the patients condition or vascular access are observed or reported by the patient, ......., the registered nurse must assess the patient.” “The registered nurse will assess/reassess any findings addressed pre or during treatment as needed.” A review of medical records conducted on November 8, 2023 between approximately 9:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. revealed the following: MR #2, Date of admission 02/22/23: Treatment flowsheet dated 10/23/23 reviewed. Treatment initiated at 7:03 a.m. At 8:41 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “218/80” (entered by Employee #4, patient care technician). At 9:09 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “222/83” (entered by Employee #6, patient care technician). At 9:35 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “230/89” (entered by Employee #4, patient care technician). At 10:40 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “232/79” (entered by Employee #4, patient care technician). At 11:08 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “237/80” (entered by Employee #4, patient care technician). No documentation provided of the personal care technician notifying the registered nurse of the patients high blood pressure readings during treatment. Treatment flowsheet dated 10/27/23 reviewed. Treatment initiated at 6:57 a.m. At 8:43 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “212/79” (entered by Employee #13, patient care technician). At 9:04 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “215/85” (entered by Employee #4, patient care technician). At 9:33 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “213/79” (entered by Employee #13, patient care technician). No documentation provided of the personal care technician notifying the registered nurse of the patients high blood pressure readings during treatment. Treatment flowsheet dated 10/30/23 reviewed. Treatment initiated at 7:09 a.m. At 10:04 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “195/68” (entered by Employee #6, patient care technician). At 10:38 a.m. BP was “200/73” (entered by Employee #6, patient care technician). At 11:04 a.m. BP “202/72” (entered by Employee #6, patient care technician). No documentation provided of the personal care technician notifying the registered nurse of the patients high blood pressure readings during treatment. Treatment flowsheet dated 11/03/23 reviewed. Treatment initiated at 6:50 a.m. At 8:03 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “197/78” (entered by Employee #6, patient care technician). At 8:34 a.m. BP was “194/80” (entered by Employee #4, patient care technician). At 9:06 a.m. BP “207/84” (entered by Employee #13, patient care technician). At 9:37 a.m. BP “199/78” (entered by Employee #14, patient care technician). At 10:06 a.m. BP “192/65” (entered by Employee #14, patient care technician). At 10:33 a.m. BP “201/93” (entered by Employee #13, patient care technician). At 10:57 a.m. BP “208/82” (entered by Employee #13, patient care technician). No documentation provided of the personal care technician notifying the registered nurse of the patients high blood pressure readings during treatment. MR #4, Date of admission 04/16/18: Treatment flowsheet dated 10/25/23 reviewed. Treatment initiated at 7:37 a.m. At 10:03 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “244/101” (entered by Employee #15, patient care technician). At 10:33 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “247/129” (entered by Employee #15, patient care technician). No documentation provided of the personal care technician notifying the registered nurse of the patients high blood pressure readings during treatment. Treatment flowsheet dated 10/27/23 reviewed. Treatment initiated at 7:45 a.m. At 9:34 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “190/87” (entered by Employee #6, patient care technician). At 9:52 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “190/110” (entered by Employee #6, patient care technician). No documentation provided of the personal care technician notifying the registered nurse of the patients high blood pressure readings during treatment. Treatment flowsheet dated 10/30/23 reviewed. Treatment initiated at 7:39 a.m. At 9:38 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “211/104” (entered by Employee #6, patient care technician). At 10:05 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “215/99” (entered by Employee #6, patient care technician). At 11:33 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “201/100” (entered by Employee #4, patient care technician). At 11:49 a.m. blood pressure (BP) was “201/100” (entered by Employee #4, patient care technician). No documentation provided of the personal care technician notifying the registered nurse of the patients high blood pressure readings during treatment. An interview with the facility acting Clinical Nurse Manager on November 8, 2023 at approximately 12:30 a.m. confirmed the above findings.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2023 | Standard inspection | 6 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Oct 16, 2017.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 17 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, better than expected; hospital admissions, worse than expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 6 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Northampton County, 6 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Fkc Bethlehem | 4 |
| Fkc Easton | 3 |
| Davita Palmer Dialysis Center | 3 |
| Fkc Slatebelt | 3 |
| Davita St Lukes Anderson Dialysis | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.