Fkc Latrobe
A dialysis facility in Latrobe, Pennsylvania 15650
318 Unity Plaza, Latrobe, Pennsylvania 15650. (724) 537-2041.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 5of 5 patient survey rating
- 1 deficiency cited in the last three years
- 20 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 28, 2024: a standard inspection.
1 deficiency cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 28, 2024: standard inspection1 deficiency
-
Manage Volume Status
The inspectors’ words, 801 words
“POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42178 Based on review of facility policies/procedure, medical records (MR), hemodialysis (HD) treatment records, and employee interviews, the facility failed to follow its policy for monitoring vital signs, reporting and/or documenting abnormal findings for four (4) of seven (7) MR reviewed (MR#3-#5, & #7). Findings included: Review of agency Policy on 8/28/24 at approximately 3:00pm revealed: “Patient Assessment and Monitoring...Pre-Treatment...Blood Pressure, Record blood pressure. Verify: Systolic blood pressures greater than 180mm/Hg and/or diastolic blood pressures greater than 100mm/Hg, Systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg systolic during treatment...During Treatment...Blood Pressure...Reposition electronic cuff or use a manual cuff for aberrant blood pressure readings. Report to nurse: Systolic blood pressures greater than 180mm/Hg, Diastolic blood pressures greater than 100mm/Hg, Blood pressures greater than or equal to 100mm/Hg systolic...Post-Treatment...Blood Pressure...Ensure vital signs and overall condition are stable or discharge...” A review of medical records took place on 8/27/24 from approximately 2:00pm-3:15pm and 8/28/24 from approximately 12:00pm-1:30pm and revealed the following: MR #3, Start of Care at facility: 6/28/24, dates reviewed: 8/12/24-8/23/24. Treatment record dated 8/12/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 167/112 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. Treatment record dated 8/14/24: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 10:04am of 164/110 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. Treatment record dated 8/16/24: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 1:31pm of 167/105 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. Treatment record dated 8/21/24: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 10:00am of 163/109, at 11:04am of 15/101, at 11:31am of 169/105, and at 12:37pm of 178/106. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. MR#4, Start of Care at facility: 9/6/19, dates reviewed: 8/12/24-8/23/24. Treatment record dated 8/12/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 209/114 and a blood pressure during treatment at 9:52am of 212/108 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressure greater than 180mm/Hg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/19/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 202/97 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressure greater than 180mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/23/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 184/109 and a blood pressure during treatment at 9:43am of 210/110 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressure greater than 180mm/Hg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg. MR#5, Start of Care at facility: 6/18/24, dates reviewed: 8/13/24-8/22/24. Treatment record dated 8/13/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 10:02am of 140/109 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of diastolic blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg. MR#7, Start of Care at facility: 3/11/24, dates reviewed: 8/12/24-8/23/24. Treatment record dated 8/12/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 1:02pm of 91/66 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/16/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 89/58 and a post-treatment blood pressure of 98/60 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/19/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 10:33am of 92/56, at 11:33am of 93/50, at 12:02pm of 93/54, at 12:32pm of 91/57, and at 1:04pm of 89/56 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/21/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 11:01am of 91/64 and at 11:31am of 92/63 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/23/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 11:35am of 88/55, at 12:31pm of 99/54, at 1:09pm of 98/59, and at1:35pm of 96/58 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. An interview conducted with Center Manager and Director of Operations on 8/28/24 at approximately 2:00pm confirmed the above findings.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2024 | Standard inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 28, 1989.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 20 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 5 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (44 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 97% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 8 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Westmoreland County, 8 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Fkc Greensburg | 4 |
| Dci Hempfield | 2 |
| Dci Mount Pleasant | 3 |
| Fkc of Mount Pleasant | 4 |
| Dci Parks Bend | 3 |
| Fkc Murrysville | 2 |
| Zzz Closed- Davita New Kensington Dialysis | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.