Hearth Record

Fkc Latrobe

A dialysis facility in Latrobe, Pennsylvania 15650

318 Unity Plaza, Latrobe, Pennsylvania 15650. (724) 537-2041.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 28, 2024: a standard inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 28, 2024: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 801 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42178 Based on review of facility policies/procedure, medical records (MR), hemodialysis (HD) treatment records, and employee interviews, the facility failed to follow its policy for monitoring vital signs, reporting and/or documenting abnormal findings for four (4) of seven (7) MR reviewed (MR#3-#5, & #7). Findings included: Review of agency Policy on 8/28/24 at approximately 3:00pm revealed: “Patient Assessment and Monitoring...Pre-Treatment...Blood Pressure, Record blood pressure. Verify: Systolic blood pressures greater than 180mm/Hg and/or diastolic blood pressures greater than 100mm/Hg, Systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg systolic during treatment...During Treatment...Blood Pressure...Reposition electronic cuff or use a manual cuff for aberrant blood pressure readings. Report to nurse: Systolic blood pressures greater than 180mm/Hg, Diastolic blood pressures greater than 100mm/Hg, Blood pressures greater than or equal to 100mm/Hg systolic...Post-Treatment...Blood Pressure...Ensure vital signs and overall condition are stable or discharge...” A review of medical records took place on 8/27/24 from approximately 2:00pm-3:15pm and 8/28/24 from approximately 12:00pm-1:30pm and revealed the following: MR #3, Start of Care at facility: 6/28/24, dates reviewed: 8/12/24-8/23/24. Treatment record dated 8/12/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 167/112 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. Treatment record dated 8/14/24: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 10:04am of 164/110 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. Treatment record dated 8/16/24: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 1:31pm of 167/105 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. Treatment record dated 8/21/24: included blood pressure reading during treatment at 10:00am of 163/109, at 11:04am of 15/101, at 11:31am of 169/105, and at 12:37pm of 178/106. No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg diastolic. MR#4, Start of Care at facility: 9/6/19, dates reviewed: 8/12/24-8/23/24. Treatment record dated 8/12/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 209/114 and a blood pressure during treatment at 9:52am of 212/108 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressure greater than 180mm/Hg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/19/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 202/97 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressure greater than 180mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/23/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 184/109 and a blood pressure during treatment at 9:43am of 210/110 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressure greater than 180mm/Hg or diastolic blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg. MR#5, Start of Care at facility: 6/18/24, dates reviewed: 8/13/24-8/22/24. Treatment record dated 8/13/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 10:02am of 140/109 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of diastolic blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg. MR#7, Start of Care at facility: 3/11/24, dates reviewed: 8/12/24-8/23/24. Treatment record dated 8/12/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 1:02pm of 91/66 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/16/24: included pre-treatment blood pressure reading of 89/58 and a post-treatment blood pressure of 98/60 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/19/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 10:33am of 92/56, at 11:33am of 93/50, at 12:02pm of 93/54, at 12:32pm of 91/57, and at 1:04pm of 89/56 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/21/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 11:01am of 91/64 and at 11:31am of 92/63 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. Treatment record dated 8/23/24: included a blood pressure during treatment at 11:35am of 88/55, at 12:31pm of 99/54, at 1:09pm of 98/59, and at1:35pm of 96/58 obtained by a patient care technician (PCT). No documentation of recheck or nurse notification of systolic blood pressures less than or equal to 100mm/Hg. An interview conducted with Center Manager and Director of Operations on 8/28/24 at approximately 2:00pm confirmed the above findings.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 28, 2024Standard inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 28, 1989.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 20 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (44 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 97% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 55 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Westmoreland County, 8 have a star rating from CMS: 2 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.