Hearth Record

Fkc of Mount Pleasant

A dialysis facility in Mount Pleasant, Pennsylvania 15666

2000 Summit Ridge Plaza, Mount Pleasant, Pennsylvania 15666. (724) 542-7125.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 16, 2025: a standard inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 16, 2025: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 1,116 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42178 Based on review of facility policies/procedure, medical records (MR), and employee interviews, the facility failed to follow its policy for monitoring vital signs and safety checks and reporting and/or documenting abnormal findings for seven (7) of seven (7) MR reviewed (MR1-7). Findings included: Review of agency Policy on 4/16/25 at approximately 10:30am revealed: “Patient Assessment and Monitoring...Pre-Treatment...Blood Pressure, Record blood pressure. Verify: Systolic blood pressures greater than 180mm/Hg and/or diastolic blood pressures greater than 100mm/Hg, Blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg systolic during treatment...During Treatment, Obtain blood pressure and pulse rate every 30 minutes or more as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes per state regulations, Document machine parameters and safety checks every 30 minutes or more often as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes or per state regulations ...Blood Pressure, Record blood pressure., Recheck blood pressures after a drop that requires interventions such as administering normal saline., Reposition electronic cuff or use manual cuff for aberrant blood pressure readings., Report to the nurse: Systolic blood pressures greater than 180mm/Hg, Diastolic blood pressures greater than 100mm/Hg, Blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg systolic ... “ Review of medical records on 4/15/25 between approximately 12:30pm and 4:00pm revealed the following: MR 1, Start of Care at facility: 1/31/25, dates reviewed: 3/31/25-4/11/25. Treatment record dated 3/31/25: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 6:04am of 92/51 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure less than 100mm/Hg systolic. The next blood pressure/pulse reading was obtained at 7:02am, 58 minutes later. Treatment record dated 4/2/25: included safety check documented at 6:02am, the next safety check documented at 7:30am, 1 hour and 28 minutes later. Blood pressure reading during treatment at 6:03am of 98/61 obtained by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure less than 100mm/Hg systolic. The next blood pressure/pulse reading was documented at 8:02am, 1 hour and 59 minutes later. Treatment record dated 4/4/25: included safety check documented at 7:00am, the next safety check documented at 8:00am, 1 hour later. Blood pressure/pulse documented at 7:04am, the next reading documented at 8:05am, 1 hour and 1 minute later. Treatment record dated 4/9/25: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 7:04am of 98/58, at 8:02am of 94/64, and at 9:02am of 93/63 obtained by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure less than 100mm/Hg systolic. MR 2, Start of Care at facility: 5/3/22, dates reviewed: 4/1/25-4/12/25. Treatment record dated 4/1/25: included safety check and vitals documented at 6:50am, the next safety check/vitals documented at 7:40am, 50 minutes later. Safety check and vitals documented at 8:02am, the next safety check/vitals documented at 9:07am, 1 hour and 5 minutes later. Treatment record dated 4/5/25: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 6:31am of 206/59 obtained by a (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 180mm/Hg systolic. Safety check documented at 8:30am, the next safety check documented at 9:30am, 1 hour later. Blood pressure/pulse documented at 8:34am, the next reading documented at 9:31am, 57 minutes later. Treatment record dated 4/12/25: included safety check documented at 8:00am, the next safety check documented at 9:00am, 1 hour later. Blood pressure/pulse documented at 8:02am, the next reading documented at 9:01am, 59 minutes later. MR 3, Start of Care at facility: 9/27/23, dates reviewed: 3/31/25-4/11/25. Treatment record dated 3/31/25: included safety check and blood pressure reading during treatment at 1:34pm of 168/102 obtained by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. The next safety check and blood pressure/pulse reading was obtained at 2:32pm, 58 minutes later. Treatment record dated 4/2/25: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 1:33pm of 156/111 obtained by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. Treatment record dated 4/9/25: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 11:06am of 144/119 obtained by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. Safety check and blood pressure of 98/78 documented at 1:32pm by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure less than 100mm/Hg systolic. Next safety check and blood pressure/pulse documented at 2:33pm, 1 hour and 1 minute later. MR 4, Start of Care at facility: 6/3/24, dates reviewed: 3/31/25-4/11/25. Treatment record dated 4/7/25: included safety check and blood pressure/pulse check documented at 10:41am, the next safety check and blood pressure/pulse check documented at 11:32am, 1 hour later. Treatment record dated 4/9/25: included blood pressure/pulse check documented at 10:47am, the next blood pressure/pulse check documented at 12:05pm, 1 hour and 18 minutes later. MR 5, Start of Care at facility: 2/15/25, dates reviewed: 3/25/25-4/12/25. Treatment record dated 4/12/25: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 10:18zm of 173/104, at 1:32pm of 157/101, and at 1:36pm of 155/105 obtained by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. MR 6, Start of Care at facility: 1/15/24, dates reviewed: 3/31/25-4/11/25. Treatment record dated 3/31/25: included safety check documented at 9:00am, the next safety check documented at 9:58am, 58 minutes later. Blood pressure/pulse documented at 9:01am, the next reading documented at 9:58am, 57 minutes later. Treatment record dated 4/4/25: included safety check and blood pressure/pulse documented at 9:04am, the next safety check documented at 10:00am, 56 minutes later. Next blood pressure/pulse documented at 9:58am, 54 minutes later. Treatment record dated 4/9/25: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 6:28am of 187/103, at 6:31am of 206/109, at 7:04am of 202/109, and at 9:31am of 194/105 obtained by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 180mm/Hg systolic and 100mm/Hg diastolic. MR 7, Start of Care at facility: 1/13/25, dates reviewed: 3/31/25-4/11/25. Treatment record dated 3/31/25: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 7:01am of 97/73 obtained by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure less than 100mm/Hg systolic. Treatment record dated 4/7/25: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 7:04am of 95/50, at 9:04am of 99/65, at 10:33am of 94/58, and at 10:40am of 94/58 obtained by a PCT. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure less than 100mm/Hg systolic. An interview conducted with Clinic Manager and Director of Operations on 4/16/25 at approximately 3:00pm confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 16, 2025Standard inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Apr 25, 1994.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 17 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (30 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 76% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Westmoreland County, 8 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.